戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor dacomitinib.
2 20 insertion mutants restored sensitivity to dacomitinib.
3 inantly grade 1 to 2, and more frequent with dacomitinib.
4 ed 878 patients and randomly assigned 439 to dacomitinib (256 KRAS wild type) and 439 (263 KRAS wild
5 and were then randomly allocated 2:1 to oral dacomitinib 45 mg once-daily or matched placebo centrall
6  assigned participants (1:1) to receive oral dacomitinib 45 mg/day (in 28-day cycles) or oral gefitin
7 randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to dacomitinib (45 mg/day) or erlotinib (150 mg/day) with m
8 progression-free survival was 2.6 months for dacomitinib (95% CI 1.9-2.9) and erlotinib (95% CI 1.9-3
9                 In this report, we show that dacomitinib, a pan-ErbB receptor inhibitor, diminished g
10                                              Dacomitinib, a pan-HER inhibitor, is approved for first-
11                                              Dacomitinib, an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor, had show
12 FS was 2.21 months for patients treated with dacomitinib and 1.84 months for patients treated with er
13 t) was 2.86 months for patients treated with dacomitinib and 1.91 months for patients treated with er
14 FS was 3.71 months for patients treated with dacomitinib and 1.91 months for patients treated with er
15 , 2013, we randomly assigned 480 patients to dacomitinib and 240 patients to placebo.
16 were reported in 52 (12%) patients receiving dacomitinib and 40 (9%) patients receiving erlotinib.
17 al was 9.53 months for patients treated with dacomitinib and 7.44 months for patients treated with er
18       185 (39%) of 477 patients who received dacomitinib and 86 (36%) of 239 patients who received pl
19 tations seldom achieve clinical responses to dacomitinib and afatinib, two covalent quinazoline-based
20 ents were reported in 21 (9%) patients given dacomitinib and in ten (4%) patients given gefitinib.
21 99804) has been assigned the nomenclature of dacomitinib and is currently under clinical evaluation.
22                            We did a trial of dacomitinib as initial systemic therapy in clinically an
23                                    Moreover, dacomitinib attenuated migration and invasion of the EOC
24 y enhanced the sensitivity of SCCHN cells to dacomitinib by the loss of both translesion synthesis an
25  optimal dosing schedule for osimertinib and dacomitinib combination therapy.
26 l lung cancer showed favourable efficacy for dacomitinib compared with erlotinib.
27             A combination of osimertinib and dacomitinib could therefore induce more durable response
28                                              Dacomitinib demonstrated significantly improved PFS vers
29                                              Dacomitinib did not improve overall survival compared wi
30                                              Dacomitinib did not increase overall survival and cannot
31 nhibitors (Afatinib, Gefitinib, Osimertinib, Dacomitinib, Erlotinib), confirming the biological relev
32 Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the dacomitinib group (one related to untreated diarrhoea an
33 4 months (IQR 15.6-29.6) for patients in the dacomitinib group and 24.4 months (11.5-38.9) for those
34 ew was 14.7 months (95% CI 11.1-16.6) in the dacomitinib group and 9.2 months (9.1-11.0) in the gefit
35  was 2.6 months (95% CI 1.9-2.8) in both the dacomitinib group and the erlotinib group (stratified ha
36                     However, patients in the dacomitinib group had longer progression-free survival t
37 nts were diarrhoea (47 [11%] patients in the dacomitinib group vs ten [2%] patients in the erlotinib
38                                              Dacomitinib had encouraging clinical activity as initial
39    Compared with placebo, patients allocated dacomitinib had significantly longer time to deteriorati
40          We designed BR.26 to assess whether dacomitinib improved overall survival in heavily pretrea
41 (version 1.0) to investigate the activity of dacomitinib in all patients with a baseline scan and at
42 nvestigation on the therapeutic potential of dacomitinib in treatment of the chemoresistant EOC.
43 ted therapies, are sensitive to afatinib and dacomitinib in vitro.
44                                              Dacomitinib is a covalent pan-HER inhibitor that has sho
45                                              Dacomitinib is a second-generation, irreversible EGFR ty
46                                              Dacomitinib is an irreversible pan-EGFR family tyrosine
47                                              Dacomitinib is an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine-kinase i
48 e patients were randomly assigned to receive dacomitinib (n=227) or gefitinib (n=225).
49 ted qualitative differences in the effect of dacomitinib on overall survival for patients with KRAS-m
50         Compared with placebo, the effect of dacomitinib on overall survival seemed similar in patien
51                                      We gave dacomitinib orally once daily (45 mg or 30 mg) until pro
52 nts who derived extended clinical benefit to dacomitinib (P = 0.04).
53   This randomized, open-label trial compared dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible inhibitor of
54              Introduction of Gly770 into two dacomitinib-resistant EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants res
55 identify potential predictive biomarkers for dacomitinib sensitivity, we performed whole exome sequen
56                              INTERPRETATION: Dacomitinib significantly improved progression-free surv
57 erization domain mutations show responses to dacomitinib treatment followed by within-pathway resista
58 clinically achieved a partial response after dacomitinib treatment.
59 o (median 6.83 months [95% CI 6.08-7.49] for dacomitinib vs 6.31 months [5.32-7.52] for placebo; haza
60  events were diarrhoea (59 [12%] patients on dacomitinib vs no controls), acneiform rash (48 [10%] vs
61 is acneiform (31 [14%] of 227 patients given dacomitinib vs none of 224 patients given gefitinib), di
62            Irreversible EGFR inhibition with dacomitinib was not superior to erlotinib in an unselect
63                          We aimed to compare dacomitinib with erlotinib in a phase 3 study.