戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  providing direct patient care, or attending day care.
2 , and living with young children who were in day care.
3 ren present, or the number of hours spent in day care.
4 olerance and impose a burden on families and day care.
5  procedure via an open surgical procedure in day care.
6 udy site's primary care center or usual same-day care.
7 l emergency departments for referral to next-day care.
8 n in throat isolates from children attending day care.
9 he nasopharynx of healthy children attending day care.
10 rticipants who provided a DBS sample from 30 day cares, 22 primary schools, and 11 secondary schools.
11 ndividuals, with 354 participants (22%) from day cares, 725 (44%) from primary schools, and 553 (34%)
12        The new practice was well accepted by day care and kitchen personnel.
13 relations between various characteristics of day care and lower respiratory illness (LRI) in a cohort
14                            Implementation of day care and school entry requirements for varicella vac
15      We reviewed progress toward adoption of day care and school entry requirements in each state and
16                        Food allergy diets in day care and schools decreased by half.
17 cluding REDP 33, which was exhibited by both day care and sporadic-case isolates.
18 nzae throat isolates from children attending day care, and 32 NT H. influenzae nasopharyngeal clinica
19             Other factors, such as age, sex, day care, and a history of recurrent AOM, did not influe
20     Few infants (5%, or 86 infants) attended day care, and carriage prevalence was 22% (353 infants).
21 n were more likely to be formula fed, attend day care, and experience wheezing.
22 s, farm animals, farming, visit to a stable, day care, and exposure to antibiotics during the first w
23 ing road dust, were assigned to residential, day care, and school addresses by using dispersion model
24 road traffic were estimated for residential, day care, and school addresses from birth and onward usi
25 children in the United States participate in day care, and these children are considered to be at hig
26                We identified family, school, day-care, and other social contacts and notified these p
27 ren with older siblings and those who attend day care are at increased risk for infections, which in
28 healthy children aged 2 to 6 years attending day care at the study area in northern Finland and parti
29                                         Next-day care at the study site's primary care center or usua
30                                              Day care attendance also increased risk (RR = 1.56, 95%
31 tivariate models adjusted for breastfeeding, day care attendance and maternal atopy, higher counts of
32 ivariate logistic model, cumulative hours of day care attendance and number of lower respiratory infe
33 hma at the age of seven, cumulative hours of day care attendance and reported respiratory infections
34               An inverse association between day care attendance and risk of type 1 diabetes was foun
35 at reported a measure of association between day care attendance and risk of type 1 diabetes were inc
36 or studies assessing the association between day care attendance and risk of type 1 diabetes.
37 iation measure was day care attendance vs no day care attendance and risk of type 1 diabetes.
38              These results demonstrated that day care attendance appears to be associated with a redu
39                  In the univariate analyses, day care attendance at 12 months was associated with an
40 sex, lower respiratory tract infections, and day care attendance for transient wheeze; paternal histo
41 on the basis of a parental history of atopy, day care attendance in early life is inversely associate
42                                              Day care attendance in early life was associated with a
43                             We conclude that day care attendance is an important risk factor for LRI
44 sted that exposure to infections measured by day care attendance may be important in the pathogenesis
45 vary with respect to the reported effects of day care attendance on childhood asthma.
46        The principal association measure was day care attendance vs no day care attendance and risk o
47                       The LRI rate ratio for day care attendance was 2.0 (95% confidence interval = 1
48 shold of greater than 37.5 hours per week of day care attendance was associated with a lower risk of
49                                              Day care attendance was associated with a threefold risk
50 contact with other children (older siblings, day care attendance).
51 ental history of asthma, male sex, siblings, day care attendance, exposure to tobacco smoke or molds,
52  asthma further increased the rate ratio for day care attendance.
53 ansient early wheezing except for parity and day care attendance.
54 d atopic multiple-trigger wheeze and between day-care attendance and nonatopic uncontrolled wheeze in
55  sex, race and ethnicity, any breastfeeding, day-care attendance during infancy, exposure to second-h
56                            Low birth-weight, day-care attendance, and recent eye symptoms were indepe
57 S-associated isolate and an isolate from one day care attendee who did not develop HUS.
58                               A total of 149 day care attendees (aged 24-60 months) and their familie
59  about meningococcal meningitis, families of day care attendees were notified, and 10 children from t
60                                              Day care-attending unvaccinated children in PnCRM7 commu
61                            Relative to no 30-day care, basic follow-up care was associated with an in
62 accinations in early childhood, and starting day care between 1.5 and 3 years of age might prevent or
63 duce the high prevalence of allergy diets in day care by reforming the practices for inquiring about
64 e nasopharyngeal cultures recovered from 942 day care center (DCC) attendees in Lisbon, Portugal, 591
65 break strains from a Texas jail and Maryland day care center and 16 reference strains from Texas, Mar
66 n counties other than those inhabited by the day care center and sporadic-case individuals.
67 al E. coli O157:H7 isolates from symptomatic day care center attendees revealed that the REDPs of 25
68 entrations in air from apartment, office and day care center buildings were 93, 3700, and 660 pg/m(3)
69  (REDPs) (93 to 98% similarity) among the 39 day care center isolates and nine XbaI REDPs (63 to 93%
70 dic case), and Shiga toxin production by the day care center isolates was not significantly different
71  geographic region and demonstrated that the day care center outbreak and a HUS case in 1995 were cau
72 es of E. coli O157:H7 isolates from both the day care center outbreak and sporadic cases by CHEF-PFGE
73 i O157:H7, including 39 isolates from a 1994 day care center outbreak, 28 isolates from 18 individual
74 ave originated from travelers, community and day care center outbreaks, and persons infected with the
75  direct bacteriologic cultures of items in a day care center were conducted, which demonstrated high
76 s and pattern IV was associated with another day care center, suggesting different outbreaks.
77  a varicella outbreak in a highly vaccinated day-care center (DCC) population in Pennsylvania was inv
78 ooled analysis reinforce the hypothesis that day-care center attendance in infancy and prolonged brea
79                                              Day-care center attendance in the first year of life was
80 y stimulation of the immune system, that is, day-care center attendance, birth order, maternally repo
81 tricted to children who were enrolled in the day-care center continuously during the outbreak and att
82 proportion of vaccinees who were attending a day-care center in a small community in New Hampshire.
83                                   Closure of day care centers (DCCs) to contain the COVID-19 pandemic
84 130 children attending outpatient clinics or day care centers (P < .001).
85 ong persons in community settings, including day care centers and correctional facilities, and among
86 lchildren aged 1- to 9-year-old, from public day care centers and elementary schools in the municipal
87 f transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in day care centers and schools is low.
88                                   Closure of day care centers has been implemented globally to contai
89 oniae clones were previously identified from day care centers in Portugal, primarily on the basis of
90  from August 1, 2020, to May 31, 2021, at 50 day care centers in the Oulu region of Finland.
91 nd 2 days to screen attendees and staff from day care centers in the state of Hesse, Germany, for bot
92 ndomized controlled trial was conducted at 9 day care centers in Wuerzburg, Germany, from October 202
93                                MRSA in child day care centers indicates accelerated spread of MRSA in
94   Plasmid pattern I infections occurred in 8 day care centers over a 6-month period, suggesting sprea
95 a vaccine administered to children attending day care centers was conducted during the 1996-1997 wint
96  mathematical model for SARS-CoV-2 spread in day care centers was developed to identify optimal surve
97 ial, surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 in 9 German day care centers was feasible and well accepted.
98  RNA in children and staff members attending day care centers was rare in the context of limited comm
99                                Participating day care centers were assigned to different surveillance
100 (SARS-CoV-2) ongoing in Europe in June 2020, day care centers were reopened in the state of Hesse, Ge
101 e lifestyle guidance and management forms at day care centers" (life management guidance forms) for u
102 onths-8 years) and 376 staff members from 50 day care centers, which were chosen representatively fro
103 ing can minimize the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in day care centers.
104 ng was used to estimate SARS-CoV-2 spread in day care centers.
105 as detected in 2 staff members from distinct day care centers.
106 te to the varicella incidence in schools and day care centers.
107 ase clinic attendees, and children attending day care centers.
108 by health care providers or from schools and day care centers.
109  visual acuity testing in children attending day care centers.
110 dy was to compare allergen concentrations in day-care centers (DCC) with those in private homes.
111    Epinephrine is also underused by parents, day-care centers and schools.
112 res on practices concerning special diets in day care centres and allergy knowledge were collected fr
113 dren, and the prevalence of allergy diets in day care centres decreased by 43% to 4.3% (IQ range 3.05
114 The new form was implemented into 40 Finnish day care centres in the capital region in 2013-2015.
115 days with chemotherapy being administered in day care centres, where unusual home pathogens can be en
116 onse of 104 healthy children, recruited from day-care centres and schools, to 12 different berry prod
117     Participants included children attending day care, childcare workers, and household members.
118      These results indicate that vaccinating day care children against influenza helps reduce influen
119 ons to assess the full effect of vaccinating day care children against influenza.
120 d contacts (n = 120) of influenza-vaccinated day care children had 42% fewer febrile respiratory illn
121                          Whether vaccinating day care children reduces household transmission of infl
122 hildren through home visits, group meetings, day care, community events, service provision, and liais
123 contacts with microbes in children attending day care compared with children who do not attend day ca
124           We randomly assigned household and day-care contacts, 2 to 40 years of age, in Almaty, Kaza
125 cts, 10 of 32 school-bus riders, and 9 of 61 day-care contacts.
126                    Patients assigned to next-day care did not demonstrate clinically important disadv
127         Depending on duration of attendance, day care during infancy can either increase or reduce ri
128 ngs at home and in relation to attendance at day care during infancy.
129 l, 0.7 to 1.0; P=0.04), as did attendance at day care during the first six months of life (adjusted r
130 usted HR, 2.24 [95% CI, 1.67-3.02]), started day care early or late (before 18 months: adjusted HR, 1
131                               Moreover, the "day care" effect at some loci was accounted for by the i
132 ing asthma, although the mechanism for this "day care" effect is largely unknown.
133                            Implementation of day care entry requirements in 2000 or earlier was assoc
134 verage by state to year of implementation of day care entry requirements.
135 HPyV10), breastfeeding (CMV), younger age at day-care entry (BKPyV, KIPyV, WUPyV, TSPyV, HPyV10, HPyV
136 e of additional risk factors associated with day care environment.
137    This cohort study of children in a single day care examines their ability to correctly identify em
138     We investigated the interactions between day care exposure in the 1st 6 mo of life and genotypes
139 o acquired the disease through contacts at 2 day care facilities (attack rate, 88.1 per 1000); and (3
140 ivers, 1.7 (95% CI, 1.5-1.7) for children in day care facilities, and 1.6 (95% CI, 1.4-1.8) for child
141 or rural districts, cities or rural regions, day care facilities, classrooms (ie, primary, elementary
142 sporadic if it was reported from a school or day care facility >6 weeks after or >/=10 days before ot
143 yed at home compared with those who attended day care for >36 months was 1.32 (95% confidence interva
144 t each 4-month period, although 59% had a 90-day care gap; 44% had VS, 24% had viral nonsuppression,
145                                              Day-care histories were censored at the age of diagnosis
146                                              Day-care histories were examined in a case-control study
147                                              Day care hours and number of respiratory infections were
148 iabetes was 15% lower in the group attending day care; however, the difference was not statistically
149 ng children with maternal history of asthma, day care in early life had no protective effect on asthm
150                           Children attending day care in the 1st year of life have lower risks for de
151             We examined the relation between day care in the first year of life and asthma, recurrent
152                Among all study participants, day care in the first year of life was inversely associa
153 are compared with children who do not attend day care may explain these findings.
154                    Prior experience in adult day care may lessen this association.
155 o study questions arising through the day-to-day care of critically ill patients.
156 ormatics to support clinicians in the day-to-day care of older adults.
157  0.04-0.93; P = .041) and children attending day care (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.84; P = .029) had a d
158 0); older siblings, OR 0.79 (0.63-0.99); and day care, OR 0.81 (0.63-1.06) were protective factors.
159        Old allergy attitudes persisted among day care personnel, indicating the need for continuous e
160 of updated allergy knowledge was noted among day care personnel.
161 dees were notified, and 10 children from the day care presented for evaluation.
162 der children at home or to other children at day care protects against the development of asthma and
163 ry of asthma influences the relation between day care-related exposures and childhood asthma.
164  becoming infected were 35.4 times those for day-care/school contacts (95% confidence interval (CI):
165  authors prospectively studied household and day-care/school contacts of cases in Almaty, Kazakhstan.
166 , they lived in the community and were using day care services a mean 1.7 days per week.
167  a nursing home, sometimes after using adult day care services.
168   Rate ratios were similar regardless of the day care setting, number of other children present, or t
169 safe, immunogenic, and nontransmissible in a day care setting.
170               The burden of allergy diets in day care settings could be decreased by simple pragmatic
171 hood quality, natural settings, schools, and day care settings.
172 lness, number of siblings, and attendance at day care showed an increase in the rate of all RI in inf
173 age and were recruited from primary care and day care sites in the St Louis metropolitan area; they w
174 originally ascertained from primary care and day care sites in the St. Louis area and then underwent
175                                            A day care teacher presented with complaints of headache,
176  (at four polymorphisms in three loci) with "day care" that had an effect on early-life immune phenot
177 cline upon nursing home placement, but prior day care use also attenuated this association.
178 his study was to examine the associations of day care use and nursing home placement with the rate of
179                                              Day care use at baseline was not related to cognitive de
180 ing home placement such that higher level of day care use substantially reduced association of placem
181  abstracted from medical records and data on day care use, respiratory symptoms, and physician diagno
182                                Attendance at day care was a risk factor for asymptomatic rotavirus in
183 dinal carriage data from Israeli toddlers in day care, we found a lower risk of colonization with typ
184 the odds ratios for 1-18 and 19-36 months of day care were 1.74 (95% CI: 0.89, 3.42) and 1.32 (95% CI
185  history of allergies and having children in day care were found to be related to the symptom of a ru
186  of 827 children aged 1 to 6 years attending day care were included.
187 ore exposure to other children at home or at day care were more likely to have frequent wheezing at t
188 al infections among COAST children attending day care, whereas interactions at other loci were indepe
189 e the US, exposure to reptiles and attending day-care with another child with diarrhea.
190  samples) and from the homes of children and day-care workers (602 samples) using electrostatic dust

 
Page Top