ライフサイエンスコーパス: decision to

1 classify the cells, fast enough to provide a decision to a cell sorter for real-time separation of in

2 ficacy in improving functional outcomes, the decision to abort a long procedure remains a challenge.

3 ard or nonstandard care) and the physician's decision (to accept or reject that recommendation).

4 The decision to accept IRD kidneys should balance the advant

5 ocal population obesity rates may affect the decision to accept obese individuals as donors.

6 3 m(2) as an intermediate range in which the decision to accept or decline is made on the basis of fa

7 Main outcome measures included participant's decision to accept or decline surgery, source of funding

8 ey is offered to a waitlisted candidate, the decision to accept or decline the organ relies primarily

9 A decision to accept was significantly more likely when be

10 l care bed availabilty and factors affecting decisions to accept patients to the intensive care unit.

11 ional competition may influence a hospital's decision to acquire a surgical robot.

12 onkey to make it: some of them reflected the decision to act or refraining from acting (56%), whereas

13 voluntary action, but an explanation of why decisions to act emerge at particular points in time has

14 It is suggested that the decision to activate or not to activate the immune respo

15 The decision to administer oral steroids was significantly a

16 the order of 0.01 to 0.1, which supports the decision to administer prophylactic antibiotics.

17 to IPPV where the critical care team made a decision to admit (72/93 [77%] vs 21/93 [57%], p=0.018).

18 itional research is needed to understand the decision to admit elderly patients to the ICU.

19 omization occurred within 12 hours after the decision to admit the patient to an intensive care unit.

20 st that critical care bed availability and a decision to admit to critical care are associated with b

21 o admission was 2 h (IQR 1-3) with a bedside decision to admit, and 12 h otherwise (5-29).

22 In Experiment 2, they rated their decision to adopt a focused attention state.

23 tudinal factors that influence a household's decision to adopt and use new sanitation technologies.

24 Risk was not a consistent factor in decisions to adopt more controlling techniques.

25 ry forward a level of confidence in previous decisions to affect subsequent decisions.

26 oth mechanisms were predictive of individual decisions to aggress, but observed patterns were better

27 In stem cells, EtOH may shift cell fate decisions to alter developmental outcomes by increasing

28 the frequency at which participants switched decisions to an alternative option in the subsequent tri

29 tin had the greatest influence on the cells' decisions to arrest or die, and that the proliferation s

30 lateral prefrontal cortex at the time of the decision to assign an appropriate punishment through a d

31 T Habituation refers to processes underlying decisions to attend or ignore stimuli, which are pivotal

32 Naturalistic observations show that decisions to avoid or escape predators occur at differen

33 y occurs when decision makers perceive their decision to be difficult.

34 ential strategy is to consider the treatment decision to be hierarchically dictated by the efficacy o

35 ave not been completed, rendering management decisions to be based on extrapolation from adult data a

36 of large cohorts does not allow therapeutic decisions to be based on scientific evidence.

37 y to allow accurate assumptions and informed decisions to be made concerning the scope and clinical a

38 In doing so, we aim to clarify the decisions to be made for those who wish to develop and u

39 a particular position) to be highlighted and decisions to be made on which mutations may be acceptabl

40 er source of behavioral data: the risky life decision to become an explorer or a revolutionary.

41 entified factors that influence individuals' decisions to become organ donors, which may be effective

42 igger medical consultations that result in a decision to begin ADHD treatment.

43 disease understanding and clinical treatment decisions to benefit patients.

44 ate cancer, which could be used to guide the decision to biopsy.

45 ssay (PLA) for LINC00518/PRAME expression in decisions to biopsy a series of pigmented skin lesions.

46 attributable to changes in donor factors and decisions to biopsy and pump kidneys.

47 medications for IBD should not influence the decision to breast-feed and vice versa.

48 ed neural activation patterns discriminating decisions to buy cannabis from declined offers.

49 the first time that the perplexing clinical decision to choose multiple antibiotics for combination

50 The decision to choose one treatment over the other will dep

51 m to: 1) validate the appropriateness of the decision to chronically anticoagulate; 2) guide clinicia

52 nt differently, and their views affect their decisions to climb the corporate ladder (or not).

53 le to the setting of advanced CKD, where the decision to commence anticoagulation poses a conundrum.

54 e for 1, 3, and 5 years from the date of the decision to commence watch and wait.

55 The decision to commit to spermatogenic differentiation coin

56 We first review evidence that decisions to communicate information are determined by t

57 human pharmacokinetic predictions led to the decision to conduct a human microdose study to determine

58 We aimed to define factors that influence decisions to consent for organ donation.

59 tients with mastocytosis are tasked with the decision to consider therapeutic options.

60 In this COVID pandemic, the decision to continue elective cancer surgeries, and thei

61 How need and motivation control the decision to continue or change behavior is not understoo

62 -treatment (72 weeks) biopsies supported the decision to continue the trial (relative change in alani

63 oices, indicating growing uncertainty in the decision to continue.

64 ria parasite makes a fundamental and crucial decision: to continue to invade and proliferate or to di

65 luding bacteraemia or fungaemia would affect decisions to continue or stop antimicrobial treatment.

66 We present an fMRI-based model predicting decisions to control emotion, finding that activity in b

67 ant of the game 'chicken' in which they made decisions to cooperate or not cooperate to obtain reward

68 xploiting variation in the timing of payers' decisions to cover sleeve gastrectomy as a natural exper

69 Basing the decision to decannulate on suctioning frequency plus con

70 roup members with high expertise varies from decision to decision.

71 and sociocultural factors contribute to the decision to decline care.

72 The interventions were not associated with decisions to decline newborn screening or withdraw resid

73 Decisions to deconstruct hydraulic engineering structure

74 ,951 (48%), and in 15,341 (73%), there was a decision to deliberately withhold certain treatment moda

75 is unclear how social determinants influence decisions to delist for "too sick." We hypothesized that

76 mably causes acute problems that lead to the decision to deliver.

77 We find that the decision to die is a germ cell-intrinsic process linked

78 egulatory control over ORE1 In addition, the decision to die is superimposed by an additional layer o

79 and beta-catenin, resulting in the cell fate decision to differentiate rather than proliferate.

80 Reasons for the decision to discontinue after having decided to initiate

81 The study was terminated prematurely and the decision to discontinue the study was made by the sponso

82 n, unacceptable toxicity, the investigator's decision to discontinue, or participant withdrawal.

83 The decision to disperse or remain philopatric between breed

84 een dispersal distance and plasticity in the decision to disperse.

85 ed anxieties about the consequences of their decision to donate.

86 the balance of values underlying the policy decision to eliminate nonmedical exemptions is clearly a

87 tralia, relatively little is known about the decisions to emigrate made by these nurses.

88 iral shedding during convalescence to inform decisions to end isolation.

89 The decision to engage in food-seeking behavior depends not

90 ewarding event is a crucial component of the decision to engage in its pursuit.

91 ith no performance changes while prospective decisions to engage attention were followed by better se

92 beliefs of success in Experiment 1 predicted decisions to engage in Experiment 2 and vice-versa.

93 how information about bodily state modulates decisions to engage in physical activity.

94 The decision to enroll in a clinical trial is complex given

95 physician-related biases that influence this decision to ensure patient autonomy.

96 nt availability and stresses impact a cell's decision to enter a growth state or a quiescent state.

97 ate that neuropeptide signaling promotes the decision to enter dauer rather than reproductive develop

98 e cell fate decisions. In budding yeast, the decision to enter meiosis is controlled by nutrient and

99 ting Tup1-Cyc8 recruitment dictates the fate decision to enter meiosis.

100 SCs) that balance self-renewal and cell-fate decisions to establish a protective barrier, while repla

101 ferent kind of more naturalistic decision--a decision to evaluate "what shall I do with it?" after th

102 s underlying this variability is the agentic decision to exert control over emotional responses.

103 del informed by momentary gaze revealed that decisions to expend effort are related to amplification

104 fate is controlled by the binary stochastic decision to express the transcription factor Spineless i

105 RNAs), plays a key role in plants making the decision to flower by integrating into the known floweri

106 ding knowledge and attitude) influencing the decision to follow a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) or not

107 cancer patients admitted to ICU, then with a decision to forgo life-sustaining therapies and that wer

108 The decision to forgo life-sustaining therapies was associat

109 The decision to forgo life-sustaining therapies was independ

110 method was used to test the hypothesis that decision to forgo life-sustaining therapies was independ

111 admitted to ICU, in 1,369 patients (8.1%) a decision to forgo life-sustaining therapies was made dur

112 cer patients discharged from our ICU after a decision to forgo life-sustaining therapies were dischar

113 trols, and vice versa.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Decisions to forgo large rewards for smaller ones due to

114 y cancer patients are admitted to an ICU and decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies are frequen

115 f a conservation landscape to show that this decision to "front-load" project spending can be subopti

116 expression programs mediate specific lineage decisions to generate neuronal and glial cell types from

117 traction-from local confidence in individual decisions to global estimates of our skills and abilitie

118 ve activation of this pathway impacts cell's decision to "go" vs. "grow." These insights define a tyr

119 ate expected incremental social value of the decision to grant access to a new treatment on the basis

120 s and high unmet needs and give guidance for decisions; to grant access for patients, to provide a do

121 Justice systems delegate punishment decisions to groups in the belief that the aggregation o

122 and emotional aspects of CPM may affect the decision to have CPM and should be addressed when discus

123 How patients make decisions to have surgery may contribute to this problem

124 y decreases in trustworthiness engendered by decisions to hide (experiments 3A and 3B).

125 The decision to implant durable mechanical circulatory syste

126 known resistance amongEnterobacteriaceae The decision to implement these new breakpoints, including t

127 ar monitoring are needed to inform treatment decisions to improve long-term cardiovascular health.

128 We made a pragmatic decision to include all studies to best reflect reality,

129 of pathogenic learning may optimize progeny decisions to increase survival in fluctuating environmen

130 opram and the dopamine precursor levodopa on decisions to inflict pain on oneself and others for fina

131 al approach to error disclosure in which the decision to inform the patient stems from within the org

132 the use of procalcitonin (PCT) to guide the decision to initiate antibiotic therapy in AECOPD has re

133 nt for key factors potentially affecting the decision to initiate anticoagulation, such as infarct si

134 as renal function declines, complicating the decision to initiate anticoagulation.

135 The decision to initiate low-dose aspirin use for the primar

136 ccumbens (NAc) neurons naturally encodes the decision to initiate or suppress reward seeking when fac

137 ted TPL-2 regulation impacts on the cellular decision to initiate proinflammatory cytokine production

138 Whether CAC score can assist in guiding the decision to initiate statin treatment for primary preven

139 e and trustworthiness of the resident; (2) a decision to initiate trust in the resident to begin the

140 We modeled the larva's navigational decision to initiate turns as the output of a Linear-Non

141 ropriate in primary prevention when clinical decisions to initiate statin therapy are uncertain.

142 y disorders of the biliary system and thus a decision to inject Gd-EOB-DTPA was taken.

143 nd autoimmune disease and may facilitate the decision to institute anti-inflammatory treatment in the

144 nd severe) tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the decision to intervene is influenced by right ventricular

145 f whom were discharged prior to 28-days post decision to intervene surgically.

146 There is great need to understand decisions to intervene restoratively and to find impleme

147 The decision to introduce or amend vaccination programmes is

148 Continued surveillance is warranted as the decision to introduce protein conjugated vaccine in Indi

149 electively predict an opponent's yet unknown decision to invest in their common good or defect and di

150 cannot be drawn, and therefore has made the decision to issue a retraction of the manuscript.

151 s as the most important factor in making the decision to join a trial.

152 ries of human behavior suggest that people's decisions to join a group and their subsequent behavior

153 and self-motivated reasons behind patients' decisions to join a retinal trial.

154 epresenting a factor that contributed to the decision to leave surgical training, and with the toppli

155 the olfactory interactions that regulate its decision to leave the nest to forage.

156 with clinician pessimism and may affect the decision to limit care independent of a patient's severi

157 Factors that influenced the decision to limit extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in

158 Involvement in the decision to limit life support allowed surrogates to reg

159 ling among bereaved surrogates involved in a decision to limit life support in the ICU.

160 ined upon ICU admission in 12,854 (61%), the decision to limit treatment was based on the patient's a

161 Surrogate decision makers involved in decisions to limit life support for an incapacitated pat

162 Decisions to limit life-sustaining therapies are strongl

163 Finally, FGF4 couples fate decisions to lineage composition through changes in loca

164 imics can regulate MAPKs, affecting cellular decisions to live or die.

165 Organisms tread a fine line in balancing the decision to maintain cellular homeostasis or promote cel

166 w p21 regulates the proliferation-quiescence decision to maintain genomic stability.

167 In a modified Go/NoGo task, decisions to make or withhold actions on 'Choose' trials

168 scillatory activity that reflected subjects' decisions to make riskier choices.

169 , improved performance so as to make optimal decisions to maximize reward.

170 nderlying model of the goods space, allowing decisions to meet current needs.

171 planatory power of self-assessed risk in the decision to migrate or stay and, equally important, conf

172 from similar studies, China-educated nurses' decisions to migrate are complex and not based solely on

173 sk communication would support the optimized decisions to minimize the impact of coronavirus on our l

174 t rapidly mobilize and make difficult policy decisions to mitigate the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVI

175 known to precede subjects' reports of their decision to move.

176 In line with theoretical accounts, people's decisions to move from current locations were independen

177 k, based around theories of how animals make decisions to move on when foraging for food.

178 e agonist cabergoline significantly affected decisions to move on, specifically modulating the effect

179 activity of dopamine in the brain modulates decisions to move on, with people valuing other location

180 es a complex choreography of transcriptional decisions to obtain specific cellular identities.

181 mesothelium and allow appropriate cell fate decisions to occur in this multipotent mesoderm lineage.

182 primary care professionals individualize the decision to offer or refer adults without obesity who do

183 association between factors influencing the decision to offer surgery to seriously ill older adults

184 Respondents whose decision to offer surgery was influenced by their belief

185 Background Despite known limitations, the decision to operate on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) i

186 r predictions across vignettes) and in their decisions to operate (49%-85%).

187 s explained 39% of the observed variation in decisions to operate across the four vignettes.

188 fits vary and are highly predictive of their decisions to operate.

189 eons' assessments of risk and in turn, their decisions to operate.

190 ives at a morally permissible and a rational decision to opt out.

191 f this critical information guides physician decisions to optimize patient clinical outcomes.

192 Physical fatigue crucially influences our decisions to partake in effortful action.

193 An individual's decision to participate in a raid is strongly associated

194 Decisions to pause or pursue nonpandemic research should

195 ffered LCS and elected on the basis of their decision to pay (the out-of-pocket cost for LCS).

196 ting (56%), whereas others (44%) encoded the decision to perform (or withhold) a specific action (e.g

197 e the decision to proceed with CCTA, and the decision to perform a CAC scan should be balanced with t

198 ization status, this forms the basis for the decision to perform a DBPCFC, following a standardized d

199 Decision to perform PCI was left to the discretion of lo

200 heir musical actions (i.e., their individual decisions to play or to stop playing) and at the level o

201 ty of the autoinjector influence physician's decision to prescribe one.

202 -not arbitrary regulations-should inform the decision to prescribe opioids.

203 Decisions to prioritize reward consumption or pain avoid

204 ess in trial outcome delivery, informing the decision to proceed or stop clinical evaluation of a tar

205 resolution of hematologic abnormalities, the decision to proceed to transplantation in these patients

206 Thus, CAC results should not influence the decision to proceed with CCTA, and the decision to perfo

207 The decision to proceed with reproductive development or und

208 testinal transplantation and may support the decision to proceed with transplantation when other indi

209 Evidence is valuable because it informs decisions to produce better outcomes.

210 mental health treatment lends support to the decision to provide gender-affirming surgeries to transg

211 Their effect on personal decisions to purchase firearms is not well-understood.

212 The decision to pursue a left ventricular assist device (LVA

213 Patient and caregiver conflict over the decision to pursue an LVAD was highly correlated in this

214 givers and contribute to conflict around the decision to pursue LVAD remains largely unexplored.

215 The decision to pursue rhythm control is based on symptoms,

216 y derived form of sexual conflict: a queen's decision to pursue risky additional mating flights is dr

217 Demanding tasks often require a series of decisions to reach a goal.

218 The decision to receive treatment for AK varied from 57.7% (

219 Thus, the decision to recommend PMRT requires a great deal of clin

220 reaks in Russia and Sweden in 2016, critical decisions to reduce morbidity and mortality include rapi

221 of negative images could be used to predict decisions to regulate affective responses to those image

222 These brain variables predicted future decisions to regulate emotion beyond what could be predi

223 Our results revealed the following: (1) decisions to regulate were more frequent in individuals

224 lesser valued option, females execute their decision to reject this inferior substrate not by stoppi

225 sites means there is risk associated with a decision to relocate (e.g. poor foraging) as well as a p

226 Stem cell fate decisions to remain quiescent, self-renew or differentia

227 t coincides with a European Committee on AST decision to remove previously established, differing AZI

228 The cornerstone of this update has been the decision to reprocess all high-level LINCS datasets and

229 important roles in regulating physiological decisions to reproduce, grow, and age.

230 Such decisions to restrict species diversity in biomedical re

231 ecision to take daily tenofovir as PrEP, the decision to return for at least one PrEP follow-up visit

232 nt and resident outcomes would better inform decisions to revise physician scheduling in Canadian ICU

233 The decision to screen for colorectal cancer in adults aged

234 ouraging CPM on patient care satisfaction or decisions to seek treatment from another clinician.

235 Seven experiments explore people's decisions to share or withhold personal information, and

236 The decision to start ART was determined by CD4 count for on

237 ting of a clinical consultation to guide the decision to start or discontinue a treatment.

238 ists are frequently faced with the important decision to start or terminate a creative partnership.

239 The decision to start screening mammography in women prior t

240 n of multiple myeloma and often dictates the decision to start treatment.

241 ribute to the Drosophila larval sensorimotor decision to startle, explore, or perform a sequence of t

242 at C. elegans are able to judiciously make a decision to stay on stiffer regions.

243 tep is taken, not via a direct effect on the decision to step but by modulating the initial in-place

244 n menopause-specific QOL influence a woman's decision to stop chemoprevention therapy.

245 the most relevant factor to consider in the decision to stop CTX after ART-induced immune reconstitu

246 s that NSBBs did not increase mortality; the decision to stop NSBB treatment in relation to stressful

247 ial NSBB users stopped taking NSBBs, and the decision to stop NSBB treatment marked a sharp rise in m

248 hese two states have specific effects on the decisions to stop at and leave proteinaceous food patche

249 Decisions to stop or continue donepezil treatment should

250 Nine years elapsed between Gavi's investment decision to support typhoid conjugate vaccines (TCVs) in

251 Moreover, decisions to support or oppose war are descriptively deo

252 The decision to surgically evacuate the hematoma was made by

253 nce of stress, the mechanisms underlying its decision to sustain copulation are unclear.

254 probability of migrating, and, secondly, the decision to switch between migratory strategies.

255 We also found that the decision to switch from replication to differentiation i

256 of treatment could benefit from a very early decision to switch treatment.

257 der seasonal variation could cause premature decisions to switch to alternative RDTs.

258 n-making, usually applied to cell-autonomous decisions, to systems that collectively make decisions t

259 ssion to examine factors associated with the decision to take daily tenofovir as PrEP, the decision t

260 ular screening examination can influence the decision to take part in the other type of cardiovascula

261 EP, suggesting that participants based their decision to take PrEP, at least in part, on their percei

262 wenty congenitally deaf readers made lexical decisions to target words and pseudowords.

263 Using platelet count trends to guide decision to test for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is

264 vmPFC/mOFC) is involved in constraining the decision to the relevant options.

265 unicated their confidence about a perceptual decision to the social context.

266 ould be decoded from the time of the initial decision to the time of the subsequent information-seeki

267 Patients made faster lexical decisions to the panic-symptom words when they were prec

268 The apes successfully adapted their decisions to the social context and their performance wa

269 ated earlier, consistent with binding action decisions to their ensuing outcome.

270 imed to identify factors associated with the decision to transfuse.

271 measure of kidney quality which may aid the decision to transplant the kidney.

272 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens or a decision to treat the patient empirically without a defi

273 threshold (ie, the criteria that guided the decision to treat).

274 orthiness of the other person prior to their decision to trust or not trust.

275 olfactory and visual signals upstream of the decision to turn.

276 ft tissue grafting has an influence on their decision to undergo future treatment.

277 The decision to undergo mitral valve surgery is often made o

278 ng important clinical decisions, such as the decision to undergo MR surgery.

279 tatus of Miro phosphorylation influences the decision to undergo Parkin-dependent mitochondrial arres

280 ase, co-ordinate regulation may optimize the decision to undertake a final cell division as nutrients

281 ecause every model performed acceptably, the decision to use a given model should depend on practical

282 ary artery calcium testing can assist in the decision to use a statin.

283 biotic choice, dose, and duration, after the decision to use antibiotics has been made.

284 ain metastases to identify predictors of the decision to use bevacizumab and survival following bevac

285 In the absence of severe poisoning, the decision to use extracorporeal treatment is determined b

286 n to cognitive outcomes will help inform the decision to use intradialytic cerebral perfusion monitor

287 The decision to use this surgical approach should be made in

288 5 hours with high accuracy and may guide the decision to use thrombolysis in patients with unknown ti

289 inically relevant decisions drug users make: decisions to use drugs.

290 fter the pandemic vaccination influenced the decision to vaccinate in subsequent seasons.

291 amples can vary from trial to trial, causing decisions to vary.

292 Political partisanship influences citizens' decisions to voluntarily engage in physical distancing i

293 The decision to withdraw a drug should be made for each indi

294 ure (37.7%) were factors that influenced the decision to withdraw extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

295 Death often follows a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments.

296 ath, admission to an intensive care unit, or decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatme

297 e often inaccurate and may lead to premature decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatments (LST) i

298 In the acute setting, the decision to withhold anticoagulants is based on an indiv

299 ed the effect of opioid ADE understanding on decisions to withhold opioids when ADEs (i.e., nausea/vo

300 ve evaluated the influence of preferences on decisions to withhold prescribed opioids for children.