戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  mouse visual cortex during stimulation with drifting gratings.
2 ts spatial-frequency tuning as measured with drifting gratings.
3  of P and 6 % of M cells responded poorly to drifting gratings.
4 ly predict the amplitude of the responses to drifting gratings.
5 were characterized with both white noise and drifting gratings.
6  on Simple cells in layer 4Ca in response to drifting gratings.
7 t were approximately half that evoked by the drifting gratings (1.0% +/- 0.1% versus 2.1% +/- 0.3%, P
8 es of dorsal V2 and dorsal V3, small bars of drifting gratings along the horizontal meridian of the c
9 unmodulated components of spike responses to drifting gratings, an index that forms a bimodal distrib
10 tial resolution of LGN neuronal responses to drifting grating and white noise stimuli when CG neurons
11 ice, the arrays allowed for the detection of drifting gratings and flashing objects at light-intensit
12                  The response of MC cells to drifting gratings and flashing spots was halved by drift
13  male adult rats, during the presentation of drifting gratings and noise movies.
14 discriminate the direction of motion of both drifting gratings and random dot stimuli in their impair
15 ency, receptive-field size, phase-locking to drifting gratings and response decay timescale-are all c
16 minance increments, contrast sensitivity for drifting gratings, and the extraction of motion signal f
17 oral frequencies; (2) plaids composed of two drifting gratings; and (3) gratings masked by full-scree
18 ms can occur when two low-contrast collinear drifting gratings are separated by a blank gap, leading
19 rformance in flicker detection, detection of drifting gratings (at low spatial frequencies), speed di
20  stimuli of differing complexity: sinusoidal drifting gratings, binary dense noise, and natural movie
21                 This mechanism responds to a drifting grating by modulating firing at the drift frequ
22 of a direction-selective ganglion cell using drifting gratings can reverse this cell's directional pr
23            Surprisingly, visual responses to drifting gratings in retinal axonal boutons were robustl
24 rection, SF and TF, and speed in response to drifting gratings in V1 and PM of anesthetized mice.
25 cross various stimulus conditions, including drifting gratings, naturalistic movies, and spontaneous
26                   We study the response to a drifting grating of a network model of layer 2/3 with ra
27 ive fields of single neurons with patches of drifting grating of optimal spatial frequency and orient
28 ormation using asymmetric plaids composed of drifting gratings of different directions and speeds.
29 sented large stimulus sets consisting of (1) drifting gratings of various orientations and spatiotemp
30        Motion thresholds for 1 cycle deg(-1) drifting gratings or static pulsed gratings on the orang
31 plaids--stimuli composed of two orthogonally drifting gratings, presented separately to each eye--in
32  elevated motion perception thresholds for a drifting grating (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5).
33              Stimulation of the model with a drifting grating shows that direction selectivity result
34 een excitation and inhibition in response to drifting gratings.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The wiring of e
35 ssing during visual stimulus presentation of drifting gratings significantly impaired discrimination
36 re too sparse and the deflection response to drifting grating stimuli (e.g. tuning curves) are well s
37 cortical neurons in the cat while presenting drifting grating stimuli of varying lengths.
38 ulated firing rates (F1 values) generated by drifting grating stimuli, and their associated interspik
39 ed discrimination tasks and passively viewed drifting grating stimuli.
40 ue primary visual cortex (V1) in response to drifting grating stimuli.
41                  Adaptation with an oriented drifting grating stimulus alters responses of neurons lo
42                Subjects viewed a lateralized drifting grating stimulus, presented at multiple stimulu
43 ual cortex are optimized for the length of a drifting grating stimulus.
44 -evoked fMRI signal increase associated with drifting-grating stimulus was 1.7% +/- 0.5% (P < 10(-4),
45 : (1) stimulation of simple cells in V1 with drifting gratings supports a wiring schema of spatially
46 r to the preferred orientation measured with drifting gratings than is the orientation preference of
47 ipheral targets and reported the location of drifting gratings that became visible during saccade exe
48 lem.' Here we manipulate contrast in several drifting gratings that can be perceived as either indepe
49 d on a human paradigm, we presented illusory drifting gratings to mice.
50  in their temporal frequency selectivity for drifting gratings versus the envelope of interference pa
51 aque primary visual cortex V1 in response to drifting grating visual stimuli, were evaluated on coars
52 ng vs electrophysiology), and stimulus type (drifting gratings vs moving dots, full field vs small pa
53 lectivity of each complex cell measured with drifting gratings was also well predicted by the combina
54  Following prolonged visual stimulation with drifting gratings, we observed significant differences i
55 in V1, whereas 56% of total spikes evoked by drifting gratings were from layers 2, 3, and 4B.
56                                              Drifting gratings were presented to the receptive fields
57       The CRF was stimulated with an optimal drifting grating, whereas the surround was probed with a
58 Here, we show that prolonged adaptation with drifting gratings, which alters responses in the early v
59 orticotectal neurons responded to sinusoidal drifting gratings with a nonlinear (nonsinusoidal) incre
60                          We presented visual drifting gratings with and without simultaneous auditory
61  displayed a stronger tendency to respond to drifting gratings with different orientations while main
62                            SINs responded to drifting gratings with increased firing rates (F0) for a
63 nd only 12% in PM were tuned to the speed of drifting gratings with PM preferring slower drift rates
64 first harmonic (F1) to low-spatial frequency drifting gratings ("Y-cell signature").