1 ence, clinical features), and study designs (
cross-sectional).
2 All the studies were
cross sectional.
3 The present
cross-sectional 3T (1)H MRS study is the first to use a
4 associated with echocardiographic traits in
cross-sectional analyses (false discovery rate <0.10), a
5 Cross-sectional analyses in both cohorts showed that pla
6 Cross-sectional analyses on prevalent DSPN were based on
7 iance and Spearman rank correlation test for
cross-sectional analysis and Wilcoxon signed rank test f
8 Cross-sectional analysis examining interstitial chest CT
9 This
cross-sectional analysis is based on assessments done at
10 om electronic health records, we conducted a
cross-sectional analysis of 24.4 million primary care of
11 e gut microbiome and vitamin D, we conduct a
cross-sectional analysis of 567 older men quantifying se
12 We performed a
cross-sectional analysis of 6032 (16% HIV/HCV coinfected
13 This study assessed
cross-sectional analysis of all heart failure clinical t
14 Here, we report a detailed
cross-sectional analysis of clinical, imaging and molecu
15 We conducted a
cross-sectional analysis of data from adult contacts of
16 We performed a
cross-sectional analysis of endocrine surgeons identifie
17 In phase 1, a
cross-sectional analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and ha
18 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Serial
cross-sectional analysis of National Health and Nutritio
19 In this
cross-sectional analysis of physicians who participated
20 A
cross-sectional analysis of the Neurological, cOgnitive
21 Cross-sectional analysis showed a significant decrease (
22 t physicians.METHODSIRB-exempt and expedited
cross-sectional analysis through survey to NYC residency
23 We did a
cross-sectional analysis using general least-squares lin
24 By contrast, we find by
cross-sectional analysis using genetic and pharmacologic
25 In the
cross-sectional analysis, for every 50 DOT/1000 PD incre
26 In this retrospective
cross-sectional analysis, neurocognitive testing and 3 T
27 S from April 2009 through December 2017 in a
cross-sectional analysis.
28 ers were increased in all diabetic groups in
cross-sectional analysis.
29 arch, 28 met the inclusion criteria: 20 were
cross-sectional and 8 were prospective cohort.
30 Five different hypotheses using a
cross-sectional and a longitudinal design were tested to
31 Both
cross-sectional and cohort studies were conducted using
32 This was an observational,
cross-sectional and descriptive study of adult Nigerians
33 and subjects without allergy and tested for
cross-sectional and interseasonal differences in levels
34 The
cross-sectional and longitudinal (on a subset of 88 pati
35 We used single-genome amplification (SGA) in
cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to uniquely de
36 Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of plasma
37 Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of K(i) and
38 Pathology studies,
cross-sectional and longitudinal PET-only studies, and c
39 , 2.94) and 2.02 (95% CI=1.26, 3.23) for the
cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, respectively.
40 flares in patients from a Mexican cohort and
cross-sectional and longitudinal United States cohorts.
41 for mood disorders, specifically summarizing
cross-sectional and more recent longitudinal studies dem
42 Most studies are
cross-sectional and rely on questionnaires with limited
43 Cross-sectional and short-term analyses of data from the
44 These findings-although
cross-sectional and specific to 9-10-year-old children-m
45 We performed
cross-sectional and time-to-event analyses in a prospect
46 All studies were
cross-sectional and used a range of measurement tools; n
47 We determined the age-stratified,
cross-sectional,
and longitudinal associations between V
48 Using a correlational
cross-sectional approach, we compared a number of oxidat
49 rements including distensibility index (DI),
cross-sectional area (CSA), and HPZ length were collecte
50 protein levels and increased skeletal muscle
cross-sectional area and contractility properties.
51 Bronchioles became smaller in their
cross-sectional area and diameter.
52 Maximum average change in normalized
cross-sectional area at 4-weeks was -46.1+/-45.1% post-I
53 week (termination) time points to monitor PV
cross-sectional area at each PV ablation site.
54 Muscle and adipose tissue
cross-sectional area at the fifth, eighth, and tenth tho
55 y a skeletal muscle myofibril depends on its
cross-sectional area but not on the number of active sar
56 en NOX4 expression and skeletal muscle fiber
cross-sectional area in pancreatic cancer patients.
57 al activity increased lower extremity muscle
cross-sectional area in patients with myotonic dystrophy
58 rtion area, which is roughly the same as the
cross-sectional area of an acyl chain.
59 Cross-sectional area of the cervical and upper thoracic
60 rtical thickness and spinal cord grey matter
cross-sectional area of the Timed 25-Foot Walk.
61 ccompanied with a shorter length and smaller
cross-sectional area of the upper airway, resulting in a
62 he maximal diameter of test-set patients and
cross-sectional area profiles of the true and false lumi
63 However, correlation with spinal cord
cross-sectional area-a predictor of disability-is poor,
64 n neurogenic myopathy, without affecting the
cross-sectional area.
65 both have significantly smaller muscle fiber
cross-sectional area.
66 Manually measured
cross-sectional areas are most commonly used, but there
67 ment, few changes were seen in mean myofiber
cross-sectional areas compared to age-matched naive cont
68 The inspiratory and end-expiratory
cross-sectional areas of the trachea were measured.
69 receptor, oxidative stress, proteolysis, and
cross-sectional areas were evaluated.
70 All but 1 hypothesis-testing study were
cross-sectional assessments of association.
71 We evaluated the
cross-sectional association between each dietary pattern
72 We investigated the
cross-sectional association of cumulative sugar-sweetene
73 Cross-sectional associations between plasma NfL and PET
74 riate linear regression was used to test for
cross-sectional associations between VF damage and activ
75 Cross-sectional associations of the plant-based diet ind
76 This leads to the hypothesis that, beyond
cross-sectional associations, impaired sleep structure a
77 Cross-sectional biomarker results may suffer from revers
78 ing the correlation with clinical variables,
cross-sectional brain imaging and neurophysiological dat
79 igh TDP-43 stage was associated with smaller
cross-sectional brain volumes, faster rates of brain atr
80 itive impairment (MCI) have been examined in
cross-sectional,
but rarely in longitudinal studies.
81 In 2016, we conducted a
cross-sectional carriage survey (CSS5) in a community wh
82 D) changes that were largely concordant with
cross-sectional clinical studies.
83 and gender-matched control subjects in this
cross-sectional clinico-radiological study.
84 4 (mean +/-SD) years posttransplant; and the
Cross sectional Cohort (CSC, n=446): patients developing
85 The investigation of the largest
cross-sectional cohort of CHIKV-deaths to date reveals t
86 shuttled by CD31(+) EVs in a large (n = 218)
cross-sectional cohort of patients categorized as having
87 m the primary case-control cohort and 1 of 2
cross-sectional cohorts explored suggest that the gastro
88 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Three
cross-sectional cohorts: an Arizona-based neuropathology
89 data on cardiac structure and function (and
cross-sectional comparison to normal-weight and obese co
90 ation in COPD.Methods: We applied SuStaIn to
cross-sectional computed tomography imaging markers in 3
91 Serial
cross-sectional data (April 14 to May 26, 2020) from nea
92 Cross-sectional data (n = 408) from a 2018 PWID populati
93 pling localized to transmodal cortex in both
cross-sectional data and a subset of participants with l
94 s study was based on a secondary analysis of
cross-sectional data collected as part of a randomised c
95 We analysed
cross-sectional data from 10,837 middle-aged and elderly
96 Cross-sectional data from 13 nationally representative s
97 We analyzed
cross-sectional data from 16 nationally representative n
98 ties: 1) a series of descriptive analyses of
cross-sectional data from demographic and health surveys
99 Cross-sectional data from older adults (>=60 y; n = 2420
100 We pooled
cross-sectional data from the 2004 to 2017 National Heal
101 We use
cross-sectional data from the Swedish Tinnitus Outreach
102 We analyzed
cross-sectional data from wave 2 of the 19 country Surve
103 For the current analysis we used the
cross-sectional data of 1,380 Berlin Aging Study II (BAS
104 Moreover,
cross-sectional data revealed that infertile men with th
105 HI discount policy on dental visits based on
cross-sectional data.
106 te this, we use five independently recruited
cross-sectional datasets consisting of 641,860 individua
107 An accuracy study with
cross-sectional design was performed out from a database
108 In a
cross-sectional design, 36 patients with first onset of
109 The limitations of this study include a
cross-sectional design, systematic differences in premig
110 As previous studies have mainly used
cross-sectional designs to assess relations between sour
111 Profiles of
cross-sectional diameter, true-lumen area, and false-lum
112 laterally from each other, and the cisternal
cross-sectional diameters are significantly reduced comp
113 Cross-sectional diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance im
114 each with a nanoconstriction at one end and
cross-sectional dimensions close to that of a single bac
115 imated to be high, existing data are largely
cross-sectional,
do not include data on preinjury and po
116 the fact that much of the available data are
cross-sectional,
drawn from administrative or claims dat
117 This study reports on the
cross-sectional evaluation of data of 626 users of mySin
118 Study of Atherosclerosis) participants, the
cross-sectional (
exam 1) and longitudinal (exams 1 to 3)
119 focused on exploring such relationship from
cross-sectional gene expression data.
120 tent with the hypothesis that when stone tip
cross-sectional geometries become smaller over time in p
121 gs being equal, projectiles with smaller tip
cross-sectional geometries should penetrate deeper into
122 to a target than projectiles with larger tip
cross-sectional geometries.
123 ipped projectile each possessing a different
cross-sectional geometry.
124 The colonic microbiota exhibits
cross-sectional heterogeneity, but the mechanisms that g
125 Sarcopenia can be evaluated using
cross-sectional image analysis of CT-scans, at the level
126 Cross-sectional images (B-scans) obtained with SD-OCT sh
127 CBCT images were compared with preprocedural
cross-sectional images (CT/MRI).
128 In this study, we analyzed 202
cross-sectional images across the length of 31 human L4
129 DP-CBCT with pre-procedure contrast enhanced
cross-sectional images in terms of tumour detection.
130 e examined in this study, and a total of 165
cross-sectional images were co-registered with histology
131 uation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) on
cross-sectional images, time to required next treatment,
132 ected a higher percentage of RLN compared to
cross-sectional imaging (83% vs. 50%; P = 0.048), with M
133 Pre-procedural evaluation included
cross-sectional imaging and ex vivo simulation using pri
134 Cross-sectional imaging disclosed a 5.2-cm intraparotid
135 Advances in
cross-sectional imaging have resulted in increased detec
136 therapy and is not inferior to preprocedural
cross-sectional imaging in terms of tumour detection.
137 Cross-sectional imaging reveals that amorphous boron nit
138 Cross-sectional imaging techniques (CT and MRI) are well
139 esponse are currently assessed by endoscopy,
cross-sectional imaging, and biomarkers.
140 Biobank (N = 189,488), we aimed to test the
cross-sectional independent associations and joint inter
141 Retrospective
cross-sectional international multicentre study includin
142 Our study is also
cross-sectional,
limiting our ability to directly test h
143 generalize effectively to other challenging
cross-sectional medical imaging tasks when training data
144 n the quantitative faecal metagenomes of the
cross-sectional MetaCardis Body Mass Index Spectrum coho
145 In this observational
cross-sectional multicenter study of 340 patients, we ev
146 Cross-sectional (
n = 34) and longitudinal (n = 7) assess
147 of hepatic steatosis, in a population-based
cross-sectional national health survey.
148 SIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of
cross-sectional nationally representative household surv
149 We did a secondary analysis of
cross-sectional,
nationally representative, individual-p
150 the inability to infer causality due to the
cross-sectional nature of the surveys and the likely und
151 A
cross-sectional observational study assessed dietary int
152 We performed this prospective
cross-sectional observational study in a multi-site Lond
153 ed substudy of a prospective, international,
cross-sectional observational study of children with PAR
154 We conducted a
cross-sectional observational study of COVID-19 hospital
155 A
cross-sectional observational study was conducted for a
156 This was a
cross-sectional observational study.
157 A
cross-sectional,
observational study was conducted using
158 Cross-sectional observations have shown that the timing
159 s evaluated for both eyes by the revision of
cross-sectional OCT images of 6-mm volume scans.
160 human prenatal neural development comes from
cross-sectional or case studies that are not able to res
161 ase immunoprecipitation system assays in 100
cross-sectional or longitudinal samples from patients wi
162 In this
cross-sectional pilot study, we recruited symptomatic an
163 arning BC analysis pipeline was applied to a
cross-sectional population cohort that included any outp
164 Three
cross-sectional population-representative cluster survey
165 homozygous mutation, allowed us to study the
cross-sectional progression of cardiac involvements in r
166 In this
cross-sectional prospective study of 49 patients with IT
167 ting (n = 67), the AHQ scores replicated the
cross-sectional psychometric results and suggested sensi
168 We investigated the
cross-sectional relationship between SVD and in vivo neu
169 logy in adults with DS, and determined their
cross-sectional relationship with age, beta-amyloid path
170 Findings of this
cross-sectional representative study of an adult US popu
171 s residing in three European cities from the
cross-sectional Research on Obesity and Diabetes among A
172 However, this notion is predicated on
cross-sectional research that is vulnerable to sampling
173 Cross-sectional resting state functional connectivity (r
174 In this
cross-sectional retrospective cohort study, we sought to
175 In a
cross-sectional retrospective study of 3120 diabetic pat
176 This
cross-sectional retrospective study quantified the ipsil
177 From 2013 to 2015, we analyzed data from a
cross-sectional sample from the Women's Interagency HIV
178 A
cross-sectional sample of 171 adolescents (aged 13-16 y)
179 Thalamic nuclei volumes were tested in a
cross-sectional sample of 472 adults (293 with psychosis
180 their neurofunctional signatures in a large
cross-sectional sample of depressed youth.
181 d healthy controls (n = 159) and the largest
cross-sectional sample of patients with remitted psychot
182 ed pre- and postimplementation of the law in
cross-sectional samples of products with sales >1% of th
183 rphometry techniques in 2 large, independent
cross-sectional samples, obtained from the Alzheimer's D
184 We performed a
cross-sectional,
single-visit study of adults seeking se
185 of dog ownership, partially due to repeated
cross-sectional studies comparing dog owners and non-own
186 Cross-sectional studies have shown that magnetic resonan
187 es during development.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
Cross-sectional studies have shown that the ability to r
188 37 mostly fair-quality cohort and
cross-sectional studies, 15 mostly good-quality ecologic
189 only 3 (5.5%; higher prevalence of cough in
cross-sectional studies, higher incidence of pregnancy-r
190 A school based
cross sectional study was carried out among secondary sc
191 A
cross sectional study was conducted in 16 selected towns
192 study (q = 0.004, Student's t-test) and the
cross-sectional study (q = 0.033, linear regression).
193 In this comparative descriptive
cross-sectional study 45 consecutive TB patients who ref
194 Our
cross-sectional study aimed to describe qualitative and
195 This
cross-sectional study aims to investigate if a point-of-
196 We conducted a Community based
cross-sectional study among 502 children aged 1-9 in Mar
197 elective coronary artery bypass grafting for
cross-sectional study and collected right atrial appenda
198 s from 2006 to 2014, we conducted a repeated
cross-sectional study and used linear probability regres
199 estimates of statins on metabolites from the
cross-sectional study are comparable to those from inter
200 This was a prospective
cross-sectional study carried out at a large United King
201 This
cross-sectional study characterized associations between
202 This
cross-sectional study compared patients with stable AAA
203 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This
cross-sectional study compared the annual profits of 35
204 This is a
cross-sectional study conducted with a representative sa
205 A
cross-sectional study design was used.
206 DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Serial
cross-sectional study design, using National Health and
207 young Taiwanese males aged 20-50 years in a
cross-sectional study in 2014.
208 This is a
cross-sectional study in 57 PHIVs, 59 HIV-exposed but un
209 We performed a
cross-sectional study in Kampala, Uganda, to delineate s
210 This
cross-sectional study in Malaysia investigated associati
211 For the first time in Iran, we performed a
cross-sectional study in order to determine the prevalen
212 This
cross-sectional study included 298 eyes of 150 GL/S pati
213 This
cross-sectional study included 46 adult patients who und
214 ng MRI.Materials and MethodsThis prospective
cross-sectional study included participants with DM2 and
215 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A
cross-sectional study involving Medicare beneficiaries a
216 The aim of this
cross-sectional study is to determine the serum, saliva
217 In a
cross-sectional study nano- and tissue-level mechanics w
218 In this
cross-sectional study of 159 patients with widely distri
219 This was a
cross-sectional study of 196 patients.
220 mode with postpartum gene expression using a
cross-sectional study of 324 mothers who delivered full-
221 matter connectivity and word production in a
cross-sectional study of 42 participants with aphasia du
222 We performed a
cross-sectional study of 664 serum samples from the Oxfo
223 This is a prospective, non-randomized,
cross-sectional study of 80 neurocritical care unit pati
224 This is a
cross-sectional study of 886 participants (645 men and 2
225 a metal mixture with general cognition in a
cross-sectional study of adolescents residing near ferro
226 We conducted a
cross-sectional study of adult MDR-TB cases and their HH
227 We did a dual-centre
cross-sectional study of adults with Down syndrome recru
228 een November 20 and 24, 2017, we conducted a
cross-sectional study of individuals with serious health
229 This was a
cross-sectional study of MM in PLWH aged >=70 years from
230 We conducted a
cross-sectional study of NHs certified by the U.S. Cente
231 A multicenter, retrospective,
cross-sectional study of pediatric BAV patients followed
232 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
Cross-sectional study of physicians participating in MIP
233 This was a
cross-sectional study of PLHIV randomly matched by age (
234 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Serial
cross-sectional study of rural Medicare Fee-for-Service
235 In a serial
cross-sectional study of students, the Healthy, Hunger-F
236 During 2015-2016 a
cross-sectional study on 234 randomly-selected farms inv
237 This
cross-sectional study used FFQ data and plasma metabolom
238 This
cross-sectional study used nasal epithelium collected in
239 A retrospective
cross-sectional study using routinely collected data (pa
240 A
cross-sectional study was carried out in Ningxia, China
241 A descriptive
cross-sectional study was conducted among students aged
242 A school-based
cross-sectional study was conducted among teachers older
243 A community-based
cross-sectional study was conducted at Debre Berhan town
244 Cross-sectional study was conducted with 176 adults with
245 A
cross-sectional study was conducted with 307 community-d
246 A
cross-sectional study was conducted with a twin cohort 8
247 A
cross-sectional study was conducted with suspected CDI p
248 A
cross-sectional study was conducted, and breath samples
249 A multi-centre
cross-sectional study was conducted.
250 A
cross-sectional study was designed to shed light on the
251 GN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter
cross-sectional study was performed in pediatric wards i
252 This
cross-sectional study was performed on 95 patients with
253 A diagnostic accuracy comparative
cross-sectional study was performed, comparing two scree
254 We performed a
cross-sectional study with 108 post-LT patients and foun
255 In a retrospective
cross-sectional study, 23474 individuals without diabete
256 In this
cross-sectional study, 50 participants (mean age 62.5 +/
257 In this
cross-sectional study, 60 women over 40 years of age wer
258 In a
cross-sectional study, 637 adults (70% male) from clinic
259 In this
cross-sectional study, a large proportion of ICD or CRT-
260 In this
cross-sectional study, an online survey was administered
261 In the present
cross-sectional study, CDAT was translated and back-tran
262 In this multinational
cross-sectional study, existing data on 4,729,307 single
263 In this single-centre
cross-sectional study, hospitalised adult (>=18 years) p
264 For this
cross-sectional study, in partnership with a central lab
265 those at high risk of developing HCC through
cross-sectional study, including patients with cirrhosis
266 Materials and Methods In this prospective
cross-sectional study, MRI and (1)H MR spectroscopy and
267 nd Methods In this prospective single-center
cross-sectional study, participants with type 1 or 2 dia
268 Materials and Methods In this retrospective
cross-sectional study, patients consecutively admitted t
269 In a
cross-sectional study, to compare fasting and postprandi
270 Therefore, in this
cross-sectional study, we characterized the brain inflam
271 In this
cross-sectional study, we examined 165 participants cons
272 In this
cross-sectional study, we examined the association betwe
273 In this retrospective,
cross-sectional study, we performed 16S rRNA sequencing
274 In this multicenter
cross-sectional study, we performed an egocentric networ
275 In the present
cross-sectional study, we studied processes of effector
276 In this retrospective
cross-sectional study, we took SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-confirm
277 In this
cross-sectional study, we use internal transcribed space
278 In this
cross-sectional study, we used customized perceptual tas
279 es in Tanzania by conducting a retrospective
cross-sectional study.
280 ere randomly selected to participate in this
cross-sectional study.
281 MI: 25.05 +/- 4.93 kg/m 2) took part in this
cross-sectional study.
282 group of 13 to 32 weeks participated in this
cross-sectional study.
283 l relationship cannot be established in this
cross-sectional study.
284 lled intervention study and in subjects of a
cross-sectional study.
285 porated into this observational, prospective
cross-sectional study: 68 mild primary open-angle glauco
286 Data came from a
cross sectional survey of families with molecularly conf
287 Using
cross-sectional survey data (Engage, 2017-2018) from 1,1
288 We performed a
cross-sectional survey in April-May 2018 among Rohingya
289 tive Plasmodium falciparum infections from a
cross-sectional survey in Papua New Guinea.
290 Data were from a representative
cross-sectional survey of 1,521 adults (301 combustible
291 e-mediating polymorphisms were analyzed in a
cross-sectional survey of asymptomatic P. falciparum inf
292 Six
cross-sectional survey studies explored family members'
293 An anonymous, nonvalidated,
cross-sectional survey was conducted online.
294 A
cross-sectional survey was undertaken of all children ag
295 ed an anal swab sample as part of a repeated
cross-sectional survey, VE against HPV-16/18 was 89.9% (
296 retion during a prospective nine year serial
cross-sectional survey.
297 In a series of
cross-sectional surveys weighted to be representative of
298 , 12, and 18 months after LLIN distribution,
cross-sectional surveys were done in 50 randomly selecte
299 ferent NDDs (aged 6-16 years) that underwent
cross-sectional T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted magne
300 ls and periodontal examination data from the
cross-sectional US NHANES, 2009-2014 (n = 10,010), were