ライフサイエンスコーパス: decide

1 are many strategies by which cell fates are decided.

2 of (23% vs 83%, P < 0.001), self-efficacy to decide about (38% vs 70%, P < 0.001), and willingness to

3 groups equally well, but would typically be decided against as infeasible or costly.

4 at the temperatures and pressures needed to decide among competing theories.

5 s is the first study to explore how surgeons decide among management options for critically-ill EGS p

6 nosed with localized prostate cancer have to decide among treatment strategies that may differ in the

7 .5 by means of donor-acceptor mechanism were decided as analytes.

8 als to request clarity on the method used to decide author order among those who contributed equally.

9 nts, the number of cells to sequence must be decided before running an experiment, and afterwards, it

10 ed a task in which healthy volunteers had to decide between accepting a reward at the cost of receivi

11 Habitat-related choices require animals to decide between areas with greater and lesser quantities

12 Participants had to decide between two options: (i) wait for 1.5 s to briefl

13 ivity of DR serotonergic neurons, while mice decided between differently delayed rewards as they perf

14 Proteins are endocytosed, and their fate is decided between recycling and degradation to modulate lo

15 How do we make simple choices such as deciding between an apple and an orange?

16 evant for flower-visiting insects faced with deciding between flowers that may differ in reward attri

17 should be considered by the heart team when deciding between PCI versus CABG for revascularization i

18 Deciding between stimuli requires combining their learne

19 sense that the acceptance of a trial move is decided by comparing a computed acceptance probability w

20 eatly across the Northeast Asia, and largely decided by mean diameter at breast height, dominant heig

21 Chirality of biomolecules is decided by the direction of magnetic field where prebiot

22 Frequencies of dressing changes were decided by the investigator on the basis of the clinical

23 al stromal tumour treatment paradigm, it was decided by the sponsor's medical director together with

24 ith de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was decided combining cytogenetics/genetics and postconsolid

25 le for analysis after exclusion based on pre-decided criteria, from which 104 modifiable factors and

26 amework for understanding how cell fates are decided during development.

27 is selected, conversion to laparotomy can be decided early in the performance of the case.

28 e fate of Y. pestis infection of the lung is decided extremely early during infection and that Pla pl

29 in a subset of human CRC cell lines, is the deciding factor of cancer cell susceptibility to SMAC mi

30 ecific IgG titers starting from 24 months to decide for further doses.

31 ion making and could describe how they would decide for or against a particular procedure.

32 ad to decide for themselves but pretended to decide for their best friend in a second prosocial condi

33 In one condition, participants had to decide for themselves but pretended to decide for their

34 Humans seem to decide for themselves what to do, and when to do it.

35 es not represent a prognostic parameter when deciding for adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy.

36 correlates of such decisions in participants deciding for themselves or pretending to choose for a fr

37 How does a naive, young animal decide from which adults to learn behavior?

38 This finding may help clinicians decide from which age onward it may be relevant to clini

39 administer and may be used by clinicians to decide further biomarker testing, preventive strategies,

40 The research team was not involved in deciding hospital treatment, duration of treatment in th

41 the physicians to interpret the results and decide how best to use the information.

42 uromodulators, during tasks in which animals decide how patiently they should wait for reward, and ho

43 liability is likely important when receivers decide how to respond [3].

44 gh an editorial process in which the authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer r

45 hrough an editorial process in which authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer r

46 gh an editorial process in which the authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer r

47 at are expanding preventive therapy use must decide how tuberculosis infection testing should be used

48 ined the data, determined data priority, and decided how data should be reported, including scoring m

49 ersonally known individuals-and subsequently decided how the stranger's preference relates to the oth

50 Deciding how high to elevate a house poses a nontrivial

51 d provide winemakers with a useful tool when deciding how long to mature a specific type of wine in a

52 ol to aid both in algorithm selection and in deciding how much effort to devote to parameter tuning.

53 s which need to be properly appreciated when deciding how to best use them to guide clinical decision

54 NAIs against new viral strains is vital for deciding how to use the stockpile.

55 On the basis of imaging, clinicians must decide if they should stop, pause, or continue treatment

56 In this fMRI study, participants voluntarily decided if they wanted to punish the first-party offende

57 We found the criterion for deciding if the entrapped air evolves into single or dou

58 in the fly embryo are rapid: hunchback genes decide in minutes whether nuclei follow the anterior/pos

59 enetic mark but how its locus-specificity is decided in relation to DNA sequence is not fully underst

60 migrants are allowed to be heterogeneous and decide interactively on their destination, the resulting

61 mple model developed to explain when animals decide it is worth taking an action also explains a sign

62 Of these patients, four (8%) patients decided not to participate because of travel commitments

63 y-four (56.7%) underwent surgery, 56 (22.0%) decided not to undergo surgery, 40 (15.7%) required only

64 Evaluation of penicillin allergy before deciding not to use penicillin or other beta-lactam anti

65 ad hoc basis, usually requiring the user to decide on an appropriate number of clusters to prune out

66 its objectives, the GPEI should consider to decide on and communicate a suitable mechanism for co-sh

67 fficacy of using C-reactive protein (CRP) to decide on antibiotic prescription among febrile children

68 unction seems mandatory in these patients to decide on appropriate anti-infective preventive measures

69 diction after cardiac arrest is important to decide on continuation or withdrawal of intensive care.

70 vited to a shared decision making process to decide on further screening options consisting of either

71 of birds can move together in synchrony and decide on new directions of movement in a seamless way.

72 ygen species production and NET formation to decide on required antibiotic and antimycotic prophylaxi

73 The results could be used to decide on the applicability of a given scanner or transd

74 adiopharmaceutical advisory committee should decide on the data to be presented by the manufacturer o

75 These findings can help clinicians decide on the optimal castration strategy for individual

76 try, but little is known about when students decide on their specialty or what factors influence thei

77 ional emissions reductions, before countries decide on their unconditional reductions.

78 rehensive guide for those providers who must decide on therapeutic options in the management of patie

79 logist, masked to the CT and PET/CT results, decided on the radiation treatment management of all pat

80 ents should be taken into consideration when deciding on a case-by-case basis between transcatheter a

81 a particular problem in young patient groups deciding on best-timing for surgery.

82 se regulation and mitigation, as well as for deciding on future research priorities.

83 Critical clinical reasoning when deciding on ICD implantation in ACHD patients, therefore

84 ute pancreatitis needs to be considered when deciding on optimal treatment strategies.

85 ication and provides useful information when deciding on priorities for mitigation.

86 de-off between accuracy and performance when deciding on the appropriate tool for the assembly step.

87 xyglucose-PET/CT may assist the clinician in deciding on the best therapy for the clinically N0 neck

88 e scenarios are vital for policy makers when deciding on the development of future energy resources,

89 factors of emphysema patterns are helpful in deciding on the management, including surgical options.

90 able challenges remain in patient selection, deciding on the most appropriate order in which to admin

91 However, deciding on the number of clusters to use and interpreti

92 type of barrel for wine maturation but also deciding on the optimum maturation length, is a challeng

93 elevated ICP from imaging is important when deciding on whether to implement invasive ICP monitoring

94 a justification for a future action, such as deciding on whether to keep undeserved money, motivated

95 to curtail editorial selectivity altogether, deciding publication on the basis of technical merit alo

96 In our experiment, groups (generations) decide sequentially about the provision of a multigenera

97 (4+y) Se(5) has so far not been conclusively decided since its discovery due to its intrinsic multiph

98 of more than 18 mmHg for whom the clinician decided SLT was the appropriately indicated therapy were

99 rical insights could inform policy makers on deciding sufficient levels of mobility reduction to cont

100 Summit held in May 2016, it was unanimously decided that four areas of current oncology clinical pra

101 oorer high frequency hearing more frequently decided that information was important to their health c

102 e US Department of Health and Human Services decided that its 1981 exclusion of transsexual surgical

103 The ROC curve decided that the cutoff point of FENO was 37.8ppb (AUC=0

104 etween benefit and risk, the study's sponsor decided that they would no longer pursue development of

105 ing the positive result, 23.9% of physicians decided that this finding was not important enough to in

106 ous patients' treatment and response data to decide the allocation of each following patient favourin

107 have the potential in the long term to help decide the extent to which a patient has heart failure f

108 omatin electrostatic, and other interactions decide the nature of the packaging of chromatin.

109 Power analysis is essential to decide the sample size of metagenomic sequencing experim

110 rovide valuable references for clinicians to decide the treatment strategies.

111 Major trade routes decided the major plague outbreak hotspots, while naviga

112 y between several pollen and stigma proteins decides the fate of the pollen.

113 ction pattern will play an important role in deciding the nature of the packaging of chromatin.

114 Other factors may need to be considered in deciding the optimal approach.

115 ive, transparent, and repeatable process for deciding the outcomes of RCTs that explicitly incorporat

116 cing it, even when participants could freely decide their action.

117 In metazoan tissues, cells decide their fates by sensing positional information pro

118 mance of these vdWHs holds a crucial role in deciding their functional efficiency.

119 Herb Tabor-decided they must find a way.

120 Particularly, before deciding they were asked to focus on the (un)fairness of

121 If we decide to increase the extent of land under conservation

122 nical foraging task, in which a forager must decide to leave a current resource in search for another

123 uple is planning to start a family, and they decide to order a 23andMe test after reading about the c

124 esearch challenge is to determine how people decide to seek or avoid information.

125 puterized task, the participant must rapidly decide to shoot or not shoot at White and Black men who

126 oice considerations of an individual who may decide to use these interventions in the face of ongoing

127 In view of this, we decided to carry out in this study the formation of cova

128 mount to 12500 per year in France, we herein decided to compare the empirical clinical microbiology d

129 s of positive selection for its variants, we decided to compare the Inuit findings with other Native

130 In this work, we decided to decipher the interactions between CQA dehydro

131 outinely used during cancer radiotherapy, we decided to delineate the effects of radiation dose fract

132 We decided to determine if CD28 costimulation of T cells wa

133 y of America (IDSA) Board of Directors (BOD) decided to develop a 2019 IDSA Strategic Plan.

134 of UNC-6 compared to vertebrate netrins, we decided to employ an integrated approach to study its so

135 ne interview whether or not participants had decided to enter a HAEP.

136 the job search for young scientists who have decided to enter the junior faculty/independent investig

137 MRI, the International Myeloma Working Group decided to establish guidelines on optimal use of imagin

138 We decided to evaluate the analytical and clinical performa

139 For this end we decided to evaluate their alterations in the pathologic

140 As such, we decided to examine mucus function in mouse models with m

141 On July 3, 2017, the FDA decided to halt the study because of the imbalance in th

142 (hASNase1) share 70% amino-acid identity, we decided to humanize gpASNase1 by generating chimeras wit

143 The FDA decided to initiate a larger study of Kawasaki disease r

144 Once the rat has decided to initiate a trial, it remains engaged in the t

145 for the decision to discontinue after having decided to initiate PrEP were evaluated.

146 th target viral Env to block viral entry, we decided to investigate the relationship between these tw

147 In the present study, we decided to isolate HuHF MelSCs using "side population" t

148 tion mechanism of this critical reaction, we decided to perform a DFT study.

149 ce of a significant interaction (p=0.74), we decided to pool the data for the pre-emptive and reactiv

150 re likely to comment females should not have decided to proceed.

151 The CLSI decided to set a susceptible-only interpretive breakpoin

152 nd experiences of the women on the panel, we decided to share their stories with our readers in this

153 tter dopamine, plays a role in cognition, we decided to study the distribution of tyrosine hydroxylas

154 Based on these precedents, we decided to study the reaction of NO with thiols as poten

155 tion after hospital discharge, some patients decided to switch to clopidogrel.

156 We therefore decided to systematically reinvestigate proposed functio

157 s that have not been reported previously and decided to target one of these genes, Sfxn3 (encoding si

158 itically ill patients for whom the physician decided to test preload responsiveness by passive leg ra

159 We decided to test the value of VirScan in the follow-up of

160 Nonetheless, when it is decided to trial a drug to improve appetite and/or impro

161 For that purpose, we decided to use chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT),

162 Here, we decided to use inducible degrons for a more rapid and co

163 instance, perception happens while an animal decides to expel or swallow the substance in the mouth (

164 luminate the computations by which the brain decides to imitate or emulate others.

165 When deciding to act, the neurotransmitter dopamine is implic

166 We conclude that deciding to approach reward under threat relies on hippo

167 Deciding to control emotional responses is a fundamental

168 nary approach is particularly important when deciding to perform additional diagnostic assessments, i

169 de-offs between fast and slow movements when deciding to respond to a visually perceived threat.

170 to disease onset trigger is important prior deciding to study single factors for a multiple steps di

171 n the determination of entrustability before deciding to take over.

172 ort syntheses to inform and guide readers in deciding to use a specific book relative to other option

173 Deciding to use gene drives to control and suppress pest

174 It should be considered when deciding treatment intensity in metastatic settings, and

175 ling computer mouse location as participants decide-we demonstrate the theoretical and practical uses

176 systems so that experimentalists can easily decide what hardware is required for their needs.

177 How do we decide what to teach and what to leave for learners to d

178 osts they had not personally experienced, to decide what to teach.

179 It senses disturbances, decides what needs to be done next, and then restores ba

180 We present a computational model that decides what to teach by maximizing the learner's expect

181 ng to make the data more useful to patients, deciding what additional data elements should be collect

182 re are risks to overemphasizing novelty when deciding what constitutes good science.

183 of recognition memory and the criterion for deciding what memory strength is sufficient for identifi

184 d of options and considerations present when deciding what perovskite materials, contact layers, and

185 Deciding what to do and when to move is vital to our sur

186 ably, the most difficult part of learning is deciding what to learn about.

187 e essential for survival, for instance, when deciding what we should (not) eat.

188 o move), but not sensory evaluation aspects (deciding what you are looking at).

189 vity cues through a simple neural circuit to decide when and how to swim.

190 tures would be a strong alternative: authors decide when and what to publish; peer review reports are

191 ether this paradigm shift will change how we decide when our self-interest (e.g., comfort) is pitted

192 ally constructed, but rather the capacity to decide when to develop and apply said skills.

193 ut the density and actions of nearby fish to decide when to feed on algae and when to flee foraging a

194 internal neuronal representations of time to decide when to initiate a given action at the end of an

195 rse signals from the environment are used to decide when to initiate seed germination, a process driv

196 Healthy human participants had to decide when to leave collecting financial rewards in a l

197 e theorem), human participants of either sex decided when to leave locations in situations where fore

198 provides a rational management strategy for deciding when to continue, discontinue, or reinstitute a

199 they also support computations relevant for deciding when to explore.

200 e-exploit dilemma refers to the challenge of deciding when to forego immediate rewards and explore ne

201 Deciding when to initiate oral anticoagulation in patien

202 Deciding when to terminate care of offspring is a key co

203 lating bicycle mode share and flows can help decide where to build new infrastructure for maximum imp

204 Deciding where and when to sample are among the most cri

205 contribution to motor aspects of decisions (deciding where to move), but not sensory evaluation aspe

206 If fishers consider multiple fisheries when deciding where, when, and how much to fish, then managem

207 formance is commonly compared empirically to decide whether a certain task should be performed by a c

208 ing algorithm that uses thyroid US images to decide whether a thyroid nodule should undergo a biopsy

209 All visual animals must decide whether approaching objects are a threat.

210 lvable, i.e., there is no algorithm that can decide whether dynamics of an arbitrary quantum system c

211 in patients presenting to the ED in order to decide whether hospital admission and further investigat

212 performed a task in which they were asked to decide whether information from a surgeon or an administ

213 In everyday life, we have to decide whether it is worth exerting effort to obtain rew

214 For each word, the patient's task was to decide whether it was novel or repeated.

215 R problem and uses the found optimal path to decide whether or not performing sequence alignment is n

216 In the risk-taking task, participants had to decide whether or not they place a bet, while in the bel

217 OVID-19 pneumonia, requiring radiologists to decide whether or not to mention COVID-19 specifically a

218 We hypothesized that empowering patients to decide whether or not to receive narcotics for pain cont

219 sed a task in which human participants could decide whether or not to sample additional decision-rele

220 best age cutoffs for screening programs and decide whether programs of screening should be funded.

221 breaks to be identified and could be used to decide whether screening for long-term carriage (e.g., i

222 periment, and afterwards, it is necessary to decide whether sufficient cells were sampled.

223 Hence, the physician can decide whether symptomatic therapy can be intensified or

224 h potential predators, animals instinctively decide whether there is a threat they should escape from

225 s perform a novel task that required them to decide whether to encode items into working memory.

226 In response to oxidative stress, cells decide whether to mount a survival or cell death respons

227 ion-theoretic model of how a clinician might decide whether to order Xpert or other tests for TB, and

228 ng a Prisoner's Dilemma, participants had to decide whether to penalize the defection of a third play

229 rs identify potentially relevant studies and decide whether to read the full text.

230 (and non-immune participants) are needed to decide whether widespread use of modified 4-aminoquinolo

231 The ability to decide whether, when and how to try is central to human

232 ethical use by enabling local communities to decide whether, when, and how to alter local ecosystems.

233 ccuracy and response times when participants decided whether a real word was accurately paired with a

234 ade an initial perceptual decision, and then decided whether or not they wanted to sample more eviden

235 eting the FPC while 141 healthy participants decided whether or not to engage in cognitive or physica

236 trustee's reciprocation history before they decided whether or not to invest.

237 The coordinating radiologist decided whether secondary recall was indicated.

238 elayed match-to-category (DMC) task, monkeys decided whether sequentially presented stimuli were cate

239 On each trial, observers decided whether signals come from common or separate sou

240 ked participants' motor movements while they decided whether to accept or reject gambles.

241 s weeks later, 30 human subjects (14 female) decided whether to fund proposed projects described on a

242 nd at the beginning of the study a coin toss decided whether women with odd or even SX numbers would

243 ith many other species, it is the female who decides whether to mate.

244 ice, even with the best observation regimes, deciding whether 'missed' years represent real pauses in

245 ainty into account-in a very specific way-in deciding whether a measured offset between the line segm

246 the preferential implication of the NAcC in deciding whether and when to engage in reward-seeking ra

247 the preferential implication of the NAcC in deciding whether and when to engage in reward-seeking ra

248 key step in audiovisual speech perception is deciding whether auditory and visual speech have the sam

249 ties should be taken into consideration when deciding whether IOL implantation would be appropriate.

250 We discuss criteria for deciding whether or not geolocators can answer proposed

251 Moreover, results supported the idea that deciding whether or not to react to an injustice and the

252 tion about a trustee's past behaviour before deciding whether or not to trust them.

253 lar lesions and can potentially be useful in deciding whether orchiectomy can be replaced with follow

254 tly on solving the causal inference problem, deciding whether sensory signals arise from a common cau

255 cept relies on solving the binding problem - deciding whether signals come from a common cause and sh

256 This may help clinicians in deciding whether surgery is feasible and to better couns

257 means of evaluating mass effect, and thus in deciding whether surgical management is warranted.

258 y value can then later be used as a guide in deciding whether the experience merits repeating, or whe

259 ts male flies consider nutritional status in deciding whether the potential benefit of pursuing femal

260 In deciding whether to accept risk, decision makers must in

261 consultants prioritize specific factors when deciding whether to admit a patient to ICU.

262 Deciding whether to admit a patient to the ICU requires

263 rning from performance-related feedback, and deciding whether to alter our future decisions.

264 he guideline to an individual patient who is deciding whether to be screened.

265 rneurons in a widely studied mouse behavior: deciding whether to explore or avoid the open arms of an

266 e key factors that should be considered when deciding whether to screen for syphilis using either the

267 s the benefits of generating genomic data in deciding whether to undergo exome sequencing.

268 will help to guide clinicians when they are deciding whether to use benralizumab to treat patients w

269 onally plastic (i.e. to have the ability to "decide" whether to remain quiescent or to undergo activa

270 n to engage in reward-seeking rather than to decide which action to perform.

271 n to engage in reward-seeking rather than to decide which action to perform.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Th

272 restigious scientific journals traditionally decide which articles to accept at least partially based

273 It is thus possible to decide which cultivars to use in order to obtain the hig

274 histones, or RNA, epigenetic mechanisms can decide which genes to express and which to suppress.

275 In clinical practice, providers need to decide which genes to test in individuals with ASD pheno

276 ies is that users currently have no means to decide which insertion and deletion (indel) parameters t

277 nservation practitioners or policymakers, to decide which method to use as a basis for decision-makin

278 ary ranking criteria such as target yield to decide which route to select for target production.

279 tion remains unaddressed: how does the brain decide which strategy to use in a given situation?

280 helps taxonomists and the users of taxonomy decide which taxa and names should be used by society wh

281 How cells decide which way to die is unclear.

282 ing so involves the non-trivial challenge of deciding which aspects of a task domain to generalize.

283 ently no universally accepted principles for deciding which biological species should be accepted whe

284 ts should consider a number of criteria when deciding which contract research organization (CRO) is b

285 e mutations at diagnosis and at relapse; (2) deciding which drug to use among several therapeutic opt

286 The challenge that one faces is deciding which guidelines to use as a resource for discu

287 However, deciding which interventions to pursue and understanding

288 Deciding which options to engage, and which to forego, r

289 ria and risk assignment and may also vary in deciding which patients require intervention.

290 Deciding which patients should be offered surgery, and w

291 This study is informative for deciding which proteasome inhibitor to use for treating

292 o help their patients through the process of deciding which results to receive.

293 teraction maps as a structural framework for deciding which SNPs to test for association with gene ex

294 can assist clinicians and drug developers in deciding which theranostic targets should be taken for f

295 nt of the corneal condition is necessary for deciding which type of keratoplasty (i.e., deep anterior

296 importance they give to different factors in deciding who to prioritize for ICU admission.

297 ctive social task measuring adaptive choice (deciding who to reengage or avoid) in male and female pa

298 haemoglobin concentrations (f-Hb), assist in deciding who would benefit from colonoscopy.

299 iduals must also use status information when deciding whom to approach and whom to avoid [19].

300 relationship tool and safety decision aid (I-DECIDE) would increase women's self-efficacy and improve