戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 age drug fragment couplings (e.g., flutamide-duloxetine).
2 uated these sex differences in the effect of duloxetine.
3 ioural response of Caenorhabditis elegans to duloxetine.
4 ct animals, rats of neither sex responded to duloxetine.
5 o may respond optimally to therapies such as duloxetine.
6 d randomized trial comparing placebo pill to duloxetine.
7 a moderate recommendation for treatment with duloxetine.
8 e followed by placebo or placebo followed by duloxetine.
9 nanomolar range and is comparable to that of duloxetine.
10 significantly increased starting at 120 mg/d duloxetine.
11 utility was 0.52 for nortriptyline, 0.43 for duloxetine, 0.05 for pregabalin, and 0.00 for mexiletine
12 erotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine, 0.71%; venlafaxine, 1.54%), a tricyclic anti
13 icantly at 2 weeks of treatment with 80 mg/d duloxetine (11.3 at baseline, 3.4 at 240 mg/d, P<0.001).
14 n treatments (CBT: 10.2, escitalopram: 11.1, duloxetine: 11.2).
15  SUCRA-based relative ranking of treatments, duloxetine 120 mg was associated with higher efficacy fo
16                                              Duloxetine 120 mg was associated with the highest improv
17 lowing doses were compared: 60-mg and 120-mg duloxetine; 150-mg, 300-mg, 450-mg, and 600-mg pregabali
18 with CBT (16 1-hour sessions) or medication (duloxetine 30-60 mg/day or escitalopram 10-20 mg/day).
19 gine (56%), followed by oxcarbazepine (46%), duloxetine (30%), carbamazepine (26%), topiramate (25%),
20                   One was a 10-week trial of duloxetine (30-120 mg daily; mean 92.1 mg/day [SD 30.00]
21  treatment with escitalopram (10-20 mg/day), duloxetine (30-60 mg/day), or CBT (16 50-minute sessions
22 treatments (CBT: 41.9%, escitalopram: 46.7%, duloxetine: 54.7%).
23 , subjects were randomly assigned to receive duloxetine 60 mg twice a day (n = 104) or placebo (n = 1
24 lind, placebo-controlled, active-referenced (duloxetine 60 mg), parallel-group study evaluated the sh
25                                              Duloxetine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhi
26                                              Duloxetine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibito
27 was rapidly normalized by spinal delivery of duloxetine acting via 5-hydroxytryptamine type 2A recept
28 rate a role of neuroendocrine stress axes in duloxetine analgesia (anti-hyperalgesia) for the treatme
29 enrolled patients, 127 patients treated with duloxetine and 128 who received placebo were evaluable f
30 s for the study were that the indication for duloxetine and a direct measurement of depression severi
31                                              Duloxetine and comparator SSRI.
32 orepinephrine/serotonin reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine and milnacipran) in fibromyalgia.
33 onin and norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors--duloxetine and milnacipran--and the anticonvulsant prega
34 adrenaline re-uptake inhibitors, for example duloxetine and milnacipran.
35 difference in the average pain score between duloxetine and placebo was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.26-1.20).
36                                              Duloxetine and SSRI did not differ in efficacy, and comp
37 serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, duloxetine and the serotonin selective reuptake inhibito
38  settings, the analgesic actions of the SNRI duloxetine and the SSRI fluoxetine were differentially a
39                       IRs were similar among duloxetine and untreated patients (0.5/1000 PY [95 % CI:
40 mm Hg (PD30) increased dose-dependently with duloxetine and was significant at the end of the 120-mg/
41 er day for amitriptyline, 120 mg per day for duloxetine, and 600 mg per day for pregabalin).
42 s in the synthesis of ezetimibe, dapoxetine, duloxetine, and atomoxetine.
43  with amitriptyline (off-label), pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran (on-label) in reducing fibro
44 e treatment of fibromyalgia, but pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran are the only pharmacological
45  drugs as first-line therapy, or tramadol or duloxetine as second-line therapy.
46                        Individuals receiving duloxetine as their initial 5-week treatment reported a
47 veral other pharmaceutical agents, including duloxetine, atomoxetine, fluoxetine and tolterodine.
48                                 We find that duloxetine binds to several metabolic enzymes and change
49                                 Furthermore, duloxetine blunted an increase in corticosterone induced
50 done, phenelzine, imipramine, amitriptyline, duloxetine, bupropion, trazodone, tianeptine, and agomel
51 clinical trial, we found that treatment with duloxetine, but not placebo, normalized DMN connectivity
52 cumulation of the widely used antidepressant duloxetine by using click chemistry, thermal proteome pr
53  modafinil, levodopa, rotigotine, clozapine, duloxetine, clonazepam, ramelteon, gabapentin, zonisamid
54 arge, randomized placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine collected before and 8 weeks after treatment.
55 py-induced peripheral neuropathy, the use of duloxetine compared with placebo for 5 weeks resulted in
56                                              Duloxetine compared with placebo improved (pooled risk d
57  0.82 points lower for patients who received duloxetine compared with those who received placebo (95%
58 these cultures with the L1 mimetic compounds duloxetine, crotamiton, and trimebutine rescued impaired
59                 There was strong evidence of duloxetine, desvenlafaxine, and levomilnacipran increasi
60                                  Paroxetine, duloxetine, desvenlafaxine, and venlafaxine were associa
61 udy evaluates the association of exposure to duloxetine during pregnancy and the risk of major and mi
62 r stillbirth was associated with exposure to duloxetine during pregnancy.
63 uncovered in 6/19 participants a tendency of duloxetine enhancing predicted placebo response, while i
64 line, bupropion, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levom
65 depression in adults: bupropion, citalopram, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, milna
66 line, citalopram, clomipramine, desipramine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, imipramine, mirtaz
67                                              Duloxetine exerts only modest relief of male stress urin
68 ted of more than 2 million births with 1,512 duloxetine-exposed pregnancies.
69                                              Duloxetine-exposed versus duloxetine-nonexposed PS-match
70                                              Duloxetine-exposed women were compared with 4 comparator
71 , amitriptyline, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, nefazo
72 ignificantly fewer discontinuations than did duloxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, reboxetine, and ven
73 , patients were randomized to receive either duloxetine followed by placebo or placebo followed by du
74         Conclusion Results of treatment with duloxetine for AIMSS were superior to those of placebo a
75 mantadine for BD, retinoic acid for MDD, and duloxetine for CTP.
76 e behavioral therapy (CBT), escitalopram, or duloxetine for major depressive disorder.
77 ing to the antidepressant venlafaxine XR (or duloxetine for those not eligible to receive venlafaxine
78 with increases in total cholesterol and, for duloxetine, glucose concentrations, despite all drugs re
79 stress urinary incontinence, confirming that duloxetine had a modest positive effect in men with post
80  Patients given imipramine, venlafaxine, and duloxetine had more discontinuations due to adverse even
81 njections provide short-term pain relief and duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy.
82 pion hydrochloride, citalopram hydrobromide, duloxetine hydrochloride, escitalopram oxalate, fluoxeti
83                                   Effects of duloxetine hydrochloride, selective serotonin reuptake i
84                                              Duloxetine improved but did not resolve urinary incontin
85 study further examines the hepatic safety of duloxetine in a large US health insurance database.
86 thalamic-pituitary-adrenal, to the effect of duloxetine in preclinical models of oxaliplatin- and pac
87 antidepressant medications (escitalopram and duloxetine) in patients with major depression and examin
88 gher but not statistically significant among duloxetine initiators compared to initiators of venlafax
89 hepatic-related death or liver failure among duloxetine initiators compared to venlafaxine and possib
90                                 Among 30,844 duloxetine initiators, 21,000 were matched to venlafaxin
91                                              Duloxetine is a selective serotonin-norepinephrine reupt
92  is ineffective for acute low back pain, and duloxetine is associated with modest effects for chronic
93                              Fetal safety of duloxetine is not well established.
94                                              Duloxetine is the only agent that has appropriate eviden
95                                              Duloxetine is the only treatment for CIPN currently reco
96 tes CIPN, and that the therapeutic effect of duloxetine is thought to be mediated, at least in part,
97                                              Duloxetine is US Food and Drug Administration approved f
98 , or vilazodone) or an SNRI (desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, or venlafaxine
99 munity of accumulators and non-accumulators, duloxetine markedly altered the composition of the commu
100                                              Duloxetine (MD -3.13, 95% credible interval [CrI] -4.13
101 ndomized to receive nortriptyline (n = 134), duloxetine (n = 126), pregabalin (n = 73), or mexiletine
102 ived treatment with escitalopram (n = 22) or duloxetine (n = 14) for 10 weeks.
103 cebo and active-comparator phase 3 trials of duloxetine (n = 2515).
104 cally antagonized NET by a range of doses of duloxetine [(+)-N-methyl-3-(1-naphthalenyloxy)-2 thiophe
105 naline reuptake inhibitors, mainly including duloxetine (nine of 14 studies); 7.7 (6.5-9.4) for prega
106                    Duloxetine-exposed versus duloxetine-nonexposed PS-matched analyses showed odds ra
107  women were compared with 4 comparators: (1) duloxetine-nonexposed women; (2) selective serotonin reu
108 olerability, fluoxetine was also better than duloxetine (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% CrI 0.13 to 0.95)
109 ine were significantly more efficacious than duloxetine (odds ratios [OR] 1.39, 1.33, 1.30 and 1.27,
110  neuroendocrine stress axes in the effect of duloxetine on CIPN, rats of both sexes were submitted to
111 n that stress may impact response of CIPN to duloxetine, open new approaches to the treatment of CIPN
112 first week and 2 capsules of either 30 mg of duloxetine or placebo daily for 4 additional weeks.
113       Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to duloxetine or placebo for 13 weeks.
114 of taking 1 capsule daily of either 30 mg of duloxetine or placebo for the first week and 2 capsules
115 as by randomizing patients to receive either duloxetine or placebo, and it supported true causal infe
116 ed 65 or above were treated by vortioxetine, duloxetine or placebo.
117 e randomly assigned to receive escitalopram, duloxetine, or CBT monotherapy and completed 12 weeks of
118 of treatment withcognitive behavior therapy, duloxetine, or escitalopram were prospectively monitored
119                       For example, high-dose duloxetine outperformed escitalopram in treating core em
120 early superior medication, nortriptyline and duloxetine outperformed pregabalin and mexiletine when p
121 ised after 2 weeks of treatment with 80 mg/d duloxetine (P<0.001), the lowest dose used in the study.
122 talytic protocol for the synthesis of an (S)-duloxetine precursor.
123     Most guidelines recommend amitriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin, or gabapentin as initial analges
124 xine-exposed women; and (4) women exposed to duloxetine prior to, but not during, pregnancy.
125 ns were collected in 32 participants for the duloxetine RCT and 34 participants for the desvenlafaxin
126 ween Jan 26, 2006, and Nov 22, 2011, for the duloxetine RCT and Aug 5, 2012, and Jan 28, 2016, for th
127 away linearly modeled placebo analgesia from duloxetine response, we uncovered in 6/19 participants a
128                               Gabapentin and duloxetine reversed mechanical hyperalgesia but did not
129 e and alprazolam (RR = 1.86); loratadine and duloxetine (RR = 1.94); loratadine and ropinirole (RR =
130 ound that our selected compounds tacrine and duloxetine significantly improved remyelination in the p
131 lafaxine (SMD, -1.53 [CrI, -2.41 to -0.65]), duloxetine (SMD, -1.33 [CrI, -1.82 to -0.86]), and amitr
132                                              Duloxetine, strontium ranelate, and NGF antibodies are p
133 nctional connectivity compared with placebo (duloxetine study: beta=-0.06; 95% CI -0.08 to -0.03; p<0
134 depressive symptom severity in both studies (duloxetine study: r=0.38, 95% CI 0.01-0.65; p=0.0426; de
135 n supplemented with amitriptyline (P-A), and duloxetine supplemented with pregabalin (D-P), each path
136 gabalin supplemented with amitriptyline, and duloxetine supplemented with pregabalin for the treatmen
137 sion and without liver disease who initiated duloxetine to comparators (venlafaxine or selective sero
138 in another 6/19, we uncovered a tendency for duloxetine to diminish it.
139 nd in the wastewater effluent ranged from 3 (duloxetine) to 2190 ng/L (venlafaxine), whereas individu
140 line, escitalopram, citalopram, mirtazapine, duloxetine, trazodone, fluoxetine, bupropion, paroxetine
141 th placebo-treated female subjects (n = 92), duloxetine-treated female subjects (n = 92) demonstrated
142 verse events of any grade were higher in the duloxetine-treated group (78% v 50%); rates of grade 3 a
143 improvement on most efficacy measures, while duloxetine-treated male subjects (n = 12) failed to impr
144                                  Plasma from duloxetine-treated subjects (ex vivo effect) dose-depend
145      Compared with placebo-treated subjects, duloxetine-treated subjects had significantly greater re
146      Compared with placebo-treated subjects, duloxetine-treated subjects improved significantly more
147                                              Duloxetine treatment improved fibromyalgia symptoms and
148   Hepatic injury has been reported following duloxetine use.
149 ty-nine percent of those initially receiving duloxetine vs 38% of those initially receiving placebo r
150 efficacious; and 51 of 134 [38.1%] quit), of duloxetine was 0.80 (95% CrI, 0.68-0.92; 29 of 126 [23.0
151                                              Duloxetine was administered in a randomized, placebo-con
152 trial (with a 1-week placebo lead-in phase), duloxetine was an effective and safe treatment for many
153                                              Duloxetine was approved for the treatment of chronic kne
154 onic low back pain than previously observed, duloxetine was effective for chronic low back pain, and
155                                              Duloxetine was not significantly different from placebo
156                                              Duloxetine was safely administered and well tolerated.
157 xel-induced painful peripheral neuropathy to duloxetine, we demonstrate a major contribution to its e
158                   Systemic administration of duloxetine, which alone had no effect on nociceptive thr
159 newly developed ones, such as pregabalin and duloxetine, while specifically marketed for diabetic neu
160              The primary hypothesis was that duloxetine would be more effective than placebo in decre
161 We hypothesized that treatment of AIMSS with duloxetine would improve average joint pain compared wit

 
Page Top