ライフサイエンスコーパス: discrepancy

1 d possible explanations for the experimental discrepancy.

2 cts of stimulus probability and set stimulus discrepancy.

3 results agree with published results in a 4% discrepancy.

4 ghness as the likely causes for the observed discrepancy.

5 were found to be associated with tumour size discrepancy.

6 loyed in FRET can contribute to the observed discrepancy.

7 logical factors have been implicated in this discrepancy.

8 tortions bounded by a statistical measure of discrepancy.

9 field observations and resolves the apparent discrepancy.

10 ate mechanisms which might explain potential discrepancies.

11 of research remains full of controversy and discrepancies.

12 of different studies and possibly reconcile discrepancies.

13 results, while weighted analysis showed some discrepancies.

14 acteristics did not explain the between-site discrepancies.

15 Ca2+ elevation, resolves the majority of the discrepancies.

16 inical history collected to aid in resolving discrepancies.

17 assessment of the nature and causes of these discrepancies.

18 cal decision-making climates had the largest discrepancies.

19 ening behavior and can explain many of these discrepancies.

20 ic source types responsible for the observed discrepancies.

21 th radiologist arbitrated results in case of discrepancies.

22 eement with experiments, there are remaining discrepancies.

23 showed significant changes, with substantial discrepancies across NVTs implicated in terms of clinica

24 V testing in the past two decades might hide discrepancies across socioeconomic groups.

25 while the cumulative exposure to consistent discrepancies additionally recruits prefrontal processes

26 le abnormality (normal, preplus, plus), with discrepancies adjudicated by a reading supervisor.

27 Discrepancies affecting acute or follow-up clinical care

28 tive models also inherit the DFT-computation discrepancies against experimentally measured properties

29 rovide additional insight and illuminate the discrepancies among current selection criteria.

30 We also explore the discrepancies among shear modulus values measured using

31 he above phenomena can account for the large discrepancies among the previously reported spin Hall an

32 However, there are large discrepancies among the reported spin Hall angle values

33 inhibit endocytosis may be one source of the discrepancy among reports on the role of endocytosis in

34 Discrepancies amongst racial groups and income quartiles

35 ent and 99% negative percent agreement after discrepancy analysis.

36 th high mortality were performed to quantify discrepancies and identify areas for intervention.

37 The results help explain the discrepancies and inconsistencies in RO rejection of neu

38 These findings reconcile previous observed discrepancies and redefine the role of AMPK activation d

39 We ruled out various sources for the discrepancy and found that the most likely cause is solu

40 rse sUA preparation methods account for this discrepancy and that an animal model with clinically rel

41 of local charge of H1N1 HA can explain this discrepancy and thus further associate electrostatic cha

42 with histologic rejection although with many discrepancies, and R4(late) with fibrosis.

43 These discrepancies are likely explained by the diversity of t

44 the molecular mechanisms responsible for the discrepancy are not well understood.

45 ut the neurobiological underpinnings of this discrepancy are unclear.

46 The present work addresses published discrepancies as to whether cytosolic CAs stimulate NBCe

47 Applying a bias pulse during swelling, this discrepancy becomes even more pronounced, with the thick

48 Such discrepancy becomes more prominent when the dropout effe

49 Approximately 25% of subjects had large discrepancies between ACC/AHA risk and plaque burden at

50 We report multiple discrepancies between analyses performed on the two type

51 models of breast cancer identified profound discrepancies between cell-autonomous and systemic Akt1-

52 ences of sex development are conditions with discrepancies between chromosomal, gonadal and phenotypi

53 ted with interfaces, leading to considerable discrepancies between classical predictions and experime

54 and surface pressure; and could help resolve discrepancies between climate models and existing CO(2)

55 apeutic management of neovascular AMD, avoid discrepancies between clinicians/investigators, and esta

56 We further hypothesized that discrepancies between CNN-predicted age and chronologica

57 d be placed on assessing potential causes of discrepancies between conflicting studies evaluating the

58 In particular, we highlight the discrepancies between different methodologies: some stud

59 sed by data inequality and data distribution discrepancies between ethnic groups.

60 ical case of silver nanospheres, where small discrepancies between experimental and calculated extinc

61 This study aims to highlight discrepancies between experimental and simulation linked

62 n giant gas planets, and reconciles existing discrepancies between experiments as a manifestation of

63 d reduce the impact of procedural errors and discrepancies between facilities and blood donors.

64 as a possible explanation for the phenotypic discrepancies between gene-knockout and gene-knockdown(1

65 This is in part due to discrepancies between in vitro design evaluations and fi

66 ed operations, we found substantial absolute discrepancies between intraoperative times as estimated

67 Discrepancies between MGMT promoter methylation status a

68 Measurement discrepancies between modalities are clinically signific

69 ddressing species, molecular, and phenotypic discrepancies between model systems and patients to tran

70 stimuli therefore provide powerful probes of discrepancies between models and human perception.

71 p-R) to overcome interspecies and trans-omic discrepancies between mouse models and human subjects.

72 For 116 structural discrepancies between N2 and VC2010, 97 structures match

73 based on making predictions and experiencing discrepancies between predicted and actual events or exp

74 These findings resolve discrepancies between previous accounts and establish a

75 Given the limited sample size and discrepancies between previous results and our study, fu

76 y METTL3 and/or ALKBH5 also displayed higher discrepancies between protein and mRNA expression in pai

77 Measuring discrepancies between protein models and native structur

78 However, empirical studies have highlighted discrepancies between SDM and realities of surgical deci

79 The transport methods found no such discrepancies between sites in ACCORD BP, suggesting par

80 To resolve apparent discrepancies between smFRET and SAXS inferences, we int

81 differentiation; there were, however, a few discrepancies between some pairs of datasets.

82 The discrepancies between studies could be explained by limi

83 d biases are primarily due to (a) systematic discrepancies between the climate used in analysis and t

84 The molecular similarities include discrepancies between the genetic markers that brings in

85 In practice, however, discrepancies between the measured radiocarbon ages and

86 bsequent experiments showed that some of the discrepancies between the model and dataset were caused

87 Analysis of discrepancies between the reference standard and Virtual

88 perceptual coherence, the brain corrects for discrepancies between the senses.

89 e then used logical axioms from CL to detect discrepancies between the two.

90 he purpose of this study is to elucidate the discrepancies between these modalities by assessing the

91 tigated possible mechanisms that explain the discrepancies between these two studies.

92 Discrepancies between top-down and bottom-up inventories

93 ome coronavirus 2 may be "atypical" due to a discrepancy between a relatively unaffected static respi

94 evidence for swift forest relocation and the discrepancy between CCV and FTE response contradict equi

95 Moreover, the discrepancy between children and adolescents with and wi

96 As the discrepancy between conservation needs and society's wil

97 f cyclic hypoxia patterns with a 21% average discrepancy between cyclic fractions assessed via sO(2)

98 Overall, both kinetic discrepancy between DNA and RNA polymerases and cellular

99 d RNA polymerases and cellular concentration discrepancy between dNTPs and rNTPs present pharmacologi

100 arly relevant in transplantation with an age discrepancy between donor and recipient.

101 ugh lens status did not affect the extent of discrepancy between ETDRS and Snellen measurements, amou

102 ard prediction errors (RPEs), defined as the discrepancy between expectations and outcomes.

103 s in dopaminergic neurons encode the ongoing discrepancy between expected and actual value of a stimu

104 Given the magnitude of the discrepancy between expected and observation-inferred em

105 Overall, we suggest that the discrepancy between fMRI and electrophysiological measur

106 The discrepancy between fMRI and electrophysiological measur

107 Understanding the discrepancy between IgE sensitization and allergic react

108 Such a discrepancy between in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilit

109 By contrast, the discrepancy between maternity centres with highest and l

110 visits = 4.3) and operationalized using the discrepancy between mean participant and partner report

111 However, our results clearly show that the discrepancy between microclimate warming rates and therm

112 When discrepancy between mutant and morpholino-induced (morph

113 Far field observatories show a systematic discrepancy between observed and calculated arrival time

114 This discrepancy between observed and simulated vegetation re

115 Due to this discrepancy between opportunity and action, a recent cal

116 Surprise signals a discrepancy between past and current beliefs.

117 However, discrepancy between patient perception and clinician per

118 Possible reasons for the discrepancy between preclinical and clinical findings, a

119 e time of 108 RUC reviews, the mean absolute discrepancy between RUC time estimates and benchmark tim

120 However, there seems to be a significant discrepancy between structural and functional recovery o

121 ect an evaluative process engaged whenever a discrepancy between task context and sensory inputs aris

122 n vision, characterized by marked functional discrepancy between the 2 eyes in individual animals.

123 analysis reveals that the upward trends, and discrepancy between the coast and inland are maximized i

124 A major concern is the discrepancy between the computed binding free energies,

125 We observed a discrepancy between the development and validation studi

126 Unfortunately, there is currently a major discrepancy between the evolution of phytochromes and th

127 The observed discrepancy between the expression levels of SATB1 mRNA

128 Our results explained the discrepancy between the low tissue concentrations of NL

129 ion terms that are necessary to minimize the discrepancy between the model predictions and available

130 at inhibition most likely explains the large discrepancy between the obtained qPCR and ddPCR results.

131 The discrepancy between the OCS rate at country level (38.1%

132 This report examines the discrepancy between the results of physical dosimetry an

133 ve index (RI)-mismatched substances (i.e., a discrepancy between the RI of the immersion medium and t

134 Additionally, a discrepancy between the samples of terrestrial and marin

135 In fact, there is a discrepancy between the two most recent spectroscopic me

136 16.5 (mean 1.7; r = 0.532), demonstrating a discrepancy between the two sampling strategies and poss

137 behavioral bias for persistent multisensory discrepancies, but also show that the trial-wise and cum

138 They resolved discrepancies by consensus.

139 a new modelling framework that resolves this discrepancy by accounting for magma buoyancy, viscoelast

140 re, we investigate possible reasons for this discrepancy by developing a mathematical model of sizer

141 Such discrepancy calls for a better understanding of how info

142 This discrepancy can be attributed to a significant differenc

143 We also show that this discrepancy cannot be attributed to the bulk optical non

144 muonic hydrogen atoms(1) found a substantial discrepancy compared with previous results(2), which bec

145 m IBD mouse models exist, data and phenotype discrepancies contribute to confounding translation from

146 Since these discrepancies could compromise downstream analyses and b

147 This discrepancy could potentially be explained by an inabili

148 This discrepancy decreases the power of studies to identify m

149 This discrepancy demands a figure-of-merit that includes a ho

150 d data from accepted full-text studies, with discrepancies discussed with a third reviewer (NT).

151 Data were cross-checked and any discrepancy discussed.

152 owing interest, and while few studies exist, discrepancies do occur in the sampling, extraction, and

153 A major discrepancy emerges over Amazonia, where current underes

154 iffusion breakpoints that provide the lowest discrepancy error rates by testing an Enterobacterales i

155 However, discrepancies exist amongst the major classification met

156 f CXCR4 depends on the cellular context, and discrepancies exist depending on the cell lines used.

157 Although certain discrepancies exist on the REE speciation quantified by

158 ucture are not fully understood, significant discrepancy exists between predicted and actual signalin

159 e adapted human participants to audio-visual discrepancies for different durations, from 32 to 256 se

160 To understand these apparent discrepancies, for a large and globally distributed pass

161 ors and variability in simulating the PBLHs (discrepancies from -2.5 to 4.0 km).

162 Physicochemical analysis of the discrepancies generated by these codes reveals the a pri

163 The onset of these discrepancies has a mesoscopic character: it lies betwee

164 To date, this affinity discrepancy has been attributed to a tryptophan (W110(PD

165 or Homotherium since widespread mito-nuclear discrepancies have been uncovered in modern cats [10].

166 Discrepancies have been viewed as under-reporting of fin

167 To resolve these discrepancies, here we have modeled synaptic glutamate d

168 Moreover, these discrepancies highlight (1) that methods for correcting

169 Other discrepancies highlighted important deficiencies in curr

170 The discrepancy highlights the urgent need to incorporate pa

171 thod of preparation of LPS may explain these discrepancies however this is not fully understood.

172 This large discrepancy impedes OCE's clinical adoption.

173 t is unclear if these differences are due to discrepancies in absolute diaphragm force output.

174 of GORD, providing a possible explanation to discrepancies in AET and impedance interpretation.

175 Here, we find discrepancies in analysis from RNA-seq datasets quantifi

176 neration sequencing studies have highlighted discrepancies in beta-cells which exist between mice and

177 Yet, discrepancies in carbon isotope excursion estimates from

178 This results in significant discrepancies in each of the following: (1) reported con

179 Discrepancies in efficacy between single-dose and repeat

180 Discrepancies in feature representation are likely due t

181 e statistical methods introduced here reduce discrepancies in gene expression values derived from qPC

182 mplete concordance between the 2 organs, the discrepancies in grade and type of rejection, and the te

183 drug treatment and thereby explain observed discrepancies in mutation rates estimated by Luria-Delbr

184 Strikingly, significant discrepancies in optical and catalytic properties of the

185 The ZmMYB167 expression-induced discrepancies in plant phenotypic and biomass properties

186 Discrepancies in research funding may contribute to stag

187 NA fragment size accurately predict measured discrepancies in serum viral load measurements by differ

188 Therefore, despite the recognition of some discrepancies in the absolute values between the co-cult

189 total forest AGB can be attributed to their discrepancies in the AGB density and/or forest area.

190 prehensive and curated source of point data, discrepancies in the application of names compared to cu

191 and 12 h post administration, with apparent discrepancies in the concentrations measured using pre-

192 By correcting these distortions, we reduced discrepancies in the literature concerning stimuli that

193 reagent purity may be a cause of some of the discrepancies in the literature, and we have found that

194 toichiometry are still not understood due to discrepancies in the literature.

195 en tested for its ability to account for the discrepancies in the number of driver mutations and the

196 ther, we unravel a technical explanation for discrepancies in the published literature on immune effe

197 This lack in the literature may also lead to discrepancies in the reported treatment outcomes and thu

198 This can be due to discrepancies in the sources of plastic released into th

199 In particular, we address current discrepancies in treatment between different cooperative

200 The ecophysiological reasons for this discrepancy in abundance are unclear.

201 These results elegantly resolve an apparent discrepancy in calcium signaling and the pathogenesis of

202 46), CR-POPFs (65.2%), and greatest non-zero discrepancy in CR-POPF rates between scenarios (18-fold)

203 and qualitatively assess whether there is a discrepancy in detecting amyloid beta (Abeta) positivity

204 ect radiative effect, this model-measurement discrepancy in dry deposition alters modeled CCN and rad

205 In the presence of discrepancy in length between the 2 discontinuous segmen

206 al other puzzling tinnitus phenomena such as discrepancy in loudness between tinnitus rating and matc

207 There was a discrepancy in Medicare payments for patients who achiev

208 More importantly, the discrepancy in survival between older and younger grafts

209 There was also a pronounced discrepancy in terms of efficiency across study designs.

210 There was a large discrepancy in the average age in years of ACS (70) and

211 We find that the discrepancy in the coherence stems from long-time non-eq

212 might have been associated with the regional discrepancy in the form and rate of N fertilizer use and

213 Moreover, the discrepancy in the projected increase in the climate-sen

214 The discrepancy in the results for the V system can be expla

215 sociated with higher precision, suggesting a discrepancy in the underlying processes between these ph

216 Model-data discrepancy in total forest AGB can be attributed to the

217 assay during the study may have caused some discrepancy in VL values because of different limits of

218 This isotopic discrepancy indicates most riverine DBC is sequestered a

219 This unexpected discrepancy indicates that not all sites in M1 that exhi

220 igh precision current source to minimize the discrepancy induced by the channel-to-channel variation.

221 e show how fln-2 variation explains previous discrepancies involving effects of sir-2.1 (sirtuin deac

222 quencing, qPCR and CARD-FISH assays revealed discrepancies involving the identification of sublineage

223 One hypothesis proposed to reconcile this discrepancy is an increased sensitivity of smaller size

224 This discrepancy is apparent also among individual resting-st

225 A possible reason for the discrepancy is differences in task demands, such that a

226 c and early Jurassic molecular ages, and the discrepancy is difficult to explain by geographic or tap

227 The large discrepancy is due to the remote coupling of confined st

228 This discrepancy is explained by the observation that N-helix

229 This discrepancy is notable because the longer residence time

230 One suggested reason for this discrepancy is that the processes underpinning lexical a

231 One of the reasons for this alarming discrepancy is the lack of a method that is sufficiently

232 This discrepancy is tied primarily to the oil and gas sector

233 -wise or cumulative exposure to multisensory discrepancies, it remained unclear whether both arise fr

234 gainst slower adaptive changes to persistent discrepancies likely to be more permanent.

235 These discrepancies may arise within a single modality (comput

236 These discrepancies may reflect inter-species differences or c

237 This discrepancy may be because children are asymptomatic or

238 This discrepancy may be caused by the inhibition of extracell

239 This discrepancy may be explained by posterior shadowing arti

240 This discrepancy may have originated from the unique mechanis

241 This discrepancy might be caused by biophysical processes suc

242 The discrepancy might suggest that previous techniques are n

243 on for a range of concentrations, with small discrepancies observed only above 0.1 M.

244 with the aim of elucidating the reasons for discrepancies observed within and across spatial scales.

245 of adaptation, the relative contribution of discrepancies occurring over these timescales is unknown

246 Due to the orders of magnitude in the discrepancies of experimental binding affinities, we int

247 Here, the key mechanism discrepancies of water-afflicted Li-O(2) batteries are p

248 method are in excellent agreement, with the discrepancy of 0.3-3%, validating our CMS method for abs

249 electrochemical data caused by stability and discrepancy of current sources among different charge/di

250 whether MRI has the potential to narrow the discrepancy of histopathological grades between biopsy a

251 However, because of the discrepancy of scales between advection and diffusion in

252 ssue architecture characterized by an apical discrepancy of the mucosal margin respective to its idea

253 Subtle structural discrepancies on mechanosensitive channel nanopockets ar

254 widely used for the treatment of transverse discrepancy or maxillae hypoplasia, but the biological m

255 They show, however, a large discrepancy, partly related to a large aseismic deformat

256 utilization of home health pre-ACA, and this discrepancy persisted post-ACA.

257 unts and sizes were reproducible within a 1% discrepancy range across repeat intra-eye assessments.

258 brief period of de-adaptation to an opposing discrepancy, recalibration was initially cancelled but s

259 Our findings reconcile discrepancies regarding the many roles of FACT and under

260 This resolves apparent discrepancies regarding the role of T helper 2 cells in

261 The reasons for these discrepancies remain largely unclear.

262 f global-mean temperature; however, regional discrepancies remain unresolved.

263 CT/CT-based and nominal values, considerable discrepancies remain.

264 riments to analyze the mechanism behind this discrepancy revealed that the loss of surface expression

265 xplore the origins and significance of these discrepancies, revealing that some "truth" usually under

266 erature and pH, but with several significant discrepancies, some of which may have resulted from expe

267 ons they could share understanding by making discrepancies stronger and more engaging.

268 This discrepancy suggests caution when relating computational

269 considered to represent true positives after discrepancy testing by a third method.

270 Overall, our findings reconcile some of the discrepancies that arose from differences in techniques

271 callers, local databases and tools result in discrepancies that complicate analysis. NCBI's genetic v

272 balance rapid adaptive changes to transient discrepancies that should be quickly forgotten against s

273 An apparent discrepancy therefore exists between the magnitude of ex

274 To trace the origin of such discrepancies through time and across major biomes and c

275 y used to correct irregular teeth and/or jaw discrepancies to improve oral function and facial aesthe

276 We attribute this discrepancy to the definition of hydration number, which

277 This discrepancy uncovers the specific strategy of the forger

278 aim of the present study was to clarify this discrepancy using a fentanyl vs. diluted Ensure((R)) cho

279 The clinical significance of measurement discrepancies was evaluated with respect to diagnosis of

280 When long-term adaptation to an audio-visual discrepancy was immediately followed by a brief period o

281 A remarkable discrepancy was observed between prevention measures off

282 Resolving the discrepancies we identify will be essential to settle th

283 To resolve these discrepancies, we carried out several meta-analytic revi

284 To evaluate this discrepancy, we compared anatomical shunt with 25-um mic

285 Despite this discrepancy, we confirm that the waste sector is the lar

286 To understand this discrepancy, we dissected the physicochemical mechanism

287 To address this discrepancy, we investigated the role of EZH2 in adipoge

288 To evaluate this discrepancy, we measured anatomical shunt with 25-um mic

289 To dissect this apparent discrepancy, we modulated LCN2 levels in mice.

290 Here, to resolve this discrepancy, we mutated these insulin residues and the e

291 To address this discrepancy, we sought to investigate the relationship b

292 To resolve this discrepancy, we tested the genetic requirement for E-cad

293 Disclosure discrepancies were also analyzed.

294 Discrepancies were discussed with a third researcher to

295 Discrepancies were resolved by consensus or an independe

296 pleted with a standardised data form and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

297 tand the genetic basis of genotype-phenotype discrepancies when using the Xpert MRSA/SA BC test (in v

298 incorrectly assigned, lack lipids, and show discrepancies with "native states" mostly obtained in de

299 We found a discrepancy with the liquid drop fusion model: the fusio

300 e riparian areas of streams; (2) examine the discrepancies within the existing land cover data from N