戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  influenza, mumps, or hepatitis A during ICE detention.
2 ron which may mediate its role in OGT intron detention.
3 he numerous contributors to varying rates of detention.
4 n and overrepresented in crisis pathways and detention.
5  a trans-acting factor regulating OGT intron detention.
6                                     Juvenile detention.
7 g youth in achieving positive outcomes after detention.
8 s' illustrate the experiences of involuntary detention.
9 h nonsense-mediated decay or by nuclear mRNA detention.
10 fluenced positive experiences of involuntary detention.
11 s varied in how they experienced involuntary detention.
12 y of psychiatric disorders after youth leave detention.
13 ined psychiatric disorders after youth leave detention.
14 lude a new legal framework for indeterminate detention.
15 cerated men, 8% engaged in NSSI during their detention.
16 rders were the most prevalent 15 years after detention.
17 wer them to initiate involuntary psychiatric detentions.
18 een patients were detained (median length of detention, 14.5 days).
19  of the year among asylum seekers in onshore detention (19%) (p < 0.001), in January (2015) on Manus
20 = 0.02), and among asylum seekers in onshore detention (20.4%) between 8:00 PM and 11:59 PM (p < 0.00
21 tations (3.1; 95% CI: 2.5 to 3.9), and youth detention (8.1; 95% CI: 5.9 to 10.8).
22 ommunity supervision (aHR 1.3 [1.1-1.5]), or detention (aHR 2.1 [1.8-2.4]) versus charge only; and th
23 d splicing, and half showed increased intron detention, altering transcript pools of >300 genes.
24 ndividuals with recent incarceration (705 in detention and 2,422 following release).
25 y be an important tool for reducing pretrial detention and advancing health equity without exacerbati
26 greater powers to deny support and allow the detention and deportation of potential victims and has b
27 tions have been raised as to whether certain detention and interrogation procedures amount to torture
28 m)25 (NUDT21) as a regulator of MAT2A intron detention and intracellular SAM levels.
29 t the current study examines are immigration detention and nonjudicial removals.
30 ncover mechanisms that regulate MAT2A intron detention and reveal a previously undescribed role for C
31   Age estimations are relevant for pre-trial detention and sentencing in criminal cases and as part o
32                         This includes humane detention and the delivery of justice and adequate healt
33 lation is the mechanism that releases intron detention and triggers nuclear export, enabling rapid an
34  for a mean (SD) of 15.8 (13.2) years before detention and were in ICE custody for a median of 39 day
35 s before migration, during migration, during detention, and after resettlement in the US.
36 l services, appropriate facilities for civil detention, and detaining patients long enough to assure
37 nal-justice systems, high rates of pre-trial detention, and overcrowding.
38        Although potentially lifesaving, such detentions are controversial and costly, and they may be
39                      Here we describe intron detention as such control mechanism.
40 alongside making applications for compulsory detention, assessment and treatment.
41 by switching off the sample stream to ensure detention at the binding zone (for up to 30 min).
42 systems (stormwater pond, wetland basin, and detention basin) and low-impact development (LID) system
43  detention, participants were interviewed in detention between November 20, 1995, and June 14, 1998,
44 ced the frequency of involuntary psychiatric detentions by 16.5% (that is, 370 fewer detentions over
45 ersons after their discharge from short-term detention, by means of community-based directly observed
46 f a large subnucleolar structure, termed the detention center (DC).
47 s of youth sampled from a temporary juvenile detention center in a large US city.
48 omly selected youths in a temporary juvenile detention center in Cook County, Illinois.
49 18 years, each of whom was incarcerated at a detention center in metropolitan Atlanta, Ga.
50  Switzerland (an adult prison and a juvenile detention center).
51                              In the juvenile detention center, all newly incarcerated adolescents wer
52 ited from the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center, Chicago, Illinois, between November 20
53                              In the juvenile detention center, individuals in the audiovisual materia
54 on questionnaire responses upon entry to the detention center, rather than an offer to screen all PLD
55 l Regional Detention Facility, and Otay Mesa Detention Center.
56  2020, to September 9, 2021, in the juvenile detention center.
57 take from the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center.
58  abuse in adolescents admitted to a juvenile detention center.
59 ouths (11-17 years old) at an urban juvenile detention center.
60 influenza, varicella, and mumps in 22 US ICE detention centers between 2017 and March 2020.
61 conditions lacking medical expertise made US detention centers hotbeds for infectious disease outbrea
62 018, to December 31, 2022, at 3 of the 5 ICE detention centers in California: Adelanto ICE Processing
63 d that comprehensive screening strategies in detention centers in Switzerland can be cost-effective,
64 US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention centers is limited.
65 ngs, emergency medical care provision in ICE detention centers requires increased transparency to ens
66                        In this analysis of 3 detention centers with a mean daily census of 775 indivi
67 es in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers with rates in the US population from S
68 prisons, Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers, and juvenile facilities.
69 t outbreaks of COVID-19 in federal immigrant detention centers, which lack clear and consistent guide
70 ntion due to substandard medical care within detention centers.
71 arter settings, such as camps, colleges, and detention centers.
72 of people who use drugs into compulsory drug detention centres (CDDCs) is common throughout East and
73 enile detention facility, adults at homeless detention centres, and women and men at a remand centre
74 is crucial metric excludes prisons and youth detention centres, despite the health needs in these set
75                         However, involuntary detention could result in an unexpected rise in incidenc
76 , and intimate partners; unlawful arrest and detention; discrimination in accessing health services;
77 ow high rates of preventable deaths while in detention due to substandard medical care within detenti
78  debates on policies that would end pretrial detention due to the inability to afford bail, with some
79 ession analysis to assess the association of detention duration and several variables: (1) self-rated
80 heck, we conducted sensitivity analyses with detention duration as a continuous measure.
81                                              Detention duration less than 6 months vs 6 months or lon
82 al robustness of these findings, with longer detention duration significantly associated with mental
83 not implement any kind of reform to pretrial detention during the study period.
84 pregnancy intentions and having a partner in detention each mediated the effect of partner's gang mem
85  have a disorder approximately 5 years after detention, even after adjusting for demographic characte
86 fugee clinics (2,409; 6.4%) and correctional/detention facilities (2,325; 6.1%) were the next most co
87 ulosis (TB) disease at intake into immigrant detention facilities allows for early detection and trea
88                        From the use of quasi-detention facilities and so-called contingency accommoda
89                             Correctional and detention facilities are at high risk of experiencing ou
90 f alternatives to incarceration, prisons and detention facilities could be leveraged to promote prima
91 prison system of Lombardy, which includes 18 detention facilities for adults.
92           In this case series, deaths in ICE detention facilities from 2011 to 2018 occurred primaril
93 ity to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 within detention facilities housing unaccompanied migrant child
94 s study of medical emergencies at 3 of 5 ICE detention facilities in California, there were discrepan
95                                              Detention facilities with United States Immigration and
96 l, prevention, and evaluation of COVID-19 in detention facilities.
97 US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities.
98  2019 among migrants at the Houston Contract Detention Facility (HCDF) and among inmates at the Harri
99      Among 71 individuals who died in an ICE detention facility during the study period, detainee dea
100 stancing and vaccination among detainees and detention facility employees are needed to limit the spr
101 measures implemented at a privately operated detention facility housing US Immigration and Customs En
102  in prison (PLP) at San Vittore, a pre-trial detention facility in Milan, Italy, between February and
103 , and drug use in street youth at a juvenile detention facility, adults at homeless detention centres
104 nto ICE Processing Center, Imperial Regional Detention Facility, and Otay Mesa Detention Center.
105                           Twelve years after detention, females were more likely than males to have p
106  among delinquent youth 5 and 12 years after detention, focusing on sex and racial/ethnic differences
107 ic reviews and meta-analyses of the rates of detention for BAME populations.
108  be at least 8.5 times as costly as a day in detention for jurisdictions to find this tradeoff undesi
109 arriving in the USA are likely to be held in detention for months or years pending adjudication of th
110 outh aged 10 to 18 years were interviewed in detention from November 1995 through June 1998.
111 uths aged 10 to 18 years were interviewed in detention from November 20, 1995, through June 14, 1998.
112                                              Detention in a juvenile justice facility.
113               This study examined compulsory detention in BAME and migrant groups in the UK and inter
114 reatment depending upon intended use such as detention in basins prior to use or chlorination is requ
115  for-profit versus a nonprofit facility; and detention in certain facilities.
116 l cohort study of 1829 youths after juvenile detention in Chicago, Illinois.
117                Attempts to explain increased detention in ethnic groups should avoid amalgamation and
118                                       Intron detention in precursor RNAs serves to regulate expressio
119 argest Zambian prisons, reforms to pre-trial detention in South Africa, integration of mental health
120 ness about the widespread use of immigration detention in the United States does negatively impact in
121 e are fewer studies examining US immigration detention, in large part because US immigration detentio
122         Postpandemic risk remains unclear as detention increases.
123 wet ponds, dry detention ponds, dry extended detention, infiltration basin, and filtering practices)
124 carceration has focused on prisons, but jail detention is far more common than imprisonment.
125 ention, in large part because US immigration detention is largely privately operated and opaque by de
126 ss the spectrum of custody, including police detention, jail, prison, probation, and parole, access t
127  detention [Nauru], and offshore immigration detention [Manus Island]).
128      These findings suggest that immigration detention may foster delegitimating beliefs about the US
129 ustody is one mechanism by which immigration detention might be a catalyst for worsening health.
130                          Sixteen years after detention, more than one-quarter of Black (156 of 575 [2
131      This omission is critical because after detention most youth return to the community, where they
132  immigration detention, offshore immigration detention [Nauru], and offshore immigration detention [M
133                  For example, 12 years after detention, non-Hispanic white males had nearly 3 times t
134 ficantly higher rates of comorbidity when in detention (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7), males had
135        Tuberculosis controllers sought civil detention of 15 patients.
136                         Our findings suggest detention of asylum seekers exacerbates psychological sy
137 ncluding police use of drug-user registries, detention of drug users in centres offering no evidence-
138  inhibition predominantly results in nuclear detention of intron-containing transcripts and the produ
139 late intracellular SAM levels through intron detention of MAT2A, the only SAM synthetase expressed in
140 ed a new civil detention process and allowed detention of noninfectious but persistently nonadherent
141 poorly spliced introns, resulting in nuclear detention of partially spliced transcripts, which may be
142                                              Detention of people who use drugs into compulsory drug d
143 e of the criminalisation of drug use and the detention of people who use drugs.
144 ts, community detention, onshore immigration detention, offshore immigration detention [Nauru], and o
145 tail methylation is essential to prevent RNA detention on chromatin.
146                           Twelve years after detention, only 21.9% of males and 54.7% of females had
147 .e., community-based arrangements, community detention, onshore immigration detention, offshore immig
148    Tuberculosis controllers sought the civil detention or arrest of 67 patients during the study peri
149 tric detentions by 16.5% (that is, 370 fewer detentions over 2 years; b = -0.180, 95% confidence inte
150 were significantly correlated with length of detention (p=0.004, 0.017, and 0.019, respectively).
151 long-term outcomes of delinquent youth after detention, participants were interviewed in detention be
152  poor health, mental illness, and PTSD, with detention periods of 6 months or more associated with hi
153 ead with historical (past violence, juvenile detention, physical abuse, parental arrest record), clin
154                Kidnappings and extrajudicial detentions, physical assaults, death threats, physical t
155 patitis C virus (HCV) among people living in detention (PLD) is typically high in many countries incl
156 -scale decarceration and changes to pretrial detention policies are likely to be important for improv
157 nvestigates the performance of nine proposed detention ponds (across the city of Renton, Washington,
158 s for the future indicated that the selected detention ponds are likely to reduce the concentrations
159                                              Detention ponds are used in urban stormwater management,
160                     The study concluded that detention ponds can be used as a reliable solution for r
161 e found that the performance of the proposed detention ponds in reducing stormwater pollutants varied
162 ate the performance of the proposed nine (9) detention ponds under future climate scenarios of 100-ye
163  (DEA)] in five types of SCM (wet ponds, dry detention ponds, dry extended detention, infiltration ba
164 ed depending on the size and location of the detention ponds.
165               Although New Jersey's pretrial detention population dramatically decreased under bail r
166                        Reducing the pretrial detention population has been a cornerstone of movements
167      In 1993, California created a new civil detention process and allowed detention of noninfectious
168 g processes and patients' experiences of the detention process.
169 ates of comorbidity decreased in youth after detention, rates remained substantial and were higher th
170            A series of procedure-related and detention-related factors were observed to be associated
171            Incarcerated adolescents' time in detention represents a rare opportunity to provide care
172 rmine whether ICE Performance-Based National Detention Standards (PBNDS) were violated.
173  groups are at a greater risk of psychiatric detention than are majority groups, although there is va
174  medical health screening within 24 hours of detention, there are many lacking areas.
175 uity of prevention, care, and treatment upon detention, throughout imprisonment, and upon release.
176                                     The mean detention time with a positive test was 14.8 +/- 3.2 day
177                         The median length of detention was 3 weeks for infectious patients and 28 wee
178         In 10 cases, both civil and criminal detention were attempted.
179 e entry policies (eg, temporary visa status, detention) were associated with poor mental health (SMD
180                             Five years after detention, when participants were 14 to 24 years old, al
181 ent and/or suicide attempt) in pretrial jail detention who were recruited from 2 jails from May 11, 2
182 reased the use of monetary bail and pretrial detention without increasing failure to appear rates at

 
Page Top