戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 /-0.94) as most important to include in a CR discharge summary.
2 rocessing to analyze text data from clinical discharge summaries.
3 ed automated event adjudication of 1 028 294 discharge summaries.
4 alyze complications from free text fictional discharge summaries.
5 ectively abstracted by certified coders from discharge summaries.
6 rds lacked the diagnosis SH documentation in discharge summaries.
7  significantly lower in the patient-friendly discharge summaries (6.2 [0.5] vs 11.0 [1.5]; P < .001).
8 re significantly higher for patient-friendly discharge summaries (81% vs 13%; P < .001).
9 d self-care education, a structured hospital discharge summary, a family physician follow-up appointm
10 missions for ACS were identified through the discharge summaries, along with 20 additional patients p
11 le (n=1100) of clinical notes (including 50% discharge summaries and 50% outpatient notes), identifie
12          A 3-months representative sample of discharge summaries and continuity clinic notes underwen
13  SH and documentation tendencies in hospital discharge summaries and continuity notes.
14 performance on a subset of randomly selected discharge summaries and outpatient notes.
15  interventions, including computer-generated discharge summaries and using patients as couriers, shor
16  the detailed Danish death certificates, and discharge summaries, and if performed, autopsy reports.
17 ations performed before MR imaging, hospital discharge summaries, and the field centers at which MR i
18                                         Yet, discharge summaries are commonly not available and incom
19 cantly more readable and understandable than discharge summaries as they appear in electronic health
20                        The availability of a discharge summary at the first postdischarge visit was l
21 this study were to investigate receipt of CR discharge summaries by PCPs, as well as timing, and sati
22  performance when confronted with real-world discharge summaries: comparison between the human and Ch
23 arization represents an increasingly onerous discharge summary component for physicians.
24 pared with the transformed, patient-friendly discharge summaries created through the LLM.
25 comes and Measures: Incident AMI (defined by discharge summary documentation, enzyme/electrocardiogra
26 was associated with more timely and complete discharge summaries for patients discharged from the ICU
27 wo physicians reviewed each patient-friendly discharge summary for accuracy on a 6-point scale, with
28 discharged from ICU with timely and complete discharge summaries from 10.8% (preimplementation period
29                             We obtained 1501 discharge summaries from 1640 (91.5%) patients discharge
30  Result The gold standard is derived from 50 discharge summaries from our previous work, in which 2,2
31 (DFCI) are used to label imaging reports and discharge summaries from the Medical Information Mart fo
32 ding an English-Chinese term dictionary from discharge summaries in the two languages.
33 dies have demonstrated inadequate quality of discharge summaries in timeliness, transmission, and con
34                 PCPs who did not receive the discharge summary in advance of their patient's first po
35                                           No discharge summary included all 7 Transitions of Care Con
36 ft Azure OpenAI, was used to transform these discharge summaries into a patient-friendly format betwe
37 s suggest that LLMs can be used to translate discharge summaries into patient-friendly language and f
38 ting of dictated free-text documents such as discharge summaries, medical narratives are widely used
39 ormation to primary care physicians and make discharge summaries more consistently available during f
40          However, text data from eHRs, e.g., discharge summary notes, are challenging in their analys
41                                              Discharge summaries of 50 patients (31 female [62.0%] an
42 ss-sectional study evaluated a sample of the discharge summaries of adult patients discharged from th
43 and conducted a limited chart review of 3788 discharge summaries of cirrhosis admissions.
44                                  We analyzed discharge summaries of patients enrolled in the Telemoni
45 ible consenting PCPs, 71 (51.5%) received CR discharge summary, of whom 64 (90.1%) completed the surv
46                                              Discharge summaries often lacked important information s
47 aries, the median hospital dictated 69.2% of discharge summaries on the day of discharge (range, 0.0%
48 s of COVID-19 within clinical documentation, discharge summary or death certificate.
49 , list of active issues, active medications) discharge summaries pre and post implementation using mi
50  care typically received a typed, structured discharge summary, prescription for new medications if i
51               Improvements in all aspects of discharge summary quality are necessary to enable the di
52 wever, degree of hospital-level variation in discharge summary quality for patients hospitalized with
53     Even at the highest performing hospital, discharge summary quality is insufficient in terms of ti
54 ventilator settings, nursing progress notes, discharge summaries, radiology reports, provider order e
55                     Approximately half of CR discharge summaries reach PCPs, revealing a large gap in
56                                    Review of discharge summaries showed 22% of studies are clinically
57 se inpatient or outpatient clinician note or discharge summary stated the term recrudescence.
58 findings of this cross-sectional study of 50 discharge summaries suggest that LLMs can be used to tra
59 se outcomes was obtained from chart reviews, discharge summaries, the Cleveland Clinic Unified Transp
60  summary quality are necessary to enable the discharge summary to serve as an effective transitional
61 ater positive valence expressed in narrative discharge summaries was associated with substantially di
62 lly or always in 28.9% of hospitals, and the discharge summary was always sent directly to the patien
63                            Clinical neonatal discharge summaries were available for the very preterm
64 bility and understandability of the original discharge summaries were compared with the transformed,
65                                          All discharge summaries were processed by the LLM between Ju
66 ous admissions to hospital was assessed, and discharge summaries were read.
67         Clinical notes, hospital orders, and discharge summaries were reviewed to determine if a pati
68                                              Discharge summaries were tracked from the CR program to
69 a bilingual lexicon from English and Chinese discharge summaries with a small seed lexicon.
70                  All PCPs desired to receive discharge summaries, with most wanting it transmitted vi