ライフサイエンスコーパス: cut-off

1 f 0.21ngml(-1) (very lower than the clinical cut-off).

2 xperiencing ongoing clinical benefit at data cut-off.

3 alse discovery rate (FDR) to be lower than a cut-off.

4 sing a blood eosinophil > 200 cells/muL as a cut-off.

5 sessed when mRNFL differences exceed the 95% cut-off.

6 itivities of CRP (cut-off 6.5 mg/L) and PCT (cut-off 0.025 ng/mL) were 52.3% (36.7-67.5%, 95%-CI) and

7 End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score alone (cut-off 18) was the best predictor of survival.

8 olled according to Asthma Control Test score cut-off: 20) and eight healthy controls were included.

9 NETest assay by PCR (spotted plates, normal cut-off: 20).

10 tone, with an unchanged low molecular weight cut off (~250 Da).

11 roups 3 and 4), an AUROC of 0.942 was found (cut-off 322 ug/h/kg, sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 91.3

12 The sensitivities of CRP (cut-off 6.5 mg/L) and PCT (cut-off 0.025 ng/mL) were 52.

13 Applying a calculated optimal cut-off absorbance-value of 2.1, differentiated S. pneum

14 r dose greater than or equal to 100 Gy (best cut-off according to the receiver operating characterist

15 eristic (ROC) curve was drawn to determine a cut-off ADC value for the differentiation between benign

16 When a cut-off ADC value of 1.791x10(-3) mm(2)/s was used, sens

17 racteristic analysis was used to determine a cut-off ADC value to differentiate these lesions.

18 I z-score > International Obesity Task Force cut-off and WC z-score > 90th percentile, respectively.

19 e TPA spectrum, the effective TPA wavelength cut-off, and the Kerr nonlinear refractive index have be

20 therapy in patients programmed to high-rate cut-off (Arm B) or delayed ventricular tachycardia thera

21 arin-induced multiple electrode aggregometry cut-off at 1,300 AU x minutes (specificity, 100%; sensit

22 Tumor size (best cut-off at 1.95 cm), lymphovascular and perineural invas

23 (95% CI: 0.80-1.00, p = 0.001) with an ideal cut-off at 12.5 HU, where the sensitivity was 81.8% and

24 A cut-off at 2 points distinguished a high-risk group (sco

25 (95% CI: 0.62-0.98, p = 0.014) with an ideal cut-off at 31.5 HU, where the sensitivity was 54.5% and

26 erentiating ccRCC from other RCC subtypes, a cut-off AV of 86-89 HU, aorta-based corrected AV of 89-9

27 erties were achieved with a molecular weight cut-off below 500 g mol(-1) and a low fouling tendency.

28 ratio of 0.10 umol heme b mol(-1) POC as the cut-off between heme b replete and heme b deficient (ane

29 o penetrate the hot halo gas until they were cut off by shock heating from the dark matter halo.

30 Therefore, the optimal cut-off by CMR during the acute phase of an MI to predic

31 than non-adherent patients, but no absolute cut-off can be proposed based on the available data.

32 l taxonomy units, even at the most stringent cut-off can represent multiple bacterial species, and th

33 ed and discharged for over 200 cycles with a cut-off capacity of 1000 mAh g(-1) at a high current den

34 the two ligands were compared based on SUVR cut-off categorization as standard of truth, although no

35 sual assessment and 98.1% (105/107) for SUVR cut-off categorization.

36 A cut-off CFT value for treatment of macular edema in IU,

37 Cut-off choice was based on Youden index calculation, an

38 5 and 0.99 to 0.99 and 0.46 depending on the cut-off chosen.

39 ndoscopic outcomes, and to determine the FCP cut-off concentration that correlated with patient outco

40 on occurred in urine that was lower than the cut-off concentration, suggesting potential clinical app

41 g and analysis such as normalization method, cut-off criteria, software settings including software v

42 A cut-off CT density value of the gallbladder wall of more

43 The resulting cut-off curves yield information regarding the hydrophob

44 -up was June 29, 2017, and the data analyses cut-off date was June 30, 2017.

45 We present a new bound for the structural cut-off degree based on the connectivity within the hubs

46 at medium- and substrate-related diffraction cut-off edges.

47 ese results support an interpretation of the cut-off effect in food emulsions, based on the "amphipho

48 In all cases, a cut-off effect was observed, in line with previous obser

49 A "cut-off" effect was observed for the pyrene quenching by

50 Notably, the observed decay of the over cut-off emission is found to be critically associated wi

51 Efficient proton acceleration reaching cut-off energies of up to 20 MeV with particle numbers e

52 emission at energies higher than the quantum cut-off (eV b ); a component that decays monotonically w

53 eaders) should avoid using 0.05 or any other cut off for a p-value as the basis for a decision about

54 The optimal size cut-off for ACC in AI was 4.6 cm.

55 il count below the threshold often used as a cut-off for access to relevant treatments, compared with

56 ikely to have an IQ score < 80, the clinical cut-off for borderline intellectual disability.

57 Temporal Error Score that finds an objective cut-off for each taxonomic rank using information for th

58 A CriSTAL score of 6 was the optimal cut-off for high-risk of in-hospital death.

59 ge-gated sodium channels showed a sharp size cut-off for ion permeation, such that no ion possessing

60 The optimal cut-off for ISS was 33, with sensitivity of 60.0%, speci

61 The BMI cut-off for obesity varied in the included studies.

62 (Kyowa Medex Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a cut-off for positivity >=10 mug Hb/g faeces.

63 vidence to suggest both 5% and 20% mFPA as a cut-off for raised ALT.

64 bjects exceeded the most stringent published cut-off for subtle parkinsonism of three definitions exa

65 lection of 26.1 and 14.8 ml/100 g/min as the cut-off for TBF of tumoural and peritumoural regions dif

66 netic clusters and the development of an SNP cut-off for transmission) were central to our analyses,

67 ion (LoD) up to 240 CFU/mL, comensurate with cut-off for UTIs (10(3)-10(5) CFUs/mL) was achieved.

68 te sensitivity characteristics and the first cut off frequency (fc) from the transient characteristic

69 output resistance makes the unity power gain cut-off frequency (f max ) of GKTFETs considerably large

70 ansconductance (g m ) and unity current gain cut-off frequency (f T ) than GFETs.

71 We identified the band gap Eg and phonon cut-off frequency omegamax as the two most relevant feat

72 A cut-off >0.72 kU/L of IgE towards Cor a 14 diagnosed 87%

73 isode of fungemia (Fungitell Assay; positive cut-off >=80pg/mL).

74 alue, were calculated for the standard CA125 cut-off (>=35 U/ml).

75 prediction; (AUC: 0.713; 95%CI: 0.646-0.781; cut off: > 15.2 cm; sensitivity: 65.9%; (95% CI: 55-75.7

76 ynamic relation with a non-Feynman onset and cut-off has no correspondence in either nonlinear optics

77 of the inflated radiation impedance close to cut-off in a medium with a plasma-like permittivity.

78 Patients with NFL above the 807.5 pg/mL cut-off in CSF had 5.0-times relative risk of disease ac

79 ts an astonishing non-Feynman-like onset and cut-off in the excitation spectrum of the ground state e

80 To this end, we first identified a cut-off in the measure: pairs of multicomponent odorants

81 The combined wall-lumen cut-off is 35 HU with sensitivity of 100% and specificit

82 s the window at an arbitrary current density cut-off (J(cut-off)) value.

83 Using a cut off level of 3 mug/mL, postoperative morbidity (odds

84 pies and alleviate colonoscopy capacity, the cut-off level for a positive FIT result was increased fr

85 We established a cut-off level for the diagnosis of ALS.

86 ficity of 87% and a sensitivity of 58% for a cut-off level of 203 mg/L (AUC: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.63-0.83)

87 As a single test, an IL-6 cut-off level of 432 pg/mL on day 1 yielded a specificit

88 A cut-off level of 62 pg/mL discriminated between ALS and

89 Cut off levels for all three Fusarium toxins were valida

90 am allowed for instant adjustment of the FIT cut-off levels to optimize program performance.

91 diagnosis of cashew allergy and to identify cut-off levels to replace oral food challenges.

92 Using a cut off limit of 0.3, resulted in the correct identifica

93 alysis method and determine a more sensitive cut-off limit distinguishing fresh from frozen poultry.

94 For qualitative detection, the cut-off limit of the strip test was determined at 2 ug/L

95 for both FT-NIR and FT-MIR range by using a cut-off limit set at 2 ug/kg OTA, independently from the

96 ria, Metroticket 2.0 criteria, and AFP model cut-off <=2 points (all P < 0.001) with c-statistics of

97 However, a single cut-off may not be universally applicable with diagnosti

98 ng ultrafiltration with low molecular weight cut-off membranes, cation exchange chromatography and re

99 ydrolysate was subjected to molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) filtration, following which the non-ultra

100 ty of liver resection (F-statistic at median cut-off: NALR 24.8; MALR 266.8; P < 0.001).

101 143 L m(-2)h(-1)bar(-1) and a particle size cut off of 35 nm.

102 Using a cut off of two pathogen peptides, 9/10 acute Lyme Borrel

103 With cut-off of > 4 mm as diagnostic of plantar fasciitis, th

104 A cut-off of >198 pg/mL was used to define amyloid-negativ

105 ity of 61.1% and specificity of 85.7% with a cut-off of <0.109.

106 urve demonstrated that STEV signal threshold cut-off of <0.316 was 95.2% sensitive and 95.6% specific

107 A baseline stool Shannon diversity cut-off of <2 had optimal operating characteristics for

108 vity of 61% and a specificity of 96% using a cut-off of 0.34ng/ml.

109 ficity of 95% in diagnosis of cirrhosis, and cut-off of 1 had sensitivity of 75.9% and specificity of

110 Tremor stability index with a cut-off of 1.05 gave good classification performance for

111 This capacitive assay had a cut-off of 1.36% (confidence interval of 99.99%); it the

112 ecificity of 83% at an optical density index cut-off of 1.5.

113 eages, we found that the previously proposed cut-off of 10 allelic differences in cgMLST can be still

114 the surveillance of HCC in Indonesia with a cut-off of 10 ng/ml were 82.6 and 71.2%, respectively.

115 Complete success was 75.6% for an upper IOP cut-off of 14 mm Hg and 76.9% for 21 mm Hg, and qualifie

116 (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated a CT-score cut-off of 14.5 to have 100% sensitivity and 91.9% speci

117 An fCal cut-off of 155 mcg/g was sensitive (96%) and accurate (7

118 APRI cut-off of 2 had sensitivity of 45.4% and specificity of

119 f <10, 10 to 20, and >20 HU, with an optimal cut-off of 20 HU to diagnose ACC.

120 "obese" (O) or "non-obese" (NO) using a BMI cut-off of 25 kg/m(2).

121 i-permeable membrane with a molecular weight cut-off of 5 kDa.

122 These results support the generally accepted cut-off of 5% fat for steatosis and indicate 20% as a th

123 When grouped by an age cut-off of 60 years, the women in the elder group had a

124 pgmL(-1) (far below the clinical established cut-off of 600 pgmL(-1)) for IL-8 protein in undiluted s

125 ion of 1.06 and 1.36 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s as the cut-off of ADC of tumoural and peritumoural regions was

126 When using a cut-off of BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) for obesity, our subgroup a

127 tal pancreatectomy (DP), and to identify the cut-off of DFA1 that optimizes CR-POPF prediction.

128 differential expressed genes identified by a cut-off of fold change >2 and adjusted P value < 0.05.

129 A cut-off of greater than or equal to 4 Bush Francis Catat

130 rocedures, and determine if the discriminant cut-off of hospital volume may influence postoperative m

131 Using a cut-off of less than ten genome-wide mutation difference

132 We aimed to identify the optimal cut-off of TEI by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR

133 s per week, would quasiuniversally offer 40% cuts off of current overprescriptions.

134 At data cut-off on Jan 7, 2016, 29 (76%) patients in the ipilimu

135 rrence-free survival assessed after database cut-off on Nov 29, 2013.

136 ularity or blow-up of apex curvature that is cut off once the pinnacle tip reaches microscales.

137 High-rate cut-off or delayed ventricular tachycardia therapy progr

138 hould have read "Use a second pipette with a cut-off pipette tip to add Matrigel to the center well,"

139 t a 45% catheter to vein ratio was the ideal cut off point to maximise sensitivity and specificity (A

140 The ROC curve showed the optimum cut-off point at 0.628 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (p = 0.001), whi

141 The Cho SNR cut-off point differentiating between pathologic complet

142 The best cut-off point for malignancy index was determined to be

143 o consensus exists on the optimal diagnostic cut-off point for MET copy number gains identified using

144 a more customizable treatment plan with the cut-off point identifying patients without normal phonat

145 The cut-off point of intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) conten

146 ance systems for anemia may consider using a cut-off point that is specific for the method of blood s

147 s for all VHI domains and, finally, a global cut-off point through ROC and precision-recall analysis

148 LCEOT >=5 mmol/L was the best cut-off point to predict PNF (Se=83.3%, SP=74.3%, positi

149 For the purpose of finding the global cut-off point, a group of 180 participants was recruited

150 DeltaSUV at 48.9% cut-off point, reported for the first time here, produce

151 ere then calculated to determine the optimum cut-off point.

152 different PMPEs were calculated using a 15% cut-off point: 1) full-mouth (MB-B-DB/MB-B-DL); 2) two d

153 rovided and validated for the first time the cut-off points for all VHI domains and, finally, a globa

154 Cut-off points for interocular symmetry of the superior

155 Cut-off points for symmetry were defined as the 95th per

156 The optimal cut-off points of NLR, PLR, and LMR were 2.57, 123.5 and

157 In the testing period, the cut-off points previously selected were validated.

158 ulated for each particle size as well as the cut-off points that optimize the combination of sensitiv

159 The cut-off points that optimized the combination of sensiti

160 Data cut-off points were identified by receiver operating cha

161 In the testing period, the previous cut-off points were validated.

162 ween survivors and non-survivors, determined cut-off points, and assessed the added value to clinical

163 ct on carbapenem use was assessed at several cut-off points.

164 g Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute cut-off points.

165 Using 6 million IU/mL as the cut-off, pre-treatment results were concordant in 70.4%

166 Similarly, a cut-off range of 19-25 U/ml and > 25 U/ml is recommended

167 Based on our results, a cut-off range of 4.8-8 U/ml and > 8 U/ml could be used t

168 especially in the 0-1000 Da molecular weight cut-off range.

169 d that by embedding a current source in this cut-off region, more than an order of magnitude enhancem

170 Using a cut-off rule based on flow cytometry results of the nega

171 Based on the cut-off score (0.361) obtained from the multivariable mo

172 Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS; cut-off score 9).

173 ative feature of this research is the global cut-off score calculated for the VHI.

174 of the semi-automated approach, applying the cut-off score decreased the amount of manual abstraction

175 4-point, Little Schmidy index (LS4) using a cut-off score of 1 to indicate fall risk with sensitivit

176 symptoms were assessed using the GDS with a cut-off score of 4/5 (not depressed/depressed).

177 The optimal cut-off scores to identify persons at low risk of compli

178 d the use of different measurement tools and cut-off scores to measure mental health problems and oth

179 Various pass/fail cut-off scores were described.

180 The sensitivity and specificity of different cut-off scores were explored.

181 era sign, collar sign and other signs (sinus cut-off sign, hump sign, band sign).

182 ext] 4 decades of emission probability) at a cut-off slip magnitude [Formula: see text].

183 This cut-off slip provides a statistical measure to the chara

184 A series of cut off temperature thresholds and durations (2, 3, and

185 00/CBP inhibitor, abrogated this process and cut off the secretion of exosomal PD-L1 by blocking the

186 r well," instead of "Use a second pipette to cut off the tip of the pipette and add Matrigel to the c

187 e than conventional starving therapy by only cutting off the energy supply.

188 scaled up to the industrial level, either by cutting off the lines of control for endogenous metaboli

189 This suggests that cutting off the secretion or expression of PD-L1 might i

190 ossible to inhibit growth of cancer cells by cutting off the supply of 5,10-meTHF.

191 Using the low-risk cut-off, the model identifies bacteremia with 98.7% sens

192 iminating capability of OncoScore (OncoScore cut-off threshold = 21.09; AUC = 90.3%, 95% CI: 88.1-92.

193 The cut-off threshold for erroneous MOTUs was identified as

194 ore metric or using a maximum expected error cut-off threshold.

195 It does not require a P-value cut-off to define differential expression, and works wel

196 ts in a notable shift of the molecular level cut-off to smaller molecules establishing selectivity im

197 With a cut-off value > 0.015 mmol/l indicating IBS, the sensiti

198 Similarly, for polyp detection, a cut-off value > 19 U/ml has a sensitivity of 96.3% and t

199 For tumor detection in plasma specimens, a cut-off value > 25 U/ml has a sensitivity and specificit

200 ts apart from tear osmolarity, regardless of cut-off value (>308 mOsm/L, >316 mOsm/L, and inter-eye d

201 Good results in terms of the cut-off value (2.32% mass fraction of soft wheat) and fa

202 However, the current PDFF cut-off value (5%) used to define steatosis by magnetic

203 Only resistin (cut-off value 13.7 ng/ml) and IL-6 (cut-off value 473.4

204 esistin (cut-off value 13.7 ng/ml) and IL-6 (cut-off value 473.4 pg/ml) were reliable early markers o

205 The epidemiological cut-off value 99% (ECV(99)) amongst genotypically wild t

206 iagnosing actively rejecting grafts (optimal cut-off value [OCV] of 19 mum, 24 mum, and 26 mum, respe

207 Optimal early T1 shortening cut-off value and its diagnostic performance in the iden

208 emoglobin (fHb) concentrations below the FIT cut-off value and later development of colorectal advanc

209 of 112.5 ml was a marker of SAP and 433.0 ml cut-off value could be used to predict the need of inter

210 ol levels and calculated a salivary cortisol cut-off value for screening adrenocortical function.

211 Considering the VAE-NT group, optimized TBI cut-off value of 0.295 provided a sensitivity of 89.5% a

212 Considering all cases, the cut-off value of 0.335 for the TBI provided a sensitivit

213 at the HC level was found to be 90% when the cut-off value of 1.25 was identified.

214 a negative FIT result at baseline (below the cut-off value of 10 mug Hb/ g feces).

215 An optimal cervical spinal cord GM CSA cut-off value of 11.1 mm(2) was found to enable accurate

216 An FCP cut-off value of 150 mg/kg achieved the highest summatio

217 FCP concentration with a cut-off value of 150 mg/kg had only fair to good accurac

218 IL-6 with cut-off value of 157.0 pg/ml was a predictor of necrosis

219 We identified a driving pressure cut-off value of 19 cm H2O where an ordinal increment wa

220 100% specificity and 79% sensitivity; a PDFF cut-off value of 2.0% identified patients with steatosis

221 ROC analysis yielded an optimal cut-off value of 2.245 (AUC=0.999, p<0.001, sensitivity=

222 At an optimal cut-off value of 23.9 pg/mL, the sensitivity and specifi

223 0.839; 95% CI, 0.751-0.927) with an optimal cut-off value of 24.3%.

224 We identified a plateau pressure cut-off value of 29 cm H2O, above which an ordinal incre

225 w (n = 191) NLR groups according to the best cut-off value of 3.88.

226 ng to ROC curves, in the tumor group, at the cut-off value of 4 U/ml, the sensitivity of fecal tM2-PK

227 t cytokine (P < 0.0001), and with an optimal cut-off value of 67.5 pg/mL, the sensitivity and specifi

228 analysis because they only identify the high cut-off value of a biomarker by utilizing color changes

229 The cut-off value of CFT for initiating systemic treatment w

230 In a post hoc analysis, a cut-off value of CFT for systemic treatment initiation i

231 ue approach was used to evaluate the optimal cut-off value of recurrence-free survival to divide the

232 , which is 4 orders magnitude lower than NSE cut-off value of small cell lung cancer.

233 A cut-off value of the annual CRS/HIPEC caseload affecting

234 The optimal cut-off value of the appendiceal diameter was 6.5 mm.

235 To obtain an optimal cut-off value of the strain ratio for differentiating be

236 s without discrepancy, 16 mm Hg was the best cut-off value predicting survival, independently of bein

237 eiver operating characteristic analysis, and cut-off value that most accurately identified individual

238 The cut-off value that most accurately identified subjects w

239 Reducing the PDFF cut-off value to 3.0% identified patients with steatosis

240 95% CI: 2.387-18.223; P = 0.026) and optimal cut-off value was 1039 (AUC: 0.801; P = 0.002).

241 ; 95% CI: 2.387-18.223; p=0.026) and optimal cut-off value was 1039 (AUC: 0.801; p=0.002).

242 A cut-off value was established to improve discrimination.

243 The breath H(2) optimal cut-off value was lower with a2 Milk(TM) (13 ppm) than c

244 When the ADC cut-off value was taken as <= 0.753 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, it

245 Using the 66% DeltaSUV cut-off value, reported previously, NPV and PPV were 80

246 risk individuals with a FIT result below the cut-off value, we associated baseline concentrations of

247 he proportion with intakes below a specified cut-off value.

248 ter consecutive fHb concentrations below the cut-off value.

249 rillation but calls into question the 90-day cut-off value.

250 w at an arbitrary current density cut-off (J(cut-off)) value.

251 Cut off values are not available for tree nuts.

252 Cut off values for change in left ventricular end-diasto

253 der to validate the assays we determined the cut off values, sensitivity and specificity of the assay

254 and accuracy were calculated based on these cut off values.

255 eral flow immunoassay is developed using two cut-off values (10 and 50 mg kg(-1) gliadin) to provide

256 Diagnostic accuracy, optimal cut-off values and best position for FE NO50 within a pa

257 hanges in LSM do not correlate with HVPG and cut-off values are not reliable in ruling out CSPH after

258 PDFF cut-off values at 90% specificity were 16.3% for grades

259 Subgroup analysis included cut-off values for annual volume of pancreatoduodenectom

260 When cut-off values for clinical affectation (measured as MSS

261 erating characteristic analysis to determine cut-off values for differentiation between low and inter

262 stic (ROC) curves, we determined the optimal cut-off values for each score for these outcomes.

263 (ROC) curve analysis was performed to define cut-off values for high and low ratios of these indices.

264 characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, optimal cut-off values for left ventricular (LV) geometrical par

265 Optimal M30 cut-off values for mild and severe ballooning were 330 a

266 the ROC analysis, there were no satisfactory cut-off values for OPN that would distinguish patients w

267 Cut-off values for sarcopenia, defined as SMI < 50 cm(2)

268 ality for assessing muscle mass, the optimal cut-off values for sarcopenia, the ideal timing and freq

269 Cut-off values for the best sum of sensitivity and speci

270 ot be identified using the recommended CH(4) cut-off values in FM or LM.

271 Cut-off values of -1.455 (NFS) and 1.3 (FIB-4) have nega

272 When applying the pre-specified cut-off values of 34 mL/m(2) for LAVI and -15% for GLS,

273 For qualitative analysis, the cut-off values of beta-lactams, tetracyclines, quinolone

274 ls of the contamination rate were adopted as cut-off values of contamination reads.

275 Based on the cut-off values of mucosal TNF and RHI scores from the ca

276 nteraction detector was used to identify the cut-off values of the annual caseload affecting the 90-d

277 However, whether transaminases-adapted cut-off values should be used for ad-hoc decisions in pa

278 Using existing literature cut-off values the sensitivity and specificity of breath

279 distribution, the proportion below specified cut-off values was estimated.

280 Salivary cortisol cut-off values were 0.015mug/dL for plasma cortisol leve

281 Optimal cut-off values were determined with receiver operating c

282 Cut-off values were established by applying ROC curve an

283 At optimal cut-off values, which had 69-98% sensitivity in detectin

284 in a dichotomous manner using pre-specified cut-off values.

285 e or negative findings based on manufacturer cut-off values.

286 ectrodes across literature where different J(cut-off) values have been used.

287 ADC values below the cut-off was 97.1%, specificity was 97.6%, positive predi

288 determined that the most effective DeltaSUV cut-off was at 48.9%, and that when combined with visual

289 An optimal concentration cut-off was established for the floral source-specific m

290 Large ART with 220 mm(2) as the cut-off was significantly associated with lymphatic inva

291 rable to embolism-forming cavitations, which cut off water supply, ultimately causing leaf death.

292 A significant shift in the cut off wavelength of the BNNSs based photodetectors was

293 The device has an 8 microm cut-off wavelength at 77 K and exhibits a quantum effici

294 of ~0.8 eV)-based photoconductor exhibits a cut-off wavelength at ~1.7 mum and gives a responsivity

295 oom temperature photovoltaic response with a cut-off wavelength of 3.4 mum was demonstrated.

296 e photodetectors are designed to have a 100% cut-off wavelength of ~2.4 mum at 300K, with sensitivity

297 is varied, the device exhibits well-defined cut-off wavelengths of either approximately 8.7 or appro

298 Using the strictest ramp sequence cut-off, we show that across most taxonomic groups, ramp

299 Using this cut-off, we were able to design olfactory metamers-pairs

300 gating luciferase and Au NPs is digested and cut off, which results in the recovery of bioluminescenc