コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 dow onto stereotypical beliefs about cues to deception.
2 have shown that people are poor at detecting deception.
3 ar them in the nest by chemical and acoustic deception.
4 ften considered the least concerning form of deception.
5 e approach to harness this potential without deception.
6 ion that people lack the potential to detect deception.
7 nd LOSE (distress) conditions in a game with deception.
8 o, their pediatricians abetted the paternity deception.
9 tizens' nonverbal signals of uncertainty and deception.
10 htly above chance when it comes to detecting deception.
11 nstraints that are typically associated with deception.
12 be particularly prone to mechanisms of self-deception.
13 gnitive simplicity, which is related to self-deception.
14 nforce the benefits of cheating enhance self-deception.
15 nd left Brodmann area 10 at the time of this deception.
16 study and understand brain mechanisms during deception.
17 n a functional MRI (fMRI) study of detecting deception.
18 he associated neural processes that underlie deception.
19 g and passively or actively participating in deception.
20 sible concerns about sampling and the use of deception.
21 MRI is a reasonable tool with which to study deception.
22 to appeal coverage decisions, 50% sanctioned deception.
23 ve modularity admits the possibility of self-deception.
24 extended to a behavioral definition of self-deception.
25 mproving the effectiveness of inter-personal deception.
26 insky to formalize a cognitive model of self-deception.
27 n when we deliberately provoked suspicion of deception.
28 oscience of Magic Reveals about Our Everyday Deceptions].
30 ornaments can arise from sexual conflict and deception.(2)(,)(3) The sensory trap hypothesis posits t
33 " "not in the patient's best interest," and "deception." Additional questions measured career dissati
36 are "deceptive" or "unfair." Under the FTC's deception analysis, the focus is on whether consumers ar
40 to replicate prior group brain correlates of deception and improve on the consistency of individual r
41 at selected areas from Antarctic Peninsula (Deception and Livingstone Islands, Southern Shetlands).
43 onetary rewards, perhaps explaining why self-deception and paranoia contribute to costly decisions wh
45 aena lunulata octopus for the development of deception and signaling systems that resolve these criti
46 erstand hemodynamic and neural correlates of deception and thus to detect deception with the added ad
47 glorious self-perception are typical of self-deception, and are thus crucial in the emergence and exp
52 ssions under Simple Deception, Sophisticated Deception, and Plain Truth conditions, comparing facial
53 le expect to cheat, they do not foresee self-deception, and that factors that reinforce the benefits
54 bout the relative costs and benefits of self-deception are informed by adopting a temporal view that
55 conflict is resolved, and varieties of self-deception are modeled as type-specific conflict-resoluti
59 observer's perspective, we suggest tactical deception as a framework to study aspects of cognition i
60 istical Manual of Mental Disorders specifies deception as a perpetrator characteristic, a far wider r
64 pots that attract pollinators through sexual deception, but how G. diffusa controls spot development
65 bed) placebos (OLPs) may relieve CBP without deception, but OLP mechanisms remain poorly understood.
66 t signalling occurs in nature, set limits on deception by dishonest Batesian mimics, and prompt new q
67 e proposed system is able to detect identity deception (by using the first names of participants) wit
69 Our findings show that different modes of deception can be distinguished via facial action analysi
70 s typically convey reliable information, but deception can evolve when the sender and receiver have c
72 tain unbiased measures, economists hold that deception can generate suspicion of researchers, invalid
75 tion, tactics of mate retention, patterns of deception, causes of sexual regret, attraction to cues t
76 ense and longer lasting in the Sophisticated Deception condition than in the Simple Deception and Pla
77 e that they diverged from cues in the Simple Deception condition-the actual appearance of deception i
80 tionship between nonverbal communication and deception continues to attract much interest, but there
81 required foundations for successful passive deception, demonstrating experimentally the ability to c
87 ed participants, we found that false-purpose deception did not affect honesty in either task, even wh
88 t the location of the food into account, and deception did not occur if food was placed under the nor
89 ce supports and extends contextual models of deception (e.g., the COLD model), highlighting possible
90 In contrast, the extraordinarily specific deceptions evolved by orchids that attract a very narrow
91 his short-term psychological benefit of self-deception, however, can come with longer-term costs: whe
92 s suggest that placebos administered without deception (i.e., non-deceptive placebos) can help people
93 The regions of greater activation induced by deception identified by fNIRS were approximately consist
94 ive strategies could be considered 'tactical deception' if they rely on higher-level cognitive proces
95 o-opted sequentially, and strength of sexual deception in different G. diffusa floral forms strongly
97 ations about researcher use of false-purpose deception in general-often considered the least concerni
100 IRS) to investigate hemodynamic responses to deception in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) at the individu
103 rition and avoiding confounds with a form of deception in which two related studies are presented as
104 ption detection has mainly focused on Simple Deception, in which false information is presented as tr
105 vely few studies have examined Sophisticated Deception, in which true information is presented as fal
108 cheat on tests are likely to engage in self-deception, inferring that their elevated performance is
115 decisions, our cognitive definition of self-deception is extended to a behavioral definition of self
116 ts that spurious beliefs can have value-self-deception is irrational yet can facilitate optimal behav
117 se findings suggest that while false-purpose deception is not fundamentally problematic in the contex
119 gh it is widely believed that concealment or deception is required to elicit a placebo response, rece
120 eruptive episodes of the volcanic history of Deception Island (Antarctica): (i) the volcanic products
121 nd high frequency volcanic gas monitoring at Deception Island because of the arduous climatic conditi
126 e abruptly ended by large eruptions from the Deception Island volcano, resulting in near-complete loc
127 ) at 52 m depth (48,112 reads), Whalers Bay (Deception Island) at 151 m (104,704) and English Strait
128 sessed soil fungal diversity at two sites on Deception Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica usi
132 erlocutors and AI systems, threats emerge of deception, manipulation, and disinformation at scale.
134 chiatrists, their continuing support for the deception model is important, and begs an explanation.
135 ever, experimental studies on the effects of deception, notably false-purpose deception-the most comm
137 ects by plants that are pollinated by sexual deception of males of the same insect species [2-4].
138 its is an increasing problem not only due to deception of the consumer but also because it poses heal
139 the hemochromatosis gene product, HFE), and deception of the host immune system (by viral homologs).
140 rroneous (for example, resulting from wilful deception or being subject to recall error), absent (for
141 cipants' behaviour during the experiment; no deception or manipulation of prestige was employed at an
143 Specific areas of the brain involved in deception or truth telling can be depicted with function
145 eful in social image management is strategic deception: our ability and willingness to manipulate oth
148 perception, these new results indicate that deception pain studies should not assume that participan
149 participants completed a Differentiation of Deception Paradigm twice (baseline and test sessions).
150 data are consistent with the idea that self-deception, paranoia, and overconfidence flourish under u
153 e of robots, many people have concerns about deception, privacy, job loss, safety, and the loss of hu
155 bserved among self-reported smokers, whereas deception regarding smoking status may explain most of t
159 As such, given the resources and probable deception required and risk to external validity, the pr
161 er agents, that their performance in complex deception scenarios can be amplified utilizing chain-of-
162 spontaneous facial expressions under Simple Deception, Sophisticated Deception, and Plain Truth cond
164 testing) can inform the detection of illness deception, such tests need support from converging evide
168 nstrated that it is the cost associated with deception that stabilises honesty, and that the honest s
169 effects of deception, notably false-purpose deception-the most common form of experimental deception
170 ersonality, aggression, impulsivity, Mimicry Deception Theory, and Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory.
171 cording to their revealed level of strategic deception; these types were also distinguished by neural
172 , ushering in an arms race between truth and deception, through which stories, language and skills in
173 ort-term memory, causal reasoning, planning, deception, transitive inference, theory of mind, and lan
175 l correlates of deception and thus to detect deception with the added advantages of being compact, te