1 20-30 y; 78.1% women) were included in a 6-d
cross-sectional study.
2 The data set was structured as a repeat
cross-sectional study.
3 al red and processed meat intake in the EPIC
cross-sectional study.
4 e subjects were included in this prospective
cross-sectional study.
5 The trial design was a repeat
cross-sectional study.
6 ld; 43 girls) children were included in this
cross-sectional study.
7 This is a prospective, population-based,
cross-sectional study.
8 unity-based controls (n = 166) included in a
cross-sectional study.
9 ge, 23.53 years; range, 18 to 42 years) in a
cross-sectional study.
10 uantitative real-time PCR, and Singulex in a
cross-sectional study.
11 carriers (C9-)) were included in the present
cross-sectional study.
12 axial length was previously found only in a
cross-sectional study.
13 This is a Prospective,
cross-sectional study.
14 12.5 years, 32 women) were included in this
cross-sectional study.
15 mo) dyads (n = 113) were recruited for this
cross-sectional study.
16 es in Tanzania by conducting a retrospective
cross-sectional study.
17 ere randomly selected to participate in this
cross-sectional study.
18 lled intervention study and in subjects of a
cross-sectional study.
19 MI: 25.05 +/- 4.93 kg/m 2) took part in this
cross-sectional study.
20 group of 13 to 32 weeks participated in this
cross-sectional study.
21 l relationship cannot be established in this
cross-sectional study.
22 d the remainder were observational cohort or
cross-sectional studies.
23 ve and 6 retrospective cohort studies, and 2
cross-sectional studies.
24 HD), but current evidence is based on small,
cross-sectional studies.
25 population who had participated in two large
cross-sectional studies.
26 be considered when the method is applied to
cross-sectional studies.
27 ions and global expression patterns in large
cross-sectional studies.
28 5% CI 0.75-1.3, P = 0.88), or AM prevalence (
cross-sectional study: -
0.46 pp, 95% CI -4.4 to 3.5, P =
29 Twenty-nine studies (17
cross-sectional studies;
12 cohort studies) comprising d
30 Methods: In this
cross-sectional study,
14 patients with mild cognitive i
31 37 mostly fair-quality cohort and
cross-sectional studies,
15 mostly good-quality ecologic
32 cantly higher monthly AM screening coverage (
cross-sectional study: +
18 percentage points [pp], 95% C
33 In a
cross-sectional study,
21 never-treated schizophrenia pa
34 Methods: For this single-center,
cross-sectional study,
22 patients with 24 histologicall
35 Methods: For this single-center,
cross-sectional study,
22 patients with 24 histologicall
36 In a retrospective
cross-sectional study,
23474 individuals without diabete
37 In this retrospective
cross-sectional study,
26 patients who had undergone SB
38 gnificantly increased AM screening coverage (
cross-sectional study: +
40 percentage points [pp], 95% c
39 In this
cross-sectional study,
43 subjects of normal or increase
40 In this comparative descriptive
cross-sectional study 45 consecutive TB patients who ref
41 In this retrospective
cross-sectional study,
4508 cases from the U.K. Biobank
42 In this
cross-sectional study,
50 participants (mean age 62.5 +/
43 In this prospective observational
cross-sectional study,
60 eyes of 30 healthy women takin
44 In this
cross-sectional study,
60 women over 40 years of age wer
45 In a
cross-sectional study,
637 adults (70% male) from clinic
46 porated into this observational, prospective
cross-sectional study:
68 mild primary open-angle glauco
47 no impacts on either AM treatment coverage (
cross-sectional study: +
8.0 pp, 95% CI 0.09-16, P = 0.04
48 In this
cross-sectional study,
a large proportion of ICD or CRT-
49 In the present
cross-sectional study,
a total of 23 lesions were includ
50 Our
cross-sectional study aimed to describe qualitative and
51 This
cross-sectional study aimed to determine the Regulatory
52 The present
cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the relations
53 This
cross-sectional study aims to investigate if a point-of-
54 This population based
cross-sectional study aims to investigate LoS post CS (o
55 We conducted a facility-based
cross-sectional study among 467 hospitalized infants age
56 We conducted a Community based
cross-sectional study among 502 children aged 1-9 in Mar
57 We undertook a
cross-sectional study among 6-23 months old Burkinabe ch
58 We performed a
cross-sectional study among adults in communities partic
59 We performed a
cross-sectional study among participants without cardiov
60 In this
cross-sectional study,
an online survey was administered
61 We performed a
cross-sectional study analyzing the overall degree of in
62 elective coronary artery bypass grafting for
cross-sectional study and collected right atrial appenda
63 s from 2006 to 2014, we conducted a repeated
cross-sectional study and used linear probability regres
64 estimates of statins on metabolites from the
cross-sectional study are comparable to those from inter
65 This
cross-sectional study assessed the relationship between
66 We conducted a
cross-sectional study at the Infectious Diseases Institu
67 We conducted a
cross-sectional study at the Institute of Nephrology, So
68 In this
cross-sectional study,
cardiac four-dimensional flow (4D
69 This was a prospective
cross-sectional study carried out at a large United King
70 In the present
cross-sectional study,
CDAT was translated and back-tran
71 This
cross-sectional study characterized associations between
72 This
cross-sectional study compared patients with stable AAA
73 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This
cross-sectional study compared the annual profits of 35
74 of dog ownership, partially due to repeated
cross-sectional studies comparing dog owners and non-own
75 Data (n = 301) were from a
cross-sectional study conducted at a drag racing event o
76 Materials and Methods This was a
cross-sectional study conducted between March 23 and May
77 This is a
cross-sectional study conducted with a representative sa
78 The objective of this prospective
cross-sectional study,
conducted at a national referral
79 Meta-analyses of mainly
cross-sectional studies confirm that low individual/hous
80 A
cross-sectional study containing consecutively selected
81 A
cross-sectional study design was used.
82 DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Serial
cross-sectional study design, using National Health and
83 We conducted a
cross-sectional study during 2013 to 2014 in Taiwan.
84 This
cross-sectional study enrolled 1629 patients, 784 recrui
85 In this serial
cross-sectional study,
estimated life expectancy at age
86 The present
cross-sectional study evaluated the association between
87 The
cross-sectional study examined the eyes of 44 subjects,
88 A
cross-sectional study examined the relationships in 325
89 The present
cross-sectional study examined to what extent exaggerate
90 This
cross-sectional study examines prevalence of fit test fa
91 In this multinational
cross-sectional study,
existing data on 4,729,307 single
92 In this retrospective
cross-sectional study,
eyes were grouped by diabetic ret
93 vestigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)
cross-sectional study for which detailed 24-h dietary re
94 We conducted a
cross-sectional study from 23 January to 23 February 202
95 In this
cross-sectional study from January 2018 to January 2019,
96 This national-wide
cross-sectional study has revealed the significant assoc
97 er cognitive networks.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated age-related re
98 Recent
cross-sectional studies have examined the association be
99 Cross-sectional studies have identified correlations bet
100 Prior
cross-sectional studies have investigated the combined e
101 Cross-sectional studies have shown age-related reduction
102 Cross-sectional studies have shown that magnetic resonan
103 es during development.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
Cross-sectional studies have shown that the ability to r
104 only 3 (5.5%; higher prevalence of cough in
cross-sectional studies,
higher incidence of pregnancy-r
105 In this single-centre
cross-sectional study,
hospitalised adult (>=18 years) p
106 I) derived measures of muscle volume (MV) in
cross-sectional studies,
however, few studies have compa
107 This
cross-sectional study identified individuals aged 18 to
108 emingly contradictory results from different
cross-sectional studies in the literature.
109 young Taiwanese males aged 20-50 years in a
cross-sectional study in 2014.
110 tic dissociation in HCPs.Methods: This was a
cross-sectional study in 21 ICUs in France between April
111 This is a
cross-sectional study in 57 PHIVs, 59 HIV-exposed but un
112 We performed a
cross-sectional study in 96 patients followed up ~ 15 ye
113 We carried out a
cross-sectional study in 97 patients with advanced HCV-r
114 We performed a
cross-sectional study in an ongoing CRC screening trial
115 We performed a
cross-sectional study in Kampala, Uganda, to delineate s
116 This
cross-sectional study in Malaysia investigated associati
117 For the first time in Iran, we performed a
cross-sectional study in order to determine the prevalen
118 We performed an observational
cross-sectional study in outpatient hepatology clinics a
119 This was a
cross-sectional study in patients with type 1 diabetes,
120 We did a
cross-sectional study in sick children younger than 5 ye
121 For this
cross-sectional study,
in partnership with a central lab
122 The
cross-sectional study included 23,868 patients with a di
123 This
cross-sectional study included 252 Finnish individuals a
124 This
cross-sectional study included 26 patients with clinical
125 This
cross-sectional study included 298 eyes of 150 GL/S pati
126 Materials and Methods This retrospective
cross-sectional study included 330 consecutive patients
127 Our
cross-sectional study included 438 members (aged 25-65 y
128 This
cross-sectional study included 46 adult patients who und
129 This
cross-sectional study included 51 healthy controls and 1
130 This
cross-sectional study included 517 men who were particip
131 This
cross-sectional study included 558 women attending a fer
132 A prospective, masked,
cross-sectional study included 69 children, 3-15 years o
133 ng MRI.Materials and MethodsThis prospective
cross-sectional study included participants with DM2 and
134 eted faecal metabolites were identified in a
cross-sectional study including grade 1 hypertensive (HT
135 In a
cross-sectional study,
including 95 virally-suppressed s
136 those at high risk of developing HCC through
cross-sectional study,
including patients with cirrhosis
137 Therefore, this
cross-sectional study investigated the association betwe
138 This
cross-sectional study investigates associations of resid
139 This
cross-sectional study investigates whether the associati
140 This retrospective,
cross-sectional study involved 3190 participants, includ
141 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A
cross-sectional study involving Medicare beneficiaries a
142 This is a
cross-sectional study involving undergraduate students i
143 The aim of this
cross-sectional study is to determine the serum, saliva
144 In a
cross-sectional study (
June 2018 to September 2019), we
145 Materials and Methods In this prospective
cross-sectional study,
MRI and (1)H MR spectroscopy and
146 In this
cross-sectional study,
multivariable linear regression w
147 In this
cross-sectional study,
multivariate linear and logistic
148 1518) with mean follow-up of 3.6 years and 6
cross-sectional studies (
n=189).
149 We used two study designs: i) a repeated
cross-sectional study (
n = approximately 2,300) with bas
150 In a
cross-sectional study nano- and tissue-level mechanics w
151 This was a
cross-sectional study nested in BRISA (Brazilian Ribeira
152 ngs from published cohort, case-control, and
cross-sectional studies of diagnosis and case series and
153 In
cross-sectional studies of presymptomatic frontotemporal
154 In a
cross-sectional study of 101 PLWH and HIV-uninfected Sou
155 EarlyNuts is a population-based,
cross-sectional study of 12-month-old infants in Melbour
156 In this
cross-sectional study of 159 patients with widely distri
157 We performed a
cross-sectional study of 171,321 adults who underwent he
158 This was a
cross-sectional study of 196 patients.
159 We used a
cross-sectional study of 20 marijuana users and 19 contr
160 In a
cross-sectional study of 202 HIV-infected children aged
161 We did a sequential annual
cross-sectional study of 2164 children aged 8-9 years at
162 mode with postpartum gene expression using a
cross-sectional study of 324 mothers who delivered full-
163 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Serial
cross-sectional study of 4 690 729 deaths recorded in th
164 matter connectivity and word production in a
cross-sectional study of 42 participants with aphasia du
165 We conducted a
cross-sectional study of 613 hemodialysis patients aged
166 We performed a
cross-sectional study of 664 serum samples from the Oxfo
167 This is a prospective, non-randomized,
cross-sectional study of 80 neurocritical care unit pati
168 We performed a prospective, observational,
cross-sectional study of 87 children (age range, 8-17 ye
169 This is a
cross-sectional study of 886 participants (645 men and 2
170 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A
cross-sectional study of a standard germline detection m
171 a metal mixture with general cognition in a
cross-sectional study of adolescents residing near ferro
172 We conducted a
cross-sectional study of adult MDR-TB cases and their HH
173 We did a dual-centre
cross-sectional study of adults with Down syndrome recru
174 Cross-sectional study of adults with underlying health c
175 We conducted a
cross-sectional study of asymptomatic individuals (N = 5
176 We used two study designs: (1) a repeated
cross-sectional study of children 0-17 months old (n = 2
177 We performed a
cross-sectional study of children and adolescents <=21 y
178 In this
cross-sectional study of data collected in 55 low- and m
179 Cross-sectional study of fee-for-service Medicare patien
180 In a
cross-sectional study of group structure and kinship we
181 In this
cross-sectional study of HHCs of MDR-TB and rifampicin-r
182 We performed a retrospective,
cross-sectional study of HLA DSA and AT1R antibodies in
183 een November 20 and 24, 2017, we conducted a
cross-sectional study of individuals with serious health
184 In a
cross-sectional study of individuals with type 1 diabete
185 We conducted a
cross-sectional study of Kenyan adults with and without
186 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Serial
cross-sectional study of Medicare fee-for-service benefi
187 This was a
cross-sectional study of MM in PLWH aged >=70 years from
188 We conducted a
cross-sectional study of NHs certified by the U.S. Cente
189 This is an observational,
cross-sectional study of patients from the Montreal Hear
190 pathogenic SLC12A3 mutations, we performed a
cross-sectional study of patients with Gitelman syndrome
191 A
cross-sectional study of patients with intestinal stomas
192 A multicenter, retrospective,
cross-sectional study of pediatric BAV patients followed
193 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
Cross-sectional study of physicians participating in MIP
194 This was a
cross-sectional study of PLHIV randomly matched by age (
195 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Serial
cross-sectional study of rural Medicare Fee-for-Service
197 In this
cross-sectional study of solid organ transplant (SOT) ca
198 In a serial
cross-sectional study of students, the Healthy, Hunger-F
199 This is a pooled
cross-sectional study of survey data collected for the y
200 Retrospective
cross-sectional study of the incidence of new persistent
201 This
cross-sectional study of unselected children included 11
202 During 2015-2016 a
cross-sectional study on 234 randomly-selected farms inv
203 nd Methods In this prospective single-center
cross-sectional study,
participants with type 1 or 2 dia
204 Materials and Methods In this retrospective
cross-sectional study,
patients consecutively admitted t
205 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this
cross-sectional study,
patients who received a first-tim
206 In this
cross-sectional study,
patients with at least one dental
207 This was a
cross-sectional study performed in a primary and tertiar
208 study (q = 0.004, Student's t-test) and the
cross-sectional study (
q = 0.033, linear regression).
209 A
cross-sectional study quantified the long-term pathophys
210 This pilot
cross-sectional study recruited volunteer participants c
211 In a
cross-sectional study,
rectal swabs were collected from
212 This
cross-sectional study relates activated T cell responses
213 ith wearable technology is promising; recent
cross-sectional studies showed that gait characteristics
214 This prospective,
cross-sectional study stratified patients (n = 288 eyes)
215 Rationale:
Cross-sectional studies suggest an exacerbation-prone as
216 In this
cross-sectional study the Groningen Defecation and Fecal
217 In the
cross-sectional study,
the between-session component con
218 We aimed to investigate, with a
cross-sectional study,
the prevalence of disease categor
219 Cross-sectional study;
three radiologists with different
220 We designed a
cross-sectional study to address this knowledge gap and
221 ngle-photon emission CT scans were used in a
cross-sectional study to measure DaT levels in moderate/
222 In a
cross-sectional study,
to compare fasting and postprandi
223 In this
cross-sectional study,
two-thirds of European patients w
224 This
cross-sectional study used a self-administered questionn
225 This
cross-sectional study used FFQ data and plasma metabolom
226 This
cross-sectional study used nasal epithelium collected in
227 This
cross-sectional study used the recently publicly availab
228 This
cross-sectional study uses data from a voluntary survey
229 A retrospective
cross-sectional study using a nationwide insurance claim
230 Cross-sectional study using existing demographic, examin
231 We performed a nationwide, serial
cross-sectional study using maternal data from all live
232 series analysis of a retrospective, repeated
cross-sectional study using outcome data from all 580 co
233 of a manufacturing facility, we performed a
cross-sectional study using paired environmental and hum
234 A retrospective
cross-sectional study using routinely collected data (pa
235 This
cross-sectional study utilized data from the National He
236 This
cross-sectional study utilized the National Anesthesia C
237 A school based
cross sectional study was carried out among secondary sc
238 A
cross sectional study was carried out in three children
239 A
cross sectional study was conducted in 16 selected towns
240 This population based
cross sectional study was conducted to detect amblyopia
241 A
cross-sectional study was carried out in Ningxia, China
242 A community-based
cross-sectional study was carried out within selected cl
243 A multicentric
cross-sectional study was conducted among MSM recruited
244 A descriptive
cross-sectional study was conducted among students aged
245 A school-based
cross-sectional study was conducted among teachers older
246 A prospective observational
cross-sectional study was conducted at a single center H
247 Institution based
cross-sectional study was conducted at Debark hospital,
248 A community-based
cross-sectional study was conducted at Debre Berhan town
249 A hospital-based
cross-sectional study was conducted at SCSH from Septemb
250 An epidemiological
cross-sectional study was conducted between May 2017 and
251 A
cross-sectional study was conducted in 4565 12 years-old
252 A
cross-sectional study was conducted in dental implant pa
253 A
cross-sectional study was conducted in four centers incl
254 This
cross-sectional study was conducted in nonpregnant indiv
255 A
cross-sectional study was conducted on 1415 adolescents
256 an a priori statistical power calculation, a
cross-sectional study was conducted on erratic peri-impl
257 An initial
cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the freque
258 Cross-sectional study was conducted with 176 adults with
259 A
cross-sectional study was conducted with 307 community-d
260 A
cross-sectional study was conducted with a twin cohort 8
261 A
cross-sectional study was conducted with suspected CDI p
262 A
cross-sectional study was conducted, and breath samples
263 A descriptive
cross-sectional study was conducted.
264 A multi-centre
cross-sectional study was conducted.
265 A
cross-sectional study was designed to shed light on the
266 GN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter
cross-sectional study was performed in pediatric wards i
267 A
cross-sectional study was performed involving 406 12-yea
268 This
cross-sectional study was performed on 95 patients with
269 A diagnostic accuracy comparative
cross-sectional study was performed, comparing two scree
270 The aim of this
cross-sectional study was to assess whether impulsivity
271 A
cross-sectional study was undertaken during the rainy se
272 In two
cross-sectional studies,
we investigate whether or not w
273 In the present
cross-sectional study,
we address this question by compa
274 In this
cross-sectional study,
we analysed data from a nationall
275 In this
cross-sectional study,
we analysed population-level data
276 Therefore, in this
cross-sectional study,
we characterized the brain inflam
277 In this
cross-sectional study,
we compared a cohort of 61 patien
278 In this repeated
cross-sectional study,
we did two seroprevalence surveys
279 In this
cross-sectional study,
we enrolled healthy children aged
280 In this
cross-sectional study,
we evaluated expression of MMPs 2
281 In this
cross-sectional study,
we evaluated population-level ass
282 In this
cross-sectional study,
we examined 165 participants cons
283 In this
cross-sectional study,
we examined the association betwe
284 In a blind,
cross-sectional study,
we included duodenal biopsies fro
285 In this retrospective,
cross-sectional study,
we performed 16S rRNA sequencing
286 In this multicenter
cross-sectional study,
we performed an egocentric networ
287 In a field-based
cross-sectional study,
we recruited 343 small-scale weld
288 In the present
cross-sectional study,
we recruited 957 chronic inpatien
289 In this
cross-sectional study,
we review the outbreak response f
290 In the present
cross-sectional study,
we studied processes of effector
291 In this
cross-sectional study,
we tested younger and older adult
292 In this retrospective
cross-sectional study,
we took SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-confirm
293 In this
cross-sectional study,
we use internal transcribed space
294 In this
cross-sectional study,
we used customized perceptual tas
295 In this
cross-sectional study,
we used neuromelanin-sensitive MR
296 The effects of atopic eczema reported in
cross-sectional studies were heterogeneous, with no evid
297 A total of 20 longitudinal and 21
cross-sectional studies were included.
298 We performed a
cross-sectional study with 108 post-LT patients and foun
299 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
Cross-sectional study with longitudinal follow-up at 48
300 Here, we first conducted a
cross-sectional study with previously acquired human [(1