ライフサイエンスコーパス: death certificate

1 278 (13.7%) had respiratory TB listed on the death certificate.

2 ases 10 codes U07.1 or U07.2 anywhere on the death certificate.

3 ath were derived by chart review or from the death certificate.

4 had that specific etiology mentioned on the death certificate.

5 s between events or conditions listed on the death certificate.

6 Underlying cause of death on the death certificate.

7 ion database or kidney disease listed on the death certificate.

8 ementia, and vascular dementia listed on the death certificate.

9 y, specificity, and predictive values of the death certificate.

10 h Revision and the World Health Organization death certificate.

11 cause-of-death section of the New York City death certificate.

12 al deaths and almost all stillbirths have no death certificate.

13 008 using ECGs, hospital discharge codes and death certificates.

14 ontributing causes-of-death data recorded on death certificates.

15 re obtained from death registry matching and death certificates.

16 ed with poisoning mortality as identified on death certificates.

17 e relatives was determined and verified from death certificates.

18 ned through interviews, medical records, and death certificates.

19 fined cause of death as that listed on their death certificates.

20 eath than with the causes of death listed on death certificates.

21 , medical history, physical examination, and death certificates.

22 determining cause of death than reliance on death certificates.

23 cause and CVD mortality were abstracted from death certificates.

24 influenza infection by laboratory results or death certificates.

25 g 36 who were diagnosed only on the basis of death certificates.

26 Causes of death were obtained from death certificates.

27 ALS cases were ascertained through death certificates.

28 mbers and causes of death were collected via death certificates.

29 CHD were obtained from hospital records and death certificates.

30 cal records in a records-linkage system, and death certificates.

31 cords with genealogy data and 250,000 linked death certificates.

32 s a form of punishment, and falsification of death certificates.

33 orture, and 32% (25/78) for falsification of death certificates.

34 and confirmed by use of medical records and death certificates.

35 wer respiratory infection were obtained from death certificates.

36 h due to CVD confirmed by medical records or death certificates.

37 comes were ascertained by medical records or death certificates.

38 sease were obtained from medical records and death certificates.

39 than non-Hispanic Whites in studies based on death certificates.

40 ical staff and reviewed patients' charts and death certificates.

41 from autopsy results, hospital records, and death certificates.

42 Causes of death were determined from death certificates.

43 0 to 414) was the underlying cause on 62% of death certificates.

44 er sources of care during 1993-1995 and from death certificates.

45 diagnoses, and mortality was determined from death certificates.

46 udicated with the use of medical records and death certificates.

47 sease were obtained from medical records and death certificates.

48 h for subjects who died were determined from death certificates.

49 er disease had hepatitis B reported on their death certificates.

50 ay be overrepresented as a cause of death on death certificates.

51 62.5%) had cryptosporidiosis listed on their death certificates.

52 s (from 520 patients), supplemented by state death certificates.

53 Causes of death were ascertained from death certificates.

54 Cases were identified through death certificates.

55 (date and ICD-10 code) was ascertained from death certificates.

56 cause-specific mortality as determined from death certificates.

57 most drug poisoning deaths as "accidents" on death certificates.

58 algorithms for hospitalization databases and death certificates.

59 lying cause of death from ALS collected from death certificates.

60 uses of death were ascertained from official death certificates.

61 , and cause of death was ascertained through death certificates.

62 HCV infection is greatly underdocumented on death certificates.

63 views, medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates.

64 corded liver disease had HCV listed on their death certificates.

65 data about the coding of individual cause of death certificates.

66 mized by linkage to hospitalization data and death certificates.

67 bout the drugs and other substances named on death certificates.

68 e, sex, and race-ethnicity was obtained from death certificates.

69 ed through linkage with hospital records and death certificates.

70 sensus guidelines and compared with reported death certificates.

71 ined noncancer mortality rates from national death certificates, 1975 to 2005.

72 njured patients with in-hospital deaths, 825 death certificates (43%) listed a noninjury cause of dea

73 's kappa (kappa) statistic = 0.69) than with death certificates (61%; kappa = 0.54).

74 ugh cause-of-death information obtained from death certificates, 70% (n = 174) through linkage of dea

75 from the presenting cancer (ascertained from death certificates), adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnic

76 n of nonmalignant respiratory disease on the death certificate, adjusting for a wide range of potenti

77 Causes of deaths were ascertained through death certificates; ALS was not identified separately un

78 hree physician epidemiologists, based on the death certificate and additional records surrounding the

79 ion until 31 March 2008 were abstracted from death certificates and a database of hospital admissions

80 -up of individual patients was obtained from death certificates and cancer registries.

81 standard demographic techniques, we analyzed death certificates and census data and made sex-specific

82 onditions leading to death was obtained from death certificates and comprehensive assessments that we

83 We tabulated the drugs named on death certificates and computed age-adjusted and age-spe

84 ome was death from infection identified from death certificates and confirmed through medical record

85 visits and by review of medical records and death certificates and defined by the presence of ascite

86 d from cause of death information coded from death certificates and from discharge diagnoses coded fr

87 s of observation (n = 1,560) aggregated from death certificates and geographic divisions, the authors

88 scertained through blind physician review of death certificates and hospital or pathology reports.

89 ction and stroke events were identified from death certificates and hospital records.

90 medical record review and fatalities through death certificates and medical record review.

91 revascularization procedures, obtained from death certificates and medical records, by baseline peri

92 Causes of death were extracted from death certificates and medical records.

93 fied over a median of 4.6 y were verified by death certificates and medical records.

94 Causes of death were ascertained from death certificates and medical records.

95 In addition, persons completing death certificates and NHS physicians interpreting death

96 Underlying cause of death was obtained from death certificates and other sources and coded and categ

97 Causes of death were ascertained from death certificates and primary care and health authority

98 The accuracy of GUE reporting on death certificates and the etiology of fatal GUE merit f

99 underlying causes of death was obtained from death certificates and the National Death Index.

100 50,080 individuals, ascertained by validated death certificates and the national death registry.

101 Birth certificate data linked to infant death certificates and to infant discharge abstracts wer

102 Methadone was named on 2,149 death certificates and was the most frequently named sub

103 codes from inpatient and outpatient care and death certificates and were confirmed by medical record

104 cience Center Enterprise Data Warehouse, and death certificates and were linked to the UPDB for analy

105 ian of the decedent frequently completed the death certificate, and HCV and HBV often were not detect

106 tal discharge diagnoses, birth certificates, death certificates, and a study of neonatal seizures con

107 patients or their proxies, medical records, death certificates, and autopsy and biopsy reports.

108 se of death was similar to that for clinical death certificates, and could therefore be acceptable fo

109 n = 83,103) were ascertained from linkage to death certificates, and hazard ratios (HRs) for all- and

110 for 1999, obtained from physicians' reports, death certificates, and interviews with physicians.

111 data were obtained from physicians' reports, death certificates, and interviews with physicians.

112 iograms, hospital discharge diagnosis codes, death certificates, and Medicare claims data.

113 ed experts used study data, medical records, death certificates, and proxy reports to adjudicate caus

114 ough contact with next of kin, collection of death certificates, and searches of the National Death I

115 th cases identified through medical records, death certificates, and state cancer registries.

116 We reviewed EMS and hospital records, state death certificates, and the national death index to dete

117 den countries are based on clinical records, death certificates, and verbal autopsy studies.

118 base based on race and ethnicity reported on death certificates; and classification ratios for self-r

119 According to death certificates, approximately 1800 persons die from

120 Death certificates are inaccurate and do not report PCI-

121 Death certificates are widely used in epidemiologic and

122 rtension and diabetes mellitus (mentioned on death certificate as either primary or contributing caus

123 The death certificate assigned coronary heart disease in 51.

124 Compared with the physician panel, the death certificate attributed 24.3% more deaths to corona

125 eath among 1244 child reports with available death certificates/autopsy reports included sudden infan

126 Death certificate-based 12-year mortality was analyzed a

127 Comparisons were made with a retrospective, death certificate-based determination of SCD incidence u

128 e, a simultaneous comparison was made with a death certificate-based method of determining SCD incide

129 Standard death certificate-based methods for ascertaining deaths

130 The retrospective death certificate-based review yielded 1,007 cases (inci

131 Retrospective death certificate-based surveillance results in signific

132 nment may be due to underreporting of SLE on death certificates, but may also represent underdiagnosi

133 to have a malignant neoplasm listed on their death certificates, but the PMR was 6.07 (95% CI 4.88-7.

134 f death and demographic data, collected from death certificates by the Centers for Disease Control an

135 le-Cause Mortality Files, compiled from U.S. death certificates by the National Center for Health Sta

136 Among 2683 decedents, the death certificate coded coronary heart disease as the un

137 Rate of fetal injury deaths, based on fetal death certificates coded with an underlying cause of dea

138 elephone assessments, hospital discharge and death certificate codes, and the visit 6 neurocognitive

139 xams, telephone interviews, and hospital and death certificate codes.

140 nderlying cause of death was identified from death certificates collected through 2006 (mean follow-u

141 entions targeted at improving the quality of death certificate completion are urgently needed.

142 ngly support the need to include training in death certificate completion as part of physician educat

143 ve residents had received formal training in death certificate completion.

144 We analyzed all death certificate data (n = 19,617) from Los Angeles Cou

145 of Death in HIV (CoDe) protocol, which uses death certificate data and clinical markers.

146 Survey using death certificate data and medical examiner records to c

147 Death certificate data are often used to study the epide

148 According to death certificate data between 1969 and 2013, an overall

149 s among persons aged 25 years or older using death certificate data collated by the National Center f

150 Using New York death certificate data for 1989-1991 and 1999-2001 and h

151 -2006, were linked to hospital admission and death certificate data for 71,681 pairs of maternal gran

152 We analyzed all monthly death certificate data from Los Angeles County, Californ

153 National death certificate data greatly overestimate deaths in wh

154 extracted for this observational study from death certificate data in the US Centers for Disease Con

155 Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of death certificate data of reproductive-age women, live b

156 and Hospital Activities (CPHA) and national death certificate data reported to the National Vital St

157 We reviewed death certificate data to assess the accuracy of deaths

158 The authors used death certificate data to evaluate national trends in th

159 tions (OIs) in 1993, national multiple-cause death certificate data were examined using two approache

160 National Vital Statistics' death certificate data were used to calculate death rate

161 Computerized death certificate data were used to identify all deaths

162 US death certificate data were used to identify deaths due

163 by the federal government and based on state death certificate data, identifies such deaths by assign

164 ted for each case from the same linked birth-death certificate data, matched to the case on year of b

165 nal mortality statistics, which are based on death certificate data, may overestimate the frequency o

166 Using death certificate data, most investigators have noted a

167 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention death certificate data, using International Statistical

168 e Washington State Trauma Registry linked to death certificate data.

169 e was identified by using state and national death certificate data.

170 these causes using 1989-2001 US linked birth/death certificate data.

171 using 1989-1991 California linked birth and death certificate data.

172 ity rates were determined through the use of death certificate data.

173 Hospital discharge and death-certificate data were linked for all patients unde

174 population from routine cancer-registry and death-certificate data.

175 followed through 1992-1993 for a hospital or death certificate diagnosis of CLD or cirrhosis (ICD-9-C

176 ncer subtype at the population level because death certificates do not record subtype information.

177 es were identified by hospital records or by death certificates during the follow-up period.

178 limitations of relying on death counts from death certificates, estimations of indirect deaths, and

179 We used data from death certificates filed in the United States from 1999

180 er for Health Statistics of the CDC from all death certificates filed in the United STATES: From thes

181 e most frequent cause of death listed on the death certificate for patients, and cardiovascular disea

182 Using linked birth and death certificates for all births in the U.S. between 19

183 adjudicators was better than agreement with death certificates for all disease-specific causes of de

184 We linked individual-level data with death certificates for all registered singletons births

185 or proxies and obtaining medical records and death certificates for ESRD cases.

186 te the validity of mortality estimation from death certificates for two such cancers, melanoma and my

187 Recent studies looking at information from death certificates found people with intellectual disabi

188 We used data from US death certificates from 1983 to 1997 to calculate median

189 US death certificates from 1990 to 2004 for which hepatitis

190 We conducted an analysis of death certificates from 1999 to 2017 to calculate annual

191 We validated HZ coding on death certificates from California, using hospital recor

192 Causes of deaths were ascertained through death certificates from January 1, 1989, through 1998.

193 Individual death certificates from Kentucky during 1911-1919 were a

194 ess is enhanced by obtaining paper copies of death certificates from the states, because death certif

195 sed cause-of-death and demographic data from death certificates from the US National Center for Healt

196 ation of Diseases system diagnostic codes on death certificates from the US National Mortality Databa

197 The death certificate had a sensitivity of 83.8% (95% CI, 81

198 Death certificates had only 58% accuracy (95% confidence

199 virus (HCV)-infected persons recorded on US death certificates has been increasing, but actual rates

200 certained over an average of 13.7 years from death certificates, hospital records, and ECG changes at

201 Diabetes incidence was identified from death certificates, hospitalization and nursing home rec

202 agriculture occupation was described on the death certificate in 115 (35%) of these men.

203 ple cause of death (MCOD) data in 12 million death certificates in 2006-2010.

204 Using computerized data from all death certificates in the United States between 1973 and

205 Between 1979 and 1988, 1,784 death certificates in the United States listed Wegener's

206 a genealogy of the Utah population linked to death certificates in Utah over a period of 100 years.

207 harge diagnosis of AN, or who had a cause-of-death certificate including an AN diagnosis.

208 cancer (n = 5) in hospitalization records or death certificates, including 36 who were diagnosed only

209 The listing of hemochromatosis on death certificates increased 60% from 1979 to 1992.

210 Death certificates indicated PD was a substantial contri

211 The authors obtained death certificate information in a cohort of 260 patient

212 2019;188(7):1213-1223) use death certificate information on all deaths occurring am

213 withdrawal of anticonvulsant medication, and death certificate information provided no evidence to su

214 Based on death-certificate information, mortality was 16.7 times

215 om CVD and cardiometabolic diseases based on death-certificate information.

216 d: 238 attributed to cardiovascular disease (death certificate International Classification of Diseas

217 Accuracy of coding on death certificates is difficult to ascertain.

218 ntial diagnosis of stroke subtype on routine death certificates is inaccurate, we aimed to estimate s

219 Limitations: Underreporting of SLE on death certificates may have resulted in underestimates o

220 Death certificates may lack accuracy and misclassify the

221 ods for calculating CLD mortality rates from death certificates may underestimate hepatitis C-related

222 cases relied on multiple sources, including death certificates, medical files, and autopsy reports.

223 (2007-2014) for whom the data were linked to death certificates/medical records through December 2016

224 y hospital discharge diagnosis (n = 208) and death certificates (n = 13).

225 Physicians who had signed selected death certificates (n = 6,927) were sent a questionnaire

226 We reviewed polysomnograms and the death certificates of 112 Minnesota residents who had un

227 The authors reviewed death certificates of active New York City police office

228 all death certificates of these fetuses and death certificates of live-born co-twins of fetuses that

229 eoplasms other than leukaemia were listed on death certificates of people with Down's syndrome less t

230 ase was recorded more often than expected on death certificates of persons with NF1 who died at <30 y

231 Copies of all death certificates of these fetuses and death certificat

232 se (ICD-9 490 to 493.9, 496) listed on their death certificates; of these 2,554,959 decedents, only 1

233 death certificates from the states, because death certificates often provide additional information

234 Death certificates on which CJD was mentioned were also

235 identally diagnosed at autopsy or known from death certificates only.

236 odes for AF on hospital discharge records or death certificates or 12-lead ECGs performed during 3 tr

237 d up for 3 months for clinical, new imaging, death certificate, or autopsy evidence of subsequent PE.

238 g the identified relatives' medical records, death certificate, or cancer registry information were i

239 t disease was obtained from hospital records/death certificates over 22 years of follow-up.

240 ned from medical records, cancer registries, death certificates, pathology reports, and review of his

241 ten appeared to be infectious in origin, but death certificates provide insufficient information to d

242 sons with NF1 and, within the limitations of death certificates, provides population-based data about

243 omputed agreement on cause of death from the death certificate, proxy, and adjudication, as well as s

244 death was adjudicated using medical records, death certificates, proxy interview, and autopsy reports

245 lude likely lag time in receipt of completed death certificates received by the Centers for Disease C

246 d classification ratios for self-reported vs death certificate-recorded AI/AN race among decedents in

247 e, hospital admission, disease registry, and death certificate records from the CALIBER programme, wh

248 tient records, national cancer registry, and death certificate records, and from primary care data am

249 Deaths were confirmed by death certificates, referring physicians, and medical re

250 tation conflicts with reports generated from death certificate registries.

251 individual cancer mortality rates from 2008 death certificate reporting from the Centers for Disease

252 es of death among men and women from 2009 US death certificate reporting; (2) individual cancer morta

253 e lung disease from 1979 through 1993, using death certificate reports of 31,314,160 decedents in the

254 15 distinct strata and reduced the number of death certificate requests by 76%.

255 questionable matches to reduce the number of death certificate requests to state offices.

256 es are hospital and ED discharge records and death certificates, respectively.

257 erified through the National Death Index and death certificate reviews.

258 curring through July 7, 1999, as verified by death-certificate reviews, and compared by morning vs af

259 Cases were identified though a state death certificate search, Centers for Disease Control an

260 her sensitivity (sensitivity = 50%-89%) than death certificates (sensitivity = 31%-81%).

261 improving the reporting of cause of death on death certificates should improve national vital records

262 The new evidence includes the death certificate stating the man's occupation to have b

263 se by the physician panel were excluded, the death certificate still assigned more deaths to coronary

264 rocardiograms, hospital discharge codes, and death certificates), stroke, heart failure, CHD, and mor

265 ases, interview studies with physicians, and death certificate studies (the Netherlands and Belgium)

266 A nationwide death certificate study in Flanders, Belgium, was conduc

267 r other soft-tissue neoplasm listed on their death certificates than were persons without NF1.

268 Data were derived from birth and fetal death certificates that were linked for the first and se

269 -up visits, hospital discharge diagnosis, or death certificates through 2011.

270 terhospital transfers), and fetal and infant death certificates to assess neonatal mortality rates am

271 etermined using the National Death Index and death certificates to characterize the mortality experie

272 ches of registers of hospital discharges and death certificates) to identify definite CCM diagnoses f

273 sively followed for mortality, identified by death certificate underlying or contributing causes, by

274 sively followed for mortality, identified by death certificate underlying or contributing causes, by

275 Death certificates underrepresent the true mortality fro

276 Death certificates, utilized by previous reports, have p

277 s the primary or a contributory cause on the death certificate varied according to disease subtype an

278 ssumption that death by stroke reported on a death certificate was due to the index stroke if death o

279 iew of 5 years of annual follow-up forms and death certificates was analyzed in 2,127 patients who ha

280 rom coronary heart disease, ascertained from death certificates, was classified as death from myocard

281 Using death certificates, we analyzed trends in NYC-specific a

282 Based on examination of US death certificates, we identified deaths in 26 states fo

283 re linked with the state death registry, and death certificates were manually reviewed.

284 ere linked with the state death registry and death certificates were manually reviewed.

285 tributing respiratory causes listed on their death certificates were more affected by air pollution,

286 certificates and NHS physicians interpreting death certificates were not blinded to the use of HT.

287 Death certificates were obtained for 96% (214) of the 22

288 Death certificates were obtained for all but three of th

289 Death certificates were obtained for all participants wh

290 gh December 1994 to obtain vital status, and death certificates were obtained for those who died.

291 Death certificates were obtained from individual states.

292 Death certificates were obtained from state health depar

293 Death certificates were obtained.

294 Death certificates were reviewed by 2 physicians.

295 ilable medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates were reviewed to identify cause of de

296 ional registries of households, cancers, and death certificates were used to derive incidence and mor

297 , using an expanded definition that included death certificates where CLD, viral hepatitis, or CLD-re

298 tabulation of direct and indirect deaths on death certificates will require concerted efforts and co

299 As expected, death certificates with a diagnosis of Down's syndrome w

300 illnesses on hospital discharge records and death certificates, yet few of these cases have an etiol