戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 IQ metric over 5 mm pupil diameter following cycloplegia.
2 cts, objective refraction was performed with cycloplegia.
3 ne-induced accommodation or atropine-induced cycloplegia.
4  to a more myopic state and with atropine by cycloplegia.
5 e same autorefractor with the subjects under cycloplegia.
6 ith the same autorefractor in subjects under cycloplegia.
7 d vitreous chamber depth were measured after cycloplegia.
8 s and IOL power calculations attributable to cycloplegia.
9 orthoptist using the PR2000 without inducing cycloplegia.
10 metropic refractive errors when used without cycloplegia.
11 of autorefraction and biometry pre- and post-cycloplegia.
12 utorefraction was performed before and after cycloplegia.
13 , LT, and axial length both before and after cycloplegia.
14  2.5x less precise pre-cycloplegia than post-cycloplegia.
15 ion and biometric measurements pre- and post-cycloplegia.
16  the SE before cycloplegia from the SE after cycloplegia.
17                     Of the 88% who underwent cycloplegia, 58% had hyperopia (spherical equivalent [SE
18 o autorefraction measurements, pre- and post-cycloplegia agreement and refractive error independence
19                      Regarding pre- and post-cycloplegia agreement, SE became more positive by + 0.79
20  but with visual side effects resulting from cycloplegia and mydriasis.
21 on has been shown to cause mydriasis without cycloplegia and to increase the rate of aqueous humor fl
22   Vision, open-field autorefraction (without cycloplegia), and ocular biometry were measured in each
23 croscopy, auto-refractometry, retinoscope in cycloplegia, and fundus examination.
24 s and Measures: Visual acuity, refraction in cycloplegia, and manifest strabismus were evaluated and
25 ive balanced salt solution (BSS) irrigation, cycloplegia, and specific surface ablation technique str
26  can affect how ocular parameters respond to cycloplegia, and therefore intraocular lens (IOL) power
27 All children then underwent retinoscopy with cycloplegia by an examiner who was unaware of the result
28 tive errors by using videorefraction without cycloplegia could effectively serve as a first stage of
29                   66 trials (91.7%) utilized cycloplegia for measuring refractive error.
30 ying robust statistical techniques, ensuring cycloplegia for refractive error measurements, and prope
31 aSE) for each eye by deducting the SE before cycloplegia from the SE after cycloplegia.
32 DeltaSE between the 2 drops before and after cycloplegia in both eyes for all refractive error groups
33 Nanodropper, Inc), on pupillary dilation and cycloplegia in children compared with the standard of ca
34       Refractive error was assessed, without cycloplegia, in both eyes of all participants using an a
35            Assessing refractive errors under cycloplegia is recommended for paediatric patients; howe
36     If an accurate measurement is essential, cycloplegia is recommended when measuring refraction in
37 reement as differences between post- and pre-cycloplegia measurements, for spherical equivalent (SE),
38 tion of 1.07 +/- 0.23 D, and nearly complete cycloplegia occurred.
39       Surgeons should consider the effect of cycloplegia on refractive prediction errors and IOL powe
40  met only for pupillary dilation and not for cycloplegia or constriction percentage; however, the sma
41       In monkeys, LAT-A causes mydriasis and cycloplegia, perhaps related to its known ability to dis
42                                         With cycloplegia, pupil diameter changed significantly more i
43                                              Cycloplegia significantly improved the SE repeatability
44 the Myopia Master were 2.5x less precise pre-cycloplegia than post-cycloplegia.
45 red with an auto-refractor in the absence of cycloplegia, the visual acuity is assessed without refra
46               Before administration with the cycloplegia treatment 1 % cyclopentolate hydrochloride,
47 metry (Km) repeatability did not change with cycloplegia (TRT, pre-cyclo: 0.25 D, post-cyclo:0.27 D)
48 mpass demographic data, current practice and cycloplegia use, numerical response to indicate the mini
49                 HOAs were measured following cycloplegia using Shack-Hartmann aberrometry.
50             Refraction was performed without cycloplegia using WAM5500 open-field auto refractometer
51           The average SE of both eyes before cycloplegia was -0.082 +/- 4.8 diopters.
52                    The average DeltaSE after cycloplegia was 1.15+/-1.2 for cyclopentolate and 1.04+/
53  Within 6 months, streak retinoscopy without cycloplegia was performed under general anesthesia.
54                    To pinpoint the effect of cycloplegia, we recorded refractive predictions in pre-
55 easurements of retinoscopic refraction under cycloplegia were taken at 4- to 6-month intervals up to
56 yopia, as determined by autorefraction after cycloplegia with 2 drops of 1% tropicamide at each annua
57 rogression of myopia by autorefraction after cycloplegia with 2 drops of 1% tropicamide.
58 cloplegic autorefraction after inducement of cycloplegia with 2 drops of 1% tropicamide.
59        A refraction was then performed after cycloplegia with either Retinomax hand-held or Nidek aut
60  was determined by subjective methods before cycloplegia, with noncycloplegic autorefraction values a