コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
2 ongestive heart failure (primary diagnosis), decompensated advanced liver disease, cancer with or wit
4 sing tide of alcohol relapse, admissions for decompensated ALD, and an increase in newly diagnosed pa
6 ical response, the patient remained severely decompensated and re-transplantation was performed after
8 eption of cirrhosis as either compensated or decompensated and the recent, more complex models of cir
12 ng directly from acute liver failure or from decompensated chronic liver disease is an increasing pro
13 in the prevalence of cirrhosis (1.7%-2.2%), decompensated cirrhosis (1.1%-1.2%), and HCC (0.03%-0.13
14 produced the largest absolute reductions in decompensated cirrhosis (16%) and hepatocellular carcino
15 PMs from ascites samples of 66 patients with decompensated cirrhosis (19 with SBP) and analyzed them
16 is hypothesis and included 522 patients with decompensated cirrhosis (237 with ACLF) and 40 healthy s
17 es of a separate cohort of 111 patients with decompensated cirrhosis (67 with SBP) and quantified the
18 l in a large cohort of patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis (AD, n = 52) or acute-on-chronic
19 Independent predictors of mortality were decompensated cirrhosis (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 23.
20 ected with HCV genotypes 1 through 6 who had decompensated cirrhosis (classified as Child-Pugh-Turcot
21 therapy, recently approved for patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC) secondary to hepatitis C vi
22 hronic HCV only, 9% with cirrhosis, 12% with decompensated cirrhosis (DCC), 2% with liver cancer, 2%
24 phageal variceal hemorrhage in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (first section); we reviewed the
25 ge IV disease (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.58), decompensated cirrhosis (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.30-1.70), a
26 [CI]=1.11-2.11; log-rank test; P<0.001) and decompensated cirrhosis (RR=2.01; 95% CI=1.07-3.79; log-
27 as been reported on the real-world clinical (decompensated cirrhosis [DCC] and hepatocellular carcino
28 cs of systemic inflammation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ACLF, with special emphasis
31 bundant, activated, and highly functional in decompensated cirrhosis and are further enriched in SBP.
32 the only effective therapy for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and fulminant liver failure.
33 V, the number of individuals with cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis and HCC will continue to increas
34 f patients developing HCV-related cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis and HCC will increase substantia
35 sis progression, and mortality attributed to decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and
37 st cost-effective strategy for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and MELD score greater than 13.
38 o-controlled, phase 2 trial in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and moderate-to-severe liver fai
39 e that typically precedes the development of decompensated cirrhosis and the accompanying uncertainti
40 controlled trials of adults (>18 years) with decompensated cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome
44 advanced liver disease, including those with decompensated cirrhosis before and after liver transplan
45 advanced liver disease, including those with decompensated cirrhosis before or after liver transplant
47 tes incubated with plasma from patients with decompensated cirrhosis carrying the protective SNP geno
49 ecrease the 15-year cumulative incidences of decompensated cirrhosis from 12.2% to 4.5%, hepatocellul
50 ificantly larger proportion of patients with decompensated cirrhosis given a combination of G-CSF and
51 nt-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis given a fixed-dose combination o
59 sease distinguishes acute liver failure from decompensated cirrhosis or acute-on-chronic liver failur
61 ction of any genotype and either compensated/decompensated cirrhosis or posttransplantation recurrenc
62 that the optimal MELD threshold below which decompensated cirrhosis patients should receive HCV trea
63 re to predict 30-day hospital readmission in decompensated cirrhosis patients using the US nationwide
66 prospective study, consecutive patients with decompensated cirrhosis seen at the Institute of Liver a
67 This validated model enabled patients with decompensated cirrhosis to be stratified into groups wit
68 in 40 mg/day plus rifaximin in patients with decompensated cirrhosis was associated with a significan
71 ASTRAL-4) in which patients with HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis were randomly assigned to an all
73 th fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) and decompensated cirrhosis who had a life expectancy of 1 y
74 Adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of decompensated cirrhosis who were admitted to the ICU bet
75 Os was observed in patients with HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis who were given sofosbuvir and ve
76 ve was to identify LT-eligible patients with decompensated cirrhosis who would benefit (and not benef
77 ere is a concern that the cured patient with decompensated cirrhosis will find themselves in "MELD pu
81 , and systemic inflammation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis with and without bacterial infec
83 32% had a diagnosis of cirrhosis (9.9% with decompensated cirrhosis), 36% had a Fibrosis-4 index sco
84 Among the full cohort with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, 61% (504 of 830) died during th
85 could prevent approximately 124,200 cases of decompensated cirrhosis, 78,800 cases of hepatocellular
87 ver function in patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, and delay or obviate the need f
88 ency is common among patients with HCV, with decompensated cirrhosis, and in the posttransplant setti
89 ents with cirrhosis, particularly those with decompensated cirrhosis, are at increased risk of bacter
90 stance abuse, sexually transmitted diseases, decompensated cirrhosis, cirrhosis, and hepatitis C viru
91 f HCV incidence, prevalence, compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver
92 H-fibrosis, NASH-compensated cirrhosis, NASH-decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver
93 advanced liver disease, including those with decompensated cirrhosis, in routine practice (all curren
94 including patients with HIV/HCV coinfection, decompensated cirrhosis, liver and kidney transplants, a
96 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79) among patients with decompensated cirrhosis, the median survival benefit was
97 he prominence of vascular destabilization in decompensated cirrhosis, we evaluated Angiopoietin-2 to
98 hemodynamic derangements than patients with decompensated cirrhosis, we investigated whether PICD co
99 ) correlates with mortality in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, who are almost invariably sarco
100 s fluid were collected from 35 patients with decompensated cirrhosis, with or without spontaneous bac
121 -old woman was admitted to our hospital with decompensated congestive heart failure and pericardial e
125 re-transplantation for recipients who remain decompensated despite virological response and is likely
127 ollected prospectively from 39 patients with decompensated end-stage systolic heart failure (92% male
128 y artery occlusion pressure in patients with decompensated end-stage systolic heart failure was recen
131 interferon-alpha and ribavirin who developed decompensated graft cirrhosis 6 years after a first live
132 57-year-old liver transplant recipient with decompensated graft cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis E
133 4 patients with CS, the majority were due to decompensated heart failure (50%) or myocardial infarcti
135 Estimates of the numbers and rates of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) hospitalization are c
140 valsartan in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) was well-tolerated an
141 ure), 7,141 patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) were randomized to re
142 vo heart failure (HF)) or worsening (acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF)) of symptoms and sign
146 y of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF), we assessed fac
147 E-AHF) and Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (CARRESS-HF) trials during h
148 ic Optimization Strategy Evaluation in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (DOSE-AHF) and Cardiorenal R
149 rtan (S/V) in stabilized patients with acute decompensated heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fr
152 xtracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute decompensated heart failure (i.e., cardiogenic shock com
154 ined tachyarrhythmia (atrial/ventricular) or decompensated heart failure admission/transplantation/de
156 al function during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure and associated outcomes.
157 HF) trials during hospitalization with acute decompensated heart failure and clinical congestion.
158 is a primary therapeutic objective in acute decompensated heart failure and commonly monitored with
160 n for hospitalization in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and is an important target f
161 Failure) that randomized patients with acute decompensated heart failure and preexisting WRF to inten
162 tal practice patterns of NIPPV use for acute decompensated heart failure and their relationship with
163 s admitted to a single institution for acute decompensated heart failure and treated with UF: HFLEF (
164 fylline for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Volume Overload to Asses
165 fylline for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Volume Overload to Asses
166 fylline for Patients Hospitalized with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Volume Overload to Asses
167 nificantly associated with increased risk of decompensated heart failure and/or development of clinic
168 of hypotension while hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure are not well understood.
169 ity outcomes for patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure are poor and have not signif
171 ion fraction who were hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure at 129 sites in the United S
172 , and unplanned clinic visits to treat acute decompensated heart failure based on the blinded adjudic
173 tion of chronic oral medication during acute decompensated heart failure hospitalization may not be a
174 xtracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute decompensated heart failure in our ICU (67% of them had
175 technology for inpatient management of acute decompensated heart failure in patients with volume over
177 Hypotension while hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure is an independent risk facto
178 SBP reduction) during the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure is strongly and independentl
181 h heart failure without CRT-D from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) h
182 re National Registry-United States and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry-Internatio
183 re National Registry-United States and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry-Internatio
184 amined 196 770 AHF admissions from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry-United Sta
186 ped from 3 clinical databases (ADHERE [Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry], EFFECT s
188 was then prospectively validated in 50 acute decompensated heart failure patients using meticulously
189 ip between intensive volume removal in acute decompensated heart failure patients with preexisting wo
192 Therapy During Hospital Admission for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Reduce Mortality and Readmis
194 f age, she was admitted to our hospital with decompensated heart failure to be evaluated for a heart
195 oral neurohormonal antagonists during acute decompensated heart failure treatment negatively influen
196 ventilation (NIPPV) for patients with acute decompensated heart failure was introduced almost 20 yea
197 ients >/=55 years of age admitted with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection frac
198 mong hospitals in the use of NIPPV for acute decompensated heart failure without evidence for differe
199 -HF trial (Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure) that randomized patients wi
200 y of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure) trial randomized 7,141 hosp
201 Pressure Measurements in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure) was a single-center prospec
202 of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide and Decompensated Heart Failure), 7,141 patients hospitalize
203 ic Optimization Strategy Evaluation in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure), and CARRESS-HF (Cardiorena
206 xtracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute decompensated heart failure, 1-year survival was 42%, bu
207 There were 17 CV events (12%, 6 CV deaths, 6 decompensated heart failure, and 5 arrhythmias; median t
209 infarction, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal acute decompensated heart failure, and death from cardiovascul
210 patients (acute myocardial infarction, acute decompensated heart failure, biventricular failure, and
211 should be considered for patients with acute decompensated heart failure, but timing of implantation
212 an overview of the pathophysiology of acute decompensated heart failure, current management strategi
213 f the pathophysiologic derangements in acute decompensated heart failure, denoted by the acronym DRI(
214 outcome of hospitalization for management of decompensated heart failure, initiation of mechanical ci
216 ion fraction who were hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure, the initiation of sacubitri
231 ortality in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure: 4 HF-specific mortality pre
233 he myocardium; in fact, cell therapy for the decompensated heart has to be based on the acquisition o
235 mic NaNO2 infusion that may be beneficial in decompensated HF and warrants further evaluation with lo
236 ighted hospitalizations) classified as acute decompensated HF had available ejection fraction data (5
237 18.6 months, comparable to that after first decompensated HF hospitalization, even after age-sex adj
238 the impact of in-hospital guidance for acute decompensated HF treatment by a predefined NT-proBNP tar
239 ptide)-guided therapy in patients with acute decompensated HF using a relative NT-proBNP target has n
240 proBNP-guided therapy of patients with acute decompensated HF using a relative NT-proBNP target would
243 ance of troponin elevation in the setting of decompensated HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF
245 ted with high mortality rates, comparable to decompensated HF, and a major burden of rehospitalizatio
247 recorded and categorized as primarily due to decompensated HF, other cardiovascular disease, infectio
251 ws comparative assessment of compensated and decompensated (HF) forms of cardiac hypertrophy because
252 registry participants who were admitted for decompensated HFpEF (ejection fraction >/=50%) from Janu
253 ities among hospitalized patients with acute decompensated HFpEF and HFrEF has increased over time, a
254 oponin elevation among patients with acutely decompensated HFpEF is associated with worse in-hospital
255 ement of troponin levels among patients with decompensated HFpEF may be useful for risk stratificatio
257 persistent upregulation of the HBP triggers decompensated hypertrophy through activation of mTOR whi
258 Myxedema coma is a life-threatening form of decompensated hypothyroidism that must be treated with a
259 Using multicenter study data in hospitalized decompensated infected cirrhosis patients, I-ACLF define
260 The recipient was a 51-year-old man with decompensated liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcino
264 orthotopic liver transplantation because of decompensated liver cirrhosis was admitted with acute an
265 partment present in ascites of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, and focus especially on M
266 dictor of mortality in patients with acutely decompensated liver cirrhosis, though determining CysC a
268 nd highly effective in HCV-HIV patients with decompensated liver disease and post-LT, with post-LT su
270 infection in reducing the risk of cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinom
271 ikelihood of SVR; age, sex, body mass index, decompensated liver disease, diabetes, genotype 1 subtyp
272 titis B virus or HIV infection), evidence of decompensated liver disease, or a history of hepatocellu
275 ed complications (e.g., fulminant hepatitis, decompensated liver, and hepatocellular carcinoma) were
280 ation with low procedure mortality, bridging decompensated patients to permanent LVAD or heart transp
282 d SMV with or without RBV in compensated and decompensated patients with cirrhosis with HCV GT1 infec
284 An elevated admission BUN/Cr identifies decompensated patients with heart failure likely to expe
287 ctly leads to right ventricular hypertrophy, decompensated right-sided heart failure, and death.
288 s also studied in the RVfib of patients with decompensated RV failure (n=11) versus control (n=7).
290 th compensated RV hypertrophy, patients with decompensated RV failure had decreased miR-126 expressio
291 el resulted to a short microRNA signature of decompensated RV failure, which included the myocardium-
293 sues from rats with normal, compensated, and decompensated RV hypertrophy, carefully defined based on
297 ccurred at 2 weeks in patients with recently decompensated systolic HF treated with anakinra, whereas