戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 often unspecific, resulting in a challenging diagnostic work-up.
2 would present for screening and then undergo diagnostic work-up.
3 s even more prevalent and requires extensive diagnostic work-up.
4 teroid treatment), and the ON etiology after diagnostic work-up.
5 formance differed according to the volume of diagnostic work-up.
6 pulmonary embolism in patients with a normal diagnostic work-up.
7 ed its value as an integral component of the diagnostic work-up.
8 ALY), compared with the cost of the standard diagnostic work-up.
9 ith multiple stroke etiologies or incomplete diagnostic work-up.
10 ts received radioablative therapy after this diagnostic work-up.
11 her costs, lower effectiveness) by the usual diagnostic work-up.
12 assuming increasingly important roles in the diagnostic work-up.
13 fying patients with suspected FA for further diagnostic work-up.
14                                     At first diagnostic work-up, 18 patients (64.3%) met the criteria
15 mained stable in scenarios in which standard diagnostic work-up accuracy, drug treatment effectivenes
16  P/LP variants combine to support WGS in the diagnostic work-up across all CP and related phenotypes.
17 not considered variation in dose exposure or diagnostic work-up after abnormal screening results.
18  presented, as well as indications about the diagnostic work-up and differential diagnosis.
19 rt (n=28) were reviewed at the time of first diagnostic work-up and during follow-up, using the PML d
20 athy exists, and should be considered in the diagnostic work-up and genetic counselling of patients w
21 ents with suspected ICI-AKI requires careful diagnostic work-up and kidney biopsy for patients with m
22                                       The TB diagnostic work-up and linkage to HIV care should be str
23 of the lung is an important component of the diagnostic work-up and management of IFD.
24 ve imaging methods are increasingly used for diagnostic work-up and management of steatosis, includin
25 rom patient files covering pregnancy, birth, diagnostic work-up and ocular parameters such as refract
26 gate the value of cardiac MRI (cMRI) for the diagnostic work-up and prognostication of these patients
27 ppropriate specialists for completion of the diagnostic work-up and recommendations for appropriate m
28 reement regarding the elements of a complete diagnostic work-up and the timing and specific surgical
29  that underwent PTNB as part of their cancer diagnostic work-up and those who did not (p = 0.57 and 0
30 FDG PET/CT plays a complementary role in CUP diagnostic work-up and was able to determine the likely
31  specificity, transient utility decrement of diagnostic work-up, and additional cost of tomosynthesis
32  able to cover area from head to toes in one diagnostic work-up, and besides the anatomic regions eva
33 also improved symptom recognition, expedited diagnostic work-up, and increased downstream support, in
34 mbosis as well as its underlying etiologies, diagnostic work-up, and management is essential, because
35 e underlying genetic defect with a resultant diagnostic work-up can lessen or prevent tumor burden, i
36 pective questionnaires were used to evaluate diagnostic work-up, counseling, and treatment plans of t
37  (True-Positive upstaging in 61 patients) to diagnostic work-up decreased cost by 5.5%, adding FDG-PE
38  given a BI-RADS category 3 assessment after diagnostic work-up did not change.
39  of metastatic tumors for which standardized diagnostic work-up fails to identify the primary site.
40  PillCam(TM) Crohn's System as supplementary diagnostic work-up focused on the small-bowel between Ju
41       Imaging is fundamental for the initial diagnostic work-up, follow-up, and selection of the opti
42  Annually, 38% of radiologists performed the diagnostic work-up for 25 or fewer of their own recalled
43   Participants were asked to apply the usual diagnostic work-up for CD according to their diagnostic
44      MRI criteria were first included in the diagnostic work-up for multiple sclerosis in 2001, and s
45 hallenges that clinicians face in pursuing a diagnostic work-up for patients near the end of life.
46     To evaluate the contribution made to the diagnostic work-up for patients with suspected ocular tu
47 lid nodules smaller than 5 mm from immediate diagnostic work-up for solid nodules larger than 8 mm an
48 noscopy in the years 2010-2016, as part of a diagnostic work-up for suspected IBD.
49 o undergo colorectal screening or who have a diagnostic work-up for symptoms.
50 heir screening performance by performing the diagnostic work-up for their own recalled screening mamm
51 y low risk of being infected, and additional diagnostic work-up for these joints is not necessary.
52                                          The diagnostic work-up for this disease includes different i
53 al recommendations to recall the women for a diagnostic work-up, for both reader-specific and common
54 full guideline and presents a combination of diagnostic work-up, genetic and family screening, risk s
55              We found that regardless of the diagnostic work up, gluten-sensitive patients were predo
56 idered a research tool and not a part of the diagnostic work-up in clinical practice.
57 for increased incidence due to screening and diagnostic work-up in each group via mean lead times (ML
58   The clinical impact may be a more thorough diagnostic work-up in patients presenting with SVT.
59  demand on healthcare providers to perform a diagnostic work-up in relatively early stages of the dis
60 dering that it responds well to treatment, a diagnostic work-up including a tissue biopsy should be i
61                                   Additional diagnostic work-up, including a search for underlying in
62                                 Thus, active diagnostic work-up, including biopsy to allow prompt tre
63      All other patients underwent a complete diagnostic work-up, including genetic evaluation and end
64               All 249 patients with a normal diagnostic work-up, including those with protocol violat
65 y dose variability from screening, resultant diagnostic work-up, initiation age, and screening freque
66                                     However, diagnostic work-up is complex and time-consuming: it req
67                   A comprehensive and prompt diagnostic work-up is mandatory for all CRAO patients.
68 s a diagnosis of exclusion, the differential diagnostic work-up is of special importance.
69                                          The diagnostic work-up is well established but some pitfalls
70 the authors propose an approach for adequate diagnostic work-up leading to appropriate care for those
71  whether the inclusion of CGP in the initial diagnostic work-up leads to improved outcomes over the c
72                                              Diagnostic work-up may include sputum cytologic examinat
73                                       In the diagnostic work-up, morphologic imaging modalities such
74 rcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] titer, negative diagnostic work-up, negative CT), HumaSPECT-Tc correctly
75                                      Routine diagnostic work-up occasionally does not identify any ab
76 17 might be more useful than p-tau181 in the diagnostic work up of AD.
77 et <40 years and should be considered in the diagnostic work up of young-onset parkinsonism.
78 d an evidence-based guideline on the initial diagnostic work-up of acute leukemia (AL).
79 ly endorsed the CAP-ASH guideline on initial diagnostic work-up of AL and included some discussion po
80             The CAP-ASH guideline on initial diagnostic work-up of AL was reviewed for developmental
81 in stored samples that were collected at the diagnostic work-up of ALS patients (n = 234), ALS mimics
82                   A specific approach to the diagnostic work-up of an infant with NLF based on this d
83 rmance, and it should be incorporated in the diagnostic work-up of BC patients.
84 f neuroimaging features of RB to improve the diagnostic work-up of children with RB.
85 es that imaging may aid substantially in the diagnostic work-up of complex neurologic disorders.
86 )F-FDG PET/CT plays an important role in the diagnostic work-up of GCA, PMR, and TAK and is increasin
87  clinical presentation and challenges in the diagnostic work-up of LVV and medium-sized vessel vascul
88 ranodal manifestations, guideline-compatible diagnostic work-up of marginal zone lymphoma is challeng
89 both expert and non-expert clinicians in the diagnostic work-up of MCDs with the aim of improving pat
90 12589 PET imaging, potentially improving the diagnostic work-up of MSA and allowing for detection of
91                         MRI has improved the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis, but inappropri
92  procedures have shown critical value in the diagnostic work-up of neurodegenerative disorders, the c
93  leukocytes in 221 subjects referred for the diagnostic work-up of neuroimmunological disorders to ob
94                                          The diagnostic work-up of patients with fever of unknown ori
95 tress testing plays an important role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with heart failure with p
96 rs the rational use of this technique in the diagnostic work-up of patients with known or suspected p
97 example, (64)Cu-DOTATATE PET, is part of the diagnostic work-up of patients with neuroendocrine neopl
98 of multiphase CT enterography to the routine diagnostic work-up of patients with OGIB should be consi
99 y histopathologic and molecular examination, diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected glioma is
100 plete mitochondrial genome sequencing in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected mitochondr
101            CARMIL2 should be included in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected monogenic
102 ance as a complementary imaging tool for the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected PHV obstru
103 lity for a positive challenge outcome in the diagnostic work-up of peanut or hazelnut allergy making
104 llected, untreated subjects presenting for a diagnostic work-up of possible neuroimmunological disord
105  discuss the use of molecular studies in the diagnostic work-up of T-cell lymphomas.
106 pathogens, and sensitive PCR methods for the diagnostic work-up of these are available.
107 reasingly been incorporated into the routine diagnostic work-up of these neoplasms.
108 g, and nuclear and radiologic imaging in the diagnostic work-up of these neoplasms.
109 of targeted US alone may be feasible for the diagnostic work-up of women with localized symptoms and
110 s not intended to address in detail the full diagnostic work-up of WRA, nor to be a formal evidence-b
111 ought to describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, operative approach, and outcomes in
112      SPECT either was dominated by the usual diagnostic work-up or had cost-effectiveness ratios of $
113  medically serious pathology, and so require diagnostic work-up or specialist referral, or both.
114                   After undergoing extensive diagnostic work-up, patients were upgraded to probable o
115  5.0-9 mm were reviewed to determine whether diagnostic work-up prior to first annual repeat screenin
116 minations is low and is lower than that with diagnostic work-up prior to short-interval follow-up rec
117                                   Absence of diagnostic work-up prior to short-interval follow-up rec
118                                      Further diagnostic work-up revealed autoimmune thyroiditis, but
119  sensitivity and specificity of the standard diagnostic work-up, the effectiveness of drug treatment,
120 tions from the full guideline which focus on diagnostic work-up, the timing and choice of surgical an
121                                          The diagnostic work-up to detect or rule out CTEPH should in
122  with an elevated PSA and, therefore, need a diagnostic work-up to exclude prostate cancer.
123 nce regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic work-up, treatment strategies and follow-up w
124                                 During their diagnostic work-up urine was collected during a 12-h per
125                                          The diagnostic work-up was complemented by CT angiography, M
126 orphic VAs of LV origin and negative routine diagnostic work-up were included.
127  age who underwent chest CT as part of their diagnostic work-up were screened for study participation
128 s $479,500 per QALY (compared with the usual diagnostic work-up), while visual or quantitative single
129         In economic evaluation, the costs of diagnostic work-up with and without FDG-PET and CT were

 
Page Top