ライフサイエンスコーパス: ecologist

1 most widely used demographic tools by animal ecologists.

2 ulations remains a significant challenge for ecologists.

3 dscapes is therefore of utmost importance to ecologists.

4 coloration have been relatively neglected by ecologists.

5 methods can be readily implemented by animal ecologists.

6 ered the most fascination among plant-insect ecologists.

7 hanging climate is a pending challenge among ecologists.

8 virologists, mycologists and other microbial ecologists.

9 changes constitutes an immense challenge for ecologists.

10 ins a challenge to empirical and theoretical ecologists.

11 nd biogeography is a hot topic for microbial ecologists.

12 s been a considerable challenge for chemical ecologists.

13 de has been an intensely debated topic among ecologists.

14 ed importance and of fundamental interest to ecologists.

15 s, long considered a "black box," has eluded ecologists.

16 g organisms, warranting greater attention by ecologists.

17 inuous-time models remain unfamiliar to many ecologists.

18 ive ranges of NIS are of immense interest to ecologists.

19 atterns of flora and fauna observed by urban ecologists.

20 h HMMs as a fundamental inferential tool for ecologists.

21 ommunities that have long been recognised by ecologists.

22 rotists) has been a formidable challenge for ecologists.

23 olors that have long fascinated evolutionary ecologists.

24 the importance of tissue stable isotopes to ecologists.

25 d by environmental modelers and quantitative ecologists.

26 of a wide range of questions of interest to ecologists.

27 attention from behavioural and evolutionary ecologists.

28 been a long-standing theoretical puzzle for ecologists.

29 y are familiar to agriculturalists and field ecologists alike as one of the principal groups of natur

30 develop a predictive tool for stable isotope ecologists, allowing for estimation of incorporation rat

31 This approach, though not often used by ecologists, allows ecological responses to be directly c

32 tion data and an approach similar to that of ecologists analysing empirical data.

33 ar in the budgets are not well understood by ecologists and biogeochemists outside of that community.

34 most significant intellectual challenges to ecologists and biogeographers.

35 Collaboration among molecular geneticists, ecologists and bioinformaticians promises to enhance our

36 ions for enhancing the collaboration between ecologists and computer scientists and highlight areas f

37 Ecologists and conservation biologists need to identify

38 Ecologists and conservation biologists often study parti

39 These climate connectivity analyses allow ecologists and conservation practitioners to determine t

40 mals of interest to evolutionary biologists, ecologists and developmental biologists.

41 Behavioral ecologists and economists emphasize that potential costs

42 Recently, however, ecologists and economists have begun to develop more sys

43 Ecologists and entomologists might be unaware of even we

44 tudy general ecological questions, microbial ecologists and environmental engineers need to investiga

45 work encapsulates many of the models used by ecologists and epidemiologists and should facilitate the

46 Ecologists and epidemiologists have begun focusing on de

47 e that, until recently, were unrecognized by ecologists and even more so by microbiologists.

48 Acknowledgements 686 References 686 SUMMARY: Ecologists and evolutionary biologists are concerned wit

49 Ecologists and evolutionary biologists are increasingly

50 Ecologists and evolutionary biologists are well aware th

51 Ecologists and evolutionary biologists can assess risks

52 Ecologists and evolutionary biologists have been looking

53 al remediation, but without involvement from ecologists and evolutionary biologists the impact of env

54 of natural environments is changing the way ecologists and evolutionary biologists view the importan

55 Geographic range size has long fascinated ecologists and evolutionary biologists, yet our understa

56 Three statistical approaches developed by ecologists and evolutionary biologists--parametric estim

57 ersification poses an important challenge to ecologists and evolutionary biologists.

58 o this interplay between BMRs and T(b), many ecologists and evolutionary physiologists posit that the

59 -evolutionary dynamics--is invigorating both ecologists and evolutionists and blurring the distinctio

60 Ecologists and fisheries managers are interested in moni

61 Our approach provides a new tool for network ecologists and for directing the management and restorat

62 relationships identified a separation of bat ecologists and infectious disease researchers with few c

63 erved in nature has been poorly addressed by ecologists and largely excluded from network theory.

64 an lemmings have mystified both professional ecologists and lay public.

65 of unprecedented ecological change in which ecologists and natural resource managers are increasingl

66 Ecologists and oceanographers inform population and ecos

67 tion structure that needs to be revisited by ecologists and population geneticists alike.

68 rmities has led to substantial interest from ecologists and public health professionals.

69 nally been studied in parallel by behavioral ecologists and quantitative geneticists.

70 of Elton, population cycles have challenged ecologists and resource managers.

71 ings are more accessible and impactful among ecologists and the wider scientific community.

72 introgression) has long been of interest to ecologists and weed scientists.

73 has long been an interest of biogeographers, ecologists, and evolutionary biologists.

74 ting significant attention from biochemists, ecologists, and medical scientists.

75 o plant scientists, evolutionary biologists, ecologists, and stakeholders assessing the environmental

76 , however, how useful such techniques are to ecologists, and whether they are suited to animal social

77 teraction type (e.g., feeding, pollination), ecologists are beginning to consider networks which comb

78 Ecologists are fascinated by the prevalence of nestednes

79 Ecologists are increasingly aware of the importance of e

80 Microbial ecologists are increasingly turning to small, synthesize

81 influence population dynamics and evolution, ecologists are increasingly using parameterized mathemat

82 Ecosystem ecologists are now addressing the role of plant disease

83 al, comparative, and theoretical approaches, ecologists are starting to gain a detailed understanding

84 Ecologists are still puzzled by the diverse population d

85 Ecologists are therefore presented with a new challenge:

86 Behavioral ecologists argue that evolution drives animal behavior t

87 sity of the phytoplankton has long perplexed ecologists because these organisms coexist in an isotrop

88 reat interest to evolutionary biologists and ecologists because they represent historical examples of

89 gradients have received much attention from ecologists but there is little consensus on underlying c

90 tantially from dialog between geologists and ecologists, but current research must now integrate full

91 ould no longer be overlooked by evolutionary ecologists, but should become standard components of the

92 ions has recently become a central focus for ecologists, but species' functional responses to environ

93 erbivores and predators have long fascinated ecologists, but the causal reasons for a shift to omnivo

94 Study of the second, which ecologists call tolerance, is in its infancy.

95 o fundamental plant life-history trade-offs, ecologists can begin to predict plant community structur

96 Recent simulations suggest that ecologists can enhance the predictive ability of models

97 Ecologists can learn much from other disciplines on each

98 Armed with this tool, community ecologists can make sense of many types of data, includi

99 and heterospecifics with environmental data, ecologists can now simultaneously quantify intraspecific

100 This means that field ecologists can use the homogeneous IDE as a relatively s

101 We found that ecologists characterize drought in a wide variety of way

102 nd will necessitate a change in the way many ecologists collect and analyse their data.

103 that exploit such patches are of interest to ecologists, conservation biologists, modelers, and mathe

104 his study has important implications for how ecologists consider nutrient limitation of primary consu

105 The pioneering evolutionary ecologist David Lack suggested that reproductive output

106 l drought studies (564 papers) to assess how ecologists describe and study drought.

107 Ecologists emphasize the need to forecast and mitigate t

108 Interdisciplinary collaborations (including ecologists, engineers, climatologists, meteorologists, s

109 entrance to game theory that will help plant ecologists enrich their research with its worldview and

110 Ecologists, evolutionary biologists and biomedical resea

111 It is designed to help ecologists, evolutionary biologists and conservation bio

112 Ecologists expect species and biomes to shift poleward a

113 y, there are few resources available to help ecologists face the challenges they are likely to encoun

114 Most measures of local climate used by ecologists fail to capture such complex associations bet

115 ents and coarse resolutions, while community ecologists focus on small extents and fine resolutions.

116 fluencing it have attracted the attention of ecologists for a long time, the influence of biodiversit

117 cross environmental gradients has challenged ecologists for decades.

118 plants has challenged community and food web ecologists for decades.

119 es diversity has been of central interest to ecologists for decades.

120 ients of soil resources has fascinated plant ecologists for decades.

121 s) in grasslands and savannas has fascinated ecologists for decades.

122 the relative species abundance--have puzzled ecologists for more than half a century.

123 x (Lynx canadensis) have been of interest to ecologists for nearly sixty years.

124 Behavioral ecologists frequently focus on a single modality of wild

125 ly distributed in an environment, behavioral ecologists frequently turn to ideal free distribution (I

126 ast amounts of diverse data now available to ecologists, from genetic sequences to remotely sensed an

127 However, recent attention by pollination ecologists has focused on the broad spectra of pollinate

128 Recently, ecologists have also recognised the importance of carrio

129 ommunity assembly is central to ecology, yet ecologists have amassed little quantitative information

130 Ecologists have argued about the commonness and strength

131 In recent years evolutionary ecologists have become increasingly interested in the ef

132 declines in the abundance of common species, ecologists have become interested in quantifying how cha

133 Ecologists have been compiling ecological networks for o

134 ends largely on seed dispersal, evolutionary ecologists have been unable to link co-occurring traits

135 As a result, ecologists have begun using the DNA that animals natural

136 For more than 50 y ecologists have believed that spatial heterogeneity in h

137 Many ecologists have called for mechanism-based investigation

138 Ecologists have come to understand that networks of inte

139 n length was variable among natural systems, ecologists have considered many explanatory hypotheses,

140 For more than a century ecologists have considered that competitive interactions

141 Ecologists have delineated many mechanisms that can, in

142 Ecologists have developed tools to link population-level

143 Ecologists have documented both the importance of bats a

144 Although ecologists have documented the effects of nitrogen enric

145 Yeast taxonomists and ecologists have dramatically expanded and clarified Sacc

146 Ecologists have found numerous forms of this relationshi

147 Accordingly, behavioral ecologists have gained greater appreciation for their ev

148 Our results indicate that ecologists have gathered sufficient information to begin

149 Unfortunately, microbial ecologists have generally used correlation as a proxy fo

150 For decades, ecologists have hypothesised that exposure to plant seco

151 Recently, however, ecologists have improved their understanding of ecologic

152 Over the past decade ecologists have increasingly sought to quantify phylogen

153 ogy has a long history of investigation, but ecologists have largely restricted their attention to th

154 Ecologists have limited understanding of how geographic

155 Although ecologists have long acknowledged species' direct physio

156 Ecologists have long acknowledged the importance of seed

157 Ecologists have long argued about multiple mechanisms by

158 Evolutionary and behavioural ecologists have long been interested in factors shaping

159 Evolutionary ecologists have long been interested in the adaptive sig

160 Ecologists have long been interested in the processes th

161 Ecologists have long been intrigued by the ways co-occur

162 Specifically, ecologists have long debated the influence of songbird p

163 Ecologists have long hypothesized that fragmentation of

164 Ecologists have long observed that consumers can maintai

165 Thomas Ecologists have long pondered why tropical forests conta

166 Ecologists have long postulated that density-dependent m

167 Ecologists have long questioned how this diversity is ma

168 Ecologists have long recognized the roles of competition

169 Ecologists have long searched for a framework of a prior

170 Ecologists have long sought a way to explain how the rem

171 Ecologists have long sought to account for the patterns

172 Microbial ecologists have long sought to associate the transformat

173 While ecologists have long studied food webs of feeding intera

174 Ecologists have long used field inventory plots as the m

175 However, while ecologists have mostly explored indirect effects of risi

176 Psychologists and ecologists have observed that individuals tend to use a

177 ing could be simple, strong, and direct, yet ecologists have persistently failed to perceive generali

178 Ecologists have proposed that when interspecific competi

179 Traditionally, many microbial ecologists have reasoned that microbes are not limited b

180 Ecologists have recently devoted their attention to the

181 necessary suffering, applied and theoretical ecologists have recently focused on virus-vectored immun

182 Ecologists have recognized the potentially important rol

183 terns makes them experimentally intractable, ecologists have relied on theoretical modelling - typica

184 For decades, ecologists have sought to understand how animals move to

185 l economy billions of dollars each year, but ecologists have struggled to predict the risk of an intr

186 For centuries ecologists have studied how the diversity and functional

187 consistent and one-dimensional approach that ecologists have taken to both disturbances and stability

188 Ecologists have traditionally addressed coastal ecosyste

189 Ecologists have traditionally focused on herbivore carca

190 e of polyploidy, however, remains uncertain; ecologists have traditionally relied on observational me

191 detailed, long-term measurements until now, ecologists, health researchers, and policy makers genera

192 Ecologists hold two views about the role of herbivory in

193 This poses a major challenge to microbial ecologists: how can one compare the microbial diversity

194 dely recognized as one of the leading insect ecologists in the world.

195 In addition, ecologists increasingly recognize that fluxes of organis

196 Ecologists increasingly report the structures of metacom

197 A pressing challenge for ecologists is predicting how human-driven environmental

198 ncept of in-use product stock for industrial ecologists is similar to the concept of net manufactured

199 Among ecologists, it is widely believed that conservative grow

200 ten been studied by population and community ecologists, it will be important to incorporate a variet

201 terminants of plant community structure, but ecologists lack a synthetic theory for how they affect c

202 ur theoretical understanding of coexistence, ecologists lack clear expectations for how these interac

203 ble ecosystem characteristics that preoccupy ecologists, like ecosystem stability and the responsiven

204 Ecologists maintain that this non-random structure is ke

205 To study drought, ecologists must define or at least operationalize what c

206 Ecologists must therefore often contend with incomplete

207 e constructing a taxonomy that is useful for ecologists nearly impossible.

208 Physical-chemists, (micro)biologists, and ecologists need to conduct meaningful experiments to stu

209 Ecologists need to significantly raise the profile of th

210 ve and cultural predator-prey ecology offers ecologists new lenses through which to understand specie

211 cludes structural models used extensively by ecologists now.

212 m can be initiated to educate the industrial ecologists of the future.

213 Animal ecologists often collect hierarchically structured data

214 Ecologists often measure the biomass and productivity of

215 As such, ecologists often need to train their own models.

216 daptive evolution, potentially resolving why ecologists often observe neutral distribution patterns a

217 Molecular ecologists often rely on phylogenetic evidence for asses

218 Evolutionary ecologists often seek to identify the mechanisms maintai

219 Ecologists often use image capture to bolster data colle

220 Ecologists often use mark-recapture to estimate demograp

221 lustered into three communities: one used by ecologists, one used by veterinarians, and a third diver

222 by organic chemists and research by chemical ecologists, our understanding of phytochemically mediate

223 change on populations is a key challenge for ecologists, particularly as the pace of change increases

224 unity of evolutionary biologists, population ecologists, pest biologists and genome researchers, the

225 Marine ecologists previously emphasized control by locally oper

226 erally acknowledged amongst marine microbial ecologists, primarily because they provide the means to

227 In particular, ecologists recognise the important role that animal beha

228 terdisciplinary collaborations between local ecologists, remote sensing specialists, and experts in c

229 more coordinated research among terrestrial ecologists, resource managers, and coupled climate model

230 Ecologists seek general explanations for the dramatic va

231 Ecologists seek to understand the rules that govern the

232 Evolutionists, conservation biologists, and ecologists should be doing more research to determine ac

233 here is increasing evidence that restoration ecologists should be most concerned with restoring speci

234 Microbial ecologists should consider developing and adopting MMRT

235 Moving forward, we suggest that ecologists should explicitly consider grassland assembly

236 Ecologists should focus on fresh, mechanistic approaches

237 ette et al. (Global Change Biol, 2019), that ecologists 'should do better' when defining drought in e

238 ette et al. (Global Change Biol, 2019), that ecologists 'should do better' when defining drought in e

239 cult "how" questions that concern industrial ecologists since the cost, and indeed the wider implicat

240 Ecologists still search for common principles that predi

241 have fundamentally transformed the ways that ecologists study social behaviour.

242 is an important avenue of investigation for ecologists studying ecosystem dynamics.

243 Ecologists studying microbial life in the environment ha

244 ny mechanisms that have long been studied by ecologists (such as niches) have little involvement in s

245 Ecologists suspect that these oscillations are driven by

246 As microbial ecologists take advantage of high-throughput analytical

247 l require a collaborative approach involving ecologists, taxonomists, and practitioners.

248 series are often used to assess impacts, but ecologists tend to compare average values from before to

249 scientific enquiry and application; however, ecologists tend to favour explanatory modelling.

250 he widely adopted BIOM format, for microbial ecologists that implements information-theoretic subset

251 as recently attracted growing interest among ecologists, the investigation of its evolutionary conseq

252 ation and community persistence; restoration ecologists, therefore, advocate for the establishment of

253 of CNNs, demonstrate how they can be used by ecologists through distinct examples of their applicatio

254 e grand-scale natural experiment that allows ecologists to address a range of critical questions conc

255 To effectively position ecologists to address this prevalent conservation challe

256 We thus urge ecologists to combine multiple pieces of evidence in ass

257 Accounting for rewiring requires ecologists to combine natural history with network model

258 s a correlated random walk, has been used by ecologists to describe movement, and forms the basis for

259 s a foundation for future analyses, allowing ecologists to develop new and creative approaches to con

260 sts to characterize population structure, by ecologists to estimate migration rates, by animal breede

261 is increasing pressure from policymakers for ecologists to generate more detailed 'attribution' analy

262 Our approach will allow microbial ecologists to make more accurate inferences about microb

263 vector molecular biologists and evolutionary ecologists to move closer to the natural setting under t

264 ifferent trophic levels could therefore lead ecologists to overlook important evolutionary processes

265 Nonetheless, methods adapted by spatial ecologists to quantify animal home ranges can be modifie

266 Use of rKIN will allow isotope ecologists to quantify niche shifts, expansions or contr

267 t is fundamentally important for many animal ecologists to quantify the costs of animal activities, a

268 This random assembly has led some ecologists to question the relevance of biodiversity exp

269 intraspecific variation in nature is forcing ecologists to reconsider.

270 Advances in remote sensing challenge ecologists to relate information organised by biome and

271 acking pests as well as encourage behavioral ecologists to study pest species.

272 other online resources, we encourage animal ecologists to tackle global ecological and evolutionary

273 Now is the time for ecologists to take advantage of an explosion of sustaina

274 This method will empower ecologists to test vertebrate community ecology theories

275 are moving at an unprecedented rate, we urge ecologists to thoughtfully combine these new tools with

276 Climate change has at once pressed ecologists to understand and predict ecological dynamics

277 f human and wildlife diseases has challenged ecologists to understand how large-scale agents of envir

278 he daunting complexity of ecosystems has led ecologists to use mathematical modelling to gain underst

279 for natural resource managers and microbial ecologists to work together to create an integrated unde

280 sions of stability provide a way forward for ecologists trying to conserve ecosystems and manage thei

281 and make them accessible to a wider range of ecologists, ultimately helping expand the usefulness of

282 rom different communities, including aquatic ecologists, urban water system engineers and managers, a

283 of physical variability, whereas population ecologists use dynamical models that incorporate physica

284 Ecologists use plant species traits as generic predictor

285 than previously thought, challenging the way ecologists view and investigate forest regeneration.

286 diversity and ecosystem stability, with some ecologists warning of instability due to loss of species

287 The research of a generation of ecologists was catalysed by the recognition that the num

288 ther virologists, immunologists, and disease ecologists, we discussed the intrinsic and extrinsic fac

289 y 3, 2015, Nalini Nadkarni, a world-renowned ecologist who had been studying the biologic processes o

290 the idea of a balance of nature by academic ecologists, who focus rather on a dynamic, often chaotic

291 o non-uniform sampling protocols among shrub ecologists, who will favor either root collars or stems

292 orate enemy-risk effects, and that community ecologists will find many opportunities to study enemy-r

293 pate in the training of the 1990s industrial ecologists will give universities insight to the develop

294 Consequently, ecologists wish to identify environmental settings that

295 tes that have no present-day analog, leaving ecologists with no observational basis to predict the li

296 Biocontrol systems also provide community ecologists with some of the richest examples of behaviou

297 e tools for comparative metagenomics provide ecologists with the ability to investigate and explore b

298 miniaturized biologging devices has provided ecologists with unprecedented opportunities to record an

299 Historical ecologists working in the Neotropics argue that the pres

300 Ecologists would like to explain general patterns observ