ライフサイエンスコーパス: debridement

1 r infected bone defects and/or osteomyelitis debridement.

2 e primary closure of flaps was ensured after debridement.

3 al amphotericin B), and 24 required surgical debridement.

4 ompared reconstructive therapy and open flap debridement.

5 curred in 45% of episodes, often early after debridement.

6 fter PTK, and 4 of 4 (100%) after epithelial debridement.

7 and light doses, with or without epithelial debridement.

8 orneal inflammation in mice after epithelial debridement.

9 with PRF or PRP with conventional open-flap debridement.

10 mJ/mm) applied once to the study burn, after debridement.

11 mes in comparison with mechanical epithelial debridement.

12 are early recognition and complete surgical debridement.

13 ponse and the patient's compliance with oral debridement.

14 biopsy were collected at each surgical wound debridement.

15 erventional radiology drainage after initial debridement.

16 f of infection should determine the need for debridement.

17 as an aid in diagnosis and non-surgical root debridement.

18 nsgastric debridement, and open transgastric debridement.

19 endering them susceptible to removal through debridement.

20 th manipulation of the skin microbiome after debridement.

21 i-implantitis in dogs, followed by open flap debridement.

22 and is frequently treated using non-surgical debridement.

23 promoting the healing of corneal epithelium debridement.

24 uring wound healing after corneal epithelial debridement.

25 s despite antimicrobial therapy and surgical debridements.

26 t groups were identified: 1) access flap and debridement; 2) surgical resection; 3) application of bo

27 ntimicrobial gel/mouthrinse; 6) non-surgical debridement; 7) use of systemic antibiotics; and 8) 3-mo

28 tion was to provide SIT and perform surgical debridement (additional 0.89 euros per 1% fewer implants

29 for TG2 (t1), and 6 months after periodontal debridement (all groups) (t2).

30 07) and to the eyes that received epithelial debridement alone (3.74 x 10(-)(7); P = 0.01).

31 eatment strategies (non-surgical or surgical debridement alone or combined with adjunct therapies) we

32 had PTK, and 4 of 166 (2.4%) had epithelial debridement alone.

33 herapeutic keratectomy (PTK), and epithelial debridement alone.

34 PRP with open-flap debridement or open-flap debridement alone.

35 cal outcomes of the combination of Open flap debridement, Amniotic membrane and Demineralized Freeze

36 erapy alone or medical therapy combined with debridement, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT), or

37 redictive values for identifying true NF and debridement among IVIG cases using our algorithms were 9

38 h the standard protocol involving epithelial debridement and 4 corneas by the transepithelial approac

39 ervention and were treated with single stage debridement and a closed packing technique.

40 re refractory to medical therapy and require debridement and AMT for rapid re-epithelialization.

41 ereas it was seen in all eyes that underwent debridement and AMT.

42 mortality rates despite aggressive surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy.

43 ty or hospital LOS beyond that achieved with debridement and antibiotics.

44 treat this infection with combined surgical debridement and antifungal medication.

45 ckets when compared to SRP immediately after debridement and at day 10 (P <0.05).

46 ritical in mediating efferocytosis and wound debridement and bridging the gap between innate and adap

47 treatment or no AB, along with standard care debridement and chlorhexidine mouthwash.

48 d Freeze Dried bone Allograft with Open flap debridement and Demineralized Freeze Dried bone Allograf

49 zontal bony defects that underwent open-flap debridement and did not undergo resective or regenerativ

50 ages are immune cells responsible for tissue debridement and fighting infection.

51 therapy, which includes disfiguring surgical debridement and frequently adjunctive toxic antifungal t

52 d on the corneas of live rabbits by complete debridement and in rabbit corneal epithelial primary cul

53 essed for colonization at baseline and after debridement and inoculation of labeled strains.

54 at baseline (t0), 3 months after periodontal debridement and omega-3 PUFA + ASA or placebo for TG1 an

55 The tunnel approach minimizes soft-tissue debridement and permits effective cortical cuts.

56 task at the wound site by facilitating wound debridement and producing chemokines, metabolites, and g

57 management of patients with PJI treated with debridement and retention of the prosthesis, resection a

58 ases by exchange of the prosthesis, one with debridement and retention, and one with repeated aspirat

59 Debridement and sequestrectomy with primary closure were

60 nd 12 mo following treatment with mechanical debridement and systemic antibiotics.

61 ividuals with LAP were treated by mechanical debridement and systemic antibiotics.

62 s for necrotizing fasciitis include surgical debridement and treatment with cell wall-active antibiot

63 All patients had surgical debridement and were severely ill.

64 in this setting without concomitant surgical debridement and wound coverage.

65 Patients with bacteremia, arthroscopic debridements and a follow-up <1 year were excluded.

66 Infection control, early surgical debridement, and antibiotic therapy are now the central

67 ge older than 18 years, receiving at least 1 debridement, and having been discharged from the system.

68 thelial cross-linking, customized epithelial debridement, and higher fluence shorter duration ultravi

69 l treatment, in 20 (95%) eyes that underwent debridement, and in 17 (100%) eyes that underwent AMT.

70 oneal debridement, laparoscopic transgastric debridement, and open transgastric debridement.

71 cluded oral hygiene instructions, mechanical debridement, and periodontal reevaluation.

72 osure and required hospitalization, surgical debridement, and prolonged antimicrobial therapy.

73 sed with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate after debridement, and twice daily, for 2 weeks.

74 Patients with bacteremia, arthroscopic debridements, and a follow-up <1 year were excluded.

75 ic joint infection (PJI) can be managed with debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention (

76 Success of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in

77 rosthetic joint infection (PJI) managed with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) h

78 The success of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) i

79 Management by debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) i

80 ovascular instability, and consists of wound debridement, antitoxin, antibiotics, and supportive care

81 reduce the necessity for extensive surgical debridement as well as secondary wound closure by means

82 py, which consisted of full-mouth mechanical debridement at baseline and the 3-, 6-, and 12-month app

83 r data) and the necessary number of surgical debridements (based on presentation biomarkers) in 73 se

84 ily use of an EO mouthrinse after ultrasonic debridement benefited patients with and without diabetes

85 DP (excluding completion pancreatectomy and debridement) between January 1, 1984 and July 1, 2006 we

86 ccessful wound closure (based on penultimate debridement biomarker data) and the necessary number of

87 ed healing in response to corneal epithelial debridement by manifesting abnormal histology, lack of K

88 potential to reduce the number of operative debridements by 2, with resulting decreases in ICU and h

89 Pancreatic debridement can be performed during ECLS, using a compre

90 assigned to receive placebo and periodontal debridement (CG), omega-3 PUFA + ASA (3 g of fish oil/d

91 models predict that anti-adhesion-antibiotic-debridement combination therapies can eliminate a bacter

92 l effects, and that anti-adhesion-antibiotic-debridement combination therapy will be more effective t

93 ical indications for video-assisted thoracic debridement compared with traditional management, includ

94 Following hemilimbal plus whole corneal debridement, corneal NV occurred only through the non-in

95 apies involving conventional antibiotics and debridement, coupled with a novel anti-adhesion therapy,

96 paroscopic or video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement, depending on location of collection, n = 32

97 n anatomic PDs (APDs) of 2 to 3 mm, relative debridement depth (debridement depth/APD) ranged from 65

98 Overall, median debridement depth was 2.00 mm in I teeth and 1.86 mm in

99 s) of 2 to 3 mm, relative debridement depth (debridement depth/APD) ranged from 65% to 80% and 60% to

100 tions, Amoils epithelial scrubber epithelial debridement, diamond burr polishing and excimer laser ph

101 After defect debridement, direct bony defect measurements were made w

102 Debridement does not have any significant advantage in t

103 ge, 5-540) after initial endoscopic drainage/debridement, due to persistence of WOPN (n = 3), recurre

104 Others advocated debridement early in the course of the disease for all p

105 in in CAL of 1.30 mm compared with open-flap debridement, EDTA, or placebo, but no significant differ

106 of this study was to assess the subgingival debridement efficacy of GPAP in periodontal pockets with

107 ed with 0.5% toluidine blue, and subgingival debridement efficacy was assessed.

108 After surgical debridement, enamel matrix derivative (EMD) was placed i

109 s, repositioning, negative pressure therapy, debridement, enteral and parenteral feeding, vitamin and

110 litary-like treatment schedule with surgical debridements every 24 to 72 hours.

111 Corneal epithelial debridement experiments in young ACE2-deficient mice sho

112 The number of surgical debridements, flap use, or duration of antibiotic therap

113 LM (n = 20): one-stage full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (FMUD) associated with CLM (500 mg, every 12

114 e (AM) when performing full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (FMUD) in generalized aggressive periodontit

115 adjuncts to one-stage full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (FMUD) in the treatment of generalized aggre

116 disinfection (FMD) and full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (FMUD) on clinical, microbiological and bioc

117 reated with one-stage, full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (FMUD).

118 session of full-mouth ultrasonic subgingival debridement followed 1 week later by Er:YAG application

119 Open, transperitoneal debridement followed by closed packing and drainage resu

120 1) consisted of sites treated with open flap debridement followed by placement of DOX blended with be

121 1 consisted of sites treated with open-flap debridement followed by placement of DOX gel-loaded COL

122 5-8 mm underwent subgingival implant surface debridement followed by repeated bi-weekly supragingival

123 Mortality after debridement for necrotizing pancreatitis continues to be

124 ga-3 PUFA and ASA as adjuncts to periodontal debridement for the treatment of periodontitis in patien

125 after omega-3 PUFA + ASA (before periodontal debridement) for TG2 (t1), and 6 months after periodonta

126 opressor-dependent shock undergoing surgical debridement from 2010 to 2014 were identified at 130 US

127 roup (-1.9 mm), compared with the epithelial debridement group (-2.6 mm; P < 0.001) and with the unop

128 y, increasing use of video-assisted thoracic debridement has altered the traditional management of pl

129 Frequent debridement healed more wounds in a shorter time (P < .0

130 riosteal flap was raised and, after thorough debridement, horizontal and vertical dimensions between

131 Three patients required mesh debridement; however, no instances of mesh explantation

132 The standard practice of irrigation and debridement (I&D) of open fractures within 6 hours of in

133 cultured, presence of abscess, incision and debridement (I&D), failure of a trial of outpatient anti

134 bacteremic infections requiring more than 1 debridement, immunosuppressive therapy, and the exchange

135 early application of video-assisted thoracic debridement in children with empyema compared with tradi

136 l periodontal outcomes prior to root surface debridement in chronic periodontitis cases.

137 s) as an adjunctive treatment to subgingival debridement in patients afflicted with peri-implantitis.

138 der for subgingival air-polishing with sonic debridement in residual periodontal pockets during maint

139 ing the early use of video-assisted thoracic debridement in the management of empyema in children.

140 ser application as an adjunct to subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis (C

141 antibiotic therapy and the role of surgical debridement in treating chronic osteomyelitis are import

142 ired eye exenteration and extensive surgical debridement, in addition to intravenous amphotericin B.

143 tk deficiency led to decreased cardiac wound debridement, increased infarct size, and depressed cardi

144 After open flap debridement, inflammatory (total protein and albumin con

145 mance in civilians degraded when these had a debridement interval > 72 hours (73 of the 80 civilians)

146 Following chemomechanical debridement, intracanal bleeding from the periapical tis

147 idal mode of action, killing bacteria, while debridement involves physically cleaning a wound (e.g. w

148 Cross-linking with epithelial debridement is found to be most effective but various mo

149 t endoscopic necrosectomy, and then surgical debridement is reasonable, although approaches may vary

150 Surgical debridement is typically required for joint infections a

151 cture, reduction of joint dislocation, wound debridement, laceration repair, and multiple rib fractur

152 cluding videoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal debridement, laparoscopic transgastric debridement, and

153 BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: Open operative debridement maintains a role in the modern management of

154 ystem within the root canal and incompletely debridement may affect the long-term prognosis of root c

155 Plaque debridement may be accomplished by air polishing using a

156 Drainage and/or debridement may be required in patients with sterile pan

157 103-treated patients had a similar number of debridements (mean [SD], 2.2 [1.1] for the high-dose, 2.

158 ri-implantitis combining stepwise mechanical debridement measures with adjuvant Povidone-iodine appli

159 ri-implantitis combining stepwise mechanical debridement measures with adjuvant povidone-iodine appli

160 s included 3 related deaths (8.1%), frequent debridements (median, 11 cases), and amputation revision

161 termined using an in vivo corneal epithelial debridement model.

162 ical parameters, and (b) following open flap debridement most of the values returned to baseline.

163 After epithelial debridement, mounting, and pressurization on an artifici

164 e endpoint, defined as: alive at day 28, <=3 debridements, no amputation beyond first operation, and

165 nimally invasive operative approaches to the debridement of acute necrotizing pancreatitis are prefer

166 ation of 100% ethanol followed by mechanical debridement of corneal and limbal epithelium.

167 veness of a buccal SFA used for the surgical debridement of deep intraosseous defects compared to the

168 ge, we designed five injury models involving debridement of different portions of the cornea and limb

169 The surgical debridement of intraosseous periodontal defects resulted

170 g postnatal growth and healing of epithelial debridement of Krt12(Cre/Cre)/ZAP bitransgenic mice.

171 Conservative debridement of necrotic bone, pain control, infection ma

172 of antibiotics in conjunction with surgical debridement of necrotic infected tissues.

173 Surgery included debridement of necrotic tissue, carpal tunnel decompress

174 atment with systemic antibiotics and radical debridement of necrotic tissue, lethality remains high.

175 BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Drainage and/or debridement of pancreatic necrosis is indicated in patie

176 Ultrasonic scalers are routinely used in the debridement of peri-implant lesions.

177 active bowel disease, and extensive surgical debridement of perineal lesions is often necessary.

178 lorite is an effective irrigant for chemical debridement of root canals.

179 evidence to recommend the use of mechanical debridement of second molars after the extraction of thi

180 ent transoral/transmural endoscopic drainage/debridement of sterile (27, 51%) and infected (26, 49%)

181 ical features of apical delta may complicate debridement of the infected root canal system.

182 Treatment is limited to antibiotic therapy, debridement of the infected tissue, and, in severe cases

183 nto the next phase and, in turn, can promote debridement of the injury site, cell proliferation and a

184 Surgical debridement of the scleral nodule was performed.

185 a small study suggests that ultrasonic root debridement of the second molar and a three-visit plaque

186 Debridement of the whole cornea resulted in significant

187 Both methods resulted in effective debridement of treated surfaces, the plaque area being r

188 ss, transoral/transmural endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) aft

189 study is to evaluate healing after open-flap debridement (OF) of intrabony periodontal defects alone

190 econdary to active controls versus open flap debridement (OFD) alone and to defect-type modifying BG

191 Control group (n= 10) received open flap debridement (OFD) and Demineralized Freeze Dried bone Al

192 ccal Class II furcation defects to open-flap debridement (OFD) and to determine the influence of ET i

193 signed to evaluate the efficacy of open-flap debridement (OFD) combined with PRF, 1% MF gel, and PRF

194 mate such impact on the outcome of open flap debridement (OFD) for the management of chronic periodon

195 concentrates (PCs) in addition to open flap debridement (OFD) has been investigated.

196 ided into two treatment groups: 1) open flap debridement (OFD) in endodontically treated teeth (contr

197 d gains in defect fill compared to open flap debridement (OFD) in intrabony defects.

198 icacy of PRF and 1.2% ATV gel with open flap debridement (OFD) in treatment of intrabony defects (IBD

199 ed either with autologous PRF with open flap debridement (OFD) or OFD alone.

200 ribution of IMP to the outcomes of open-flap debridement (OFD) treatment of intrabony defects.

201 a-TCP) implant to EMD alone and to open-flap debridement (OFD) when surgically treating 1- to 2-wall

202 o evaluate and compare efficacy of open flap debridement (OFD) with or without PRF or PRF + 1.2% RSV

203 e treated with autologous PRF with open-flap debridement (OFD), PRF + HA with OFD, or OFD (controls)

204 PRF and HA bone graft placed after open-flap debridement (OFD).

205 trabony defects in comparison with open flap debridement (OFD).

206 ed either with autologous PRF with open flap debridement (OFD+PRF) or OFD alone.

207 % vs 83.2%, P < .001), or undergone surgical debridement on admission (4.3% vs 61.3%, P = .001).

208 While 14% of the patients had intraoperative debridement, only 3 underwent complete LVAD removal.

209 2 ulcers occasionally may require additional debridement or AMT.

210 ed with either autologous PRF with open-flap debridement or autologous PRP with open-flap debridement

211 Either a 2-mm debridement or keratectomy was made in 129SVE wild type

212 debridement or autologous PRP with open-flap debridement or open-flap debridement alone.

213 stology) and treat (often requiring surgical debridement or resection, and/or prolonged antibiotic th

214 lant placement, soft tissue graft, open flap debridement or surgical removal of impacted teeth were i

215 consisted of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement or, if not feasible, laparotomy.

216 he effect of one-stage full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (OSFMUD) on clinical and immunoinflammatory

217 After a full-mouth ultrasonic debridement, patients were randomly assigned to an EO or

218 37.5%-46.7%) after a median of 62 days from debridement; patients without failure were followed up f

219 82 patients received full-mouth periodontal debridement performed within 48 hours.

220 d ventilator-free days, number and timing of debridements, plasma and tissue cytokine levels at 0 to

221 linical series were patients scheduled for a debridement procedure of an infected sternal wound after

222 inless steel wires were collected during the debridement procedure.

223 ith periodontitis were allocated randomly to debridement procedures in four weekly sections (quadrant

224 allograft and GTR and superior to open flap debridement procedures in improving clinical parameters

225 Adjunctive omega-3 and ASA after periodontal debridement provides clinical and immunological benefits

226 biotic resistance genes were widespread, and debridement, rather than antibiotic treatment, significa

227 Debridement (removal of necrotic tissue and foreign bodi

228 A separate model estimating the number of debridements required to achieve successful closure had

229 thogen identification, and successful use of debridement, retention, and chronic antibiotic suppressi

230 Wound debridement samples and contralateral (healthy) skin swa

231 l communities in chronic wounds, we analyzed debridement samples from lower-extremity venous insuffic

232 Wound debridement samples were obtained from 10 patients monit

233 Patients received whole-mouth ultrasonic debridement, scaling and root planing, and a 7-day presc

234 BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Pancreatic debridement should be avoided in the early, acute period

235 Debridement should be optimally delayed for 4 weeks and

236 nt of implants was performed with ultrasonic debridement, soft tissue curettage (STC), glycine powder

237 nt of implants was performed with ultrasonic debridement, soft tissue curettage (STC), glycine powder

238 For infected wounds, obtain a post-debridement specimen (preferably of tissue) for aerobic

239 The combination of ultrasonic debridement, STC and GPAP with adjuvant Povidone-iodine

240 The combination of ultrasonic debridement, STC, and GPAP with adjuvant povidone-iodine

241 he following treatment: open flap mechanical debridement, supracrestal implantoplasty, bone grafting

242 Three patients underwent 2 debridement surgeries.

243 time from the first symptoms of infection to debridement surgery was 3 days (IQR: 2-5 days).

244 Periodontal open flap debridement surgery was provided for the remainder of th

245 patients with EOSII, treatment consisting of debridement surgery with implant retention followed by c

246 he adjacent teeth with periodontal open flap debridement surgery.

247 treatment with conventional mechanical root debridement/surgical procedures and may additionally par

248 s randomized, controlled pilot trial, a post-debridement systemic antibiotic therapy course for DFO o

249 s need both effective and minimally abrasive debridement techniques.

250 100 mg ASA/d for 2 months) after periodontal debridement (test group [TG]1), or omega-3 PUFA + ASA (3

251 00 mg ASA/d for 2 months) before periodontal debridement (TG2).

252 After debridement, the investigators collected wound specimens

253 The more frequent the debridements, the better the healing outcome.

254 pproach that includes aggressive wound care, debridement, thrombolytic therapy, restoration of tissue

255 ation 1:1), patients with DFO after surgical debridement to either a 3-week or a 6-week course of ant

256 open fractures requires wound irrigation and debridement to remove contaminants, but the effectivenes

257 Intervention (local debridement) to elicit a bacteremia increased the mDC ca

258 e surgical intervention, ranging from minor (debridement) to major (resection, amputation).

259 SAP, from simple drainage, to resection, to debridement, to sequestrectomy, although somewhat tortuo

260 e superficial second-degree burn wound after debridement/topical antiseptic therapy significantly acc

261 2007 to receive standard therapy (burn wound debridement/topical antiseptic therapy) with (n = 22) or

262 stage of wound healing; however, aggressive debridement transforms chronic wounds to acute wounds an

263 rded in relation to the instruments used for debridement, use and type of surgical treatment, and mat

264 in cultured cells and by corneal epithelial debridement using a mouse whole-eye organ culture model.

265 ts (19 eyes) underwent mechanical epithelial debridement using a rotating brush (group 2) during CXL

266 STs may help identify who may require serial debridements versus early closure, and precisely when tr

267 The median number of surgical debridement was 1 (range, 0-2 interventions).

268 oviding SIT and performing only non-surgical debridement was both least costly and least effective.

269 Subgingival debridement was carried out using either trehalose powde

270 Ultrasonic debridement was completed within 24 hours in FMD and FMU

271 rneal subbasal nerve plexus after epithelial debridement was measured.

272 The healing of corneal wounds after debridement was monitored and visualized by fluorescent

273 Corneal epithelial debridement was performed in control and macrophage-depl

274 Epithelial debridement was performed on P2X(7) knockout (P2X(7)(-/-

275 Surgical debridement was performed.

276 The median number of debridements was 2 (range, 1-138).

277 t osteomyelitis (DFO) who underwent surgical debridement, we investigated whether a short (3 weeks),

278 res (weeks 31, 34, 37) followed by open flap debridement (week 42).

279 efficacy of combining full-mouth subgingival debridement with Er:YAG laser application in the treatme

280 All patients with EOSII underwent surgical debridement with implant retention.

281 f a protocol combining full-mouth ultrasonic debridement with laser therapy in the treatment of initi

282 be left unoperated or to undergo epithelial debridement with or without treatment consisting of cros

283 dence, requires invasive procedures such as, debridement with primary closure or myocutaneous flap re

284 salvage therapy after endoscopic or surgical debridement with residual necrosis burden.

285 Group 1 patients underwent debridement with the help of a sterile #15 blade on a Ba

286 nition required wound necrosis on successive debridements with IFI evidence by histopathology and/or

287 d with liposomal amphotericin B and multiple debridements, with no disease on 1.5-year follow-up exam

288 a control group (two sessions of ultrasonic debridement within 1 week).

289 Epithelial debridement without basement membrane disruption produce

290 By using the epithelial debridement wound model and CD11c-diphtheria toxin recep

291 In response to cornea debridement wounding, we find increased expression of MA

292 in the repair of in vivo corneal epithelial debridement wounds and in the structural organization of

293 healing in vivo in mouse corneal epithelial debridement wounds and in vitro in primary human corneal

294 alization of full-thickness skin and corneal debridement wounds by mechanisms involving epithelial ce

295 Epithelial debridement wounds in cultured porcine corneas and scrat

296 Corneal debridement wounds were made and allowed to heal +/- Tyr

297 Epithelium debridement wounds were made, followed by the assessment

298 Healing rates were unaffected in debridement wounds, but were significantly slowed in ker

299 Epithelial debridement wounds, with and without removal of basement

300 that characterize fibrosis in mouse corneal debridement wounds.