戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 .7% (95% CI, 22.5-30.7) decrease in possible delayed diagnosis.
2 ry tract with dismal survival largely due to delayed diagnosis.
3 ailability of sIL-2R testing could result in delayed diagnosis.
4 y causes of scaphoid nonunions, secondary to delayed diagnosis.
5 ars]; 50.8% female), 2013 (2.5%) experienced delayed diagnosis.
6  differences in clinical presentation due to delayed diagnosis.
7 l cord injury occurred only in patients with delayed diagnosis.
8 nts) over the study period in the group with delayed diagnosis.
9 nderwent appendectomy, and 2045 (2.7%) had a delayed diagnosis.
10 specific symptoms, leading to a high rate of delayed diagnosis.
11 en experience morbidity and mortality due to delayed diagnosis.
12 ecessary or inappropriate investigations, or delayed diagnosis.
13 ith nonspecific clinical findings leading to delayed diagnosis.
14  advanced CMV retinitis, possibly because of delayed diagnosis.
15 gh mortality rate of CCA is a consequence of delayed diagnosis.
16 leviate the financial burden associated with delayed diagnosis.
17 , 66% of AKI cases were missed and 13% had a delayed diagnosis.
18 ications and economic burdens resulting from delayed diagnosis.
19                        Among children with a delayed diagnosis, 109 cases (23.1%) were likely to be p
20 all, 18% of CBCS participants had late stage/delayed diagnosis, 35% had delayed treatment initiation,
21               The association of volume with delayed diagnosis across conditions was evaluated using
22 y arises from several concurrent causes, and delayed diagnosis adds to its grim prognosis.
23               Paraffinoma is a rare and time-delayed diagnosis after various surgeries and therefore
24 nvolving 4 Middle Eastern men complicated by delayed diagnosis, ambiguous epidemiologic links among p
25 rategies have notable limitations, including delayed diagnosis and adverse effects.
26 dily palpable can be difficult, resulting in delayed diagnosis and can lead to emaciation and electro
27 ge numbers in Africa and are at high risk of delayed diagnosis and chronic complications of untreated
28                            Rates of possible delayed diagnosis and complications were determined.
29               High HRU costs associated with delayed diagnosis and end-organ damage indicate a need f
30 insured, financial barriers to COVID-19 care delayed diagnosis and exacerbated transmission.
31 -related deaths continue to occur because of delayed diagnosis and failure to use appropriate therapy
32               Their healthcare is impeded by delayed diagnosis and insufficient treatment.
33  SEAs and ICEAs is typically poor because of delayed diagnosis and intervention and is dependent on t
34                                              Delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis are frequent in peopl
35                                              Delayed diagnosis and personality disorder were negative
36 nts a major public health concern because of delayed diagnosis and poor prognosis.
37 visits with eye care professional may have a delayed diagnosis and repair of their RD.
38 I stage 2 decreases sensitivity, may lead to delayed diagnosis and results in underestimation of KDIG
39                                              Delayed diagnosis and sub-optimal treatment further cont
40  confound the clinical picture, resulting in delayed diagnosis and suboptimal treatment.
41 ecialists and testing may be associated with delayed diagnosis and symptom management for patients wi
42 lications that could be related to missed or delayed diagnosis and the 6-month cumulative radiation e
43 high mortality rate, largely attributable to delayed diagnosis and the intricacies of its tumor micro
44        An adverse outcome is associated with delayed diagnosis and therapy; thus, empirical treatment
45 mong HIV-infected adults, in part because of delayed diagnosis and therefore delayed initiation of tr
46 linear regression to estimate odds ratios of delayed diagnosis and to identify correlates of length o
47 , as well as address common problems such as delayed diagnosis and treatment abandonment.
48                                              Delayed diagnosis and treatment are frequently reported.
49                                              Delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to poor patient
50                                              Delayed diagnosis and treatment of AKI due to the lack o
51 ughout this small Maine community because of delayed diagnosis and treatment of the source patient, d
52                                              Delayed diagnosis and treatment resistance result in hig
53  with FND, including harm from misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis and treatment, direct harm from profes
54 alised centres with multidisciplinary teams, delayed diagnosis and treatment, poor management of trea
55 ideline, carries a potential for harm due to delayed diagnosis and treatment.
56 is in children is frequently associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment.
57                                    Missed or delayed diagnosis and undertreatment do not fully explai
58 reening age are often overlooked, leading to delayed diagnosis and worse prognosis.
59 s into vulnerable groups that may experience delayed diagnosis and/or a poorer prognosis.
60 he time of diagnosis, suggesting potentially delayed diagnosis and/or treatment.
61 ulosis in the 1990s, poor infection control, delayed diagnosis, and a high HIV prevalence facilitated
62  tissues are often responsible for missed or delayed diagnosis, and amyloidosis remains a considerabl
63 rs of immunocompromised patients, frequently delayed diagnosis, and limited therapeutics.
64  due to the absence of patient risk factors, delayed diagnosis, and limited treatment options, result
65 ession are at increased risk for occurrence, delayed diagnosis, and progression of AE.
66 RS-CoV) has been attributed to overcrowding, delayed diagnosis, and the breakdown of infection contro
67  that peak viral load, tacrolimus treatment, delayed diagnosis, and viral reduction time influence ou
68 e classes were evaluated in association with delayed diagnosis (approximated with stages III-IV at di
69                             Misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis are common where the index of suspicio
70 ndicitis hospital care costs associated with delayed diagnosis are unknown.
71                    Outcomes in patients with delayed diagnosis are worse but half retain their pouch
72 y 14-94 new PCG cases/year may be at risk of delayed diagnosis as a result of living in a potential s
73                        This is so because of delayed diagnosis (as a consequence of the silent, asymp
74 ussis in adults is difficult, resulting in a delayed diagnosis, as a delayed cough may present >/=3 m
75  it is a common entity, patients often get a delayed diagnosis because it is often subtle (hidden), m
76 rriers to seeking health care; and missed or delayed diagnosis by health-care providers.
77                                              Delayed diagnosis can lead to devastating complications.
78 rmer smokers had a 4.3 times greater risk of delayed diagnosis compared with current smokers (95% con
79  (95% CI, 1.69-7.28) higher adjusted rate of delayed diagnosis compared with hospitals with less than
80 CI, 1.21-1.63) times higher adjusted rate of delayed diagnosis compared with non-Hispanic White patie
81 ) more likely among patients with a possible delayed diagnosis compared with those without.
82                                              Delayed diagnosis contributed the largest health losses
83                                     Possible delayed diagnosis, defined as a patient with an ED disch
84  in 104 (22.0%) to 289 (61.3%) children with delayed diagnosis, depending on the imputation method fo
85 ncertainty include quantifying the hazard of delayed diagnosis; determining the optimal duration of f
86 ed access to ophthalmologists often leads to delayed diagnosis, emphasizing the need for more afforda
87  of guilt and regret regarding their child's delayed diagnosis, fear and anxiety related to medical a
88 h chorioretinal involvement rate (94.1%) and delayed diagnosis from symptom onset (45.8% cases were d
89                                              Delayed diagnosis (>8 months) seemed to be associated wi
90                                Patients with delayed diagnosis had 1.23 times (95% CI, 1.16-1.28 time
91                                Patients with delayed diagnosis had longer hospital length of stay (me
92            Advanced stage at presentation or delayed diagnosis heavily influences health outcomes in
93 r a diagnostic error occurred (ie, missed or delayed diagnosis), identify diagnostic process faults,
94                                              Delayed diagnosis in invasive aspergillosis (IA) contrib
95 and to attenuate pain, possibly resulting in delayed diagnosis in PDAC.
96 type 2 diabetes in the region is hindered by delayed diagnosis, inadequate healthcare access, and eco
97                                              Delayed diagnosis, inadequate initial treatment, and pro
98           Additional factors associated with delayed diagnosis included female sex, higher levels of
99 a result, affected individuals commonly face delayed diagnosis, incomplete laboratory evaluation, and
100                                              Delayed diagnosis is associated with the development of
101 pan multiple specialties and misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis is commonplace.
102                                              Delayed diagnosis is often observed, resulting in bowel
103                                              Delayed diagnosis is one of the primary reasons for empi
104 ng for SCID is not universally available and delayed diagnosis is the rule.
105  close cooperation with clinicians because a delayed diagnosis may be lethal to the patient.
106 atient's area of residence can contribute to delayed diagnosis, measured by melanoma thickness.
107 ance, surgical mortality, risk of death from delayed diagnosis (missed appendicitis), and LE loss att
108                                              Delayed diagnosis models were adjusted for age; delayed
109                         Even controlling for delayed diagnosis, non-Hispanic Black patients had 1.22
110 tion may help mitigate the increased rate of delayed diagnosis observed for non-Hispanic Black patien
111 ations triggered by complications related to delayed diagnosis occurred in 24.27% of participants.
112                                              Delayed diagnosis occurred in 9296 (15.8%; 95% CI, 15.5-
113                                              Delayed diagnosis of a dislocated hip in infants can lea
114                                    Missed or delayed diagnosis of acute stroke, or false-negative str
115 hether heparin therapy was associated with a delayed diagnosis of AD dementia.
116 maging, suggesting an opportunity to prevent delayed diagnosis of appendicitis in some children.
117                                              Delayed diagnosis of appendicitis is associated with wor
118                        In this cohort study, delayed diagnosis of appendicitis was associated with in
119 gression model quantified the association of delayed diagnosis of appendicitis with postoperative 30-
120 odel was used to estimate the association of delayed diagnosis of appendicitis with race and ethnicit
121 ere included in the study; 471 (63.0%) had a delayed diagnosis of appendicitis, and 277 (37.0%) had n
122                          Case patients had a delayed diagnosis of appendicitis, defined as 2 emergenc
123                                              Delayed diagnosis of appendicitis, defined as an initial
124 TTR-CM diagnosis and identify predictors for delayed diagnosis of ATTR-CM.
125 ns (e.g., due to potential underdetection or delayed diagnosis of cancer among individuals with ID).
126 on of IDA as a common factor associated with delayed diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
127 apies has yet to be realized, in part due to delayed diagnosis of dyslipidemia, underutilization of t
128                                              Delayed diagnosis of enteric perforations occurred in tw
129 neumonia, and meningococcemia) may result in delayed diagnosis of EVD before isolation of infected pa
130 eruse of bidirectional endoscopy can lead to delayed diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract cancers and
131 elated to advanced stage at presentation and delayed diagnosis of HNC between 2013 and 2023.
132 iated with advanced stage at presentation or delayed diagnosis of HNC.
133                         All nine HCCs with a delayed diagnosis of less than 1 year were smaller than
134 ion may facilitate the often challenging and delayed diagnosis of mitochondrial disease, in particula
135 DS to manage associated psychiatric symptoms delayed diagnosis of PD by up to 10 years.
136 rces in which the organism is endemic, where delayed diagnosis of progressive disseminated histoplasm
137 e in the MRE of patients with IBD to avoid a delayed diagnosis of PSC.
138 d on suboptimal methods, which can result in delayed diagnosis of severe diseases and inappropriate r
139                                              Delayed diagnosis of T1D can result in severe illness or
140                               Undiagnosed or delayed diagnosis of TB contribute to TB transmission an
141  case-patients (27%) developed TB because of delayed diagnosis of their sources; and 13 case-patients
142 pproved therapies for CA has been limited by delayed diagnosis of this disease.
143                                              Delayed diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) and drug-resistan
144                                          The delayed diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) leads
145 iven level of random or fasting glucose, and delayed diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
146 ngs, placing patients at risk for missed and delayed diagnosis of vision- and life-threatening neurol
147                             Misdiagnosis, or delayed diagnosis, of MMP with ocular involvement leads
148 obacterium tuberculosis, and misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis often occurs as a consequence.
149                   We estimated the impact of delayed diagnosis on cancer outcomes in Chile using a no
150 disease because of the significant impact of delayed diagnosis on patients.
151  to evaluate nodule growth and the effect of delayed diagnosis on treatment eligibility.
152                                   To avoid a delayed diagnosis or a misdiagnosis, familiarity with ty
153         Such underrepresentation may lead to delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis of disease, wide appli
154  belonging to an ethnic minority population, delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis, and presenting during
155 gnostic and therapeutic strategies to reduce delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis, optimize management,
156 er, still misclassified, which could lead to delayed diagnosis or overtreatment.
157 o healthcare during a pandemic may result in delayed diagnosis or suboptimal management with potentia
158                             Patients who had delayed diagnosis or were older than 45 years had high r
159 sociated with DKA in the present review (eg, delayed diagnosis: OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.72-3.01; P < .001
160 ge (P < .001), a smoking history (P = .004), delayed diagnosis (P = .001), longer disease duration (P
161 ate analysis, pouch loss was associated with delayed diagnosis (P = 0.03, hazard ratio [HR] 2.6 (95%
162                               As a result of delayed diagnosis, Palestinian patients had more infecti
163 r exposure assessment, the risk of bias from delayed diagnosis (particularly for cataracts), and pote
164                                              Delayed diagnosis patients had median (IQR) unadjusted c
165                                              Delayed diagnosis remains the main obstacle to ending AI
166 re were associated with greater frequency of delayed diagnosis (RFDadj = 5.5%, 95% CI [2.4, 8.5]; RFD
167 e serious downstream consequences, including delayed diagnosis, scarce treatment options, and worse h
168 ic population were less likely to experience delayed diagnosis, suggesting that seeking care at a hos
169                    The mean marginal cost of delayed diagnosis was $2712.
170                                              Delayed diagnosis was associated with a 1.38 (95% CI, 1.
171                                              Delayed diagnosis was associated with lower antihyperten
172                                              Delayed diagnosis was defined as a previous emergency de
173                               As a result of delayed diagnosis, we found a worse stage distribution f
174                                  Outcomes of delayed diagnosis were compared by case-control status,
175                              Children with a delayed diagnosis were less likely to have pain with wal
176 ctors such as the use of corticosteroids and delayed diagnosis were noted to adversely affect the pro
177                      Six patients received a delayed diagnosis, which adversely affected outcome.
178 use of late symptom manifestation leading to delayed diagnosis, which limits patients with HCC in ter
179 icitis hospital care costs associated with a delayed diagnosis while controlling for age, sex, race a
180                           The association of delayed diagnosis with complications by condition was th
181 sis), there were decreased rates of possible delayed diagnosis with increasing ED volume.
182 tein-induced enterocolitis syndrome avoiding delayed diagnosis with unnecessary laboratory tests and
183 st cancer, those from SGM groups experienced delayed diagnosis, with faster recurrence at a 3-fold hi

 
Page Top