戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 onally cold days (low temperatures and short day lengths).
2 n clock and can adapt to seasonal changes of day length.
3 dulation of sickness behaviors by changes in day length.
4 reversed by a discrete environmental signal, day length.
5 melatonin secretion, which continue to track day length.
6 ays, is modulated by the circadian clock and day length.
7 ith absolute day length than with changes in day length.
8 otes flowering of Arabidopsis in response to day length.
9  AMI was reported according to a standard 90-day length.
10 icient to trigger flowering, irrespective of day length.
11 velopmental arrest induced by short autumnal day length.
12 cking midday across conditions with variable day length.
13 lowering is triggered by seasonal changes in day length.
14 n of PCH1 shortens hypocotyls independent of day length.
15 ) to promote floral induction in response to day length.
16 s of cell proliferation following increasing day length.
17  plants to keep track of seasonal changes in day length.
18 e to the interaction between temperature and day length.
19 nes whose effects are strongly influenced by day length.
20 , carry ZmCCT alleles with no sensitivity to day length.
21 amus and regulate photoperiodic responses to day length.
22          There were strong associations with day-length.
23 n response to cool temperatures and/or short day-length.
24 pression and precipitation, temperature, and day-length.
25 nd reactivity following acclimation to short day lengths.
26 wing prolonged exposure to short winter-like day lengths.
27 ransfer from static long day to static short day lengths.
28 ed with reproductive refractoriness to short day lengths.
29  triggered by exposing plants to appropriate day lengths.
30 them to misinterpret the salience of current day lengths.
31 hich is recentred on solar noon for changing day lengths.
32 ctive axis repression in response to shorter day lengths.
33 maize-teosinte mapping population under long day lengths.
34 stication selection for adaptation to longer day lengths.
35  coupling strengths associated with seasonal day-lengths.
36           By contrast, intermediate-duration day lengths (12.5-14 h long) either accelerate reproduct
37 tion of circadian clock function to changing day length,(2-4) and its dysregulation is associated wit
38 s exposed for 2 or more weeks to long summer day lengths acquired a long-day photoperiodic history th
39                     For each infant, average day length (ADL) was calculated during different cumulat
40                Finally, we show how seasonal day-length, after-effects to light entrainment and seaso
41                                              Day length and ambient temperature are major stimuli con
42                          Our results suggest day length and diurnal temperature changes combine to mo
43 -induced hypocotyl elongation depends on the day length and light intensity.
44                     In response to shortened day length and lower temperatures, female Cx. pipiense p
45 his work, examining the relationship between day length and ovarian function in two large samples of
46 ic timing mechanisms to detect variations in day length and temperature as the seasons progress.
47 ndigenous to Afro-equatorial regions wherein day length and temperature exhibit little fluctuation th
48 lants perceive environmental signals such as day length and temperature to determine optimal timing f
49 tween elevation and latitude (seasonality in day length and temperature) seems more plausible.
50 ch promotes early flowering under decreasing day length and temperature.
51 led conditions mimicking seasonal changes in day length and temperature.
52 rongly influenced by environmental cues like day length and temperature.
53 e of the circadian clock to sense changes in day length and to mediate a diverse number of photoperio
54  Many organisms monitor the annual change in day length and use this information for the timing of th
55 mperature fluctuations, average temperature, day length and vernalization influence the flowering tim
56  modest alterations in entrainment to static day lengths and fails to interfere with seasonal respons
57 ers are influenced only by relatively recent day lengths and melatonin signals and ignore earlier one
58 roductive responses to intermediate-duration day lengths and melatonin signals.
59 d early flowering under both short- and long-day lengths and provided evidence for at least two disti
60 Despite the potential constraints of reduced day lengths and sea surface temperatures in winter, guil
61 ut 6 months, and we suggest that stimulatory day lengths and the proliferation of nesting substrates
62 d, to measure accurately seasonal changes in day-length and regulate the expression of several key fl
63 icators of seasonal change, such as changing day-length and temperature, leads to expression of FLOWE
64 rception of seasonal cues such as changes in day-length and temperature.
65 ments, responding to changes in photoperiod (day length) and temperature.
66 in a manner that depends on the photoperiod (day length) and temperature.
67 l glucosinolates varied with temperature and day length, and contents of quercetin and kaempferol wer
68 ith increasing values of day length, squared day length, and mean air temperature-however without sta
69 anels in the field under both short and long day lengths, and of a maize-teosinte mapping population
70                              Many plants use day length as an environmental cue to ensure proper timi
71                 Plants use photoperiod (i.e. day length) as a seasonal cue for timing when to flower.
72                                              Day-length assessment involves the photoperiodic control
73 s a problem because there is no variation in day length at the Equator.
74 and the period length is correlated with the day length at the latitude of origin, implying the adapt
75 secretion is the endocrine representation of day length, but nothing is known about how long it takes
76 xhibited testicular regression in shortening day lengths, but only IGL-intact hamsters exhibited seas
77                Herein, we discuss the use of day length by animals at physiological and genetic level
78 cal processes, known to be synchronized with day length by the circadian rhythm, were also affected b
79 isation treatment because of temperature and day length changes.
80       The perception of the seasonal cues of day-length changes and exposure to cold influences flowe
81                          Many plants monitor day-length changes throughout the year and use the infor
82                         Artificial lighting, day-length changes, shift work, and transmeridian travel
83 t, as well as early flowering, regardless of day length conditions.
84 s, in plants grown under different light and day-length conditions, and in plants overexpressing spli
85 mperature (15 degrees C) and short day (12-h day length) conditions.
86             Most mammals use changing annual day-length cycles to regulate pineal melatonin secretion
87                    Concomitantly, prolonging day length decreased the uptake of fatty acids from trig
88 hanistically, we demonstrated that prolonged day length decreases sympathetic input into BAT and redu
89                       PHYC also controls the day-length dependence of leaf size as the effect of day
90 s, we propose a model whereby the light- and day length-dependent interaction between FKF1 and COP1 c
91  timing of the evening peak of activity in a day length-dependent manner.
92 discrimination, the mechanism that generates day-length-dependent CO expression remains unknown.
93               Here, we report a study of the day-length-dependent response of cryptochrome 2 (cry2) a
94                          Photoperiodism is a day-length-dependent seasonal change of physiological or
95 amsters to measure and respond to changes in day length depends upon accurate photoentrainment of the
96 n this issue Stoleru et al. demonstrate that day length determines which clock dominates the neural c
97                 Individuals under decreasing day length developed slower and grew to a bigger size.
98  (60 d) experiments, daily rhythm phases and day lengths differed significantly between hive temperat
99 form precisely, which in turn is crucial for day-length discrimination by Arabidopsis.
100 NSTANS (CO) gene expression is necessary for day-length discrimination for photoperiodic flowering.
101 lling CO expression is clearly a key step in day-length discrimination, the mechanism that generates
102    For example, at low temperature and short day-length, Drosophila melanogaster enters a state calle
103             Results revealed that increasing day length duration predicts increased ovulation rate an
104  in preterm infants, we investigated whether day length during early gestation was associated with se
105                                 Depending on day length, either M cells (short days) or E cells (long
106                          Additionally, short day lengths enhanced the withdrawal of parasympathetic c
107 conditions (temperature, water availability, day length, etc.).
108  programmed for diapause (reared under short day lengths) fat storage was dramatically reduced and th
109 e Siberian hamsters utilize the decrement in day length following the summer solstice to implement ph
110 udy shows that in cannabis, CO is critically-day-length-gated (CDL) and down-regulated by short days,
111 s daily photic inputs and encodes changes in day length (i.e., photoperiod), but the SCN circuits tha
112 easonal reproductive cycles is the change in day length (i.e., photoperiod), encoded by the pattern o
113 hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) exposed to long day lengths (i.e., summer) or short day (SD) lengths (i.
114 nd buds in response to cold temperatures and day length in a manner that is relative to the level of
115 ol flowering time: such as the perception of day length in leaves, which leads to the production of a
116                We also studied the effect of day length in the presence of glucose on a DeltasigB Del
117 be higher in multiple brain regions in short day lengths in meadow voles, but we found no concomitant
118            To test the hypothesis that short day lengths increase parasympathetic and sympathetic ton
119                                        Short day lengths increased both parasympathetic tone, as meas
120 is hyposensitive to red light and exhibits a day length-independent early flowering phenotype.
121  seasonally breeding vertebrates, changes in day length induce categorically distinct behavioral and
122 ing mechanisms, which breaks from prevailing day length-induced gene expression.
123  propose an implementation that incorporates day length information (DL) in the prediction process fo
124                                   Plants use day-length information to coordinate flowering time with
125         In temperate regions, the shortening day length informs many insect species to prepare for wi
126 nded period of cold to promote flowering and day length-insensitive crops able to exploit the longer,
127  long-day flowering response pathway through day-length-insensitive alleles of the PHOTOPERIOD1 gene,
128                                              Day length is a key indicator of seasonal information th
129 he time of year when responsiveness to short-day length is re-established.
130                                 Photoperiod (day length) is a cue used by many seasonal breeders to p
131                         Results suggest that day length may contribute to observed variance in women'
132 CO protein are crucial mechanisms for proper day-length measurement in photoperiodic flowering.
133                  Mice exposed to a prolonged day length of 16- and 24-h light, compared with regular
134 ndary outcomes included initial and total 30-day length of stay (LOS), emergency department (ED) visi
135 gher hospital charge and an increased 2(1/2)-day length of stay vs patients younger than 65 years.
136 ients, with a minimal complication rate, a 2-day length of stay, and good intermediate results.
137 tern US with median 50-patient census and 28-day length of stay.
138 onsistent with the independent regulation by day length of the several behavioral and physiological t
139                                    The short day lengths of late summer program the mosquito Culex pi
140 arges for index hospitalization, charges per day, length of stay, discharge disposition, tracheostomy
141 avings of $1685, and a mean reduction of 1.5 days length of stay.
142 zed into short (< or = 7 days) and long (> 7 days) length of stay (LOS) by median split.
143 for odds to complications and prolonged (>=6 days) length of stay were built.
144  days), time to ileostomy output (2 versus 3 days), length of stay (4 versus 7 days), and decreased I
145 pisode and after HHA discharge (at 30 and 90 days), length of stay, and total number of visits.
146  diagnostic efficacy, within-group COM at 90 days, length of hospital stay, and mortality.
147 ondary endpoints included SSI incidence at 4 days, length of stay, cosmetic outcome, and patient sati
148 ch as operative time, blood use, ventilation days, length of stay, time to enteral independence, reje
149                              Ventilator-free days, lengths of stay, organ failures, and 28-day mortal
150 eter in shock did not affect ventilator-free days, lengths of stay, organ failures, and mortality of
151 duced rate of ERCPs, time to surgery, and 30-day length-of-stay.
152 gth dependence of leaf size as the effect of day length on leaf size is abolished in phyC mutants.
153 t mediate the effects of seasonal changes in day length on mammalian behavior mediate effects of seas
154 d LD cycles to assess the effects of altered day length on PER and TIM dynamics in clock cells within
155 exposure, they did block the effect of short day lengths on cortisol secretion and bacterial killing
156 , but the underlying molecular mechanisms of day length perception and signal transduction in many sy
157             The prevalent hypothesis is that day length perception is mediated through coupling of an
158 moter CONSTANS (CO) plays a critical role in day-length perception and exhibits complex regulation; C
159  is not due to a defect in the perception of day length periodicity or in gibberellic acid metabolism
160                          The memory for long-day lengths persisted in pinealectomized hamsters for 6.
161 iological rhythms to the sidereal year using day length (photoperiod) [2].
162                          Seasonal changes in day length (photoperiod) affect numerous physiological f
163            Seasonal synchronization based on day length (photoperiod) allows organisms to anticipate
164 terns, which are driven by annual changes in day length (photoperiod) and melatonin secretion.
165                    Here, we demonstrate that day length (photoperiod) during development induces endu
166 before birth and is linked to the pattern of day length (photoperiod) exposure experienced by the mot
167                  Plants utilize variation in day length (photoperiod) to anticipate seasonal changes.
168               We hypothesize that changes in day length (photoperiodism) may be an important environm
169 nisms have developed the capacity to measure day length (photoperiodism).
170 ondence between the observed spacing and the day length provides quantitative support for the photosy
171 of flowering, suggesting mechanisms by which day length regulates flowering time.
172    This repression is relieved by shortening day length resulting in up-regulation of the CBF pathway
173           Prolonged exposure to short winter day lengths results in refractoriness, a spontaneous rev
174 stematic screening of the effects of altered day length revealed a complex relationship between phase
175                To tune behavior according to day length, SCN neurons display unified rhythms with syn
176                                              Day-length sensing involves an interaction between the r
177        For example, in Al-Karak, Jordan, the day length-sensitive wild barley allele of Ppd-H1 was as
178 ue in barley but probably also in many other day-length-sensitive crop plants, where they may tune ad
179                    Here we show that loss of day-length-sensitive flowering in tomato was driven by t
180                                     However, day-length sensitivity in crops limits their geographica
181 proposition that cry2 and phyA are the major day-length sensors in Arabidopsis, we show that phyA med
182 ) and phytochrome A (phyA) and their role as day-length sensors in Arabidopsis.
183                                   Changes in day-length, shift-work, and transmeridian travel lead to
184                                          The day-length-specific removal of CDF1-dependent repression
185 tion to correspond with increasing values of day length, squared day length, and mean air temperature
186 ed process where various cues including age, day length, temperature and endogenous hormones fine-tun
187    Identified environmental indices based on day length, temperature, moisture, and combinations of t
188 d are more strongly correlated with absolute day length than with changes in day length.
189  pattern approximating the rate of change in day length that occurs during autumn at the latitude thi
190 n-reproductive social groups in winter/short day lengths that are selective in nature.
191 apausing mosquitoes (those reared under long day lengths) the primary follicles were arrested in a st
192           Plants react to seasonal change in day length through altering physiology and development.
193 sonal environmental variations by monitoring day length to initiate flowering.
194 nges in behavior by transmitting a signal of day length to other sites in the organism.
195 rs are seasonal breeders that use changes in day length to synchronize their reproductive effort with
196 ts mediating the input and interpretation of day length to the output of specific hormones that ultim
197  populations requiring substantially shorter day lengths to initiate flowering than perennial populat
198             Plants commonly use photoperiod (day length) to control the timing of flowering during th
199 posed to different day/night temperature and day-length treatments to assess expression changes in fl
200 ysiologically respond to seasonal changes in day length under conditions of natural light exposure.
201 ted to mean air temperature or photo period (day length) using simple linear or non-linear regression
202 eurons in adjusting hypothalamic function to day length via a coordinated multisynaptic neurotransmit
203             Instead, foraging range size and day length were relatively small and short, respectively
204 nte and tropical maize is delayed under long day lengths, whereas temperate maize evolved a reduced s
205 esponse to environmental conditions, such as day length, which regulate the onset of flowering, and p
206 ng plants like Arabidopsis thaliana, measure day length with a rhythm that is not reset at lights-off
207 integration of environmental signals such as day-length with the internal development status in Arabi
208                                   Under long day lengths ZmCCT alleles from diverse teosintes are con

 
Page Top