コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 t) or non-face-to-face encounter (eg, phone, e-mail).
2 le web interface, and receives the output by e-mail.
3 ain documented informed consent before using e-mail.
4 he telephone, a study-specific Web site, and e-mail.
5 reports; online resources; and every 2-week e-mails.
8 outpatient follow-up (clinic, telephone, or e-mail), 7.1% had an ED revisit, 4.7% were hospitalized,
10 oarthritis, or fibromyalgia and Internet and e-mail access (n = 855) were randomized to an interventi
11 ition, the odds that we could find a working e-mail address for the first, last, or corresponding aut
13 rvey was distributed to 510 unique physician e-mail addresses obtained from the American Society of O
16 ypically distributed to patients via mail or e-mail after visiting the Stanford University Hospital w
18 Over a 3-year period, we delivered 12 748 e-mail alerts on 6270 unique patients to 24 IPs covering
20 ent-reported high-grade toxicities triggered e-mail alerts to nurses; printed reports were provided t
21 tom printouts at visits, and nurses received e-mail alerts when participants reported severe or worse
26 e protocols for use on charts; (4) a monthly e-mail and mail reminders for 1 year; and (5) a case dis
27 eural cursor' with which MN opened simulated e-mail and operated devices such as a television, even w
29 n can make good use of written media, video, E-mail and telephone as well as face-to-face interaction
32 in protein families which can be searched by e-mail and World Wide Web servers to classify protein an
34 ation of this information to PCPs via secure e-mail and, if needed, phone calls to ensure message rec
35 20, to August 31, 2020, 307 invitations were e-mailed and survey links were distributed electronicall
43 and exercise information and received weekly e-mail behavioral counseling and feedback from a counsel
47 nts with online access to health records and e-mail communication with physicians may substitute for
48 scribed by a different scaling exponent from e-mail communication, providing evidence for a new class
49 health care providers through an educational e-mail, communication in a weekly newsletter, and a morn
50 of these considerations and construct their e-mail communications accordingly, recognizing that e-ma
55 ause of its widespread availability and use, e-mail correspondence provides an attractive proxy for s
56 of these mechanisms by rescaling letter and e-mail correspondence statistics to reveal their underly
58 counseling (HF-TEL) (n = 76), high-frequency e-mail counseling (HF-EMAIL) (n = 74), or no dietitian c
60 er-event time tau between consecutively sent e-mails decays asymptotically as tau(-alpha), with alpha
61 minated internationally in November 2019 via e-mail directories of pediatric intensive care societies
62 oratory by placing an information request on e-mail discussion groups of infectious disease, microbio
63 l times by teleconference, and held multiple e-mail discussions during a 2-yr period to identify the
64 everal meetings of the steering group and in e-mail discussions with the wider group of TRIPOD contri
69 er, with access to a home computer and prior e-mail experience, were asked to self-report seven sympt
73 mber and treatment allocation (by fax and/or e-mail) from the central web randomisation system and th
74 n individuals are inferred from time-stamped e-mail headers recorded over one academic year and are m
75 -practitioner contact (whether on-site or by e-mail), high levels of physical activity, and the long-
76 om the In-Training Section, respondents rank e-mail highest (762, 72.6%), followed by webpages (228,
78 Academic intensivists were recruited via e-mail invitation from a database of 1,712 eligible acad
79 ix hundred thirty intensivists recruited via e-mail invitation from a database of 1,850 eligible acad
84 communications accordingly, recognizing that e-mail may be included in the patient's medical record.
86 discussion (92.9%), telephone calls (83.9%), e-mail messages (69.0%), computer-generated documents (6
87 f timing of tasks, as studied in a sample of e-mail messages at a university and in the written corre
89 llege of Rheumatology (ACR) were notified by e-mail of a survey that was posted on our rheumatology W
93 (compact disc [CD] via pick up, CD via mail, e-mail, online patient portal, or other online access),
103 ector and advanced practice nursing educator e-mail queries (>50) identified the use of a number of t
107 s across the United States were surveyed via e-mail regarding their choice in long-term therapy for 3
111 ntact included telephone calls, letters, and e-mails; respective rates of genetic testing completion
118 adiologist submission, and the results of an e-mail survey of physicians to assess their satisfaction
119 PBF awardees from 1976 to 2006, then sent an e-mail survey to the 526 past fellows and received 365 r
121 cians were sent 2 questions via an automated e-mail system every 2 days, and cohort B physicians were
126 eived the MSI/IHC results, and the counselor e-mailed the colorectal surgeon regarding appropriate pa
128 rder entry; personal digital assistants; and e-mail, the Internet, and the patient/physician encounte
132 ists in the United States were contacted via e-mail to complete a web-based, anonymous, 24-question s
133 A total of 5999 radiologists were invited by e-mail to complete an anonymous electronic survey develo
141 a five-item instrument distributed by blast E-mail to the Society of Critical Care Medicine's Respir
142 d questionnaire of 17 questions was sent via e-mail to US dermatology residency program directors (PD
150 -search experiment in which more than 60,000 e-mail users attempted to reach one of 18 target persons
152 s about abstract actions, such as whether to e-mail versus call a friend, and to select the concrete
154 Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) via e-mail, website, and social media to EAACI members and m
155 sequence of 24 weekly behavioral lessons via e-mail, weekly online submission of self-monitoring diar
156 s received printed reports summarizing PROs; e-mails were sent to oncologists and subspecialists when
158 rmation was initially solicited by 2 sets of e-mails, which pointed to the survey internet link.
159 atients were randomly assigned to receive an e-mail with a Web-based link to the Seventh Report of th
160 tion component), 2) sending all providers an e-mail with the Women's Health Initiative study results