ライフサイエンスコーパス: discrimination learning

1 t toward a key role of V1 at early stages in discrimination learning.

2 tle is known about the neural basis of taste discrimination learning.

3 rontal cortex (OFC) of rats during olfactory discrimination learning.

4 ng the trial answer period impaired auditory discrimination learning.

5 for stable system operation and fine-grained discrimination learning.

6 coupled with significant deficits in visual discrimination learning.

7 c blockade slowed, but did not prevent, odor discrimination learning.

8 ctory bulb (OB) slows, but does not prevent, discrimination learning.

9 ptical self-stimulation, and directs sensory discrimination learning.

10 shown no evidence that CeA lesions affect FN discrimination learning.

11 subcortical structures during threat/safety discrimination learning.

12 ively with fear ratings during threat/safety discrimination learning.

13 ehavior and an impairment in contextual fear discrimination learning.

14 d D2 receptors have opposing effects on odor discrimination learning.

15 receptors have opposing effects in aversive discrimination learning.

16 t species differences in the rate of initial discrimination learning.

17 rns of cue-elicited neuronal activity during discrimination learning.

18 during direct comparison of delay and trace discrimination learning.

19 en PKA and PKC during acquisition of spatial discrimination learning.

20 mice on black-white and horizontal-vertical discrimination learning.

21 ocampal lesions, do not affect simple visual discrimination learning.

22 tance, and a persistent impairment on visual discrimination learning.

23 red on pattern discrimination and concurrent discrimination learning.

24 performing various tests of conditional and discrimination learning.

25 (3) the extent of generalization of interval discrimination learning.

26 terms of response inhibition and conditional discrimination learning.

27 id (B/W) mice were tested in shock-motivated discrimination learning, 1-way avoidance conditioning, a

28 amygdaloid complex were tested on concurrent discrimination learning (24-hr intertrial interval [ITI]

29 ce show a severe impairment of somatosensory-discrimination learning ability in a behavioral task tha

30 ofrontal cortex, of the type known to affect discrimination learning, affected structure and activity

31 , produced a persistent impairment on visual discrimination learning and a florid, but transient, Klu

32 and rescued the early development of visual discrimination learning and cognitive flexibility defici

33 havioral sensitivity to reinforcement during discrimination learning and D(2)-like receptor availabil

34 a set-shift task in which reward depended on discrimination learning and extradimensional set-shiftin

35 e was modified to an arena, and simultaneous discrimination learning and reversal learning were demon

36 nd ABL fired selectively to cues during odor discrimination learning and reversal training.

37 in awake, behaving rats during go/no-go odor discrimination learning and reversal.

38 This striosomal activity encoded discrimination learning and was correlated with task eng

39 r, decrease in sociability ratio, deficit in discrimination learning, and increased amphetamine-induc

40 cept permanence (OCP), computerized tests of discrimination learning, and infant social behavior.

41 ples include motor-sequence learning; visual-discrimination learning; and perceptual learning of a sy

42 During discrimination learning, animals receiving TCVs had impr

43 cking the update rule on the N matrix blocks discrimination learning, as observed experimentally.

44 an, spatial working memory, planning, visual discrimination learning/attentional set-shifting and dec

45 hippocampectomy in infancy spares concurrent discrimination learning but not recognition memory.

46 Experiment 1 assessed trace conditional discrimination learning by using a light conditional sti

47 Trial-dependent, latent and discrimination learning can be assessed using modificati

48 at predict distinct outcomes-a feat known as discrimination learning-can mean the difference between

49 The IED task measures visual discrimination learning, cognitive flexibility and speci

50 um and I. Daum that reports that conditional discrimination learning depends on awareness.

51 Critically, this depth-discrimination learning did not generalize to the traine

52 sly to produce a severe impairment in visual discrimination learning for auditory secondary reinforce

53 sterior fusiform gyrus were recruited during discrimination learning for faces, but not scenes and do

54 mic MK-801 have no effect on T-maze position discrimination learning, impairment of SDA by MK-801 lik

55 ioral and neural correlates of threat/safety discrimination learning in adolescents and adults using

56 agonist improved learning ability on visual discrimination learning in all monkeys but this improvem

57 y of this paradigm to generate threat/safety discrimination learning in both adolescents and adults.

58 ERalpha and ERbeta agonists disrupted discrimination learning in both sexes.

59 dorsal hippocampus rapidly improved general discrimination learning in female mice.

60 The data suggest that discrimination learning in naive subjects requires NMDA

61 , at this dose, did not impair simple visual discrimination learning in normal monkeys.

62 assertions is found in feature negative (FN) discrimination learning, in which a "target" stimulus is

63 Frequency discrimination learning is often accompanied by an expan

64 We here investigate how olfactory discrimination learning is regulated by cholinergic modu

65 Intriguingly, during active odor discrimination learning, mitral but not tufted cells exh

66 damage involving the HC and PrC compromised discrimination learning of scenes and faces but left dot

67 experienced odours and differentially delay discrimination learning of unrecognized and novel odour

68 TD were found to have deficits in the visual discrimination learning paradigm specific to the reversa

69 Here we developed a discrimination learning paradigm that assesses the abili

70 modeling reinforcement-related behavior in a discrimination learning paradigm.

71 ow normal changes in response latency during discrimination learning, particularly on trials involvin

72 reby developing CA1 performs extensive input-discrimination learning prior to the onset of environmen

73 er, were unimpaired in acquisition of object discrimination learning problems and responded like cont

74 A discrimination learning procedure was used to expose rat

75 ith the self-administration chambers using a discrimination learning procedure.

76 ive stimulus effects by examining if ethanol discrimination learning produces changes in brain region

77 Using drug discrimination learning, rats were trained to discrimina

78 superficial layers of the SC during pattern discrimination learning reverses the precedence for glob

79 eward and specific digging substrate--during discrimination learning sessions.

80 s were first trained to acquire an olfactory discrimination learning set (ODLS) on 40 olfactory-uniqu

81 n reversal learning set (DRLS) and olfactory discrimination learning set (ODLS) tasks, a delayed matc

82 gnocellularis (nBM) were tested on olfactory discrimination learning set (ODLS), olfactory discrimina

83 consistent findings regarding the concurrent discrimination learning task by demonstrating that perfo

84 For 30 years, the concurrent discrimination learning task has figured prominently in

85 the amygdala impair performance on a visual discrimination learning task in which an auditory second

86 ve of impaired performance on the concurrent discrimination learning task than was the amount of dama

87 Here, using a validated discrimination learning task that distinguishes goal-dir

88 d were tested on a simple, two-choice object discrimination learning task that has been shown to be s

89 In contrast, in a Pavlovian discrimination learning task, iMSN-Drd2KO mice exhibited

90 Using a new concurrent spatial discrimination learning task, they found that fornix tra

91 nd generalisation in an appetitive olfactory discrimination learning task.

92 relative to 3 normal controls on concurrent discrimination learning tasks with only 10 problems with

93 neous odor discrimination, and go/no-go odor discrimination/learning tests to characterize the synapt

94 mporal specificity in somatosensory interval discrimination learning that generalizes across skin loc

95 y exacerbated age-related deficits in object discrimination learning; the magnitude of this effect wa

96 We propose that V1 plays a key role early in discrimination learning to enhance behaviorally relevant

97 ations to a high criterion and on concurrent discrimination learning, to a single high criterion acro

98 y in piriform cortical function during odour discrimination learning until mastery, suggesting that e

99 gous mice demonstrated subtle impairments in discrimination learning using a touchscreen task.

100 Striosomal function during discrimination learning was disturbed with aging and sev

101 Discrimination learning was facilitated by making the CS

102 Go/no-go discrimination learning was not affected by L-NAME.

103 Simple discrimination learning was not affected, whereas acquis

104 ed activity test, and impaired probabilistic discrimination learning was seen in an OFC/striatum-depe

105 To answer this question, pattern discrimination learning was studied in three intact cats

106 iation signaling, feeding, and interoceptive discrimination learning were assessed via rodent behavio

107 Modest impairments in discrimination learning were measured in lower expressor

108 However, significant differences in discrimination learning were observed during the reversa

109 es revealed a key role for the HC and PrC in discrimination learning, which is consistent with repres

110 On conditional discrimination learning, which is particularly sensitive

111 sculus) were tested on a task of simple odor discrimination learning with 3 repeated reversals.

112 hown only to impair new postoperative object discrimination learning with large stimulus set sizes (>

113 that emerges during specific stages of odour discrimination learning, with a transient bias toward th