ライフサイエンスコーパス: dark current

1 e crystal surface leakage current and device dark current.

2 all size features without degradation of the dark current.

3 devices to obtain high photocurrent and low dark current.

4 manding a comprehensive understanding of the dark current.

5 iative and radiative components of the diode dark current.

6 was employed to reduce both bulk and surface dark currents.

7 and reduced single rod photosensitivity and dark currents.

8 external quantum efficiency (200%), ultralow dark current (10(-12) A), and high on-off ratio (10(3)).

9 n Mn-doped Ga2O3 thin films takes on a lower dark current, a higher sensitivity, and a faster photore

10 we provide insight into how a deficit in the dark current affects the health and function of photorec

11 -/-) mouse rods also showed little change in dark current and a large and significant decrease in the

12 This new property reduces the dark current and carrier trap density and increases the

13 nd to light directly, they maintain a normal dark current and continue to mediate visual signaling by

14 olar cell flash responses, suppressed inward dark current and decreased input conductance.

15 Recovery of dark current and flash sensitivity in individual intact

16 Somewhat surprisingly, dark current and light sensitivity were normal in indivi

17 t may also be obtained by the measurement of dark current and photocurrent when repeatedly lowering t

18 ponses to appear light adapted, with reduced dark current and sensitivity and faster response kinetic

19 can be calculated through the measurement of dark current and sensitivity with an easy-to-follow prac

20 gous (D+/+) for this mutation have decreased dark current and sensitivity, reduced Ca(2+), and accele

21 raps and charge-transfer states as source of dark current and show that traps dominate the generation

22 m both sexes recover as much as 15% of their dark current and that responses can persist for hours.

23 d on a statistical model that correlates the dark current and the X-ray induced photocurrent with the

24 rge surface-to-volume ratio also ensures low dark current and thus low thermal noise, compared to nar

25 demanding active ion transport maintains the dark current and where NO presumably activates guanylate

26 This, combined with the low and stable dark currents and high linear X-ray attenuation coeffici

27 fied photodetectors have significantly lower dark-currents and higher on-currents.

28 over this wide spectral range and reduce the dark current (and noise) to values well below dark curre

29 The relation between open-circuit voltage, dark current, and noise current is demonstrated using fo

30 mitting diodes a high response speed and low dark current, and they are widely used in communications

31 thin film X-ray diffraction result in a high dark current, and thus a low V(oc).

32 including sample/buffer rescaling, detector dark current, and, within a narrow range, hydration laye

33 ent scattering/absorption, autofluorescence, dark currents, and excitation background.

34 ity of 0.31 A/W), 3 GHz bandwidth, and 30 nA dark current at a reverse bias of 30 V.

35 at Hammerhead operates stably at 300 kV with dark current below 10 muA.

36 tectivities approaching 10(13) Jones, with a dark current below 10(-7) A cm(-2) up to -5 V.

37 The induction of prolonged dark currents by intense blue light could be suppressed

38 espectively, were extracted from the forward dark current characteristics.

39 te flash induced a small amplitude prolonged dark current composed of discrete unitary currents simil

40 urrent generated via charge-transfer states, dark current contains a major contribution from trap-ass

41 factors close to unity, and state-of-the-art dark current densities for Ge-based materials.

42 At -5 V reverse bias, the dark current densities of the diodes were measured to be

43 ived rods maintained near normal saturating (dark) current densities by developing abnormally high ra

44 rnal quantum efficiency) of 35% (>1 mum) and dark current density < 400 nA cm(-2), a >25% increase in

45 ycrystalline films significantly reduces the dark current density by more than 200 times to subnanoam

46 -2), a >25% increase in EQE and >90% reduced dark current density compared to the reference device.

47 At 150K, the photodetectors exhibit a dark current density of 1.8 x 10(-10) A/cm(2) and a quan

48 ter and the photodetector device shows a low dark current density of 2x10(-6) A cm(-2) at -0.8 V reve

49 With a dark current density of 5.3 x 10(-4) A/cm(2) under -20 m

50 double electron barrier design results in a dark current density of 6.3 x 10(-6) A/cm(2) at 77 K.

51 transport of majority carriers to reduce the dark current density of the device.

52 Steady-state dark current density versus applied potential and open c

53 The dark current density versus bias (JV) response of nitroa

54 elength infrared photodetectors with reduced dark current density were demonstrated.

55 is molecular design, we are able to suppress dark current density while retaining high responsivity i

56 The saturation dark current density, J(S), is an important factor in de

57 due to the interdependency of photogain and dark current density.

58 how that the shot noise, proportional to the dark current, dominates the noise spectral density, dema

59 ponse is orders of magnitude higher than the dark current for the same d and bias, with very differen

60 hort-wavelength IR photodetectors (EQE < 5%, dark current > 10,000 nA cm(-2)).

61 ities and quantum efficiencies, with similar dark currents, hence showing better dynamic range and de

62 Dark current in nof cones is also normal, but it is inse

63 a few 10 s of %, few-GHz bandwidths, and low dark currents, in devices with loaded Qs in the range of

64 In contrast, the dark current is activated and injection limited due to a

65 0) Jones (-2 volts) at 1200 nanometers and a dark current J(d) of just 2.3 x 10(-6) ampere per square

66 ed: capacitance, implied depletion width and dark current measurements as functions of applied bias a

67 trochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and dark current measurements.

68 We recorded the dark current noise of individual salamander L cones.

69 ark current (and noise) to values well below dark currents obtained in narrow-band photodetectors mad

70 r on beta-Ga(2)O(3) layer shows an ultra-low dark current of 800 fA at zero bias.

71 illumination, and therefore combines the low dark current of a photodiode and the high responsivity o

72 We explore the dependence of the dark current of C(60)-based organic photovoltaic (OPV) c

73 By modeling the dark current of several donor-acceptor systems, we revea

74 olymers, which can significantly depress the dark current of the polymer photodetectors with little a

75 tum efficiency of ~15% at ~1450 nm and a low dark current of ~10(-2) mA/cm(2).

76 water splitting over 5 mA cm(-2) before the dark current onset, which originated from the large surf

77 y high bandwidth, zero source-drain bias and dark current operation, and good internal quantum effici

78 nt reaches as high as ~ 10(-4) A (a photo-to-dark current ratio of ~ 10(7)) and remains close to this

79 rected responsivity (without contribution of dark current) reaches up to 85~88% (VIS) and 26~40% (NIR

80 ated from such mice, despite having a normal dark current, recovered from a light flash markedly fast

81 The initial rate of dark current recovery after 12% rhodopsin bleach was thr

82 We measured tonic activity in light and dark, current responses to changes in luminous intensity

83 noise component contributed 0.022 pA2 to the dark current, roughly equal to the discrete noise varian

84 kinetics of the recovery of the prestimulus dark current that are sensitive to duration and frequenc

85 depositions; however, they suffer from large dark currents that are tens to hundreds times higher tha

86 reased metabolic demand associated with the "dark current." The inner retina had higher MEMRI activit

87 eration of hybrid detectors demonstrates low dark current under electric fields needed for high sensi

88 The model accurately describes the dark current, V(OC) and the long-debated ideality factor

89 e dark events accounted for 73% of the total dark current variance in the native (A2) state and 46% i

90 inties because of the buffer subtraction and dark currents, we find excellent agreement to experiment

91 rber size, and the resulting capacitance and dark current, while maintaining high quantum efficiency.

92 ln J versus E(1/2) is linear for both PC and dark current, with very different magnitudes and slopes.