コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s (hNP-1, vancomycin, gentamicin, or calcium-daptomycin).
2 derstanding of the action mode of A54145 and daptomycin.
3 lipopeptide (n = 35), that is, vancomycin or daptomycin.
4 ue of the cyclic lipodepsipeptide antibiotic daptomycin.
5 ly higher treatment failure in comparison to daptomycin.
6 antibiotics including the cyclic lipopeptide daptomycin.
7 e obtained by BMD for vancomycin but not for daptomycin.
8 rectly inhibits membrane permeabilization by daptomycin.
9 11-fold for vancomycin and +/- 1.16-fold for daptomycin.
10 o 2011 and who received either vancomycin or daptomycin.
11 on the cell envelope such as vancomycin and daptomycin.
12 range, 1.1-2.3 days]) prior to switching to daptomycin.
13 dentification and successful treatment using daptomycin.
14 correlated with increased susceptibility to daptomycin.
15 eptides (HDPs) prior to clinical exposure to daptomycin.
16 2) was from blood drawn after treatment with daptomycin.
17 ard therapy and relapse after treatment with daptomycin.
18 t to multiple drugs including vancomycin and daptomycin.
19 d increased susceptibility to the antibiotic daptomycin.
20 adaptation restores the in vivo activity of daptomycin.
21 uter leaflets of membranes are accessible to daptomycin.
22 ucturally related to the clinically approved daptomycin.
23 radual membrane depolarization observed with daptomycin.
25 hort of critically ill patients treated with daptomycin 6-8 mg/kg/day for primarily Staphylococcus sp
26 ized to receive meropenem (1 g/8 hours) plus daptomycin (6 mg/kg/day) or ceftazidime (2 g/8 hours).
30 idated, particularly the question of whether daptomycin acts on the cell membrane, the cell wall, or
34 ia also released phospholipid in response to daptomycin, Agr-triggered secretion of small cytolytic t
36 wed a 100-fold decrease in susceptibility to daptomycin, although this antibiotic was not used in the
38 hogen, evolves resistance to the lipopeptide daptomycin and AMPs by diverting the antibiotic away fro
39 istance to the membrane-targeting antibiotic daptomycin and demonstrates the conservation of NOS-deri
41 usceptible-only breakpoint of <=4 mug/mL for daptomycin and enterococci was no longer appropriate.
43 able cell membrane-targeting antimicrobials (daptomycin and telavancin), but also resulted in hypersu
44 h as the antibiotics vancomycin, bacitracin, daptomycin and the beta-lactam-containing penicillins, c
47 s to resistance to the last-line antibiotic, daptomycin, and simultaneously affects host innate immun
48 which cardiolipin may mediate resistance to daptomycin, and they provide new insights into the actio
49 aptomycin MICs of 3-4 microg/mL treated with daptomycin are more likely to have worse clinical outcom
53 re at 30 days was significantly lower in the daptomycin arm compared to the vancomycin arm (20.0% vs
55 ore membrane binding, the molecular state of daptomycin as defined by CD is the same with or without
56 tyramine, which we show binds the antibiotic daptomycin, as an 'anti-antibiotic' to disable systemica
60 eport our findings on the molecular state of daptomycin before and after its membrane-binding reactio
62 icacies of a beta-lactam in combination with daptomycin (BL/D-C) and beta-lactam monotherapy (BL-M) i
66 therapy, suggesting that modification in the daptomycin breakpoint for enterococci should be consider
67 d Laboratory Standards Institute revised the daptomycin breakpoints for Enterococcus spp. twice in ra
68 terobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, daptomycin breakpoints for Enterococcus spp., and ceftar
69 Wild-type S. aureus was killed rapidly by daptomycin, but Agr-defective mutants survived antibioti
70 d MX-2401 share structural similarities with daptomycin, but unlike daptomycin they do not target bac
71 structural basis for increased resistance to daptomycin by the adaptive mutation to LiaR (D191N) firs
73 oved study of adult patients discharged with daptomycin, ceftaroline, ertapenem, and novel beta-lacta
76 okinetic model were fitted to each subject's daptomycin concentration-time data and pharmacokinetic p
77 firmed progressive decreases in killing with daptomycin concentrations that simulate those attained i
78 l-angle x-ray scattering at sufficiently low daptomycin concentrations to determine that the molecule
86 ggests the addition of a beta-lactam (BL) to daptomycin (DAP) results in synergistic in vitro activit
89 andard antibiotic therapy with vancomycin or daptomycin did not result in significant improvement in
90 efects colocalize with fluorescently labeled daptomycin, DivIVA, and fluorescent reporters of peptido
94 The best outcomes were associated with a daptomycin dose of >/=9 mg/kg compared to doses of <7 mg
99 ficient for the development of resistance to daptomycin during the treatment of vancomycin-resistant
102 embrane clearance was determined by dividing daptomycin effluent by serum concentrations and multiply
106 f E. faecium isolated from rectal swabs from daptomycin-exposed patients was compared to a control gr
112 actice of switching early from vancomycin to daptomycin for the treatment of MRSAB when the vancomyci
113 pective cohort study comparing linezolid and daptomycin for the treatment of VRE-BSI among Veterans A
116 sporus, is the active ingredient of Cubicin (daptomycin-for-injection), a first-in-class antibiotic a
118 imilar to the clinically approved antibiotic daptomycin from Streptomyces roseosporus, but has notabl
119 We hypothesized that the intravenous use of daptomycin generates off-target selection for resistance
120 y was observed, and bacteremia resolved with daptomycin, gentamicin, and/or linezolid treatment.
124 t bacteremia were significantly lower in the daptomycin group compared to the vancomycin group (3.5%
127 ncomycin arm and $110,920 in the combination Daptomycin group; however, no statistical significance w
130 solates from patients who had never received daptomycin, higher daptomycin MICs tracked with increase
131 78; 95% CI, .55-.90; P = .012) and high-dose daptomycin (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, .41-.84; P = .006) were as
133 reus isolates, and two major errors (ME) for daptomycin in an S. aureus and a Staphylococcus epidermi
136 ferring increased tolerance of linezolid and daptomycin in patients who were treated with these antib
137 We report here our experience with high-dose daptomycin in the treatment of 25 cases of CIED endocard
138 safety of vancomycin, compared with that of daptomycin, in the treatment of MRSA BSIs with a high va
146 y have proposed that calcium ions binding to daptomycin is a precondition for membrane interaction.
150 ium in a hospital system where resistance to daptomycin is evolving despite standard interventions.
153 Use of an empiric fixed dose of 750 mg of daptomycin is predicted to achieve a comparable PTA with
155 daptomycin, with significant regrowth in the daptomycin killing assay compared to the treatment-naive
157 cent lipid probes, we showed that binding of daptomycin led to a drastic rearrangement of fluid lipid
159 ver, alternative agents, such as telavancin, daptomycin, linezolid, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritava
160 SA isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline, daptomycin, linezolid, minocyline, tigecycline, rifampin
161 he isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline, daptomycin, linezolid, nitrofurantoin, quinupristin-dalf
163 IC (P = 0.012) and a significant decrease in daptomycin MIC (P = 0.03) by year of study for Etest res
165 and gdpD alleles of isolate R712 raised the daptomycin MIC for isolate S613 to 12 mug per milliliter
172 (MIC(50), 0.50 mug/mL; MIC(/90), 1 mug/mL), daptomycin (MIC(50), 0.25 mug/mL; MIC(90), 0.5 mug/mL),
173 tly improved in vitro activity compared with daptomycin (MIC90 0.5 vs 2 mug/mL) against Clostridium d
175 study investigated "creep" in vancomycin and daptomycin MICs among methicillin-resistant Staphylococc
177 In a multivariate logistic regression model, daptomycin MICs of 3-4 microg/mL (odds ratio [OR], 4.7 [
179 hat patients with E. faecium BSIs exhibiting daptomycin MICs of 3-4 microg/mL treated with daptomycin
181 ts who had never received daptomycin, higher daptomycin MICs tracked with increased resistance to kil
184 vitro was the strongest predictor of higher daptomycin MICs within the daptomycin-susceptible range.
187 eviously showed that E. faecium strains with daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in t
189 currence compared with patients treated with daptomycin monotherapy after adjusting for confounding v
193 o membranes containing phosphatidylglycerol, daptomycin no longer forms pores or translocates to the
196 wo isolates were vancomycin intermediate and daptomycin nonsusceptible, and two isolates had reduced
197 inezolid-resistant Enterococcus (n = 5), and daptomycin-nonsusceptible Enterococcus faecalis (n = 6).
201 a LiaR-regulated protein, LiaX, that senses daptomycin or AMPs and triggers protective CM remodeling
203 ncomycin patients and 9 (9.68%)/1 (1.08%) of Daptomycin patients, respectively (P < 0.02 and P = 1.00
207 vasive MRSA infections.Patients treated with daptomycin plus a beta-lactam for MRSA bloodstream infec
208 standard therapy (intravenous vancomycin or daptomycin) plus an antistaphylococcal beta-lactam (intr
209 significantly increased susceptibilities to daptomycin, polymyxin B, and two prototypical HD-CAPs (h
210 ollective findings lead us to propose that a daptomycin pore consists of two aligned tetramers in opp
211 This shift may have had a greater effect on daptomycin prescribing (-160 DOT/1000 patient-days; 95%
216 tration-time profiles were simulated for two daptomycin regimens (8 mg/kg every 48 hrs and 4 mg/kg ev
221 We performed a cohort study in which the daptomycin resistance of E. faecium isolated from rectal
222 ere was also greater phenotypic diversity in daptomycin resistance within daptomycin-exposed patients
223 gle cls2 point mutations were sufficient for daptomycin resistance, antibiotic treatment failure, and
224 , no association with persistent bacteremia, daptomycin resistance, or bacterial genotype was observe
229 The emergence and clinical significance of daptomycin-resistant enterococci and evolving microbiolo
230 at controls cell envelope homeostasis), from daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis not only reve
231 effect was also seen in a clinical strain of daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, using a murin
232 ompared with isolate S613, isolate R712--the daptomycin-resistant isolate--had changes in the structu
233 l (4 and 8 microg/ml(-1)) laboratory-derived daptomycin-resistant strains (strains CB1541 and CB1540
236 gher risk of treatment failure compared with daptomycin (risk ratio [RR], 1.37; 95% confidence interv
237 chieved high peak concentrations to maximize daptomycin's concentration-dependent activity, and resul
239 ntimicrobial therapy, but before exposure to daptomycin, showed subtle physiological changes in respo
241 oth mutants displayed reduced vancomycin and daptomycin susceptibility and phenotypic alterations (eg
242 Currently, there is debate over whether the daptomycin susceptibility breakpoint for enterococci (ie
243 stant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), in vitro daptomycin susceptibility could be influenced by exposur
251 e was 1.5%-5.5% when the MIC was 4 mg/L (ie, daptomycin-susceptible) and 91.0%-97.9% when the MIC was
252 Combinations of CF-301 with vancomycin or daptomycin synergized in vitro and increased survival si
254 54145 is a lipopeptide antibiotic related to daptomycin that permeabilizes bacterial cell membranes.
255 phase route to the synthesis of an analog of daptomycin that uses a reduced number of alpha-azido ami
256 oped a novel Caenorhabditis elegans model of daptomycin therapy and showed that disrupting LiaR-media
257 isolate predicted microbiological failure of daptomycin therapy, suggesting that modification in the
265 lity was significantly lower among high-dose daptomycin-treated patients compared with other dosing s
266 rence of infection, was numerically lower in daptomycin-treated subjects (31% vs 17%; P = .084) and w
267 of 60-day mortality between vancomycin- and daptomycin-treated subjects found a higher probability o
269 tive cholestyramine could enable therapeutic daptomycin treatment in the bloodstream, while preventin
274 istance to last resort drugs, vancomycin and daptomycin, using a novel, single cell, nanoscale techni
277 stematically evaluated 5 methods for testing daptomycin versus 48 Enterococcus faecalis, 51 Enterococ
278 m of our study was to compare meropenem plus daptomycin versus ceftazidime in the treatment of nosoco
279 s is the first matched study comparing early daptomycin versus vancomycin for the treatment of MRSAB
280 atment failure, via blinded adjudication, in daptomycin- vs vancomycin-treated subjects and the inter
282 total of 7.7 +/- 0.6 mg/kg (mean +/- sd) of daptomycin was administered, resulting in an observed pe
285 y of 246 patients with S. aureus bacteremia, daptomycin was not inferior to vancomycin or an antistap
286 o serious adverse event related to high-dose daptomycin was observed and no patient required disconti
290 py, and susceptibilities to tPMP, hNP-1, and daptomycin were compared using univariate and multivaria
291 o previously known antiviral activity (e.g., daptomycin) were identified as inhibitors of ZIKV infect
292 Frontline MRSA treatments, vancomycin and daptomycin, were unable to eradicate MRSA biofilms or no
293 lele from isolate R712 quadrupled the MIC of daptomycin, whereas replacement of the gdpD allele had n
294 ient defence mechanism that protects against daptomycin, which can be compromised by Agr-triggered to
296 careful circular dichroism (CD) analyses of daptomycin with Ca(2+) and PG-containing membranes, we f
297 study compared the clinical effectiveness of daptomycin with that of vancomycin for the treatment of
298 opy to directly visualize the interaction of daptomycin with the model Gram-positive bacterium Bacill
300 subtle physiological changes in response to daptomycin, with significant regrowth in the daptomycin