ライフサイエンスコーパス: deviation

1 s calculated using linear regression on mean deviation.

2 s) perceive their deviation and their actual deviation.

3 the CA parameters and increased the standard deviation.

4 and patella for participants with higher HMP deviation.

5 entage, but 75% of VSUs underestimated their deviation.

6 law as a benchmark for the observed standard deviations.

7 ppetite is suppressed to prevent homeostatic deviations.

8 less index variability with smaller standard deviations.

9 n body condition linked with extreme climate deviations.

10 square Root of the Mean Square of Successive Deviations.

11 y women (mean age, 54 years +/- 10 [standard deviation]).

12 men (mean age, 57.3 years +/- 11.6 [standard deviation]).

13 733 men; mean age, 49 years +/- 17 [standard deviation]).

14 ive baseline measurements was high (standard deviation = 0.02 mm in normal and in dry eyes).

15 vessel stroke [odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation = 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.78-0.

16 cally diverse adults (mean age, 62 (standard deviation, 10) years) free of known cardiovascular (CVD)

17 patients (mean age, 11 years +/- 5 [standard deviation]; 10 female patients) were evaluated.

18 tronauts (mean age, 45 years +/- 5 [standard deviation]; 10 men) showed increased mean volumes in the

19 ographs; mean age, 62 years +/- 16 [standard deviation]; 1059 men) with COVID-19 pneumonia and 3148 p

20 ,961 patients (mean age 65.1 years, standard deviation 11.7 years), most of whom were women (96%) and

21 eventeen participants (mean age +/- standard deviation, 13 years +/- 5; nine male) were in the ferumo

22 baseline was -5.9 letters correct (standard deviation, 13.0 letters correct) in the intervention eye

23 atients (mean age, 54 years +/- 18 [standard deviation]; 13 men) were evaluated.

24 tients were younger (mean age 48.3 [standard deviation 14.2]-vs.-55.0 [13.3],p = 0.047) and more freq

25 study groups at month 36 (mean +/- standard deviation 14.5+/-5.1 and 14.8+/-5.3, respectively), and

26 tor density was 14 988 cells/mm(2) (standard deviation, 1403.15 cells/mm(2)).

27 trols with itch compared with 82.9 (standard deviation = 15.6) in controls without itch (P < 0.001).

28 without itch (P < 0.001) and 74.9 (standard deviation = 15.7) in controls with itch compared with 82

29 (31 men; mean age, 58 years +/- 12 [standard deviation]; 15 patients per center; three centers) with

30 ents with itch, compared with 74.7 (standard deviation = 18.0) in patients without itch (P < 0.001) a

31 cipants (mean age, 49 years +/- 17 [standard deviation]; 18 men and two women) were included.

32 s Forty-five patients (mean age +/- standard deviation, 19 years +/- 5; 27 female) and 57 hips were e

33 atients (mean age, 68 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]; 192 men) were evaluated.

34 biopsy-proven RCC (median size +/- standard deviation, 2.8 cm +/- 1.4) were included.

35 ye each of 97 glaucoma patients (median mean deviation, -2.31 dB) and 65 control participants were in

36 -5D visual analogue scale was 65.9 (standard deviation = 20.1) in patients with itch, compared with 7

37 ncluded (mean age, 55 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]; 208 men).

38 nodules (mean size, 8.6 mm +/- 3.4 [standard deviation]; 21 part-solid nodules) in 42 patients (mean

39 ients with PEX (19.7 years +/- 7.8 [standard deviation]; 245 men) and 35 healthy volunteers (20.7 yea

40 patients (mean age, 46 years +/- 7 [standard deviation]; 25 women) with 100 ccRCCs were evaluated.

41 patients (mean age, 64 years +/- 9 [standard deviation]; 2567 women) underwent mt-sDNA screening and

42 aging session time was 4.6 minutes (standard deviation, 3.0 minutes) for Optos P200DTx and 5.2 minute

43 for Optos P200DTx and 5.2 minutes (standard deviation, 3.0 minutes) for Zeiss Clarus 500 (P = 0.17).

44 patients (mean age, 58 years +/- 5 [standard deviation]; 32 men) with 53 lesions was included.

45 atients (mean age, 59 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]; 35 women) underwent preventive FICS for cons

46 ticipants with NMOSDs (mean age +/- standard deviation, 44 years +/- 15; 45 women) and 28 age-matched

47 2 patients (66% women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 45 +/- 12 years; 133 with gastroparesis) with

48 r up to 24 years (mean = 9.9 years, standard deviation = 5.0), died, and underwent a neuropathologic

49 control participants (mean age +/- standard deviation, 56 years +/- 11; 11 women), 29 participants w

50 with AD (mean age, 73 years +/- 9 [standard deviation]; 58 women) and 100 age-matched HC participant

51 COPDGene participants (mean age +/- standard deviation, 59.8 years +/- 8.9; 3734 men and 3409 women)

52 ren (mean age, 33.9 months +/- 1.8 [standard deviation]; 59 girls, 69 boys) were evaluated.

53 Mean age was 71 years (standard deviation, 6.6); 56.5% were female.

54 atients (mean age, 62 years +/- 16 [standard deviation]; 61 men) and 262 patients (mean age, 64 years

55 cipants (mean age, 64 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]; 61 men) were evaluated.

56 disease (mean age, 46 years +/- 14 [standard deviation]; 63% female) who underwent TTE and cardiac MR

57 of 962 cases (mean patient age +/- standard deviation, 65 years +/- 17; 255 male patients; 449 scans

58 f 317 consecutive men (mean age +/- standard deviation, 65 years +/- 8) were treated.

59 iers (mean age, 14.8 years +/- 0.6 [standard deviation]; 66 boys) and in 105 control participants (me

60 cipants (mean age, 56 years +/- 15 [standard deviation]; 66 women) were evaluated.

61 ents; mean age, 76.8 years +/- 6.0 [standard deviation]; 66% female).

62 re HCV CVL was 4 351 079 copies/mL (standard deviation = 7 149 888); local HCV CVLs varied by subgrou

63 with DPN (mean age, 65 years +/- 9 [standard deviation]; 70% men; mean BMI, 34 kg/m(2) +/- 5), 20 par

64 The mean age was 74.4 years (standard deviation:8.7 years); 63.9% were women, 19.4% had no for

65 atients (mean age, 72 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]; 81 men) were evaluated.

66 ntion eye and -3.7 letters correct (standard deviation, 9.0 letters correct) in the fellow eye.

67 in sleep onset, assessed using the standard deviation across all nights recorded, was associated wit

68 ipants were male, their average +/- standard deviation age was 65+/-9 years.

69 d 10 healthy participants (mean +/- standard deviation age, 29 years +/- 13).

70 The mean (standard deviation) age was 70.7 (8.0) years and 55.6% were femal

71 ation comprised 491 subjects [mean (standard deviation): age 44.6 yrs (13.0), body mass index 25.4 kg

72 men (mean age, 51.1 years +/- 10.1 [standard deviation]; age range, 27-70 years) with 37 lesions were

73 cipants (mean age, 60 years +/- 13 [standard deviation]; all women) were evaluated.

74 or surgical correction based on preoperative deviation and ductions.

75 urve [AUC] = 0.924) and combined D* standard deviation and F (p) kurtosis (AUC = 0.916) for predictio

76 unners might benefit from reducing their HMP deviation and from selecting footwear by quantifying HMP

77 -dependent statistics, specifically standard deviation and mean.

78 regions identified based on root mean-square deviation and root mean-square fluctuation values are no

79 ascular surgical units (VSUs) perceive their deviation and their actual deviation.

80 tested whether participants with higher HMP deviation and whether using footwear that increases HMP

81 , and pooled clinical specimens had standard deviations and coefficients of variation ranging from 0.

82 ling relationships is highlighted, including deviations and potential inflection points, where differ

83 minimum angle of resolution), with standard deviations and ranges where available.

84 errors with the presentation of the standard deviations and statistical significance shown in Figure

85 entification rate of 88.5% +/- 0.2 (standard deviation) and localization distances of less than 7 mm.

86 ngs for 2015 (3 of 23: IOP, pattern standard deviation, and 7-o'clock RNFL thickness) and 2018 (1 of

87 31 women; mean age, 67 years +/-17 [standard deviation]), and group 2 comprised 57 patients (28 men,

88 Upon binding of the RNA, NMR chemical shift deviations are observed in both RRMs, suggesting both pl

89 table environmental outcomes (subject to 10% deviation) are obtained in over 80% of testing scenarios

90 The values obtained for relative standard deviation, as well as for precision, in terms of repeata

91 d the inferior vena cava using an esophageal deviation balloon, and ablation was performed from withi

92 low and high initial SSB intake (1 standard deviation below and above the mean) and 1.17 between chi

93 Relative standard deviations below 1.5% were observed for interlaboratory

94 nts) diagnosed with glaucoma and a 24-2 mean deviation better than -6 dB and a healthy (H) group (45

95 o the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson criteria (mean deviation between 0 and - 6 dB) and 68 healthy control s

96 lded very similar results (relative standard deviation between 2-PIC and external calibration: 4.9% f

97 Analysis of deviations between measured and modeled Zn concentration

98 verage the accuracy rate in identifying gait deviations between PT and PTS was similar and better tha

99 r more consecutive visits) worsening of mean deviation by >=6 dB was 20% (95% CI 12%, 33%); 5-year cu

100 We show that this deviation can be explained by transmission of long wavel

101 isson regression indicated that a 1-standard-deviation change in predisaster social cohesion at the c

102 Eleven VSUs (25%) estimated their deviation concordant with their DSAA percentage, but 75%

103 ancer risk (odds ratio [OR] per one standard deviation decrease in low-density lipoprotein [LDL] chol

104 parameters include improvement in secondary deviations, degree of muscle underaction and diplopia.

105 As patients' mean deviation deteriorated, they transitioned between health

106 In 21 of 236 tests (9%), mean deviation deviated by more than +/-3 dB from the median.

107 ility was measured using the Composite Phase Deviation (deviation from a perfectly regular pattern) a

108 Moreover, a comparison of relative standard deviation distribution between modes shows consistency i

109 cible and correct results: relative standard deviation does not exceed 8.4% and recovery of model ant

110 nd whether using footwear that increases HMP deviation during running show higher reductions of knee

111 The mean +/- standard deviation follow-up period was 14.6+/-3.1 years.

112 NH(4)NO(3) particles, with maximum standard deviations for delta(15)N and delta(18)O of +/-0.3 per m

113 in the test set was 0.80 +/- 0.04 (standard deviation) for the arteries and 0.88 +/- 0.03 for the ve

114 alculated theoretical radius > 2.49 based on deviation from a perfect 3D sphere, a 92.7% in-sample an

115 easured using the Composite Phase Deviation (deviation from a perfectly regular pattern) and intracla

116 .5) concentration and corresponding standard deviation from a published epidemiologic study to estima

117 On other hand, another cause of deviation from ambient chemistry in OFR is that some tro

118 arterial pressure (MAP) exhibited measurable deviation from baseline 2-4 weeks post IgFUS treatment.

119 tructure of sputum microbiota showed greater deviation from baseline in ICS nonresponders than in ICS

120 Deviation from chronological age was defined as "delta a

121 The overall inconsistency in approaches and deviation from evidence-based recommendations are concer

122 -structured tungsten can exhibit significant deviation from the blackbody spectrum.

123 identified from South Australia, with little deviation from the characters predicted for their last c

124 r HMP from a two-legged squat motion and the deviation from the HMP when running in different footwea

125 tice correspondence of the twin with a minor deviation from the ideal orientation.

126 loped in the gamma phase resulted in a large deviation from the level of plastic strain expected for

127 sponses (e.g. within subjects) depend on the deviation from the subject mean (relative) rather than o

128 and 1.17 between children with low and high deviation from their initial SSB intake (1 SD below and

129 en interactions with the host cell can cause deviations from a desired function, resulting in the nee

130 Surprisal analysis also determines the deviations from a fully stable-state distribution.

131 , we predicted how muscle weakness may cause deviations from a normal walking motion.

132 y, which mostly correlated with the observed deviations from Arrhenius-type behavior, with compositio

133 ere responsive to image onset, showing large deviations from baseline firing shortly after image onse

134 Deviations from binary fracture produce more exotic patt

135 expression patterns, suggesting fundamental deviations from circadian expression.

136 k suggests that SCN4A commonly shows extreme deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in thes

137 nto its constituent protofilaments, enabling deviations from helicity and other sources of heterogene

138 Deviations from local policy and national recommended be

139 in 440 healthy young adults, both caused by deviations from normal breathing which we term deep brea

140 ults, yet no study has prospectively tracked deviations from normal cerebellar growth trajectories in

141 scence might induce psychopathology-relevant deviations from normative brain development.

142 We aimed to map deviations from normative ranges of brain structure for

143 our environment it is fundamental to detect deviations from regularities of sensory input.

144 Deviations from the average coverage in the sequence cop

145 pted, we automatically detected the expected deviations from the daily feeding routine in standing, l

146 In adults, deviations from the DNA methylation (DNAm) age predictio

147 To analyze deviations from the inverse Gaussian model, we considere

148 ield and P(+) (fraction of closed RC) showed deviations from the standard Joliot-Lavergne-Trissl mode

149 Deviations from these predictions may arise from correla

150 Prior research has found deviations from this relationship across genotypes.

151 Often, this results in deviations from transition metal scaling relationships t

152 eters (age, mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, glaucoma hemifield test results, FPR, FNR, an

153 83 women; mean age, 57 years +/- 8 [standard deviation]) had trace or greater visual emphysema at CT

154 Individual MR analyses showed a 1-standard-deviation-higher HDL cholesterol (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.75-

155 esterol (odds ratio [OR] 1.66 per 1-standard-deviation-higher trait; 95% CI: 1.49-1.86; P < 0.001), t

156 ld than at free breathing (mean +/- standard deviation in milliliters of gas per milliliters of paren

157 d from selecting footwear by quantifying HMP deviation in order to minimize joint cartilage loading i

158 nt night-to-night variation, with a standard deviation in sleep duration of 1.2 +/- 0.7 h.

159 An increase of 1 standard deviation in the CHD genetic risk score was associated w

160 onsistency of the model, we calculated model deviations in 46 neonates who were scanned on a second o

161 The immune and nervous systems both sense deviations in homeostasis and initiate protective respon

162 eral highly sensitized CPRA categories, with deviations in linkage disequilibrium for Caucasians and

163 and (71)Ga NMR spectra result from both the deviations in the polyhedral coordination/site-symmetry

164 ameters outside the operating space, such as deviations in the reaction buffer, concentration of conc

165 A subset of analytes showed deviations in their standardized exchange profiles that

166 ldren, as well as its type and the amount of deviation, in addition to differentiating between phoria

167 (IVW OR 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1, 3.8 per standard deviation increase in drinks consumed per week).

168 The odds ratio for depression per standard deviation increase in genetically-predicted triglyceride

169 (IVW OR 2.6, 95% CI = 1.7, 3.9 per standard deviation increase in lifetime smoking behaviour) and an

170 er (adjusted hazard ratio for a one-standard-deviation increase in PRS=1.11, 95% CI=1.03, 1.21), and

171 14, 95% CI=0.035, 0.189), with each standard deviation increase in resilience predicting 12% longer n

172 us (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.00-1.17 per standard deviation increase of SoC) variable, and risk of breast

173 ion ranged from 1.18 to 1.51 (per 1-standard deviation increment in relative abundance) for microbiot

174 Mean +/- standard deviation IOP was 14.0+/-4.2 mmHg in the tube group and

175 all testing scenarios if 19% of performance deviation is allowed) regardless of the uncertain upstre

176 ns, including the frontal (mean +/- standard deviation) (left, 2.16 years +/- 0.29; right, 2.19 years

177 edicted structures shared a root-mean-square-deviation less than 2 angstrom to their native counterpa

178 The mean (standard deviation) lipid concentrations were LDL cholesterol 3.5

179 ion higher than 0.9954 and relative standard deviations lower than 5.6%.

180 oma hemifield test results, pattern standard deviation <0.05 on 2 examinations, or mean deviation [MD

181 se (recoveries of 87-115%, relative standard deviation <8.0%).

182 (n = 326; mean age, 59 years +/-17 [standard deviation]; male-to-female ratio: 188:138).

183 fect of HbA1c on rates of change in SAP mean deviation (MD) and OCT RNFL thickness loss over time whi

184 (CCT), optic nerve head appearance, and mean deviation (MD) assessed with Humphrey visual field (HVF)

185 corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the mean deviation (MD) of the perimetry were measured at baselin

186 " The impact of medication adherence on mean deviation (MD) over time was assessed with a linear mixe

187 linear regression of the summary index mean deviation (MD) over time.

188 s with GVFD and predict quantitative VF mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and me

189 , three different strategies were used: mean deviation (MD), visual field index (VFI), and the guided

190 d deviation <0.05 on 2 examinations, or mean deviation [MD] >-5 dB) and normal control participants.

191 and worse eye was determined by 10-2 VF mean deviations (MDs).

192 error (0.21 +/- 0.05 [mean SUV +/- standard deviation]), mean peak signal-to-noise ratio (36.3 +/- 3

193 The mean +/- standard deviation number of mammography screenings undergone per

194 n the range 95-106% with a relative standard deviation of <6.0%.

195 plification methods demonstrating a standard deviation of 247 ppb D (a deltaD of 1.6 per mille).

196 re validated by several MOFs with an average deviation of 5.4%.

197 steps protocols in data acquisition, extreme deviation of a sample from samples of the same treatment

198 BCVA and mean deviation of automated standard perimetry remained stabl

199 delled daily carbon gain causes a meaningful deviation of c. 18% day(-1) .

200 ively, and with an average relative standard deviation of ca. < 10% in the positive ion mode using PS

201 Across all patients, standard deviation of cardiac output in the aAo (0.58 L/min +/- 0

202 Standard deviation of DCE MRI parameter arterial fraction was sel

203 ical slices, respectively (mean +/- standard deviation of differences between predicted and manual st

204 ty of inhomogeneous N-QDCs with the standard deviation of energy level distribution sigma(epsilon) is

205 epidemiologic study to estimate the standard deviation of hypothetical PM(2.5) concentration distribu

206 r 8.0 mm produced smaller values in standard deviation of mean error (0.45D versus 0.68D), mean absol

207 cribing local Process S as a function of the deviation of neuronal firing rates from a locally define

208 Summary statistics (mean and standard deviation of regional volumes) are reported for each bra

209 clinical effect size was within one standard deviation of the mean predicted effect size for all but

210 The mean +/- standard deviation of the root mean square deviation was 4.39 +/-

211 with baseline FF below the mean +/- standard deviation of unaffected volunteers (-0.4 cm(2) +/- 0.15;

212 Their means percentages and standard deviations of accuracy range 100.32 +/- 0.89 to 99.27 +/

213 Standard deviations of logarithms of geometric mean concentration

214 The impact of various deviations of process parameters outside the operating s

215 rm wrinkle spacing and amplitude, as well as deviations of the actual director from the axis imposed

216 ed one to observe experimentally significant deviations of the expected CCS versus m/z correlations f

217 Means and standard deviations of the SSIM were reported, and statistical si

218 .2 kWh, with a mean energy cost (+/-standard deviation) of $0.22 +/- 0.13.

219 survivors were an average age (+/- standard deviation) of 16.3 +/- 4.7 years and 32.8 +/- 14.7 month

220 Mean deviation on standard achromatic perimetry and average t

221 RAST) either frequently show high prediction deviations or require bisolute adsorption data.

222 Data are shown as either mean +/- [standard deviation] or median [quartile 1-3 range], and group com

223 h age (P = 0.78), baseline visual field mean deviation (P = 1.00), or concurrent use of IOP-lowering

224 tion (OR, 3.2; 95% CI: 1.3, 8.3 per standard deviation, P = .02) were independent predictors of deter

225 y metastatic lesions by 79% +/- 23 (standard deviation; P < .001).

226 the first VF: (1) base parameters (age, mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, glaucoma hemifiel

227 eviation (PSD), and mean VF sectoral pattern deviation (PD) from SD OCT data.

228 VSUs were asked to estimate the guideline deviation percentage in their hospital which was then co

229 and intermediate precision relative standard deviation percentages range 0.395-0.894.

230 ome measures were changes in perimetric mean deviation (PMD) on Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in bot

231 uding heart rate; P, R, and T axis; R-T axis deviation; PR interval, QRS duration, QT, and QTc interv

232 ive VF mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and mean VF sectoral pattern deviation

233 r (median and mean absolute errors; standard deviation; range of errors; percentage of eyes with a pr

234 atients (mean age, 26 years +/- 23 [standard deviation]; range, 0-88 years; 157 male patients) were i

235 pediatric patients (14 years +/- 3 [standard deviation]; range, 9-18 years; 27 of 48 [56%] male) refe

236 and evaluate whether the loci of individual deviations recapitulated group-average brain maps of sch

237 ROP stage from 0 to 2, the mean +/- standard deviation retinal thickness at the fovea increased from

238 stronger absolute correlation with SAP mean deviation (rho=0.54) than the probability of GON given b

239 NN also achieved an average root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 1.24 angstrom on a set of 50 experim

240 variability was defined as root mean square deviation (RMSD) of TD values at all 52 VF locations.

241 method was demonstrated by relative standard deviation (RSD) lower than 0.83% for the (1)D and (2)D r

242 kDa, exhibiting an average relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.43 +/- 0.20%.

243 on (LLOQ) of 1.0 nM with a relative standard deviation (RSD, n = 3) of 0.85%.

244 The relative standard deviations (RSD) between the cycles for human plasma sam

245 2 E%; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.38 E% per BMI standard deviation score).

246 e), small height at diagnosis (<= 2 standard deviation scores; RR, 6.74 [95% CI, 4.61 to 9.86]), pitu

247 conditions, and lower (worse) mean (standard deviation) scores on the modified Rasch-scored 28-item V

248 d that 19.8% of long eyes had LD >1 standard deviation (SD) above and that 5.2% had LD <1 SD below th

249 of 409 patients with a mean age +/- standard deviation (SD) of 70.2 +/- 9.8 years and follow-up of 84

250 The mean age +/- standard deviation (SD) of the patients was 28.4 +/- 5.6 years (r

251 on average 0.06 (95% CI 0.01-0.12) standard deviation (SD) units higher on the conventional cognitiv

252 Participants aged 46.8 (standard deviation (SD), 0.7) years (n = 5,346) from the 1970 Bri

253 54%) were adherent (51% male; mean [standard deviation (SD)] age: 56.1 [59.8] months), 5 (3%) were no

254 cases and controls were 49.6 years (standard deviation [SD] 8.7 years) and 48.9 years (SD 8.7 years),

255 Baseline VAs (Mean+/-standard deviation [SD] Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Stud

256 0.58 to 0.95, respectively, for a 1-standard deviation [SD] increase).

257 t (79.5%) were female, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age at presentation of 35.2 (14.2) years

258 icacy from an average score of 2.6 (standard deviation [SD], 0.3) to 2.8 (SD, 0.2) on the EDTSES scor

259 teen HIV+ adolescents, mean age 12 (standard deviation [SD], 1.6) years, 50.4% male, and 110 HIV- ado

260 nitive outcomes (expected mean, 50; standard deviation [SD], 10).

261 Expansion Site (mean age, 21 years; standard deviation [SD], 18 years; 52% female).

262 s over 12 months were similar: 5.6 (standard deviation [SD], 2.9) versus 4.9 (SD, 3.2; P = 0.11) for

263 IOP for all patients was 15.2 mmHg (standard deviation [SD], 3.4 mmHg), which decreased to 14.2 mmHg

264 Survivors (mean age +/- standard deviation [SD], 35.6 +/- 8.8 years) had lower mean (+/-

265 eyes of 182 patients (mean age +/- standard deviation [SD], 78.8 +/- 8.8 years) with nonexudative (5

266 9.8 months (range, 0.9-33.4 months; standard deviation [SD], 9.4 months) at the first handheld OCT sc

267 atients (mean age, 61 years +/- 14 [standard deviation {SD}]; 68 female patients and 77 male patients

268 nal anisotropy was lower in [0.423 (standard deviation, SD 0.023) versus 0.446 (SD 0.016), P = 0.002]

269 e over 3 months was 74% +/- 21% (+/-standard deviation, SD).

270 ine and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and standard deviations (SDs) across 12 months were calculated.

271 nto account receptor saturation and protocol deviations such as animal species.

272 men; mean age, 56.8 years +/- 11.8 [standard deviation]) suspected of having thoracic aortic disease

273 d test results, FPR, FNR, and FL); (2) total deviation (TD) at each location; and (3) computationally

274 n isotherm models and showed less prediction deviations than the published models with the root-mean-

275 d a new metric designated 'contact proximity deviation' that enumerates contact map changes.

276 over the obstacle rapidly, making a minimal deviation to avoid a collision, and subsequently returni

277 d validation sets, and a residual prediction deviation value of 3.4.

278 ivided according to the Belin/Ambrosio total deviation value: subclinical, mild, and moderate.

279 anged from 84 to 120% with relative standard deviation values lower than 11%.

280 The mean (standard deviation) values for apolipoproteins B and A-I were 1.0

281 participants, baseline mean age +/- standard deviation was 14.0 +/- 1.5 years, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C)

282 - standard deviation of the root mean square deviation was 4.39 +/- 2.55 dB.

283 This deviation was recapitulated in vitro by emulating the in

284 change in ambulatory SBP (mean +/- standard deviation) was -0.6 +/- 6.2 mm Hg in the placebo group,

285 nk: the estimated hazard ratios per standard deviation were 1.10 (95% confidence interval: 1.05, 1.16

286 tion studies, recovery and relative standard deviation were obtained in range of 92.5-104.3% and 1.4-

287 Mean and standard deviation were recorded and differences in attenuation b

288 thin the range of 65-141%, relative standard deviations were <20% at all three spiking levels, while

289 Relative standard deviations were below 9%, and recoveries close to 100%.

290 Thus, while infra-normal deviations were common among patients, their anatomical

291 recision, was established (relative standard deviations were lower than or equal to 10%).

292 In general, lower deviations were observed between (TW)CCS(N(2)) measureme

293 Greater deviations were observed for steroid sulfates in complex

294 with a mean age of 69 years +/- 14 (standard deviation) were enrolled prospectively in the PROMeNADe

295 oma (mean age, 51.3 years +/- 14.3 [standard deviation]) were compared with those in 10 healthy contr

296 8 women (mean age, 50 years +/- 13 [standard deviation]) were evaluated.

297 1 women (mean age, 54 years +/- 10 [standard deviation]) were included, and 1 186 045 digital mammogr

298 For example, the relative standard deviation, which is the evaluation criterion of battery

299 r women (mean age, 55 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]) with HER2-negative primary breast cancer wer

300 imaging during 4.6+/-1.9 (mean +/- standard deviation) years.