ライフサイエンスコーパス: dental implant

1 a natural tooth and when to extract it for a dental implant.

2 tissue healing around an immediately loaded dental implant.

3 fect associated with the subsequently placed dental implant.

4 strategically extracted in preparation for a dental implant.

5 illin before surgical placement of one-stage dental implants.

6 ted to tooth loss and their replacement with dental implants.

7 nce, applied in the oral area compromised by dental implants.

8 l rate and marginal BL changes compared with dental implants.

9 curacy of fenestration and dehiscence around dental implants.

10 the C/I ratio on the success rate and MBL of dental implants.

11 mpare this new implant to standard root-form dental implants.

12 rom peri-implant oral mucosa around titanium dental implants.

13 f soft tissue augmentation procedures around dental implants.

14 measurements, even in subjects with metallic dental implants.

15 feature important for both natural teeth and dental implants.

16 alveolar bone loss around natural teeth and dental implants.

17 iated with changes in crestal bone levels on dental implants.

18 premolar region), were recruited to receive dental implants.

19 The study cohort included 341 dental implants.

20 s an alternative approach to osseointegrated dental implants.

21 erformed often for subsequent treatment with dental implants.

22 uently has insufficient bone mass to support dental implants.

23 ar ridge defects for placement of endosseous dental implants.

24 novo osseous formation for the placement of dental implants.

25 microtopographies during osseointegration of dental implants.

26 transcrestal sinus augmentation and received dental implants.

27 in the planning and placement of endosseous dental implants.

28 nt between the implant-abutment interface in dental implants.

29 ent (GFC) on guided bone regeneration around dental implants.

30 achieving GBR of osseous defects surrounding dental implants.

31 ograft bone composite in defects surrounding dental implants.

32 le treatment for osseous defects surrounding dental implants.

33 te sodium on guided bone regeneration around dental implants.

34 cts in the canine mandible around endosseous dental implants.

35 e increases early bone formation rate around dental implants.

36 can be responsible for bone loss around some dental implants.

37 andardized surgically created defects around dental implants.

38 curacy of fenestration and dehiscence around dental implants.

39 on the assessment of oral health surrounding dental implants.

40 with non-smokers in patients with IL and DL dental implants.

41 the standard of care for patients requiring dental implants.

42 biofilms, such as plaque on natural teeth or dental implants.

43 potential to be used as a novel way to clean dental implants.

44 of soft tissue thickness on early MBL around dental implants.

45 iseases influencing the long term success of dental implants.

46 e and supporting structures around teeth and dental implants.

47 sment of hard and soft tissue changes around dental implants.

48 ollowing clinical therapies: 1) placement of dental implants; 2) interdisciplinary dentofacial therap

49 A total of 73 dental implants (57 in the maxilla, 16 in the mandible)

50 t site, which received a wide-body, threaded dental implant 6 months later.

51 dontal disease treatment or to functionalize dental implant abutments to improve soft tissue integrat

52 A total of 376 dental implants and 323 sinus lifts were analyzed.

53 uated for the radiographic crestal BL around dental implants and adjacent teeth at time of implant cr

54 and masseter muscles) and artifactual (e.g., dental implants and air-tissue interfaces).

55 e successes and failures of a large group of dental implants and compare them to published literature

56 trophic posterior areas of the mandible with dental implants and compare these procedures with altern

57 The outcomes of both dental implants and endodontically treated teeth have be

58 nt evidence of metal particle release around dental implants and future areas for research.

59 es of immune function at subcrestally placed dental implants and healthy periodontal sites during a 1

60 ranked the statement, "Periodontists perform dental implants and related procedures" less importantly

61 hat involved soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and reported findings on KMW, MT, and/or

62 Tissues surrounding dental implants and teeth develop clinical inflammation

63 m (Ti) and titanium alloys have been used in dental implants and total hip arthroplasty due to their

64 relationship between the amount of KM around dental implants and various peri-implant parameters, wit

65 accumulation in the inflamed tissues around dental implants and will help in guiding toxicological s

66 lveolar bone volume to support an endosseous dental implant, and the need for a secondary augmentatio

67 al disease, repairs bone defects surrounding dental implants, and reverses alveolar bone loss followi

68 roups: one group received alendronate-coated dental implants, and the other group served as control.

69 ISF) cathepsin-K levels of natural teeth and dental implants, and to assess the potential relationshi

70 Osseointegrated dental implants are a highly predictable procedure with

71 Dental implants are a predictable treatment option for r

72 Endosseous dental implants are available with various surface chara

73 Short dental implants are becoming an important addition to th

74 Dental implants are commonly used to replace missing tee

75 both osseous and soft tissue healing around dental implants are critical to clinical success, there

76 entation procedures around natural teeth and dental implants are performed to facilitate plaque contr

77 The large majority of dental implants are successful over the long term.

78 tance between two consecutive threads of the dental implant as reference points for natural teeth and

79 ective study included patients that received dental implants at the University of Florida from 2011 t

80 limited to the placement and restoration of dental implants but to the implementation of PIMT to pot

81 resent study suggest that the placement of a dental implant by means of a flapless technique in a fre

82 icacy of bone induction for the placement of dental implants by two concentrations of recombinant hum

83 radiographs obtained from natural teeth and dental implants by using cemento-enamel junction and the

84 t implications for the design of medical and dental implants, chromatographic supports, diagnostic to

85 thics approval, in 8 oncologic patients with dental implants data were acquired in a trimodality setu

86 ds were used, with associations among them: "dental implant," "dental implants," "Osstell," "resonanc

87 Immediate placement of dental implants (DI) in fresh extraction sockets is asso

88 nsory deficiency related to the placement of dental implants (DIs) and resulting in liability claims

89 ically, these implants must be active in the dental implant environment where the implant is bathed i

90 e absence of adequate KM or AM in endosseous dental implants, especially in posterior implants, was a

91 s that published systematic reviews on short dental implants exhibit significant structural and metho

92 related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) and dental implant failure are two negative side effects of

93 Most would agree that the etiology of dental implant failure is related to oral biofilm.

94 Because dental implant failure patterns tend to cluster within s

95 or treatment of the main etiologic factor in dental implant failure, biofilm formation, enhancing ele

96 ion of different antidepressant classes with dental implant failure.

97 sociation between taking antidepressants and dental implant failure.

98 ent manner, the risk factors associated with dental implant failure.

99 ate the association between osteoporosis and dental implant failure.

100 al risk factors that may have contributed to dental implant failures.

101 bone thickness achieved adjacent to virtual dental implants following guided bone regeneration (GBR)

102 The use of dental implants for single-tooth replacement cases intro

103 ggests that the bacteria surrounding exposed dental implants form a diverse microbiome regardless of

104 As endosseous dental implants gain greater acceptance because of high

105 ve patients treated with subcrestally placed dental implants grafted with a xenograft (Group A) and 5

106 Comparing the natural teeth group with dental implant group with regard to MBL measure, catheps

107 In both natural teeth and dental implant groups, despite higher MBL measures, cath

108 l rate of 88.1% at 168 months, when standard dental implants had a similar estimated survival rate of

109 Short dental implants had an estimated survival rate of 88.1%

110 he maintenance of osseointegrated endosseous dental implants has been controversial.

111 The concept of immediate loading of dental implants has been researched in animal and man.

112 The microbiota colonizing dental implants has been said to be similar to the micro

113 long-term outcomes, this aspect of one-stage dental implants has not been investigated.

114 universally accepted concept of delay-loaded dental implants has recently been challenged.

115 Research interest on immediate placement of dental implants has shifted from implant survival toward

116 Osseointegrated dental implants have become a routinely recommended proc

117 augment soft tissue volume around endosseous dental implants have been investigated.

118 Dental implants have been used to replace missing teeth

119 Conventionally, endosseous dental implants have required 3 to 6 months of uninterru

120 ew cases of full-mouth rehabilitation, using dental implants, have been reported in periodontally com

121 s of 14 patients with metal implants (either dental implants, hip prostheses, shoulder prostheses, or

122 g long-term outcomes of immediate loading of dental implants immediately placed into infected sites.

123 vational study was to assess the survival of dental implant in CS and NS with T2DM.

124 c-based devices on 34 non-submerged titanium dental implants in 17 patients.

125 Of these, seven trials with 363 dental implants in 262 participants were included in the

126 enient, and fast method to assess BMD around dental implants in animal studies.

127 tection accuracy of the buccal bone level at dental implants in CBCT scans, BBT had a significant eff

128 Placement of endosseous dental implants in edentulous areas of the anterior maxi

129 The presence of <2 mm of KM around dental implants in erratic maintenance compliers seems t

130 roach in article selection focusing on short dental implants in humans.

131 This study demonstrated that osseointegrated dental implants in insulin-controlled diabetic rats main

132 eatment of surgically created defects around dental implants in mongrel dogs.

133 s to identify microbiota surrounding exposed dental implants in patients with and without a history o

134 A total of 339 endosseous dental implants in place for at least 3 years in 69 pati

135 gible patients were restored with endosseous dental implants in the area treated with rhBMP-2/ACS and

136 rrier for BMP used in osseous defects around dental implants in the canine mandible.

137 acement with immediate provisionalization of dental implants in the esthetic zone results in excellen

138 n with the immediate or delayed placement of dental implants in the maxillary anterior segment.

139 have contributed to increased application of dental implants in the restoration of partial and comple

140 gnificantly stimulated bone formation around dental implants in this model after 1 month but not afte

141 e outcomes of tooth replacement therapy with dental implants in this specific anatomic location.

142 ing the surrounding structures of endosseous dental implants include peri-implant mucositis and peri-

143 Forty single-tooth dental implants inserted after placement of bioglass and

144 Unintentional placement of dental implants into retained root fragments did not res

145 nce, a lack of adequate KM around endosseous dental implants is associated with more plaque accumulat

146 The thickness of the soft tissues around dental implants is crucial for both the preservation of

147 itial bone remodeling around these one-piece dental implants is dependent on the positioning of the r

148 The success of dental implants is highly dependent on integration betwe

149 Sinus surgery for dental implants is highly successful, but the preoperati

150 The placement of endosseous dental implants is largely considered a safe surgical pr

151 UP) as a diagnostic parameter for monitoring dental implants is not yet well understood.

152 ls was conducted to determine the effects of dental implant length and width on implant survival rate

153 With the increased use of short dental implants (<10 mm), a high crown/implant (C/I) rat

154 Formation of bacterial biofilms on dental implant material surfaces (titanium) may lead to

155 In conclusion, Ti-Cu alloy is a promising dental implant material with antimicrobial/antibiofilm a

156 tics with probing depth and bone loss around dental implants METHODS: A total of 642 implants in 145

157 re, the reformation of biologic width around dental implants, microgap if placed at or below the bone

158 rom January 1997 to July 2011, that examined dental implants of <10 mm with a 12-month follow-up were

159 through the interface between abutments and dental implants of external hexagon (EH) and internal he

160 rteen studies were selected, examining 1,955 dental implants, of which 914 were short implants.

161 inducing local bone formation in support of dental implant osseointegration.

162 t of bone drilling technique and sequence on dental implant osseointegration.

163 associations among them: "dental implant," "dental implants," "Osstell," "resonance frequency analys

164 ealth that has been reported for the average dental implant patient population.

165 A cross-sectional study was conducted in dental implant patients according to accessibility for s

166 n clinical practice in the rehabilitation of dental implant patients.

167 Every partaker in the study groups had one dental implant placed in posterior maxilla or mandible.

168 rameters of early soft tissue healing around dental implants placed following a one-stage protocol.

169 of 1,003 consecutively placed pure titanium dental implants placed from August 1987 to January 2002

170 etween immediate and conventional loading of dental implants placed immediately after extraction in p

171 augmentation procedures and that endosseous dental implants placed in bony areas treated with rhBMP-

172 bone levels were comparable around adjacent dental implants placed in cigarette smokers and never sm

173 o compare the crestal bone loss (CBL) around dental implants placed in healed sites using flapped and

174 CBL around dental implants placed in healed sites using flapped and

175 less surgical technique influence CBL around dental implants placed in healed sites?" Databases were

176 ords of 30 consecutive patients treated with dental implants placed in post-extraction sockets augmen

177 ugmentation and to assess 1-year survival of dental implants placed in reconstructed sites.

178 Another objective was to evaluate the dental implants placed in the sites treated with rhBMP-2

179 nimal loss of mineralized hard tissue around dental implants placed non-submerged and at subcrestal p

180 en demonstrated for the long-term success of dental implants placed simultaneously with or after a si

181 m a retrospective open cohort study of 4,591 dental implants, placed in private practice, with 5- to

182 some surgical complications associated with dental implant placement and discusses how to avoid and

183 laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosth

184 Dental implant placement associated with sinus floor aug

185 e first upper molar was performed at 1 year, dental implant placement at 2 years, and sacrifice at 28

186 ollowing tooth extraction, and if subsequent dental implant placement can reverse this neuroplasticit

187 the treatment planning phases of endosseous dental implant placement especially in cases with minima

188 DBA result in favorable ridge dimensions for dental implant placement in most cases.

189 alyze a cohort of 136 patients who underwent dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla at the

190 One month later, seven rats had dental implant placement into healed extraction sites.

191 Dental implant placement is a widely used treatment that

192 Vertical ridge augmentation for dental implant placement is one of the greatest challeng

193 Patients had inadequate bone volume for dental implant placement or required preprosthetic ridge

194 o compare the clinical efficacy of the early dental implant placement protocol with immediate and del

195 lacement protocol with immediate and delayed dental implant placement protocols.

196 Furthermore, dental implant placement reversed the extraction-induced

197 Computer-aided dental implant placement seems to be useful for placing

198 Healthy adult patients requiring one-stage dental implant placement were allocated randomly to rece

199 on and ridge preservation in preparation for dental implant placement were recruited in the study.

200 e to the risk of peri-implantitis, following dental implant placement, this study aimed to evaluate r

201 ful for alveolar ridge preservation prior to dental implant placement.

202 ined for histomorphometric analysis prior to dental implant placement.

203 linical signs of bone necrosis after routine dental implant placement.

204 cal trial included 117 patients with planned dental implant placement.

205 0 weeks compared with 8 to 10 weeks prior to dental implant placement.

206 ISF samples were obtained from natural teeth/dental implants presenting with either clinical health,

207 ad and neck cancer, the presence of metallic dental implants produces streak artifacts in the CT imag

208 on socket wound healing for more predictable dental implant reconstruction.

209 que for vertical ridge augmentation prior to dental implant reconstruction.

210 ical sequelae and patient satisfaction after dental implant removal (IR).

211 nt as reference points for natural teeth and dental implants, respectively.

212 ects older than 21 years of age who received dental implant(s) in the posterior maxilla.

213 butable to periodontal reasons in favor of a dental implant should be carefully considered in partial

214 entation and recession coverage at teeth and dental implant sites.

215 molecular events in osseointegration at the dental implant surface remain largely unknown.

216 iographically evaluate bone formation around dental implant surfaces exposed to the space created at

217 Adhesion of bacteria to dental implant surfaces is the critical initial step in

218 udy showing disruption of biofilm from rough dental implant surfaces using cavitation bubbles from an

219 TiZr and ZrO(2) dental implant surfaces were not more susceptible to col

220 ul planning using CT scans before performing dental implant surgeries in premaxillary region.

221 r were mostly benign and compatible with the dental implant surgeries performed in these patients.

222 Dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla often in

223 Hence, computer-aided dental implant surgery still requires improvement and sh

224 root resection, guided tissue regeneration, dental implant surgery, epithelialized free soft tissue

225 implantitis (RPI) is not a common sequela of dental implant surgery, its prevalence has been reported

226 elping cicatrization and wound healing after dental implant surgery.

227 he following keywords: "crestal bone loss"; "dental implant"; "surgery"; "flap"; and "flapless." Unpu

228 urpose was to compare and contrast predicted dental implant survival estimates assuming the independe

229 The study's purposes were to estimate dental implant survival in a statistically valid manner

230 A major reason for the success of modern dental implant systems has been the development of impla

231 may be more effective for use in endosseous dental implant systems.

232 (Ti) dominates as the material of choice for dental implant systems.

233 table radiographic BL compared with adjacent dental implants (teeth BL, 0.44 +/- 0.23 mm; implant BL,

234 ed human tissues around titanium and ceramic dental implants that exhibited signs of peri-implantitis

235 films on crowns and overdenture abutments of dental implants that had been recovered from patients du

236 nterrupted healing based on observations for dental implants that were characterized by a relatively

237 Regarding dental implants, the use of CAM is not cost effective.

238 atment have an uncertain understanding about dental implant therapy and its complications.

239 critical component of treatment planning in dental implant therapy is the amount of available bone.

240 For prosthetic-driven dental implant therapy, reconstruction of the alveolar b

241 ther highlights its diverse applications for dental implant therapy.

242 lel arm study was to evaluate the effects of dental implant thread design on the quality and percent

243 Dental implant thread geometry has been proposed as a po

244 rmined goal was established to bioengineer a dental implant to load the bone at the interface in a pr

245 n age 46.7 years) who received a total of 75 dental implants together with indirect sinus lifting pro

246 Tobacco smoking compromises the prognosis of dental implant treatment and is associated with increase

247 ents to make informed decisions and optimize dental implant treatment outcomes.

248 Long-term bone healing/adaptation after a dental implant treatment starts with diffusion of mesenc

249 In dental implant treatment, the long-term prognosis is dep

250 llary incisors should be kept in mind during dental-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla.

251 10 mm) and standard (>/=10 mm) rough-surface dental implants under functional loading.

252 Fifty-one patients with and 9 without dental implants underwent a PET/CT study.

253 o present the clinical results of treating a dental implant using recombinant human bone morphogeneti

254 ublished systematic reviews focused on short dental implants using established checklists such as the

255 The adequacy of bone for the placement of a dental implant was approximately twice as great in the r

256 tely and 3 months postextraction, and then a dental implant was placed.

257 ealing time, core biopsy was obtained, and a dental implant was placed.

258 ce and structure as a commercially available dental implant was used.

259 BR buccal bone thickness adjacent to virtual dental implants was 2.24 +/- 1.01 mm.

260 The soft tissue organization around dental implants was different for upper and lower jawbon

261 The peak failure rate of short dental implants was found to occur between 4 and 6 years

262 Thirty patients needing a single dental implant were recruited and allocated to thin (n =

263 or molar) and subsequent replacement with a dental implant were recruited and randomly allocated int

264 oted tooth to be extracted and replaced by a dental implant were recruited for this study.

265 ds of 106 patients treated with at least one dental implant were reviewed.

266 classified as good or satisfactory, meaning dental implants were actually placed at these sites, wit

267 A total of 525 short (<10 mm) dental implants were analyzed, of which 253 were 3.5 mm

268 osa adjacent to the cover screw of submerged dental implants were analyzed.

269 Dental implants were evaluated by radiographic and clini

270 1) and never smokers (group 2) with adjacent dental implants were included.

271 of patients >/=18 years old with one or more dental implants were included.

272 A total of 26 HA-coated dental implants were inserted in 100 grafted sinuses of

273 Ninety dental implants were inserted in edentulous areas of nin

274 Ninety endosseous dental implants were inserted in the mandibles of nine h

275 Twenty-three dental implants were placed adjacent to the dehiscence a

276 Eighty-four virtual dental implants were placed at planned locations using C

277 After 3 months, 12 dental implants were placed at three levels in each dog:

278 A total of 158 dental implants were placed in non-perforated augmented

279 A total of 23 dental implants were placed in the augmented sinuses wit

280 After an average healing time of 4.9 months, dental implants were placed in the grafted sinuses.

281 Twelve dental implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible

282 Titanium machine-polished dental implants were placed in the prepared sites, and c

283 A total of 27 dental implants were placed subcrestally in 21 periodont

284 t which time core biopsies were obtained and dental implants were placed.

285 In each quadrant, three dental implants were placed.

286 CT images through the patient's dental implants were reconstructed using both standard C

287 partially edentulous patients restored with dental implants were reviewed.

288 Dental implants were used to restore her dentition.

289 an earlier time point compared with standard dental implants, where the peak failure rate occurred be

290 ciation between dissolution of titanium from dental implants, which suggests corrosion, and peri-impl

291 tudy comprised 30 patients carrying titanium dental implants, who had neither a metallic prosthesis n

292 -sectional study, patients with at least one dental implant with >5 years of functional loading were

293 oral microorganisms into the FAI microgap of dental implants with different characteristics of the co

294 o the fixture-abutment interface microgap of dental implants with different fixture-abutment connecti

295 al therapy (SPT) among patients treated with dental implants with different periodontitis histories a

296 icance of KM in the maintenance of root-form dental implants with different surfaces.

297 analyze, in real time, sealing capability of dental implants with healing screw interfaces.

298 Minimal histologic bone loss occurred when dental implants with non-matching implant-abutment diame

299 ge with sufficient native bone to surround a dental implant without imposing on a vital structure wer

300 onsecutive patients with subcrestally placed dental implants without any grafting material (Group B)