コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 mouse visual cortex during stimulation with drifting gratings.
2 ts spatial-frequency tuning as measured with drifting gratings.
3 of P and 6 % of M cells responded poorly to drifting gratings.
4 ly predict the amplitude of the responses to drifting gratings.
5 were characterized with both white noise and drifting gratings.
6 on Simple cells in layer 4Ca in response to drifting gratings.
7 t were approximately half that evoked by the drifting gratings (1.0% +/- 0.1% versus 2.1% +/- 0.3%, P
8 es of dorsal V2 and dorsal V3, small bars of drifting gratings along the horizontal meridian of the c
9 unmodulated components of spike responses to drifting gratings, an index that forms a bimodal distrib
10 tial resolution of LGN neuronal responses to drifting grating and white noise stimuli when CG neurons
11 ice, the arrays allowed for the detection of drifting gratings and flashing objects at light-intensit
14 discriminate the direction of motion of both drifting gratings and random dot stimuli in their impair
15 ency, receptive-field size, phase-locking to drifting gratings and response decay timescale-are all c
16 minance increments, contrast sensitivity for drifting gratings, and the extraction of motion signal f
17 oral frequencies; (2) plaids composed of two drifting gratings; and (3) gratings masked by full-scree
18 ms can occur when two low-contrast collinear drifting gratings are separated by a blank gap, leading
19 rformance in flicker detection, detection of drifting gratings (at low spatial frequencies), speed di
20 stimuli of differing complexity: sinusoidal drifting gratings, binary dense noise, and natural movie
22 of a direction-selective ganglion cell using drifting gratings can reverse this cell's directional pr
24 rection, SF and TF, and speed in response to drifting gratings in V1 and PM of anesthetized mice.
25 cross various stimulus conditions, including drifting gratings, naturalistic movies, and spontaneous
27 ive fields of single neurons with patches of drifting grating of optimal spatial frequency and orient
28 ormation using asymmetric plaids composed of drifting gratings of different directions and speeds.
29 sented large stimulus sets consisting of (1) drifting gratings of various orientations and spatiotemp
31 plaids--stimuli composed of two orthogonally drifting gratings, presented separately to each eye--in
34 een excitation and inhibition in response to drifting gratings.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The wiring of e
35 ssing during visual stimulus presentation of drifting gratings significantly impaired discrimination
36 re too sparse and the deflection response to drifting grating stimuli (e.g. tuning curves) are well s
38 ulated firing rates (F1 values) generated by drifting grating stimuli, and their associated interspik
44 -evoked fMRI signal increase associated with drifting-grating stimulus was 1.7% +/- 0.5% (P < 10(-4),
45 : (1) stimulation of simple cells in V1 with drifting gratings supports a wiring schema of spatially
46 r to the preferred orientation measured with drifting gratings than is the orientation preference of
47 ipheral targets and reported the location of drifting gratings that became visible during saccade exe
48 lem.' Here we manipulate contrast in several drifting gratings that can be perceived as either indepe
50 in their temporal frequency selectivity for drifting gratings versus the envelope of interference pa
51 aque primary visual cortex V1 in response to drifting grating visual stimuli, were evaluated on coars
52 ng vs electrophysiology), and stimulus type (drifting gratings vs moving dots, full field vs small pa
53 lectivity of each complex cell measured with drifting gratings was also well predicted by the combina
54 Following prolonged visual stimulation with drifting gratings, we observed significant differences i
58 Here, we show that prolonged adaptation with drifting gratings, which alters responses in the early v
59 orticotectal neurons responded to sinusoidal drifting gratings with a nonlinear (nonsinusoidal) incre
61 displayed a stronger tendency to respond to drifting gratings with different orientations while main
63 nd only 12% in PM were tuned to the speed of drifting gratings with PM preferring slower drift rates