コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 influenza, mumps, or hepatitis A during ICE detention.
2 ron which may mediate its role in OGT intron detention.
3 he numerous contributors to varying rates of detention.
4 n and overrepresented in crisis pathways and detention.
5 a trans-acting factor regulating OGT intron detention.
6 Juvenile detention.
7 g youth in achieving positive outcomes after detention.
8 s' illustrate the experiences of involuntary detention.
9 h nonsense-mediated decay or by nuclear mRNA detention.
10 fluenced positive experiences of involuntary detention.
11 s varied in how they experienced involuntary detention.
12 y of psychiatric disorders after youth leave detention.
13 ined psychiatric disorders after youth leave detention.
14 lude a new legal framework for indeterminate detention.
15 cerated men, 8% engaged in NSSI during their detention.
16 rders were the most prevalent 15 years after detention.
17 wer them to initiate involuntary psychiatric detentions.
19 of the year among asylum seekers in onshore detention (19%) (p < 0.001), in January (2015) on Manus
20 = 0.02), and among asylum seekers in onshore detention (20.4%) between 8:00 PM and 11:59 PM (p < 0.00
22 ommunity supervision (aHR 1.3 [1.1-1.5]), or detention (aHR 2.1 [1.8-2.4]) versus charge only; and th
25 y be an important tool for reducing pretrial detention and advancing health equity without exacerbati
26 greater powers to deny support and allow the detention and deportation of potential victims and has b
27 tions have been raised as to whether certain detention and interrogation procedures amount to torture
30 ncover mechanisms that regulate MAT2A intron detention and reveal a previously undescribed role for C
31 Age estimations are relevant for pre-trial detention and sentencing in criminal cases and as part o
33 lation is the mechanism that releases intron detention and triggers nuclear export, enabling rapid an
34 for a mean (SD) of 15.8 (13.2) years before detention and were in ICE custody for a median of 39 day
36 l services, appropriate facilities for civil detention, and detaining patients long enough to assure
42 systems (stormwater pond, wetland basin, and detention basin) and low-impact development (LID) system
43 detention, participants were interviewed in detention between November 20, 1995, and June 14, 1998,
44 ced the frequency of involuntary psychiatric detentions by 16.5% (that is, 370 fewer detentions over
45 ersons after their discharge from short-term detention, by means of community-based directly observed
52 ited from the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center, Chicago, Illinois, between November 20
54 on questionnaire responses upon entry to the detention center, rather than an offer to screen all PLD
61 conditions lacking medical expertise made US detention centers hotbeds for infectious disease outbrea
62 018, to December 31, 2022, at 3 of the 5 ICE detention centers in California: Adelanto ICE Processing
63 d that comprehensive screening strategies in detention centers in Switzerland can be cost-effective,
65 ngs, emergency medical care provision in ICE detention centers requires increased transparency to ens
67 es in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers with rates in the US population from S
69 t outbreaks of COVID-19 in federal immigrant detention centers, which lack clear and consistent guide
72 of people who use drugs into compulsory drug detention centres (CDDCs) is common throughout East and
73 enile detention facility, adults at homeless detention centres, and women and men at a remand centre
74 is crucial metric excludes prisons and youth detention centres, despite the health needs in these set
76 , and intimate partners; unlawful arrest and detention; discrimination in accessing health services;
77 ow high rates of preventable deaths while in detention due to substandard medical care within detenti
78 debates on policies that would end pretrial detention due to the inability to afford bail, with some
79 ession analysis to assess the association of detention duration and several variables: (1) self-rated
82 al robustness of these findings, with longer detention duration significantly associated with mental
84 pregnancy intentions and having a partner in detention each mediated the effect of partner's gang mem
85 have a disorder approximately 5 years after detention, even after adjusting for demographic characte
86 fugee clinics (2,409; 6.4%) and correctional/detention facilities (2,325; 6.1%) were the next most co
87 ulosis (TB) disease at intake into immigrant detention facilities allows for early detection and trea
90 f alternatives to incarceration, prisons and detention facilities could be leveraged to promote prima
93 ity to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 within detention facilities housing unaccompanied migrant child
94 s study of medical emergencies at 3 of 5 ICE detention facilities in California, there were discrepan
98 2019 among migrants at the Houston Contract Detention Facility (HCDF) and among inmates at the Harri
100 stancing and vaccination among detainees and detention facility employees are needed to limit the spr
101 measures implemented at a privately operated detention facility housing US Immigration and Customs En
102 in prison (PLP) at San Vittore, a pre-trial detention facility in Milan, Italy, between February and
103 , and drug use in street youth at a juvenile detention facility, adults at homeless detention centres
104 nto ICE Processing Center, Imperial Regional Detention Facility, and Otay Mesa Detention Center.
106 among delinquent youth 5 and 12 years after detention, focusing on sex and racial/ethnic differences
108 be at least 8.5 times as costly as a day in detention for jurisdictions to find this tradeoff undesi
109 arriving in the USA are likely to be held in detention for months or years pending adjudication of th
111 uths aged 10 to 18 years were interviewed in detention from November 20, 1995, through June 14, 1998.
114 reatment depending upon intended use such as detention in basins prior to use or chlorination is requ
119 argest Zambian prisons, reforms to pre-trial detention in South Africa, integration of mental health
120 ness about the widespread use of immigration detention in the United States does negatively impact in
121 e are fewer studies examining US immigration detention, in large part because US immigration detentio
123 wet ponds, dry detention ponds, dry extended detention, infiltration basin, and filtering practices)
125 ention, in large part because US immigration detention is largely privately operated and opaque by de
126 ss the spectrum of custody, including police detention, jail, prison, probation, and parole, access t
128 These findings suggest that immigration detention may foster delegitimating beliefs about the US
129 ustody is one mechanism by which immigration detention might be a catalyst for worsening health.
131 This omission is critical because after detention most youth return to the community, where they
132 immigration detention, offshore immigration detention [Nauru], and offshore immigration detention [M
134 ficantly higher rates of comorbidity when in detention (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7), males had
137 ncluding police use of drug-user registries, detention of drug users in centres offering no evidence-
138 inhibition predominantly results in nuclear detention of intron-containing transcripts and the produ
139 late intracellular SAM levels through intron detention of MAT2A, the only SAM synthetase expressed in
140 ed a new civil detention process and allowed detention of noninfectious but persistently nonadherent
141 poorly spliced introns, resulting in nuclear detention of partially spliced transcripts, which may be
144 ts, community detention, onshore immigration detention, offshore immigration detention [Nauru], and o
147 .e., community-based arrangements, community detention, onshore immigration detention, offshore immig
148 Tuberculosis controllers sought the civil detention or arrest of 67 patients during the study peri
149 tric detentions by 16.5% (that is, 370 fewer detentions over 2 years; b = -0.180, 95% confidence inte
150 were significantly correlated with length of detention (p=0.004, 0.017, and 0.019, respectively).
151 long-term outcomes of delinquent youth after detention, participants were interviewed in detention be
152 poor health, mental illness, and PTSD, with detention periods of 6 months or more associated with hi
153 ead with historical (past violence, juvenile detention, physical abuse, parental arrest record), clin
155 patitis C virus (HCV) among people living in detention (PLD) is typically high in many countries incl
156 -scale decarceration and changes to pretrial detention policies are likely to be important for improv
157 nvestigates the performance of nine proposed detention ponds (across the city of Renton, Washington,
158 s for the future indicated that the selected detention ponds are likely to reduce the concentrations
161 e found that the performance of the proposed detention ponds in reducing stormwater pollutants varied
162 ate the performance of the proposed nine (9) detention ponds under future climate scenarios of 100-ye
163 (DEA)] in five types of SCM (wet ponds, dry detention ponds, dry extended detention, infiltration ba
167 In 1993, California created a new civil detention process and allowed detention of noninfectious
169 ates of comorbidity decreased in youth after detention, rates remained substantial and were higher th
173 groups are at a greater risk of psychiatric detention than are majority groups, although there is va
175 uity of prevention, care, and treatment upon detention, throughout imprisonment, and upon release.
179 e entry policies (eg, temporary visa status, detention) were associated with poor mental health (SMD
181 ent and/or suicide attempt) in pretrial jail detention who were recruited from 2 jails from May 11, 2
182 reased the use of monetary bail and pretrial detention without increasing failure to appear rates at