ライフサイエンスコーパス: disgust

1 d as more aversive (intense, unpleasant, and disgusting).

2 ual analysis of two threat subtypes-fear and disgust.

3 f negative emotions such as fear, anger, and disgust.

4 ditioned taste avoidance but not conditioned disgust.

5 nisms in alternative threat emotions such as disgust.

6 o recognize overtly different intensities of disgust.

7 of happiness and anger, but not for fear or disgust.

8 dicated a relative impairment in recognizing disgust.

9 r emotion-recognition impairments, including disgust.

10 eduction in the anterior insular response to disgust.

11 lated to bodily injury from those related to disgust.

12 tance of the basal ganglia in the emotion of disgust.

13 icted unique variance in pathogen and sexual disgust.

14 evoke appropriate behavioral responses, like disgust.

15 be a primary driver influencing variation in disgust.

16 ate case rates negatively predicted pathogen disgust.

17 is the amygdala for fear and the insula for disgust.

18 ting behavior and impairments in recognizing disgust.

19 ppiness, surprise, anger, sadness, fear, and disgust.

20 Facial expressions were neutral, fearful, or disgusted.

21 entified the food stimuli as threatening and disgusting.

22 ht have commented that parasites were rather disgusting.

23 ted intense saltiness as anything other than disgusting.

24 ias that correlate with neural signatures of disgust.(11) However, the causal role of gastric rhythm

25 r insular responses to facial expressions of disgust, a signifier of potential physical contamination

26 Infants generalize information about food disgust across all people, regardless of those people's

27 dentifies high levels of expressed anger and disgust across overall posts, it additionally reveals th

28 Both strong and mild expressions of disgust activated anterior insular cortex but not the am

29 I further explore how the disgust adaptive system, which coordinates avoidance beh

30 Potential cues include facial reactions of disgust, alarm-call vocalizations, and reduction in food

31 insular cortex but not the amygdala; strong disgust also activated structures linked to a limbic cor

32 edicted more impairment in recognizing fear, disgust and anger, and no impairment in recognizing faci

33 iness is a positive emotion to contrast with disgust and anger.

34 The role of emotional disgust and disgust sensitivity in moral judgment and de

35 ings suggest that potentiation of the ASR by disgust and fear depends on the integrity of the anterom

36 ir convergence on the core affect of threat, disgust and fear instigate distinct response profiles, p

37 , the more participants reported feelings of disgust and fear; the less acidic the pH, the more they

38 untington's disease-associated modulation of disgust and happiness processing was negatively correlat

39 Attitudes toward disgust and hygiene behaviors were assessed using questi

40 amework for testing the adaptive function of disgust and its associated disease avoidance behaviours

41 ants showed a higher accuracy in recognising disgust and lower misclassification rates and response b

42 ncerns the reason for the connection between disgust and specific political and moral attitudes; the

43 iation occurred in the partial regulation of disgust and taste avoidance by selective 5-HT(3) recepto

44 wledge that ingroup relations attenuate core disgust and that this helps explain the ability of group

45 e for broader claims regarding the effect of disgust and the existence of a physiological trait.

46 Both the feeling of disgust and the observation of disgust in others are kno

47 ditions per subject: happiness, sadness, and disgust and three control conditions, each induced by fi

48 irst-hand and vicarious experiences of pain, disgust and unfairness.

49 ofessionals have developed ways to cope with disgust and use empathy as a main strategy to overcome i

50 ored how healthcare professionals experience disgust and what coping strategies they use to manage it

51 bstrates which mediate responses to fearful, disgusted and happy expressions.

52 hey were biased to label neutral faces with "disgust" and "fear." On odor identification, IED subject

53 value: (i) 'wanting what is remembered to be disgusting', and (ii) 'wanting what is predicted to hurt

54 l emotion recognition, particularly fear and disgust, and did not benefit from increased emotional in

55 on, guilt, and shame and potentiating anger, disgust, and mirth.

56 emotions: happiness, surprise, fear, anger, disgust, and sadness.

57 dangers; react to threats with greater fear, disgust, and sadness; and develop more threat-based clin

58 V-2 positively predicted pathogen and sexual disgust, and state case rates negatively predicted patho

59 body expression representations of anger and disgust, and the influence of body on facial expression

60 WS from health to riddance of faeces-related disgust, and to increase the perceived descriptive norm

61 s performed worse on recognition of fearful, disgusted, and neutral expressions.

62 e intensities of happy, sad, angry, fearful, disgusted, and neutral faces, balanced for gender and et

63 suicide is intuitively considered impure and disgusting, and discuss implications of this purity-base

64 r threat-related emotions, such as "anger," "disgust," and "fear," but differ on those that represent

65 jects were impaired at recognizing "anger," "disgust," and "surprise," and they were biased to label

66 Disgust, anger and happiness were chosen as emotions of

67 nal emotional states (happy, surprise, fear, disgust, anger, and sad) using the same facial movements

68 ched pictures of faces to the words "fear," "disgust," "anger," "sadness," "surprise," and "happiness

69 basic emotions-"happy," "surprise," "fear," "disgust," "anger," and "sad"-and judge their intensity i

70 perience of core and body-boundary-violation disgust are dissociable in both peripheral autonomic and

71 d (4) that among the five emotions, risk and disgust are least well-preserved, compared with joy, sad

72 As feelings of disgust are thought to be an important psychological mec

73 Happiness, sadness, and disgust are three emotions that differ in their valence

74 emergence of discrimination between fear and disgust as early as 96 ms after stimulus emphasizes the

75 provoke the emotions of happiness, fear, or disgust as well as a neutral state.

76 lays of happiness, sadness, anger, fear, and disgust as well as neutral faces.

77 rably unpleasant) negative states, pain, and disgust, as conveyed by naturalistic facial expressions

78 fection exposure positively predicted sexual disgust, as predicted.

79 a flexible toolbox for testing and applying disgust at individual and collective levels.

80 domperidone significantly reduces oculomotor disgust avoidance following incentivized exposure.

81 owever, the causal role of gastric rhythm in disgust avoidance is unknown.

82 role for disgust-related visceral changes in disgust avoidance, supporting the hypothesis that physio

83 measured the effects of domperidone on core disgust avoidance, using eye tracking to measure implici

84 rather than feel ashamed of them and hiding disgust away as a silent part of care.

85 chedelic", "mysterious"), profundity (e.g., "disgust", "awe"), and perceptual qualities attributed to

86 s that did not evolve for cooperation (e.g., disgust-based "purity" concerns).

87 ined the brain correlates of the presence of disgusting behavior and impaired recognition of disgust

88 ume was associated with both the presence of disgusting behavior and impairments in recognizing disgu

89 These findings suggest that regulating disgusting behaviors and recognizing disgust in others i

90 gressive aphasia were most likely to exhibit disgusting behaviors and were, on average, the most impa

91 nalysis revealed that patients who exhibited disgusting behaviors had significantly less gray matter

92 quired for recognizing disgust or regulating disgusting behaviors remains unknown.

93 of emotion-from anxiety to fear to horror to disgust, calmness to aesthetic appreciation to awe, and

94 jor prevailing accounts focus on morality or disgust, capturing a subset of cleansing effects, but ca

95 has demonstrated that facial expressions of disgust consistently engage different brain areas (insul

96 al, postcentral, and insular cortex, whereas disgust contexts triggered the temporoparietal cortex an

97 y handle cleansing effects in non-moral, non-disgusting contexts.

98 ressions; this enhanced amygdala response to disgust correlated with the magnitude of attentional red

99 physiological arousal we found that arousing disgust cues modulated the encoding of sensory noise.

100 vel psychophysical paradigm, in which unseen disgust-cues induced unexpected, unconscious arousal jus

101 tances of "contempt speech" - being based on disgust-driven contempt rather than hate.

102 especially those related to animal-reminder disgust (e.g., mutilated body), generate neural response

103 crete emotional experiences (of anger, fear, disgust, etc.).

104 oral, physiological, and immune responses to disgust-evoking cues in both cocaine-dependent and healt

105 cipants (N = 61) were exposed to neutral and disgust-evoking photographs depicting food and nonfood i

106 Response times to disgust-evoking photographs were prolonged in all partic

107 We discuss the ethics associated with disgust experiments in the above contexts.

108 examine the neural substrate for perceiving disgust expressions.

109 attention enhanced the amygdala response to disgust expressions; this enhanced amygdala response to

110 neutral expressions; patients overattributed disgusted expressions and underattributed happy expressi

111 n of, and autonomic responding to, angry and disgusted expressions; attributing the emotions of fear,

112 For example, processing of disgust faces was associated with interactions in medial

113 cantly (P<0.005) smaller signal responses to disgusted faces in the bilateral insular cortex compared

114 ssociated with visible skin lesions, such as disgusted facial expressions of others.

115 onal responses by blocking the processing of disgusted facial expressions.

116 lizations of four emotion categories (anger, disgust, fear, happiness) and neutral sounds under two c

117 8 females) with facial expressions of anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and emotional neutrali

118 atched video clips that consistently induced disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, or a control neutral

119 nts judged expressions of 6 emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, surprise) with the lo

120 eight distinct categories: anger, contempt, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, surprise, and neutral

121 Target emotions were: amusement, anger, disgust, fear, pleasure, relief, and sadness.

122 Recognition of anger, disgust, fear, sadness and surprise (but not happiness)

123 recognition of all negative emotions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness).

124 Here, participants reported experienced disgust/fear and appraisals of sickness/harm risk to ima

125 the placebo group, suggesting a salience of disgust for the former group.

126 ording to dissect experience of two distinct disgust forms and their relationship to peripheral and c

127 particularly affect people's recognition of disgust from facial expressions, and functional neuroima

128 ral system for recognizing social signals of disgust from multiple modalities.

129 The behavioral immune system posits that disgust functions to protect animals from pathogen expos

130 behavioral and neural divergence of fear and disgust further indicates that despite their convergence

131 Conversely, disgust generated an opposite pattern of effects, reflec

132 nt in the dataset are Fear, Anger, Contempt, Disgust, Happy, Neutral, Sad, and Surprise.

133 e experience, expression, and recognition of disgust; however, whether this brain region is required

134 Greeble objects presented after fear versus disgust images also overlapped despite their clear depar

135 o measure implicit (oculomotor) avoidance of disgusting images (feces) before and after an "exposure"

136 perimental work does behavioral avoidance of disgusting images habituate following prolonged exposure

137 ntion (monetary reinforcement for looking at disgusting images).(7)(,)(8) We find that domperidone si

138 While viewing the disgusting images, cocaine-dependent individuals exhibit

139 Disgusting images, especially those related to animal-re

140 ted before and after exposure to neutral and disgusting images, respectively.

141 fessionals experience, understand and manage disgust in clinical work.

142 (GI) malaise, a state akin to the emotion of disgust in humans.

143 otten food, maggots, bodily waste-all elicit disgust in humans.

144 We note that though the role of disgust in moral judgment has been questioned recently,

145 he feeling of disgust and the observation of disgust in others are known to activate the insula corte

146 ulating disgusting behaviors and recognizing disgust in others involve two partially overlapping neur

147 The neural response to facial expressions of disgust in others is thus closely related to appraisal o

148 on average, the most impaired at recognizing disgust in others.

149 consistently high trust/anticipation and low disgust in the way mainstream sources framed "vaccine/va

150 rspectives and current challenges of testing disgust in the wild.

151 r, we found that overall and animal reminder disgust increased across pregnancy and after birth.

152 rt for emotion specificity: Sadness, but not disgust, increased self-reported craving relative to a n

153 based handwashing intervention combined with disgust-inducing messages, with provision of handwashing

154 ory perceptual and attentional processing of disgust information, akin to the central ecological func

155 Disgust is a common emotion experienced by healthcare pr

156 This review found that disgust is a common experience for healthcare profession

157 Disgust is an adaptive system hypothesized to have evolv

158 Disgust is an essential part of the behavioral immune sy

159 of the three domains of disgust, only sexual disgust is associated with more deontological moral pref

160 Disgust is hypothesized to be an evolved emotion that fu

161 s are seen as embedded within social groups, disgust is interpreted as socially universal, which coul

162 c conditions.(2-5) Unlike fear, pathological disgust is not improved substantially by exposure therap

163 Disgust is the emotion in which recognition deficits hav

164 ession (e.g., with "fear" being faster than "disgust," itself faster than "happy").

165 objective pathogen risk explain variance in disgust levels.

166 d," occurrent or enduring, and anger-like or disgust-like.

167 Disgust-literally 'bad taste'-is another important emoti

168 sks, suggesting that habits and a feeling of disgust may influence hand hygiene compliance.

169 ecially on the amygdala and the detection of disgust may rely on the insula and basal ganglia.

170 e norms, which were piggybacking on pathogen disgust mechanisms.

171 condition than in the other conditions, and disgust mediated the relationship between condition and

172 rast, later ERP waveforms evoked by fear and disgust merged gradually over time (130-425 ms).

173 The modulated disgust network included insulae, cingulate cortices, pr

174 lationship between current pathogen risk and disgust, nor the correlation between objective and perce

175 of anger (odds ratio = 0.12, p < 0.001) and disgust (odds ratio = 0.08, p < 0.001) relative to CT pa

176 ption include lack of prior experience, user disgust of working with excrement, and the perceived amo

177 esults indicate that of the three domains of disgust, only sexual disgust is associated with more deo

178 r brain areas process only facial signals of disgust or disgust signals from multiple modalities.

179 dence of relative impairments in recognizing disgust or fear, and no evidence to support a link betwe

180 presented with faces showing mild or strong disgust or fear.

181 his brain region is required for recognizing disgust or regulating disgusting behaviors remains unkno

182 nses to carefully controlled images of fear, disgust, or neutral emotion (as a baseline condition).

183 the eyes in fear, the corners of the nose in disgust, or the mouth in happiness).

184 nd that individuals who experience anger and disgust over a norm violation are more likely to endorse

185 professionals should consider ways of making disgust part of a wider conversation, allowing clinician

186 hors investigated ASR modulation to fearful, disgusting, pleasant, and neutral stimuli in 12 patients

187 Disgust promotes survival by encouraging avoidance of di

188 SD severity and symptoms (e.g., ADOS scores, disgust propensity, and sensory sensitivities).

189 he comparative online processing of fear and disgust prosody and semantics.

190 universal facial expressions of "fear" and "disgust." Rather than distributing their fixations evenl

191 iated with emetic drugs produces conditioned disgust reactions in rats (predominantly gaping), unlike

192 ggests nausea is a prerequisite for learning disgust reactions to tastes.

193 the production of nausea-induced conditioned disgust reactions, while activation of 5-HT(3) receptors

194 he nucleus prevents LiCl-induced conditioned disgust reactions.

195 ortex (IC) prevents LiCl-induced conditioned disgust reactions.

196 Conversely, scopolamine increased aversive 'disgust' reactions elicited by bitter quinine at all NAc

197 e to support a link between the striatum and disgust recognition.

198 For all emotions except disgust, recognition of extreme intensity was better tha

199 that participate in happiness, sadness, and disgust, regions that distinguish between positive and n

200 ow the experience of emotions like anger and disgust relate to the judged appropriateness of sanction

201 We propose five contexts in which disgust-related avoidance behaviours could be applied, i

202 This indicates a causal role for disgust-related visceral changes in disgust avoidance, s

203 faster to approach and avoid faces depicting disgust relative to the placebo group, suggesting a sali

204 motion recognition suggest that detection of disgust relies on processing within the basal ganglia an

205 of interoception of bodily signals, aberrant disgust responses might lead to increased infection susc

206 People can express irrational fears and disgust responses towards certain wild organisms.

207 The experiment indicated that anger, disgust, sadness, and fear are the predominant emotions

208 Emotions such as anger, fear, disgust, sadness, or happiness can significantly influen

209 ssify which of five categories--fear, anger, disgust, sadness, or happiness--is engaged by a study wi

210 ed the associations between The Three Domain Disgust Scale and the most commonly used 12 moral dilemm

211 anger are not built upon each other, whereas disgust seems to be the most elementary and specific bas

212 ndividual differences in pathogen and sexual disgust sensitivities.

213 Individuals with higher pathogen disgust sensitivity (PDS) are predicted to be exposed to

214 tly sick in the first trimester had elevated disgust sensitivity at that time.

215 It seems that changing levels of disgust sensitivity during pregnancy and postpartum resu

216 The role of emotional disgust and disgust sensitivity in moral judgment and decision-makin

217 ious study observing longitudinal changes in disgust sensitivity in pregnant women.

218 e Compensatory Prophylaxis Hypothesis (CPH), disgust sensitivity increases in times of immunosuppress

219 To do this, we obtained disgust sensitivity measures from 94 women in each trime

220 questioned recently, few studies have taken disgust sensitivity to account.

221 tastes in art to desire for closure and from disgust sensitivity to the tendency to pursue new inform

222 In contrast to the original study, where disgust sensitivity was highest in the first trimester,

223 Although disgust sensitivity was significantly higher in the seco

224 results regarding the effect of fetus sex on disgust sensitivity were mixed.

225 those concerning conspiratorial ideation and disgust sensitivity within a real-world context.

226 fe history battery, past and current health, disgust sensitivity, and Big Five personality traits).

227 and tryptophan betaine) and ASD severity and disgust sensitivity.

228 mechanism might have evolved through sexual disgust sensitivity.

229 as process only facial signals of disgust or disgust signals from multiple modalities.

230 federates) to equally unpleasant painful and disgusting stimulations, as well as unfair monetary trea

231 te lack of ASR potentiation to both fear and disgust stimuli.

232 rmal physiological conditions, perception of disgusting stimuli disrupts myoelectrical rhythms in the

233 ta provide evidence of a hypersensitivity to disgusting stimuli in cocaine-dependent individuals, pos

234 und in the deep gastric realm, we found that disgusting stimuli induced a significant increase in HRV

235 hythmias during incentivized engagement with disgusting stimuli.

236 Remarkably, brain responses to a single disgusting stimulus were sufficient to make accurate pre

237 Indeed, fear enhanced and disgust suppressed early (115 ms) response in visual cor

238 than controls to identify all intensities of disgust tested.

239 They showed worse recognition of fear and disgust than the healthy subjects.

240 d to "avoidance" emotions (like contempt and disgust) than to "punitive" emotions (like anger).

241 d: The professionals' struggle to talk about disgust; the importance of boundaries: boundary breachin

242 ents (joy, sadness, embarrassment, risk, and disgust-though the stories did not contain these emotion

243 ral and behavioral response between fear and disgust thus highlights general threat categorization in

244 ereof), and gender norms, and how we can use disgust to better activate native "behavioral immunity"

245 hat domperidone may weaken the "immunity" of disgust to habituation, putatively by reducing gastric d

246 , akin to the central ecological function of disgust to minimize contact with contagious objects to a

247 l sense, and false propositions may actually disgust us.

248 ociated with altered cognitive processing of disgust using (i) a covert recognition of faces task con

249 gusting behavior and impaired recognition of disgust using voxel-based morphometry in a sample of 305

250 Specifically, when disgusting video clips were displayed, the more acidic t

251 that when participants observed fearful and disgusting video clips, they reported to perceive not on

252 Moreover, impaired recognition of disgust was associated with decreased gray matter volume

253 We also found that pathogen disgust was associated with more utilitarian preferences

254 ghly selective deficit in the recognition of disgust was confirmed in the subgroup of 15 individuals

255 emotions used was examined separately, only disgust was found to be significantly impaired.

256 Self-reported disgust was lower in the ingroup condition than in the o

257 wash hands and pumps of soap indicated that disgust was lower where the relationship between partici

258 Happiness, sadness, and disgust were each associated with increases in activity

259 Nurture and disgust were found to be key motivators, and are used as

260 (i.e., below conscious perception) associate disgust with high-calorie foods with the aim of reducing

261 Impaired recognition of fear and disgust, with relatively preserved recognition of other

262 a pseudo-randomized sequence of humorous and disgusting YouTube clips to autistic and non-autistic ad