コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tion of allergic patients (e.g., in food and drug allergy).
2 tion should potentially not be allowed (e.g. drug allergy).
3 od allergies, anaphylaxis, insect venom, and drug allergy.
4 is and management of patients with suspected drug allergy.
5 None correlated with history of drug allergy.
6 ms, diagnosis, management, and prevention of drug allergy.
7 Infectious Diseases sponsored a workshop on drug allergy.
8 o issue an International CONsensus (ICON) on drug allergy.
9 e of 0.02-0.4 g), and 4 of 368 patients with drug allergy.
10 allograft dysfunction such as infection and drug allergy.
11 s, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or drug allergy.
12 result and may be considered indicative of a drug allergy.
13 AT in the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food and drug allergies.
14 red questionnaire on environmental, food and drug allergies.
15 new concepts for treatment and prevention of drug allergies.
16 esponses, including food, environmental, and drug allergies.
17 included food allergy (4.2%, 6.4%: p = 1.0), drug allergy (37.5%, 16.6%: p = 0.02), allergic rhinitis
19 8; 95% CI, 1.4-16.4) and parental history of drug allergy (adjusted odds ratio = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.8
21 x types of allergic reactions: food allergy, drug allergy, allergic contact dermatitis, allergic rhin
22 support quality management of patients with drug allergies and better facilitate healthcare planning
23 to support the diagnosis of food, venom and drug allergies and chronic urticaria, to monitor the nat
24 e aimed to describe the prevalence of common drug allergies and patient characteristics documented in
25 al disease, metabolic bone disease, cancers, drug allergies and toxic effects, and complications asso
26 completing testing and surveys had 1 or more drug allergies and were recruited from allergy clinics a
28 actams are among the most frequent causes of drug allergy and constitute an important clinical proble
32 ts were excluded before randomization due to drug allergy and opted for alternative treatment (5.8%),
35 atients with AOSD had a higher prevalence of drug allergy, and allergic rhinitis/allergic conjunctivi
36 tial for precision medicine in food allergy, drug allergy, and anaphylaxis under the auspices of the
38 is, asthma, atopic dermatitis, food allergy, drug allergy, and primary immune deficiency disease in r
40 physiology and diagnosis of non-IgE-mediated drug allergy are offered, with novel data regarding the
42 the 1250 outpatients referred for suspected drug allergy between July 2013 and June 2014 were evalua
44 n medicine approach to treatment of food and drug allergy, but further validation and quantification
45 Standardized protocols, including DPT in drug allergy centers, are essential to differentiate pro
47 nce of dedicated categories for food and non-drug allergies contributes to systematic underreporting.
54 hylaxis, angioedema, asthma, conjunctivitis, drug allergies, eczema, food allergy, rhinitis, urticari
55 igated according to the European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) guidelines and patients found to be
57 NSAIDs) proposed by the European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) interest group (2011) was revised in
58 nes were devised by the European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) on behalf of the European Academy of
59 While the reaction history is critical for drug allergy evaluations and is typically self-reported,
60 uidelines for investigation of perioperative drug allergy exist, but the quality of services is unkno
61 ng system developed through the consensus of drug allergy experts from the United States Drug Allergy
65 linical Immunology (EAACI) Interest Group on Drug Allergy has performed a literature search on skin t
76 rvey was emailed to all members of the EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group (DAIG) between February and
77 y of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Drug Allergy Interest Group (DAIG) on how European aller
78 us, the European Network on Drug Allergy and Drug Allergy Interest Group of the European Academy of A
79 The European Network on Drug Allergy and Drug Allergy Interest Group of the European Academy of A
80 us, the European Network on Drug Allergy and Drug Allergy Interest Group of the European Academy of A
83 ite, 11% Hispanic ethnicity), 29 with single drug allergy labels and 50 with multiple drug allergy la
87 The plasma samples, in contrast, came from 3 drug allergy-negative control patients, or 2 cefazolin-a
94 llergy and Clinical Immunology interested in drug allergy participated in an online questionnaire on
95 ogy have formed a task force and developed a drug allergy passport as well as general guidelines of d
99 in test reagents, lack of formal training in drug allergy, pre-emptive, non-standardised and unregula
100 ionnaire (Study-Q), the European Network for Drug Allergy Questionnaire (ENDA-Q), and confirmatory di
101 implicated in systemic hypersensitivity and drug allergy reactions, are targeted by a polyclonal pop
108 ion influences the risk of commonly reported drug allergies such as penicillin allergy remains largel
109 icle based in vitro diagnostic technique for drug allergies to two common platinum-based chemotherape
114 35.5% of patients had at least one reported drug allergy with an average of 1.95 drug allergies per
116 4 [1.3-8.9], and with cANCA 3.3 [1.0-10.8]), drug allergy (with PSV 3.6 [1.8-7.0], with WG 4.0 [1.8-8
118 ta-lactam (BL) allergies are the most common drug allergy worldwide, but most are reported in error.