コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 participants performed the same orientation discrimination task.
2 Observers performed an orientation discrimination task.
3 types in the striatum, during a food-seeking discrimination task.
4 underlying dyslexia using a simple frequency-discrimination task.
5 z among distractor tones on an adaptive tone discrimination task.
6 tivation on mice performing a GO/NOGO visual discrimination task.
7 during performance of a memory-guided visual discrimination task.
8 neurons during performance of an associative discrimination task.
9 vity during the sensory-gathering epoch of a discrimination task.
10 nd after training on an audiovisual temporal discrimination task.
11 ping (TD) participants completed an auditory discrimination task.
12 nd monkeys that performed a motion direction discrimination task.
13 hesus macaques performing a motion direction discrimination task.
14 videos and performed a forced-choice heading discrimination task.
15 FC in rats performing a two-alternative odor discrimination task.
16 areas of two monkeys during a somatosensory discrimination task.
17 learning on a novel visual shape orientation discrimination task.
18 at drives decisions in an auditory frequency discrimination task.
19 nkeys improved their performance in an image discrimination task.
20 nipulation, while monkeys performed a visual discrimination task.
21 f macaque monkeys performing a facial gender-discrimination task.
22 nterference effect during a motion direction discrimination task.
23 C of mice performing a PFC-dependent sensory discrimination task.
24 L) of rats during learning in an odor-guided discrimination task.
25 during such an experiment, a classic tactile discrimination task.
26 single training of a peripheral orientation discrimination task.
27 neurons in area V4 while monkeys performed a discrimination task.
28 ral intraparietal area during a visuospatial discrimination task.
29 t on memory consolidation using a behavioral discrimination task.
30 while they performed an auditory spatial cue discrimination task.
31 PEG) of ferrets trained on a simple auditory discrimination task.
32 d on a high-contrast visual stimulus using a discrimination task.
33 sting brain before and after a somatosensory discrimination task.
34 correlates with decisions in an orientation-discrimination task.
35 provenance and destination) during a visual discrimination task.
36 tedly impair performance on an adaptive tone discrimination task.
37 ence speed of acquisition in a forced-choice discrimination task.
38 ons in rats performing an auditory frequency-discrimination task.
39 d from barrel cortex while a rat performed a discrimination task.
40 al observer deemed optimal to accomplish the discrimination task.
41 by prior expectation during a visual motion discrimination task.
42 decision-making component of a somatosensory discrimination task.
43 which were also activated in the non-speech discrimination task.
44 reas while rats performed an active aperture discrimination task.
45 avian auditory cortical neurons after a song discrimination task.
46 iods of training of a high versus low reward-discrimination task.
47 nd midbrain of monkeys performing a temporal-discrimination task.
48 ively modulate sniff strength during an odor discrimination task.
49 had no impact on a well learned simple odor discrimination task.
50 n rhesus monkeys during a vestibular heading discrimination task.
51 ural images presented during a face/scramble discrimination task.
52 nnectivity before training on a novel visual discrimination task.
53 ns in a reaction time (RT) random-dot motion discrimination task.
54 formance on a two-interval, delayed response discrimination task.
55 ccuracy while listeners performed a go/no-go discrimination task.
56 FPs) in rats trained on a two-choice, visual discrimination task.
57 ues' choices in an amplitude modulation (AM) discrimination task.
58 ge on a nonnative speech and visual language discrimination task.
59 al judgments during a fine heading direction discrimination task.
60 and saccade response time on a visual motion discrimination task.
61 ences of tones while performing an intensity discrimination task.
62 ortices of monkeys performing a vibrotactile discrimination task.
63 tation-selective channels during a difficult discrimination task.
64 ential role for rate-codes in A1 for this AM discrimination task.
65 lind observers performing a global direction discrimination task.
66 both humans and monkeys performing a heading-discrimination task.
67 animals performed a two-alternative heading discrimination task.
68 o exposure to the sounds used to perform the discrimination task.
69 ity as monkeys performed a relative-distance discrimination task.
70 nalog-to-digital conversion during a sensory discrimination task.
71 cortex across days as mice learned a visual discrimination task.
72 regards to a specific event or a perceptual discrimination task.
73 edge-based approach to the fine orientation discrimination task.
74 performing a visual reaction time (RT) reach discrimination task.
75 ail to perform on a dentate-mediated spatial discrimination task.
76 eely moving rats performed an active tactile discrimination task.
77 ce imaging (fMRI) during an attentive motion discrimination task.
78 nce of neurotypical participants in a serial discrimination task.
79 impairs performance in an auditory frequency discrimination task.
80 extures of each object, to perform a sensory discrimination task.
81 eys, to perceptual reports in an orientation discrimination task.
82 ptation measured in V1 during an orientation discrimination task.
83 ing a two-alternative forced-choice auditory discrimination task.
84 ng while humans performed a difficult visual discrimination task.
85 mance of a model output neuron on a stimulus discrimination task.
86 to mask the use of these cues in a luminance discrimination task.
87 formed a two-interval forced-choice contrast discrimination task.
88 dynamics as mice learned a go/no-go auditory discrimination task.
89 n chickens trained to perform an orientation discrimination task.
90 macaque monkeys performed a fine orientation discrimination task.
91 ct behavioral performance in the same visual discrimination task.
92 d performance in a whisker-dependent texture discrimination task.
93 ing accuracy and behavioral performance in a discrimination task.
94 d cognitive demands of memory-guided sensory discrimination tasks.
95 an be surprisingly predictive of behavior in discrimination tasks.
96 n cortical representations in widely studied discrimination tasks.
97 le performing stop, working memory, and time discrimination tasks.
98 ature (orientation and frequency) and visual discrimination tasks.
99 ut not face, discrimination accuracy in both discrimination tasks.
100 of sensory neurons and animals' judgments in discrimination tasks.
101 ppocampus and can be examined using mnemonic discrimination tasks.
102 nd perform either sound location or identity discrimination tasks.
103 ow enhanced performance in simple perceptual discrimination tasks.
104 d IT activity while monkeys performed object discrimination tasks.
105 ica) are known to learn the context to solve discrimination tasks.
106 n animals are engaged in sound detection and discrimination tasks.
107 necessary to perform these types of sensory discrimination tasks.
108 n switching between orientation and contrast discrimination tasks.
109 rats performing temporal and light-intensity discrimination tasks.
110 al activation in these areas during temporal discrimination tasks.
111 humans perform a continuous series of binary discrimination tasks.
112 hile they performed quantity-estimation and -discrimination tasks.
113 performance of spectral or temporal auditory discrimination tasks.
114 performance in target detection and feature discrimination tasks.
115 or neurons and behavior during detection and discrimination tasks.
116 ation and performance of visual and auditory discrimination tasks.
118 terion, and compare it to a more traditional discrimination task, allowing us to model this explicit
119 mediately after the sample phase of a social discrimination task and 24-h later were subjected to a 5
121 erformed an eight-alternative 3D orientation discrimination task and a visually guided saccade task w
122 ile still in utero) on a consonant and vowel discrimination task and at 6 and 10 mo of age on a nonna
123 hesus monkeys while the animals did a visual discrimination task and examined trial-to-trial correlat
124 P during a well-studied moving-dot direction-discrimination task and manipulated whether a saccade ta
125 ult male mice in a cortex-dependent auditory discrimination task and measured the abundance of ECM pr
126 We trained gerbils to perform an auditory discrimination task and obtained measures of integration
127 and outer hair cells, in a two-choice visual discrimination task and studied the behavioral consequen
128 coding of oddball sounds in a human auditory discrimination task and suggest the existence of an adap
129 xtensive training on an automated two-choice discrimination task and then maintained their memory per
130 when the monkeys performed the vibrotactile discrimination task and when they were not required to r
131 -5 Hz Vm oscillations when animals performed discrimination tasks and passively viewed drifting grati
132 ts: animals trained extensively in a heading discrimination task, and "naive" animals that performed
134 ged in a two-alternative forced-choice taste discrimination task, and assaying the responses of these
135 sal, while human subjects performed a motion-discrimination task, and decomposed task behavior into l
137 s that had been trained to perform the shape-discrimination task, and it predicted the choice of the
138 orded during a version of the cued direction discrimination task, and we found no change in MT respon
139 -) were trained on a variety of speech sound discrimination tasks, and auditory cortex responses were
141 dency in the temporal domain; and (2) a time discrimination task, assessing temporal resolution.
143 ization task that was absent during a motion discrimination task before categorization training.
145 erformance on a well learned, difficult odor discrimination task, but had no impact on a well learned
146 ly, we show that behavioral performance on a discrimination task can be predicted based on the amplit
147 la after training on an inhibitory avoidance discrimination task, comprising two distinct training co
148 ts were trained in a serial feature negative discrimination task consisting of reinforced presentatio
150 hat performance on a forced-choice olfactory discrimination task depends on relative spontaneous pref
152 macaques trained to perform a fine disparity discrimination task, disparity-selective neurons in V2 w
153 ns by considering the case of the concurrent discrimination task, drawing on findings from humans and
154 prague-Dawley rats were trained on an object-discrimination task during which they could freely explo
155 while people performed a tactile, frequency discrimination task enabled us to test whether the oculo
156 monstrate that animals can perform a tactile discrimination task equally well whether mechanical stim
157 Both marmosets also performed an orientation discrimination task, exhibiting a saturating psychometri
158 trained mice to perform an auditory Go/NoGo discrimination task followed by a reversal to compare le
160 he ability of naive gerbils to learn a sound discrimination task following 5 days of exposure adjacen
161 performance on a two-alternative choice odor discrimination task following local, bilateral blockade
162 we measure perceptual deficits in a heading discrimination task following surgical ablation of the n
163 ithout musical training performed a duration discrimination task for a silent period in a rhythmic au
164 forming the same non-ideal unambiguous state discrimination task for coherent states with low mean ph
166 performed a predictive cuing task where the discrimination task for different objects was identical
167 al hippocampal subfields during a perceptual discrimination task for scenes, faces, and objects.
169 e package ISETBIO to simulate an orientation discrimination task for which visual performance differs
170 rformed foveal and parafoveal face and house discrimination tasks for upright or inverted stimuli (<=
171 We trained monkeys to perform a heading discrimination task from visual and vestibular cues, var
175 ion time in a two-choice temporal resolution/discrimination task in 36 patients with functional movem
178 encephalography (MEG) and a tactile temporal discrimination task in humans, we find that oscillatory
180 semble activity during a two-choice interval-discrimination task in rodent OFC, specifically designed
182 lucose utilization during a multidimensional discrimination task in the caudate nucleus, hippocampus,
185 measured choice probabilities in a disparity discrimination task in V1, which had been at chance (0.4
186 s were trained on a discrete-trials temporal discrimination task in which a light (22 cd/m(2)) was pr
187 7 human participants (9 females) performed a discrimination task in which a target stimulus was prece
188 d and five parrot species with a touchscreen discrimination task in which novel stimuli were occasion
189 FC lesions were trained in a multiple-choice discrimination task in which operant nosepoke responses
190 ns while they performed a cued somatosensory discrimination task in which the cue-target interval was
191 re, we tested this hypothesis using a motion discrimination task in which we manipulated the most lik
192 ormed multiple trials of a rewarded odd-ball discrimination task in which we varied the potential rew
194 unteers were trained to a coarse orientation discrimination task, in either the morning or evening.
196 tested human participants in an orientation discrimination task, in which performance is contingent
197 ined to perform a tactile-acoustic frequency discrimination task, including both unimodal and crossmo
199 sks than in those performing light-intensity discrimination tasks, indicating greater neuronal activa
200 f visual cortex, while training on a feature discrimination task involves inter-cortical interactions
201 Here we trained mice to perform a sensory discrimination task involving appetitive and aversive vi
202 an transfer learning of a coarse orientation discrimination task involving first-order, luminance-mod
203 /neurite complexes are essential for texture discrimination tasks involving glabrous skin but not whi
204 performed either an orientation or contrast discrimination task, involving one of two laterally pres
205 We examined whether performance of temporal discrimination tasks is associated with increased neuron
206 difference of detection tasks in contrast to discrimination tasks is that only the stimulus presence
207 30 aging human participants on a numerosity discrimination task known to engage the parietal cortex
208 procedural food acquisition task and visual discrimination task learned in a previous experiment.
210 icipants (20 ASC) performed a classic motion discrimination task, manually indicating the global dire
211 eural patterns during a Chinese lexical tone discrimination task matched those observed in Chinese/Fr
213 that when performing a go/no-go orientation discrimination task, mice suboptimally integrate signals
214 of rats trained on a vibrissal vibrotactile discrimination task, nor does it affect the whiskers' me
215 only about response accuracy in detection or discrimination tasks of low-level visual features such a
216 as recorded in rats performing a conditional discrimination task on a modified T-maze in which the id
222 ers' performance on two global visual motion discriminations tasks, one requiring the combination of
223 of two lines in a spatial task (line-length discrimination task) or the array with "fewer" items (nu
224 ned human listeners on an auditory frequency-discrimination task over multiple days and compared the
225 ore likely to be unable to learn the spatial discrimination task (p = 0.019), which may reflect IE-re
229 ants completed a facial emotion and identity discrimination task prior to and following tRNS to eithe
230 e response evoked by the high-contrast speed discrimination task, reflecting a functional dissociatio
232 n human participants performing two auditory discrimination tasks relying on distinct acoustic featur
234 ingly, we suggest that deficits on difficult discrimination tasks reported for patients with MTL lesi
236 , or vertex, participants performed a visual discrimination task requiring covert attention to either
237 cortex (vlPFC) of monkeys performing a shape discrimination task respond more strongly to occluded th
238 g rats in a particularly difficult olfactory-discrimination task results in acquisition of high skill
239 avioral responses during an intradimensional discrimination task showed similarity-dependent generali
240 and partial least-squares in three distinct discrimination tasks: skin cancers and precancers from b
241 t in the context of relatively simple visual discrimination tasks, spatial attention modulates percep
242 ) or the array with "fewer" items (numerical discrimination task) spontaneously transferred the learn
243 bstantial initial training on an orientation discrimination task, switches to a new location or posit
244 re presented during a go/no-go letter target discrimination task synchronized with systolic or diasto
245 s was combined with behavioral detection and discrimination tasks, thalamic recordings from awake ani
247 mbens was higher in rats performing temporal discrimination tasks than in those performing light-inte
249 at individual variability in a simple visual discrimination task that reflects both processing speed
250 d serotonin signaling during a visual motion discrimination task that separates sensory uncertainty f
251 bees (Apis mellifera) responded to a visual discrimination task that varied in difficulty between tr
253 behaviors requiring fine frequency and level discrimination, tasks that CI users find especially chal
254 monkey behaviour in a fixed-duration motion discrimination task, the model integrates sensory eviden
255 al performance of animals performing tactile discrimination tasks through LC-norepinephrine optimizat
257 o set a decision criterion in an orientation-discrimination task under both static and dynamic condit
258 when participants shifted to a novel Vernier discrimination task under identical saccade conditions.
262 ormance of human participants in an auditory discrimination task using a two-parameter computational
263 two macaque monkeys in a coarse orientation discrimination task using band-pass-filtered dynamic noi
264 ully trained on a black-and-white two-choice discrimination task using painted paddles and food reinf
266 ion of these two parts during a sensorimotor discrimination task was consistent with previous results
268 ioral flexibility during a reversal learning discrimination task was reduced in alcohol-dependent mic
269 us of macaque monkeys performing a direction discrimination task, we can predict the monkey's choices
272 In recordings from mice engaged in an odor discrimination task, we report that the firing rate of O
273 -time version of a visual/vestibular heading discrimination task, we show that behavior is clearly su
274 final experiment using an appetitive object discrimination task, we showed normal retention of the d
276 ometry data, stimuli of a demanding auditory discrimination task were presented into states of high o
277 abilities in this monkey for the orientation discrimination task were significantly larger than those
278 Three conditions (one detection and two discrimination tasks) were used to manipulate task compl
279 Human listeners performed a syllable pitch discrimination task where two syllables served as to-be-
281 made while subjects performed a visuo-motor discrimination task, which has been previously shown in
282 the prototypical two-alternative dot-motion discrimination task, which is known to strongly benefit
283 rtles demonstrate long-term memory of visual discrimination tasks, which relates to apparent abilitie
284 e perceptual consequences of learning a fine discrimination task while adapting the neurons that carr
285 stimuli) the state of SCx during an emotion discrimination task while controlling for visual effects
286 Human subjects performed an orientation discrimination task while emphasizing either response sp
287 Observers performed a simple orientation-discrimination task while ignoring task-irrelevant orien
288 corded EEG signals during a perceptual color discrimination task while participants were asked to pro
290 V4 while rhesus monkeys performed a contrast discrimination task whose difficulty changed in blocks o
291 Signal theoretic analysis of a global motion discrimination task with adaptive performance staircasin
292 howed that monkeys' decisions on a direction-discrimination task with asymmetric rewards reflected a
293 ons during the performance of an associative discrimination task with auditory cues for appetitive ve
294 es in a two-alternative forced choice visual discrimination task with high- and low-contrast visual i
295 emotor cortex of monkeys performing a visual discrimination task with reaches as the behavioral repor
296 asked humans to perform a simple perceptual discrimination task with two symmetric alternatives unde
297 Human observers performed an orientation discrimination task, with either valid or invalid attent
298 ormed analogous variants of a DMTS frequency discrimination task, with the frequency information pres
299 jointly activated by duration and numerosity discrimination tasks, with a congruency effect in the ri
300 rgeted to S1 enhanced performance on sensory discrimination tasks without affecting task attention or