ライフサイエンスコーパス: disinfection

1 nd containment, environmental culturing, and disinfection.

2 nd Leptospirillium and Penicillium following disinfection.

3 nfirmed minimal regrowth potential after the disinfection.

4 e.g. adsorption, catalysis, separation, and disinfection.

5 was significantly impacted by free chlorine disinfection.

6 A) or sequentially (PAA-UV/PAA) for enhanced disinfection.

7 icidal UV irradiation for improving UV water disinfection.

8 que with broad applications in environmental disinfection.

9 LTP has also been used for surface disinfection.

10 fection control measures, alongside chemical disinfection.

11 sis, membrane-based separation, sensing, and disinfection.

12 rated UV-C light fluence is insufficient for disinfection.

13 enotoxicity to CHO cells than chlorine-based disinfection.

14 mes in surface contamination, stability, and disinfection.

15 es, allowing for simultaneous filtration and disinfection.

16 HAAs) are formed during the process of water disinfection.

17 cleaning of surfaces, and safe and effective disinfection.

18 exists even after automated reprocessing and disinfection.

19 r energy) and achieve highly efficient water disinfection.

20 he bacterial cells is required to accomplish disinfection.

21 cal filtration is likely greater than silver disinfection.

22 ism that protects biofilms against long-term disinfection.

23 he application of ozonation in primary water disinfection.

24 tive and toxic electrophiles during chlorine disinfection.

25 ting their formation during subsequent water disinfection.

26 dynamics, and pathogen control via external disinfection.

27 HMs formation in DWTPs that use chlorine for disinfection.

28 formation in engineered systems using UV for disinfection.

29 ch solution spray or wipes were used for PPE disinfection.

30 exceptions using terminal ultraviolet light disinfection.

31 it disease, even after undergoing high-level disinfection according to manufacturers' guidelines.

32 ypochlorite (dilute bleach) offers effective disinfection against adenovirus and HSV, the viruses com

33 We suspect that TAs are natural disinfection agents protecting groundwater from bacteria

34 ective replacement for conventional chemical disinfection agents, such as Virkon.

35 After disinfection and entering the distribution system, commu

36 l advanced oxidation process (AOP) for water disinfection and micropollutant degradation, but kinetic

37 ize byproduct formation without compromising disinfection and nutrient removal.

38 hogens by employing two mechanisms: metallic disinfection and physical filtration.

39 ciated with a virus' susceptibility to solar disinfection and proposes a model to estimate disinfecti

40 -water cells can be used to promote sunlight disinfection and remove pathogenic viruses from wastewat

41 stinal infections, is highly resistant to UV disinfection and therefore drives the virus disinfection

42 Following standard disinfection and venipuncture, blood was either aspirate

43 Following standard disinfection and venipuncture, blood was either aspirate

44 ly be avoided by optimizing water treatment, disinfection, and distribution practices, among other po

45 als that can harvest visible light for water disinfection, and so speed up solar water purification,

46 d decomposition products, which also promote disinfection, and therefore offer a "one-two" punch.

47 t the mechanisms that allow them to tolerate disinfection are poorly understood.

48 tom catalyst demonstrated an effective water disinfection as a representative application.

49 -action nanoparticles was demonstrated using disinfection assays with the pathogenic bacterium Pseudo

50 ater samples, illustrating the importance of disinfection at the point of use.

51 This suggests disinfections based on chemically aggressive destruction

52 alternative to UV alone or chlorination for disinfection because of the destruction of a wide variet

53 mortality on harvest rate, vaccination, and disinfection behaviors.

54 ventilation is the most common means of air disinfection, but it is inherently unreliable and of lim

55 stem ensuring continuous water treatment and disinfection by chlorination.

56 t amended with elevated Br(-) and I(-) after disinfection by chlorine, chloramines, or ozone.

57 also exhibited an increased tolerance toward disinfection by free chlorine.

58 y, the impact of EPS composition on bacteria disinfection by monochloramine was qualitatively determi

59 orovirus (hNoV) GI and GII reductions during disinfection by peracetic acid (PAA) and monochloramine

60 Disinfection by-product exposures and the risk of specif

61 is beneficial to reduce the ozone dosage and disinfection by-product formation with a broader inactiv

62 Some disinfection by-products (DBPs) are reproductive and dev

63 ise, the minimization of potentially harmful disinfection by-products (DBPs) becomes increasingly cri

64 ogical studies suggest that women exposed to disinfection by-products (DBPs) have an increased risk o

65 Trihalomethanes (THMs) are widespread disinfection by-products (DBPs) in drinking water, and l

66 The formation of toxic disinfection by-products (DBPs) is among the main concer

67 Cheese can contain regulated disinfection by-products (DBPs), mainly through contact

68 vertently leads to the formation of numerous disinfection by-products (DBPs), some of which are cytot

69 s) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) are regulated disinfection by-products (DBPs); their joint reproductiv

70 s (HAcAms), an emerging class of nitrogenous disinfection by-products (N-DBPs) of health concern, hav

71 Disinfection by-products exist as complex mixtures in wa

72 hazard assessment for 13 HAAs found as water disinfection by-products was conducted.

73 e drone sampler were demonstrated to extract disinfection by-products, including trichloromethane, di

74 disinfected with chlorine, which originates disinfection by-products: haloacetic acids (HAAs) make u

75 Disinfection byproduct (DBP) exposure has been linked to

76 Kinetic models for disinfectant decay and disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation are necessary for

77 ize distribution, molecular composition, and disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation following the add

78 To control disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation in drinking water

79 in source waters, and consequently impacting disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation in finished water

80 ts during water treatment, but their role in disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation is unclear.

81 AOP, dissolved organic matter (DOM) and the disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation potential may als

82 ased bromide incorporation) as the surrogate disinfection byproduct (DBP) occurrence metric for infor

83 an lead to difficulty meeting drinking water disinfection byproduct (DBP) regulations.

84 acetic acid (BAA)-a regulated drinking water disinfection byproduct (DBP)-can stimulate natural trans

85 d organic matter (DOM) and increase specific disinfection byproduct formation potential (SDBP-FP).

86 water, enabling other studies of nitrogenous disinfection byproduct formation.

87 itrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is a carcinogenic disinfection byproduct from water chloramination.

88 (GAC) adsorption of micropollutants and is a disinfection byproduct precursor.

89 nating agents influence bromination rates of disinfection byproduct precursors is, however, poorly un

90 the formation of newly described brominated disinfection byproducts (Br-DBPs).

91 methylamine (NDMA) and other hazardous water disinfection byproducts (DBP) is currently hampered by a

92 matter (DOM) and DOM-associated formation of disinfection byproducts (DBP).

93 on the formation of BrO3(-) and halogenated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) (e.g., trihalomethanes, T

94 valuated the sum of the concentrations of 46 disinfection byproducts (DBPs) after treatment by chlori

95 Disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and algal toxins can be e

96 nhance the formation kinetics of chlorinated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and exacerbate the burden

97 sult in the loss of volatile and hydrophilic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and hence likely tend to

98 ty removing low molecular weight halogenated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and industrial chemicals.

99 Disinfection byproducts (DBPs) are a ubiquitous source o

100 However, during disinfection, toxic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) are formed.

101 Certain unregulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) are more of a health conc

102 es and amides are two classes of nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (DBPs) associated with chloramin

103 urface water and serve as precursors to form disinfection byproducts (DBPs) during disinfection (e.g.

104 b) waters or comprehensive identification of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) formed in spas.

105 nnovative approach to trace the formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) of MP UV water treatment,

106 ince bromide contributes to the formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) that have negative human-

107 es and result in the formation of brominated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) upon chlorination.

108 An extensively diverse array of brominated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) were generated following

109 hanced formation of brominated and iodinated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) when treated.

110 of 35 regulated and unregulated halogenated disinfection byproducts (DBPs), 8 N-nitrosamines, and br

111 te, 35 regulated and unregulated halogenated disinfection byproducts (DBPs), and 8 N-nitrosamines aft

112 s well-established for controlling regulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs), but its effectiveness fo

113 chlorine or chloramine leads to exposure to disinfection byproducts (DBPs), including trihalomethane

114 the formation of different classes of toxic disinfection byproducts (DBPs).

115 kes, leading to increased formation of toxic disinfection byproducts (DBPs).

116 waterborne illness but initiates exposure to disinfection byproducts (DBPs).

117 sis (RO) membranes, and the production of 43 disinfection byproducts (DBPs).

118 tances present in pool water to form harmful disinfection byproducts (DBPs).

119 the formation of potentially toxic iodinated disinfection byproducts (I-DBPs) while controlling the f

120 The potential formation of nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (N-DBPs) was investigated from t

121 are a class of newly identified nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (N-DBPs) whose occurrence in dri

122 g bromide levels and subsequent increases in disinfection byproducts at downstream drinking water pla

123 cidated the agent(s) that generate iodinated disinfection byproducts during drinking water treatment.

124 Ingestion of disinfection byproducts has been associated with bladder

125 s identified N-chlorinated dipeptides as new disinfection byproducts in drinking water.

126 EPA) in its benefits analysis for regulating disinfection byproducts in drinking water.

127 cular ions matched the exact masses of known disinfection byproducts including diiodoacetic acid, dib

128 aters, a significant formation of brominated disinfection byproducts is expected.

129 Disinfection byproducts such as trihalomethanes are comm

130 , probable human carcinogens, are a group of disinfection byproducts under consideration for drinking

131 acids (HMSAs) are recently discovered polar disinfection byproducts without commercially available r

132 g concentration limits for, lead and copper, disinfection byproducts, chromium(VI), strontium, and PF

133 f haloacetonitriles (HANs), a group of toxic disinfection byproducts, in wastewater-impacted surface

134 er, and leads to the formation of brominated disinfection byproducts, known to be more toxic than chl

135 rated brominated transformation products and disinfection byproducts.

136 s) are a structurally diverse class of water disinfection byproducts.

137 l formation of chlorinated intermediates and disinfection byproducts.

138 ), alkylphenols, and 21 of their halogenated disinfection byproducts.

139 s were identified as potential precursors of disinfection byproducts.

140 halogenated pollutants (chlorofluorocarbons; disinfection byproducts; pesticides, fungicides, and bac

141 ncreased N. fowleri's resistance to chlorine disinfection compared to that of the laboratory-cultured

142 uld be applied to antimicrobial research and disinfection control in clinical settings.

143 r, and provides evidence for assigning virus disinfection credit to similar MBRs used to reclaim wast

144 ing information in the form of probabilistic disinfection curves relating E. coli inactivation and pr

145 isition of pathogens; enhanced terminal room disinfection decreases this risk.

146 level disinfection (sHLD), double high-level disinfection (dHLD), or standard high-level disinfection

147 three enhanced strategies for terminal room disinfection (disinfection of a room between occupying p

148 For a typical UV disinfection dose (400 J/m(2)), various extents of photo

149 nochromatic ultraviolet light of 80 mJ/cm(2) disinfection dose was efficient for GR activity photolys

150 o form disinfection byproducts (DBPs) during disinfection (e.g., chloramination).

151 monitoring of treated wastewater quality and disinfection effectiveness prior to reuse.

152 Disinfection efficacies for RV strain OSU and Wa were ap

153 Similar disinfection efficacies were observed for TV attached to

154 Covering spills decreased disinfection efficacy against E. coli on heavy-duty tarp

155 Wiping did not increase disinfection efficacy and is not recommended because it

156 Specifically, the disinfection efficacy is closely correlated to the cell-

157 h microbial surrogate, which showed that the disinfection efficacy ranked as *OH > SO4(.-) > CO3(.-)

158 Cl(s) following AgNP oxidation, although the disinfection efficiency of OCl(-) may not be significant

159 (EPS) of bacteria have little effect on the disinfection efficiency.

160 UV/PAA was demonstrated to yield the highest disinfection efficiency.

161 day, and challenges related to cleaning and disinfection, environmental accumulation of viruses at m

162 Disinfection experiments showed that 73% of E. coli O157

163 The benefit of full-mouth disinfection (FDIS) over traditional scaling and root pl

164 ning (SRP) over weeks or same-day full-mouth disinfection (FDIS), with or without adjunctive metronid

165 Water treatment varied from disinfection, filtration, sedimentation, and activated c

166 For a typical disinfection fluence of 40 mJ/cm(2), the apparent transf

167 nal practices, including chlorine-chloramine disinfection, flushing of DWDS, nutrient removal, and em

168 To compare the effects of full-mouth disinfection (FMD) and full-mouth ultrasonic debridement

169 treatment performed by one-stage full-mouth disinfection (FMD) within 24 hours or conventional quadr

170 (SRP) per quadrant and one-stage full-mouth disinfection (FMD), on periodontal clinical parameters a

171 disinfection (dHLD), or standard high-level disinfection followed by ethylene oxide gas sterilizatio

172 erged not only after repeated cycles of ClO2 disinfection followed by regrowth but also after dilutio

173 natural wastewater treatment systems to meet disinfection goals.

174 Disinfection had the greatest impact on microbial compos

175 d integration in the natural environment, UV disinfection implemented at a treatment plant can potent

176 The implementation of chlorine disinfection in low-income countries reduces the risk of

177 occi to survive desiccation, starvation, and disinfection in the modern hospital, foreordaining their

178 nuric acid is necessary to maintain chlorine disinfection in the waters.

179 To enhance sunlight disinfection in unit process wetlands, there is no advan

180 arcinogenic compounds formed during chlorine disinfection in water treatment processes around the wor

181 Drinking water disinfection inadvertently leads to the formation of num

182 Our findings showed that solar disinfection increased the natural transformation freque

183 on experiments were conducted to support the disinfection investigation.

184 sodimethylamine (NDMA) during drinking water disinfection is a major challenge.

185 Disinfection is critical for maintaining a safe water su

186 The adoption of ozonation for water disinfection is hindered by its high ozone demand and th

187 Although disinfection is key to infection control, the colonizati

188 the product of concentration and time, as in disinfection kinetics.

189 physical filtration and silver nanoparticle disinfection likely contribute to treatment of C. parvum

190 t test, p > 0.05), suggesting that long-term disinfection may not significantly remove net biomass.

191 determining UV dosage needed for sufficient disinfection may result in unintentional release of path

192 The most appropriate disinfection method remains unclear, however, and it is

193 Enhanced disinfection methods (dHLD or HLD/ETO) did not provide a

194 ic/soil habitats and known to resist various disinfection methods commonly used in drinking and waste

195 To examine the efficacy of various disinfection methods for reusable tonometer prisms in ey

196 ith survivability data and effective surface disinfection methods for these surfaces; (2) a knowledge

197 In conventional drinking water disinfection, N-chloroisobutyraldimine can potentially b

198 With our approach, we achieved water disinfection of >99.999% inactivation of bacteria in 20

199 Disinfection of a commercial C(12)-olefin sulfonate surf

200 d strategies for terminal room disinfection (disinfection of a room between occupying patients) on ac

201 osion protection, degradation of pollutants, disinfection of bacteria and material synthesis.

202 Observations revealed inconsistent disinfection of bedside ophthalmologic equipment and lim

203 model for conditions relevant to chloramine disinfection of drinking water (pH 6-9 and carbonate-buf

204 However, solar disinfection of drinking water mostly relies on ultravio

205 Disinfection of drinking water protects public health ag

206 Efficient photocatalytic disinfection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 was achieved by

207 iorefinery pharmaceutical industries and the disinfection of large-volume fluid for the water and foo

208 nactivation by (1)O2 also contributed to the disinfection of MS2 and adenovirus.

209 Chlorination has long been used for disinfection of municipal wastewater (MWW) effluent whil

210 Ps) were generated following electrochemical disinfection of natural coastal/estuarine water, which i

211 ons), 74.8% for glove use (n=4915), 4.8% for disinfection of reusable equipment (n=841), and 43.3% fo

212 into four domains: hand hygiene, glove use, disinfection of reusable equipment, and waste management

213 Disinfection of such wastewater is essential to prevent

214 Rapid disinfection of the hospital WDS with a chlorinated, alk

215 ted the challenge of cleaning and high-level disinfection of these instruments.

216 ypochlorite, and generated hypochlorite) for disinfection of three surface types (stainless steel, he

217 f vaccination was combined with cleaning and disinfection of transport vehicles twice a week, vaccina

218 In this study, disinfection of urban wastewater (UWW) with two solar pr

219 In the scale-up of CBS, disinfection of urine transport containers is expected t

220 th open water areas DOM can promote sunlight disinfection of wastewater effluent, but a better unders

221 Disinfection of wastewaters increased mammalian cytotoxi

222 11 fixed sites, the impact of monochloramine disinfection on Legionella, heterotrophic bacteria (36 d

223 munity beta-diversity, with the exception of disinfection on the fungal community structure.

224 nation with MDRO or any other bacteria after disinfection or sterilization by 3 different methods.

225 Assuring appropriate cleaning and disinfection or sterilization of medical equipment is ne

226 e use of sterilization instead of high-level disinfection or the use of routine microbial culturing t

227 Photoactivated disinfection (PAD) could support the periodontal treatme

228 arges and treated effluent processed by a UV-disinfection plant following activated sludge treatment

229 on and ozonation protocols mimicking typical disinfection practice to compare loadings of ambient spe

230 Wastewater treatment plant disinfection practices informed by MS2 inactivation data

231 ibit genogroup dependent resistance and that disinfection practices targeting hNoV GII will result in

232 sociated outbreaks were due to inappropriate disinfection practices.

233 ile AR E. faecalis was more resistant to the disinfection process (240 min to reach DL).

234 V after exposure to UV(254), a commonly used disinfection process in the water industry.

235 monochloramine, we investigated the bacteria disinfection process using Fourier transform infrared sp

236 conveying antibiotic resistance survive the disinfection process, environmental bacteria may take th

237 only minor isotope fractionation during the disinfection process.

238 a is not indispensable in the photocatalytic disinfection process.

239 that EPS underwent during the monochloramine disinfection process.

240 nformation in designing an Fe(VI) wastewater disinfection process.

241 e further understanding of UV-based advanced disinfection processes (ADPs).

242 Ps), we monitored three WWTPs with different disinfection processes (chlorine, peracetic acid (PAA),

243 Wastewater disinfection processes are typically designed according

244 water purification, but the effectiveness of disinfection processes on norovirus is largely unknown o

245 y of bacteria and of associated ARGs, of the disinfection processes only PAA efficiently removed bact

246 been considered potentially highly effective disinfection processes.

247 iated LD, even in the setting of a long-term disinfection program.

248 resolved after we implemented an intensified disinfection protocol and used sterile water for heater-

249 Hydrogen peroxide is widely used for disinfection purposes by food industry enterprises.

250 3% of E. coli O157:H7 died within 2 h with a disinfection rate constant of k = 0.01 min(-1), which is

251 sing the hand hygiene compliance of HCWs and disinfection rate of environment, and decreasing the tra

252 ation and promote the generation of ROS, the disinfection rate was increased a further sixfold.

253 isinfection and proposes a model to estimate disinfection rates and to apportion the contributions of

254 The model shows that disinfection rates are increased by a further 50-85% whe

255 ynamics model has been developed to quantify disinfection rates within a typical ventilated room.

256 disinfection and therefore drives the virus disinfection regulations set by the U.S. Environmental P

257 g with the disinfectant and the mechanism of disinfection remains elusive.

258 er understanding of the mechanism underlying disinfection resistance in waterborne viruses, and proce

259 attention has been devoted to characterizing disinfection resistance.

260 In these pools, chlorine added for disinfection results in the formation of bromine, due to

261 Disinfection results showed no significant differences b

262 racts and bromide were treated under various disinfection scenarios to elucidate the mechanisms of Br

263 ic matter (DOM) isolates were subjected to 3 disinfection scenarios: NH2Cl, prechlorination followed

264 randomly reprocessed by standard high-level disinfection (sHLD), double high-level disinfection (dHL

265 ted fouling, the application of an oxidation/disinfection step can be an effective complement to coag

266 mparison to qPCR results across the chlorine disinfection step saw no significant change in slow grow

267 se in relative abundance across the chlorine disinfection step.

268 ings can be used to design effective DUV LED disinfection strategies for various surface conditions a

269 nsors to detect infectious viruses and novel disinfection strategies to provide safe water.

270 ay thus become harder to eliminate by common disinfection strategies.

271 appropriate infection control practices and disinfection strategies.

272 ial as a non-invasive, minimally destructive disinfection strategy.

273 luated as an alternative to a chlorine-based disinfection strategy.

274 Here we show that electrochemical disinfection, suggested as a candidate for successful ba

275 In drinking water disinfection, switching from free chlorine to alternativ

276 nd health education, followed by environment disinfection, symptom surveillance, and school closure.

277 ed to estimate HuNoV inactivation in UV(254) disinfection systems.

278 tal knowledge are key for development of new disinfection technologies and novel sensors to detect in

279 iodes (UV-C LEDs) are becoming a competitive disinfection technology but are limited by their small i

280 n this study, we demonstrate that functional disinfection temperatures can be easily achieved with un

281 Ten surface disinfection tests with SARS-CoV-2, and 15 tests with su

282 ion plays a role when viruses are exposed to disinfection that targets the capsid, but less so when t

283 at after sodium hypochlorite (dilute bleach) disinfection, the virus was undetectable, but only 2 of

284 is case also highlights the role of adequate disinfection throughout drinking water distribution syst

285 sts that it will be beneficial to upgrade UV disinfection to UV/H2O2 ADP for the inactivation of vira

286 However, during disinfection, toxic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) are f

287 ection against temperature and the classical disinfection treatments used in drinking water productio

288 normally used to assess the effectiveness of disinfection treatments; however flow cytometry proved t

289 gnificant change in slow grower counts at CT disinfection values </=90 mg.min/L; only an increase to

290 selected unregulated DBPs following chlorine disinfection was evaluated.

291 lternate days when upper room germicidal air disinfection was turned on throughout the ward.

292 ompliance, particularly for hand hygiene and disinfection, was inadequate in these outpatient setting

293 nd spectroscopic materials analysis, surface disinfection, water purification, active electromagnetic

294 ource-sink dynamics and pathogen control via disinfection, we demonstrate that complete eradication o

295 Vaccination and disinfection were strongly and positively correlated wit

296 e bacterial community is primarily driven by disinfection while the eukaryotic community is primarily

297 icals played a moderate role in the enhanced disinfection, while the synergistic effect presented a g

298 environmental decontamination, and bacteria disinfection will be presented in detail.

299 After disinfection with 1.25% NaOCl and triple antibiotic past

300 Upper room germicidal ultraviolet (UV) air disinfection with air mixing has been shown to be highly