戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 the biologic effect of a nonuniform absorbed dose distribution.
2 er image modalities to calculate a segmental dose distribution.
3 all fractions in comparison with the planned dose distribution.
4 vity usually leads to heterogeneous absorbed dose distribution.
5  may be limited by its neglect of nonuniform dose distribution.
6  flask wall scattering and the corresponding dose distribution.
7 o compute the liver NTCP from the microscale dose distribution.
8 ton point kernel to produce images of (131)I dose distribution.
9  could be varied to better control the final dose distribution.
10 rst 5 d when using heterogeneous and uniform dose distributions.
11 Organ dosimetry confirmed favorable absorbed dose distributions.
12 the match between SPECT/CT-based and nominal dose distributions.
13 e integrated over time to obtain 3D absorbed dose distributions.
14 with standard radiotherapy but similar depth dose distributions.
15                             Results: Planned dose distributions achieved greater than 90% TCP in all
16  protocol achieved a more balanced radiation dose distribution across age and water-equivalent diamet
17 ng IMRT is aimed at exploiting inhomogeneous dose distributions adapted to tumor heterogeneity.
18 mic-number struts, induced cold spots in the dose distribution adjacent to the wires of </=35%.
19 capacity of IMRT to produce highly conformal dose distributions affords the opportunity to decrease t
20                                          The dose distribution among individual cells, because of bot
21                                   Nonuniform dose distributions among disseminated tumor cells can be
22 d radiation therapy (IMRT) is that its tight dose distribution, an advantage in reducing RT morbidity
23      Using the MCNP4b code, both the spatial dose distribution and a dose-volume histogram were obtai
24 ransformed the 3D lesion distribution into a dose distribution and compared it with predictions from
25 hat in general allowing for heterogeneity in dose distribution and haematopoietic stem cell migration
26 o TOMO and IMRT, VMAT achieved better target dose distribution and similar sparing of critical struct
27   In larger tumor, VMAT provided the optimal dose distribution and sparing to heart.
28 ectron beam was focused to control the depth dose distribution and to improve the dose conformality i
29 ron radiotherapy offers advantages in either dose distribution and/or improved radiobiology that may
30 y tissues has led to attempts to improve the dose distributions and biological effects achievable wit
31 s have been extended to acquire RBE-weighted dose distributions and calculated, along with other RBE
32  S values for constructing three-dimensional dose distributions and dose-volume histograms and techni
33 osures by integrating Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions, and successfully fit to cellular pro
34                         Gamma indices of the dose distributions are better than 99.6% for all the tes
35                          Nonuniform absorbed dose distributions are inefficient in sterilizing tumors
36 hybrid framework was applied to estimate the dose distributions around GNPs due to the secondary elec
37 rgy-specific collimation can generate better dose distributions as a logical next step to maximize th
38 otron X-rays to deliver highly heterogeneous dose distributions at a micrometric scale.
39                     Comparisons of radiation dose distributions between photon and proton techniques
40 del, it is possible to represent an absorbed dose distribution by a biologically effective dose (BED)
41 rmore, with HDR brachytherapy, the radiation dose distribution can be tailored around critical anatom
42 gave for the less irradiated tissue a lobule dose distribution centered around 103 Gy (full width at
43  Due to nonuniform and system-dependent UV-C dose distributions, characterizing UV-C dose and resulti
44 ially produce a more favourable radiotherapy dose distribution compared to a state-of-the-art photon
45  decades as an effective approach to improve dose distribution compared to conventional photon-based
46              Inhomogeneities in radiotherapy dose distributions covering the vertebrae in children ca
47            There was no significant shift in dose-distribution curves due to the baking process, impl
48 ogeneous (laterally and in depth) volumetric dose distribution (cylindrical volume of 5 mm diameter a
49 inting by numbers is a strategy by which the dose distribution delivered by inverse planned intensity
50 V disinfection systems is governed by the UV dose distribution delivered to the fluid, which is an in
51                              Analysis of the dose distribution demonstrates that the dermis acts as a
52                            The heterogeneous dose distributions differed significantly from the homog
53 m dose was also calculated from the absorbed dose distribution directly.
54 to the calculation of macroscopic nonuniform dose distributions: dose point-kernel convolution, Monte
55                                          The dose distributions due to VHEE need to be optimised; one
56 heres could induce a sufficiently nonuniform dose distribution explaining this paradox.
57                We sought to define threshold dose distributions for 5 major allergenic foods in the E
58 lticentre research on vertebral radiotherapy dose distributions for children, but until more valid da
59                We wanted to derive threshold dose distributions for major allergenic foods and to ela
60   We thus managed to map a desired radiation dose distribution from a patient's PTV and OAR contours.
61                                The resulting dose distributions have a highly localized peak dose, wi
62                                              Dose distributions imposed by the physics of 'standard'
63 ping of the three-dimensional (3D) radiation dose distribution in a complex clinical radiotherapy tre
64                   To determine the radiation dose distribution in nonvascularized microtumors of vari
65                   Measurement of the spatial dose distribution in organs and tumors is needed to info
66 ective was to compare the regional radiation dose distribution in patients that developed xerostomia
67 pose of this study was to analyze the actual dose distribution in routine chest CT examination protoc
68 Proton therapy generates even more exquisite dose distribution in some patients, thus potentially fur
69 es to a better understanding of the absorbed dose distribution in the fetus.
70 C) simulations were used to predict the true dose distribution in the phantom allowing for comparison
71  quantified the siRNA duplexes and cisplatin dose distribution in various tissues and organs using an
72 s can help in the detailed assessment of the dose distributions in the hepatic functional subunits an
73 T at multiple time points to obtain absorbed dose distributions in the presence of tumor deformation
74 a discussion of the use of three-dimensional dose distributions in understanding and predicting biolo
75                                      Placing dose distribution information into PACS facilitates cent
76                      Our knowledge about the dose distribution is derived solely from modeling approa
77  optimum effect, real-time knowledge of skin-dose distribution is invaluable.
78  it should be kept in mind that the absorbed dose distribution is mainly a convolved version of the u
79 cally, one should remember that the absorbed dose distribution is mainly a convolved version of the u
80 tative SPECT/CT imaging leads to voxel-based dose distributions largely differing from the real organ
81 tative SPECT/CT imaging leads to voxel-based dose distributions largely differing from the real organ
82 rd radiotherapy beams but more optimal depth dose distributions, making it particularly advantageous
83                                  A radiation dose distribution map is generated for each patient inte
84            Stents that minimally perturb the dose distribution may be deployed before irradiation.
85 adiated from 36 different angles to obtain a dose distribution mimicking a stereotactic radiotherapy
86                        By using a log-normal dose-distribution model, the ED5 was calculated to be 1.
87 erence doses were developed from statistical dose-distribution modeling of individual thresholds of p
88         A total of 40 samples from phosphate-dosed distribution networks were analyzed from across En
89                                       The 2D dose distributions obtained from the film measurements a
90 dge, the first quantification of the spatial dose distribution of charged particles in biologically r
91 s at low doses, compared to the more uniform dose distribution of electrons, juxtaposed with neuron m
92 opography and correlates positively with the dose distribution of solar light on the retinal sphere.
93      The 2%/2 mm local gamma analysis of the dose distribution of the collimated beam spot determined
94                                              Dose distributions of adapted and scheduled plans optimi
95 ially smaller subset of OARs, neglecting the dose distributions of other OARs.
96 roperties of fast neutrons with the physical dose distributions of protons, and preliminary data indi
97 ble the large-scale comparison of incidental dose distributions of thousands of patients treated in t
98                                          The dose distributions of unfocused VHEE produce high entran
99  in relation to retinal topography and light dose distribution on the retinal sphere.
100 yielded mean organ-absorbed doses or spatial dose distributions over tumors and normal organs.
101 e this relationship and investigate if other dose-distribution parameters are better predictors for A
102                         Both MHD and various dose-distribution parameters of the cardiac substructure
103                                              Dose distributions (percentiles) were calculated for eac
104 sing the biologic consequences of nonuniform dose distributions produced in tumors by biologically ta
105 s, as well as the effects of stents on gamma-dose distributions, requires further investigation.
106                     To address this issue, a dose distribution scaling method was developed based on
107                                    Threshold dose distributions showed a good statistical and visual
108                                           2D dose distributions showed discrepancies to the planned d
109                                  Analysis of dose distribution suggests this variation results from d
110 biologically individualized strategies, with dose distribution tailored to the specific tumor biology
111             Ions provide a more advantageous dose distribution than photons for external beam radioth
112 gy Electrons (VHEEs) provide more favourable dose distributions than conventional radiotherapy electr
113    Original IMRT plans showed more conformal dose distributions than those in 3D CRT and 2D plans.
114                         IMRT may result in a dose distribution that is more conformal than that achie
115 ite tailoring of three-dimensional radiation dose distributions that conform to the tumor treatment v
116 sibility of generating dramatically improved dose distributions that could be tailored to fit a compl
117 vements in radiation plan quality and yields dose distributions that more closely mimic the clinical
118 objectives included safety and tolerability, dose distribution, the overall response rate (ORR), dise
119       Based on the key assumption of uniform dose distributions, the LSA approach consistently produc
120 directly translate into unrealistic absorbed dose distributions, thus questioning the reliability of
121 tments by conforming the delivered radiation dose distribution tightly to the tumor or target volume
122 es were used to convert the spatial absorbed dose distribution to a biologically effective dose distr
123 hnique was used to plan a uniform, conformal dose distribution to the target volume, which was the pr
124               There was little difference in dose distribution to the volume receiving 100% of the pr
125 t positioning, resulting in highly conformal dose distribution via the optimal placement of individua
126           A framework was developed in which dose distribution volumes are uploaded onto the medical
127                    Afterward, the microscale dose distribution was computed using a dose deposition k
128           The effect of tube start angles on dose distribution was investigated with Monte Carlo simu
129 racy of a skin dose tool to estimate patient dose distribution was verified with phantom studies by u
130                                        Depth dose distributions were calculated using Monte Carlo sim
131  these activity concentration maps, absorbed dose distributions were calculated with pre-calculated (
132  these activity concentration maps, absorbed dose distributions were calculated with precalculated (1
133                 Confidence intervals for the dose distributions were determined by using bootstrap re
134 om was performed, and the resulting absorbed dose distributions were examined.
135 om was performed, and the resulting absorbed dose distributions were examined.
136                                              Dose distributions were measured with Gafchromic film.
137                                              Dose distributions were modeled by using interval-censor
138                                              Dose distributions were modeled, deriving eliciting dose
139                                              Dose distributions were obtained by means of Monte Carlo
140                                              Dose distributions were simulated for 22 patients after
141             The time-dependent 3D cumulative dose distributions were used to generate 3D BED distribu
142 ose distribution to a biologically effective dose distribution, which was then used to estimate a sin
143 pecific activities, the penetration rate and dose distribution will be more favorable for such tumors
144                         We obtained a radial dose distribution with sub-micrometer resolution that de
145 ach was demonstrated to allow scaling of the dose distribution with these critical, dimensionless var
146                  Studies have shown improved dose distribution with VHEE in treatment plans, in compa
147 e can be adequately achieved with comparable dose distributions with eight or more sources.
148          Shrimp provided radically different dose distributions, with an ED10 value of 2.5 g of prote
149 foods used for challenge, 4 produced similar dose distributions, with estimated doses eliciting react
150  differed significantly from the homogeneous dose distributions, with their corresponding average S v
151 us measurement of the dose delivered and the dose distribution within a 2D plane, respectively.
152                                 The absorbed dose distribution within individual tumors was widely di
153                   The accurate prediction of dose distributions would alleviate this issue by guiding

 
Page Top