戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 able-temperature measurements in cases where Dexter and electron-transfer mechanisms can lead to indi
2 lar transfer of energy (FRET) and electrons (Dexter) are of great interest for the scientific communi
3  well-known quantum-chemical results such as Dexter charge-transfer and Forster excitation-transfer r
4               We dissect the bridge-mediated Dexter coupling mechanisms and formulate a theory for tr
5                                     However, Dexter coupling pathways must convey both an electron an
6 ty to inhibit production of myeloid cells in Dexter cultures but not that of lymphoid cells in Whitlo
7 n when the antibody was added to established Dexter cultures.
8 -independent TET beyond the traditional 1 nm Dexter distance.
9  first direct experimental verification that Dexter electron exchange from the ligand triplet state i
10 gonucleotides, a minor contribution from the Dexter electron exchange mechanism at short distances is
11 rative mechanism of this activation involves Dexter energy transfer from photoexcited osmium(II) phot
12 ystals to the orange polymers via Forster or Dexter energy transfer is analyzed through time resolved
13 istic studies and DFT calculations support a Dexter energy transfer mechanism of substrate activation
14 silicon to anthracene through a single 15 ns Dexter energy transfer step with a nearly 50% yield.
15 ysts can activate diazirine warheads through Dexter energy transfer to form reactive carbenes within
16 iated spin change of the donor and acceptor, Dexter energy transfer, is critically important in solar
17 ene intermediates via visible light-mediated Dexter energy transfer.
18 re also included, which support reaction via Dexter energy transfer.
19  annihilator-to-sensitizer ratio, facilitate Dexter energy transfer.
20 e pathway framework developed here shows how Dexter energy-transfer rates depend on donor, bridge, an
21                                  We identify Dexter exchange between the Frenkel state in donor and a
22 sion among the host chromophores followed by Dexter exchange energy transfer to the trap chromophore.
23 istance dependence, which is consistent with Dexter exchange transfer.
24                           The mechanism is a Dexter hopping process consisting of the simultaneous ex
25 nism can under certain circumstances exhibit Dexter-like "behavior", thus illustrating the danger of
26 perovskite nanocrystals promote an efficient Dexter-like singlet energy transfer to surface-anchored
27 xcited by green light, engage in interfacial Dexter-like triplet-triplet energy transfer with surface
28 ng both quenching data sets according to the Dexter mechanism also shows an excellent correlation.
29  energy transfer occurs through a Forster or Dexter mechanism, we leveraged facile halide-exchange re
30 al axes, which favors exciton diffusion by a Dexter mechanism.
31 chloride-rich CsPb(Br(1-x)Cl(x))(3) favors a Dexter mechanism.
32 ansfer is dominated by an electron-exchange (Dexter) mechanism.
33 e, when studied individually(r = 0.03 ocular dexter [OD], r = -0.05 ocular sinister [OS]).
34 enlarged blind spot in the right eye (oculus dexter, OD).
35 s distances well beyond the nominal range of Dexter or super-exchange paradigms.
36                   Using TACE-negative murine Dexter-ras-myc cell monocytes, we found that in these ce
37 2 core allows for a definitive assignment of Dexter transfer as the dominant excited-state reaction p
38                                              Dexter transfer between chemically linked donors and acc
39 ) = -0.1 eV), the increase in probability of Dexter transfer due to the closer proximity of the donor
40            Electronic coupling constants for Dexter transfer were determined to be approximately 10 c
41 long-lived, their transport occurs through a Dexter transfer, making them slower than singlet exciton
42                                The nature of Dexter triplet energy transfer between bonded systems of
43  can be interpreted as strong evidence for a Dexter triplet energy transfer mechanism, it does not im
44 tion and differentiation of myeloid cells in Dexter type bone marrow cultures.
45 ry low temperature, but this is augmented by Dexter-type electron exchange at higher temperatures.
46  only operative over short distances because Dexter-type electronic coupling for TET rapidly decrease
47 jugates to pendant ytterbium(III) cations, a Dexter-type energy transfer mechanism is suggested, whic
48 r to dominate over conventional Forster- and Dexter-type interactions, in agreement with the experime
49 n bone marrow suspensions to pre-established Dexter-type long-term bone marrow culture stromal layers
50  of solvent polarity, suggesting a concerted Dexter-type process with a damping coefficient of 0.60 a