戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 icornavirus (P < .0001; partial least square discriminant analysis).
2 e fingerprints (Q(2) of 0.784 for supervised discriminant analysis).
3 ear support vector machine and kernel Fisher discriminant analysis.
4  samples were correctly classified by linear discriminant analysis.
5 cluding the t-test and partial least squares discriminant analysis.
6 ogistic regression and partial least squares discriminant analysis.
7 e statistical technique Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis.
8 antly associated with GBS carriage by linear discriminant analysis.
9 tatistical technique of partial least square discriminant analysis.
10 ividual indices were built using linear step discriminant analysis.
11 -test, fold changes and partial least square discriminant analysis.
12 r example 0.2 to 13% improvement over linear discriminant analysis.
13 entional statistics and partial least square discriminant analysis.
14 e results, further analysed through a linear discriminant analysis.
15 sured observables following two class linear discriminant analysis.
16  was the best predictor of reentry in linear discriminant analysis.
17 erve as keystone taxa as revealed our linear discriminant analysis.
18 ns to latent structures (OPLS) and OPLS with discriminant analysis].
19                       Using Forward Stepwise Discriminant Analysis, 3 statistical models were created
20 cation of origin (Karoo vs. Non-Karoo) using discriminant analysis allowed 95% and 90% correct classi
21                          Furthermore, linear discriminant analysis allowed achieving sensitivities gr
22               We sought to determine whether discriminant analysis allows prognostication in patients
23                        Partial least squares discriminant analysis also allowed prediction of the deg
24 e plots and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis also showed significant difference
25                        Partial least squares-discriminant analysis also showed that these markers wer
26 ponent analysis (PCA), partial least squares-discriminant analysis, analysis of variance, and random
27 ction of food frauds were analyzed employing discriminant analysis and a one-class classifier.
28            Partial Least Squares regression, Discriminant Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks wer
29        Multivariate classification comprises discriminant analysis and class-modeling techniques wher
30 cipal component analysis coupled with linear discriminant analysis and classification models demonstr
31 ombination of principal component and linear discriminant analysis and least absolute shrinkage and s
32 ted by linear Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis and Naive Bayesian classifiers acr
33 cipal component analysis coupled with linear discriminant analysis and predictive classifiers were ap
34 alysis, linear discriminant analysis, binary discriminant analysis and random forest.
35                                              Discriminant analysis and SVM were used to classify new
36 metric techniques like partial least squares discriminant analysis and variable identification (PLS-D
37 lysis, such as PLS-DA (Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis) and LDA (Linear Discriminant Anal
38 ysis (PARAFAC), PARAFAC supervised by linear discriminant analysis, and discriminant unfolded partial
39                  Partial least squared (PLS)-discriminant analysis, and PLS-regression models were as
40  significance testing, partial least squares discriminant analysis, and receiver operating characteri
41 were analyzed by using partial least-squares discriminant analysis, and the results were validated wi
42 s based on principal components analysis and discriminant analysis applied to the volatile profile of
43                                 A simplified discriminant analysis based on 3 common clinical variabl
44                    On the other hand, linear discriminant analysis based on 8 selected absorbance val
45 discrimination models were created by linear discriminant analysis based on principal component analy
46                                          The discriminant analysis based on several anthocyanins, org
47                                   Simplified discriminant analysis based on unsupervised clustering h
48                                          The discriminant analysis, based on the use of one input-cla
49      Including all studied regions and using discriminant analysis between PSP and PD, 100% sensitivi
50 hine, diagonal discriminant analysis, linear discriminant analysis, binary discriminant analysis and
51 Successive Projection Algorithm) and PLS-DA (Discriminant Analysis by Partial Least Squares).
52                      The study confirms that discriminant analysis can be successful in distinguishin
53 ombination of dimension reduction and linear discriminant analysis, CARS (AUC = 0.93) and TPEF (AUC =
54 oss-validation was employed to test a Linear Discriminant Analysis classifier based upon the RT-qPCR-
55 tor variables were derived to train a linear discriminant analysis classifier by using a leave-one-ou
56                         Partial least square discriminant analysis clearly separated IC patients from
57                                            A discriminant analysis correctly classified 96.7% of the
58 thin palmitate and total carotenoid content, discriminant analysis correctly classified all samples a
59 ication models were based in SPA-LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis coupled with Successive Projection
60                                       Linear Discriminant Analysis, coupled with Successive Projectio
61                    Results demonstrated that Discriminant Analysis (DA) and Correlated Component Regr
62 ndent modelling of class analogy (SIMCA) and discriminant analysis (DA) based on MIR and NIR spectra
63                                              Discriminant Analysis (DA) led to similar (conventional/
64                                              Discriminant Analysis (DA) was successful for botanical
65 n harvesting years was studied by performing discriminant analysis (DA), k nearest neighbours (kappa-
66  density, were processed using multivariate, discriminant analysis (DA), principal component analysis
67 the year, season and production region using discriminant analysis (DA).
68           Multivariate partial least squares discriminant analysis demonstrated similar bacterial pro
69 ics, we have developed partial least-squares-discriminant analysis derived decision algorithms that o
70                                         Yet, discriminant analysis did not adequately distinguish the
71                                       Linear discriminant analysis distinguished facial change determ
72 uation logistic regression models and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) algorithm to i
73 nt of CDI were identified by means of linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis and then furt
74 d algorithm, expectation-maximization sparse discriminant analysis (EM-SDA), produces a sparse LDA mo
75                                       Fisher Discriminant Analysis enables multivariate classificatio
76   The accuracies of GLM, SVM, and functional discriminant analysis (FDA) models indicate that SVM is
77 e developed a novel method based on Fisher's Discriminant Analysis (FDA) to identify gene expression
78 ror, 2.03-12.48%) were acquired by nonlinear discriminant analysis for CRC, IBD and NTC, regardless o
79 lysis using orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis for metabolomics.
80   Recently, Witten proposed a Poisson linear discriminant analysis for RNA-Seq data.
81 paper, we propose a negative binomial linear discriminant analysis for RNA-Seq data.
82 SOM-RPM can be further analyzed using linear discriminant analysis for the validation and characteriz
83 ed, via thermophoretic enrichment and linear discriminant analysis, for cancer detection and classifi
84 spectral data; genetic algorithm with linear discriminant analysis (GA-LDA) achieved the best diagnos
85 results obtained by Genetic Algorithm Linear Discriminant Analysis (GA-LDA) were the most satisfactor
86 ined using the genetic algorithm with linear discriminant analysis (GA-LDA).
87 etic algorithms-partial least-squares-linear discriminant analysis (GA-PLS-LDA).
88   Three of 5 clusters identified by means of discriminant analysis had improved SNOT-22 outcomes with
89                        Partial least squares discriminant analysis identified a signature of 54 basel
90                                         From discriminant analysis in 103 patients with full clinical
91 rometry performed, with partial least square discriminant analysis integrating clinical, microbiome,
92 nsform micro-Raman spectroscopy coupled with Discriminant Analysis is here presented.
93 hine classification and Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (LDA and QDA, respectively).
94 ng n-alkane fingerprinting data, both linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and a likelihood-based class
95  and class modelling methods by using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and soft independent model c
96 The authentication issue was faced by Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Soft Independent Modelli
97 nd computational approaches including linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and sparse canonical correla
98 amples was most successful when using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and taking into account the
99 s an unsupervised learning method and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) as a supervised learning met
100 xtracted features were evaluated by a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier in terms of their
101                       Moreover, using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) coupled with effect size mea
102                          In addition, Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) method r
103 rincipal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) for the differentiation of p
104                        In this study, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) is applied to investigate th
105 rincipal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is proposed for the authenti
106 mong the multivariate analysis tools, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of fruit multi elemental fin
107 rincipal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) showed better results consid
108                                       Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) successfully recognizes the
109  of FT-NIR spectroscopy combined with Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) to discriminate chickpea see
110 ential forward selection coupled with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was the best strategy to sel
111   A machine-learning algorithm called linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was trained by using the lar
112               Raman spectroscopy with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to identify changes
113 rincipal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were performed.
114 tern recognition methods were tested: linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with variable selection by s
115 type Discovery and Classification and linear discriminant analysis (LDA)) are tested on six mass cyto
116 rincipal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), an identification model pro
117 ysis (PARAFAC), PARAFAC supervised by linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and discriminant unfolded p
118   Principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (kNN),
119 attern recognition techniques such as linear discriminant analysis (LDA), partial least square discri
120 d with discriminant analysis, such as Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Anal
121                        In this paper, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Anal
122 , principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machines (SV
123 rincipal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), were used to differentiate
124 ochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) or linear discriminant analysis (LDA).
125 y classification models, specifically linear discriminant analysis (LDA).
126 omponent analysis (PCA) followed by a linear discriminant analysis (LDA).
127  component analysis (PCA) followed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA).
128 rincipal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA).
129  of ecological character states using linear discriminant analysis (LDA).
130 rinciple component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA).
131 modelled by support vector machine, diagonal discriminant analysis, linear discriminant analysis, bin
132 -weighted multiblock partial least squares - discriminant analysis (MB-PLS1-DA) models were compared
133                                            A discriminant analysis method was employed in the classif
134                              Fisher's linear discriminant analysis method was employed to classify aw
135 ed training set, (18)F-FDG PET with advanced discriminant analysis methods is able to accurately dist
136 d anatomy ontology terms, employing Fisher's Discriminant Analysis methods to identify previously unk
137 e features were used as input to a quadratic discriminant analysis ML classifier, which was trained,
138                                     A Linear Discriminant Analysis model based on the abundance of 12
139 on of the groups in the partial least square-discriminant analysis model was based, demonstrated the
140                              The LDA (linear discriminant analysis) model showed that the FAMEs conte
141                        Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis modelling of fused PCA scores of t
142 ak volume ratios were used to develop linear discriminant analysis models able to distinguish olive l
143 r data exploration and partial least squares discriminant analysis models for the differences between
144                   Three partial least square-discriminant analysis models were developed in order to
145     Several Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis models were generated from the acq
146 urements obtained from partial least-squares discriminant analysis models.
147 ed diagnostic groups (multiblock barycentric discriminant analysis [MUBADA]) was used.
148  applying the tested Partial Least Squares - Discriminant Analysis multiclass model (85 fillets) to t
149 a(13)C values, apatite-collagen spacing, and discriminant analysis of delta(13)C(coll), delta(13)C(ca
150                                          The Discriminant Analysis of MultiAspect CYtometry (DAMACY)
151                                              Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) rev
152  = 0.65), Bayesian analysis in STRUCTURE and discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) sho
153  also reflected in both network analyses and discriminant analysis of principal components.
154 to decide which method should be used in the discriminant analysis of RNA-Seq data.
155                        Partial least squares-discriminant analysis of the MS/MS(ALL) lipidomic datase
156                                       Linear discriminant analysis on the physicochemical parameters
157 lling using Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) of metabolomic data read
158          An orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) score plot revealed good
159  Orthogonal Projections to Latent Structures Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) showed clear group disti
160 ) followed by orthogonal partial last square-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) to develop classifiers a
161  Orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was applied successfully
162  Afterwards, orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was favorably used to di
163 s (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were applied to characte
164 analysed by Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) which revealed a clear d
165 ysis (PCA), orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), and hierarchical cluste
166        Using orthogonal partial last-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), multivariate models wer
167 d Orthogonal Projection to Latent Structures Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA).
168  as well as Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA).
169 s (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA).
170 ysis (PLS-DA) and Principal Component-Linear Discriminant Analysis (PC-LDA) classification models wer
171                  Principal components linear discriminant analysis (PC-LDA) of acquired RS-spectra co
172 nd multivariate principal component analysis-discriminant analysis (PCA-DA) statistics applied to the
173 ncipal Component Analysis followed by Linear Discriminant Analysis (PCA-LDA) and Partial Least Square
174 ncipal component analysis followed by linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA) was used for the multiva
175 ns using principal component analysis linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA).
176 and principal component analysis with linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA).
177 region of 4000-5000 cm(-1), piecewise linear discriminant analysis (PLDA) is used to classify spectra
178 sion 7.2 software) and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) (Matlab R2017b) were used
179        Furthermore, the partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) achieved an effective cla
180            In addition, partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) achieved an effective cla
181    On the basis of the partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and ANOVA-simultaneous co
182 ur algorithm, based on partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and cross-validation by b
183 ierarchical clustering, Partial-least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and Ingenuity pathway ana
184 odels were developed by Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and internally validated
185 opy in combination with Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and Partial Least Square
186 py, and analysed using partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and partial least squares
187                        Partial-Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and Principal Component-L
188                        Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and soft independent mode
189                        Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and soft independent mode
190 earest neighbors (kNN), partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and support vector machin
191 (MIR) spectroscopy and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) as a means to discriminat
192     Among the samples, partial linear square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) classified 50.2% of the s
193 rediction errors using partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) discrimination models for
194 s (PCA) and supervised partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) from liquid chromatograph
195                        Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) identified variables to d
196                        Partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) indicated that both metho
197                         Partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) indicated that seeds from
198                        Partial Least-Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) is a popular machine lear
199                    The partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model built to discrimina
200            Object-wise partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models were developed and
201         Four different partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models were fitted to the
202 bolomics combined with partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) multivariate analysis rev
203  recognition analysis, partial-least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of images, to develop a r
204                        Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) of metabolomes of individ
205                 Partial least squares-linear discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) provided a 70% success ra
206  fusion approach using partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) scores was found to be th
207                        Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) showed clear discriminati
208                  Using partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) to compare results betwee
209 troscopy combined with Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) to discriminate the origi
210  overall structure, and partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was carried out for the a
211                  Next, partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was developed to detect f
212                        Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to determine spe
213 Analysis (PCA-LDA) and Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) were applied to the NMR d
214 ent analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were employed to investig
215 ent analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were evaluated.
216                        Partial least-squared discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) with double leave-one-pat
217                  Using partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), 87 route-specific CAS we
218 ectra was subjected to partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), a multivariate statistic
219 ts were obtained for partial least squares - discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), allowing a good discrimi
220                  Using partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), it was possible to diffe
221 iminant analysis (LDA), partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), k-nearest neighbors (k-N
222 ecognition techniques, Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), Soft Independent Modelin
223 rest neighbours (kNN), partial least squared-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), support vector machine c
224 ent analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), the purees may be alloca
225 ogistic regression and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), while group lasso explor
226 ed classification with Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA).
227 fied and submitted to a Partial-Least Square Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA).
228 copy combined with partial least squares for discriminant analysis (PLS-DA).
229 nt analysis (PCA), and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA).
230 ass analogy (SIMCA) and partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA).
231 ic algorithm (GA); and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA).
232 s combined, the partial least squares-linear discriminant analysis (PLS-LDA) model resulted in 75% an
233 tric supervised method (partial least square discriminant analysis, PLS-DA) was developed and applied
234 ent analysis, PCA, and partial least squares discriminant analysis, PLS-DA) were applied to deconvolu
235 frared (FTIR) data and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS1-DA) approach.
236 was obtained using the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) algorithm.
237 sification models with partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) and obtaining average stoc
238 least-squares (GAPLS), partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA), K nearest neighbors (KNN)
239 ent analysis (PCA) and partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA), were performed on the MS
240                     The output of the linear discriminant analysis provided a qEEV-based response ind
241 turbations [orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis Q(2)(Y) of 0.728] in the fecal lip
242 inear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) and Support Vector Machines
243 inear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) and Support Vector Machines
244 ML algorithm, an implementation of quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) written in MATLAB.
245                                    VOI-based discriminant analysis resulted in an 88.8% accuracy in p
246 omparison of locomotor kinematics and linear discriminant analysis reveal a surprisingly similar patt
247                         Partial least square-discriminant analysis revealed metabolite profiles that
248                                       Linear Discriminant Analysis revealed significant clustering ba
249                                              Discriminant analysis revealed that for each grape culti
250                                       Linear discriminant analysis reveals shape features that specif
251 nearest shrunken centroids (NSCs) and sparse discriminant analysis (SDA) with k-nearest neighbors for
252                                              Discriminant analysis showed delta(13)C and delta(15)N d
253                        Partial least squares-discriminant analysis showed that the 30 most important
254                              Stepwise Linear Discriminant Analysis (SLDA) showed that a reduced numbe
255 ve projections algorithm coupled with linear discriminant analysis (SPA-LDA) classified correctly all
256 Projections Algorithm associated with Linear Discriminant Analysis (SPA-LDA) for simultaneous classif
257  regression (sSVR) for calibration, and sPLS-discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) and support vector class
258  system (FuRES), super partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA), and support vector mach
259  was achieved by super partial least-squares discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA), support vector machine
260   PERMANOVA and sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis (sPLSDA) demonstrated that subject
261 feature selection algorithms associated with discriminant analysis, such as Linear Discriminant Analy
262                      Support vector machines-discriminant analysis (SVM-DA) was used for differentiat
263 neighbors (KNN), and support vector machines discriminant analysis (SVMDA).
264                    Further, a VOI derived by discriminant analysis that maximally separated diagnosti
265                                           In discriminant analysis, these baseline factors identified
266 nalysis (principal component analysis-linear discriminant analysis), this method was successfully app
267 noids were considered as variables in linear discriminant analysis to attempt geographical classifica
268 orthogonal) projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis to characterise and differentiate
269 lected by gas chromatography associated with discriminant analysis to differentiate milk and whey, as
270 itudinal abundance of metabolites; 4) linear discriminant analysis to evaluate robustness in a second
271 e developed a novel method based on Fisher's Discriminant Analysis to identify gene expression weight
272 e conducted orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis to identify metabolites that discr
273 The PLS1-DA algorithm was used as supervised discriminant analysis to identify the different oil extr
274                    The application of linear discriminant analysis to our overall results demonstrate
275 uares Discriminant Analysis) and LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis), to implement a traceability syst
276                                    Moreover, discriminant analysis using ASD subdomains distinguished
277 o 5 clusters based on a previously described discriminant analysis using total Sino-Nasal Outcome Tes
278 stems using a 10-fold cross-validated linear-discriminant-analysis using Fourier-transform infrared s
279               Models were built using linear discriminant analysis via the misclassification penalize
280 dministration and the multivariate canonical discriminant analysis was able to distinguish between tr
281                        Partial least squares discriminant analysis was applied to the spectral datase
282                                   The linear discriminant analysis was conducted in order to classify
283                   Then partial least-squares-discriminant analysis was conducted to investigate the b
284                                              Discriminant analysis was extended to the evaluation of
285             Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis was performed to select features c
286  an exploratory assessment relying on Linear Discriminant Analysis was performed.
287                                              Discriminant analysis was successfully discriminated the
288             Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis was used to build models separatin
289               Principal component fed linear discriminant analysis was used to develop a classificati
290 f criteria for AMR and partial least squares discriminant analysis was used to identify associated ch
291 IR in combination with Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis we were able to discriminate infec
292 ntensity variations, principal component and discriminant analysis were performed to discriminate the
293 ipal component analysis, factor analysis and discriminant analysis were used for the statistical eval
294  parameters, as also confirmed in the linear discriminant analysis, where these parameters were not s
295 ical cluster analysis followed by a stepwise discriminant analysis, which identified elements for the
296    The aging type could be defined by linear discriminant analysis with an accuracy of 95%.
297  differentiation models were built by linear discriminant analysis with the percentage of correct cla
298         The best results were obtained using Discriminant Analysis, with 95% correct re-classificatio
299                    Extreme gradient boosting discriminant analysis (XGBDA) was examined among other m
300                                 Using linear discriminant analysis, XRF-based multi-elements with and

 
Page Top