1 We identified 1,180
editorials;
594 had sole authors, 24% (141/594) of whom
2 ed to be a history of CVD epidemiology or an
editorial about its significance.
3 In an
Editorial accompanying PLOS Medicine's Special Issue on
4 This
editorial aims to minimize confusion in the field and cr
5 ies preventable problems at the level of the
editorial and peer-review process, funding agencies and
6 We included
editorials and commentaries published in American Journa
7 hout full reports or abstract, commentaries,
editorials,
and reviews were excluded.
8 nique editorial authors (i.e., counting each
editorial author name only once) were women.
9 torial authors and 36% (524/1,477) of unique
editorial authors (i.e., counting each editorial author
10 If women are underrepresented as
editorial authors across epidemiology journals (e.g., as
11 Only 31% (682/2,228) of all
editorial authors and 36% (524/1,477) of unique editoria
12 nknown and computed the proportions of women
editorial authors over all journals and according to pos
13 In this
Editorial,
Barrett and Yaffe highlight shortcomings in o
14 l of Biological Chemistry as a member of the
Editorial Board beginning in 1961, as an Associate Edito
15 Nevertheless, studies of
editorial board composition remain rare, especially thos
16 performed a cross-sectional analysis of the
editorial board gender composition among 10 high-impact
17 e; relationship to journal impact factor and
editorial board makeup; and rates of transition to senio
18 and the AJO had boasted a number of foreign
editorial board members and collaborators over the years
19 sites, as well as those selected by the JACC
Editorial Board members.
20 sites, as well as those selected by the JACC
Editorial Board members.
21 We polled the
Editorial Board of Genome Biology to ask where they see
22 that I have been at the helm of the Duke-UNC
Editorial Board of the Journal of Clinical Investigation
23 74; 2007 P = 0.42; 2017 P = 0.69), but men's
editorial board tenure was longer across each time inter
24 Three members of PLOS Medicine's
editorial board who are leading researchers in implement
25 immigrant and nonimmigrant scientists on our
editorial board.
26 ing merit-based performance reviews may help
editorial boards capture the field's changing demographi
27 Over 20 years, the proportion of women on
editorial boards increased from 5% to 19%.
28 Underrepresentation of women on
editorial boards may contribute to the gender-based achi
29 Men's longer tenure on
editorial boards may drive some of the observed disparit
30 nternational representation on the 1985-2014
editorial boards of 24 environmental biology journals.
31 ave a small but growing presence on surgical
editorial boards, and gender-based qualification differe
32 See also the
editorial by Almeida in this issue.
33 See also the
editorial by Altes and Flors in this issue.
34 See also the
editorial by Ambale-Venkatesh and Lima in this issue.
35 See also the
editorial by Andreisek in this issue.
36 See also the
editorial by Anzai in this issue.
37 See also the
editorial by Arenson et al in this issue.
38 See also the
editorial by Auffermann in this issue.
39 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Bae in this issue.
40 See also the
editorial by Bahl in this issue.
41 See also the
editorial by Balter in this issue.
42 See also the
editorial by Barkhof and Parker in this issue.
43 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Berg in this issue.
44 See also the
editorial by Bettmann in this issue.
45 See also the
editorial by Biederer in this issue.
46 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Black in this issue.
47 See also the
editorial by Block in this issue.
48 See also the
editorial by Bredella in this issue.
49 See also the
editorial by Brem in this issue.
50 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Bruno in this issue.
51 See also the
editorial by Bulte in this issue.
52 See also the
editorial by Caspers in this issue.
53 See also the
editorial by Chan and Helvie in this issue.
54 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Chang in this issue.
55 See also the
editorial by Chang in this issue.
56 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Chang in this issue.
57 See also the
editorial by Chiang in this issue.
58 See also the
editorial by Cho in this issue.
59 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Choe in this issue.
60 See also the
editorial by Choyke in this issue.
61 See also the
editorial by Cloft in this issue.
62 See also the
editorial by Colletti in this issue.
63 See also the
editorial by Davenport and Shankar in this issue.
64 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Davenport in this issue.
65 See also the
editorial by De Cecco and Monti in this issue.
66 See also the
editorial by de Roos and Lamb in this issue.
67 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by de Roos in this issue.
68 See also the
editorial by Dickey and Durrani in this issue.
69 See also the
editorial by Dickey and Levi-Polyachenko in this issue.
70 See also the
editorial by Dighe in this issue.
71 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Dillman and Ayyala in this issue.
72 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Dillman and Trout in this issue.
73 See also the
editorial by Dillon in this issue.
74 See also the
editorial by Do and Mendiratta-Lala in this issue.
75 See also the
editorial by Dodd and Dewey in this issue.
76 See also the
editorial by Eberhardt in this issue.
77 See also the
editorial by Einstein and Newhouse in this issue.
78 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Einstein in this issue.
79 See also the
editorial by Elicker in this issue.
80 See also the
editorial by Fain in this issue.
81 See also the
editorial by Fielding in this issue.
82 See also the
editorial by Filippi and Rocca in this issue.
83 See also the
editorial by Finn in this issue.
84 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Flores and Narayan in this issue.
85 See also the
editorial by Forman in this issue.
86 See also the
editorial by Forsberg in this issue.
87 See also the
editorial by Francois in this issue.
88 See also the
editorial by Friedrich in this issue.
89 See also the
editorial by Fritz in this issue.
90 See also the
editorial by Froelich and Salavati in this issue.
91 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Fuchsjager and Adelsmayr in this issue.
92 See also the
editorial by Fukuda in this issue.
93 See also the
editorial by Georgiades in this issue.
94 See also the
editorial by Gervais in this issue.
95 See also the
editorial by Godoy in this issue.
96 See also the
editorial by Goh and De Vita in this issue.
97 (C) RSNA, 2020See also the
editorial by Goh and Prezzi in this issue.
98 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Goldberg in this issue.
99 See also the
editorial by Goldberg in this issue.
100 See also the
editorial by Grenier in this issue.
101 See also the
editorial by Grist in this issue.
102 See also the
editorial by Guermazi and Roemer in this issue.
103 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Guermazi in this issue.
104 See also the
editorial by Haller in this issue.
105 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Hanneman in this issue.
106 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Haygood in this issue.
107 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Hentel and Wolk in this issue.
108 See also the
editorial by Hindman in this issue.
109 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Hofvind and Lee in this issue.
110 See also the
editorial by Hooley and Butler in this issue.
111 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Hooley in this issue.
112 See also the
editorial by Hu and McAllister in this issue.
113 See also the
editorial by Huang and Lin in this issue.
114 See also the
editorial by Jennings in this issue.
115 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Jennings in this issue.
116 See also the
editorial by Joe and Hayward in this issue.
117 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Johnson in this issue.
118 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Kallmes and Watson in this issue.
119 See also the
editorial by Kanal in this issue.
120 See also the
editorial by Karellas in this issue.
121 See also the
editorial by Kauczor and von Stackelberg in this issue.
122 See also the
editorial by Kiessling in this issue.
123 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Kikinis and Wells in this issue.
124 See also the
editorial by Kim and Van den Abbeele in this issue.
125 See also the
editorial by Klibanov and McDannold in this issue.
126 See also the
editorial by Kontos and Conant in this issue.
127 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Kotsenas in this issue.
128 See also the
editorial by Kramer in this issue.
129 See also the
editorial by Krupinski in this issue.
130 See also the
editorial by Kruskal and Sarwar in this issue.
131 See also the
editorial by Kuhl and Truhn in this issue.
132 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Kuhl in this issue.
133 See also the
editorial by Kuriyama and Yanagawa in this issue.
134 See also the
editorial by Laghi in this issue.
135 See also the
editorial by Lamb in this issue.
136 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Lang in this issue.
137 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Lang in this issue.
138 See also the
editorial by Larvie in this issue.
139 See also the
editorial by Lee and Hectors in this issue.
140 See also the
editorial by Lee in this issue.
141 See also the
editorial by Lev in this issue.
142 See also the
editorial by Lin in this issue.
143 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Lloyd and Farris in this issue.
144 See also the
editorial by Lockhart and Smith in this issue.
145 See also the
editorial by Luker in this issue.
146 See also the
editorial by Maki and Itkin in this issue.
147 See the
editorial by Mankoff and Pantel in this issue.
148 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Mann and Pinker in this issue.
149 See also the
editorial by Mann in this issue.
150 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Martin in this issue.
151 See also the
editorial by Matos in this issue.
152 ct and report research ..." Read more in the
Editorial by Mattias Bjornmalm and Frank Caruso.
153 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by McDonald and Kallmes in this issue.
154 See also the
editorial by Megibow in this issue.
155 See also the
editorial by Mendez in this issue.
156 See also the
editorial by Messina and Port in this issue.
157 See also the
editorial by Mezrich in this issue.
158 See also the
editorial by Mitsouras and Hope in this issue.
159 See also the
editorial by Mitsouras and Leach in this issue.
160 See also the
editorial by Morrell et al in this issue.
161 See also the
editorial by Moy and Heller in this issue.
162 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Moy in this issue.
163 See also the
editorial by Moy in this issue.
164 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Munera and Durso in this issue.
165 See also the
editorial by Newell in this issue.
166 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Newell in this issue.
167 (C) RSNA, 2018 See also the
editorial by Ngo in this issue.
168 (C) RSNA, 2018 See also the
editorial by Nikolic in this issue.
169 See also the
editorial by Nishino in this issue.
170 See also the
editorial by Ospel and Goyal in this issue.
171 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Oto in this issue.
172 See also the
editorial by Ouwerkerk in this issue.
173 See also the
editorial by Padhani and Turkbey in this issue.
174 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Padia in this issue.
175 See also the
editorial by Paltiel in this issue.
176 See also the
editorial by Partridge in this issue.
177 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Philpotts and Durand in this issue.
178 See also the
editorial by Pinker in this issue.
179 See also the
editorial by Port in this issue.
180 See also the
editorial by Pourmorteza in this issue.
181 See also the
editorial by Prince in this issue.
182 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Radbruch in this issue.
183 See also the
editorial by Rapalino in this issue.
184 See also the
editorial by Revel and Chassagnon in this issue.
185 creening centers ..." Read more in the Guest
Editorial by Richard A.
186 See also the
editorial by Richardson in this issue.
187 See also the
editorial by Rollins in this issue.
188 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Rosen and Walz in this issue.
189 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Rosenberg and Seidenwurm in this issue.
190 See also the
editorial by Rossi in this issue.
191 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Russell in this issue.
192 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Saindane in this issue.
193 (C) RSNA, 2021 See also the
editorial by Schaefer-Prokop and Prokop in this issue.
194 See also the
editorial by Schattner in this issue.
195 See also the
editorial by Schiebler and Parraga in this issue.
196 See also the
editorial by Schiebler in this issue.
197 See also the
editorial by Schweitzer in this issue.
198 See also the
editorial by Scott in this issue.
199 See also the
editorial by Sechopoulos and Athanasiou in this issue.
200 See also the
editorial by Shaffer in this issue.
201 See also the
editorial by Shah in this issue.
202 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Shellock in this issue.
203 See also the
editorial by Siegel in this issue.
204 See also the
editorial by Sigmund and Rosenkrantz in this issue.
205 See also the
editorial by Sinha and Oates in this issue.
206 See also the
editorial by Sitek and Wolfe in this issue.
207 See also the
editorial by Skaane in this issue.
208 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Slanetz in this issue.
209 See also the
editorial by Smith in this issue.
210 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Smith in this issue.
211 See also the
editorial by Sneag and Potter in this issue.
212 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Sneag and Tan in this issue.
213 See also the
editorial by Sofocleous and Kamarinos in this issue.
214 See also the
editorial by Sosna in this issue.
215 (C) RSNA, 2018 See also the
editorial by Sosna in this issue.
216 See also the
editorial by Steiger and Sood in this issue.
217 See also the
editorial by Stojanovska in this issue.
218 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Strouse in this issue.
219 See also the
editorial by Summers in this issue.
220 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Talbott and Hess in this issue.
221 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Talbott in this issue.
222 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Taourel in this issue.
223 See also the
editorial by Trerotola and Pyeritz in this issue.
224 See also the
editorial by Tweedle in this issue.
225 See also the
editorial by van Ginneken in this issue.
226 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Vannier in this issue.
227 See also the
editorial by Vernooij in this issue.
228 See also the
editorial by Verschakelen in this issue.
229 (C) RSNA, 2020 See also the
editorial by Vogel-Claussen in this issue.
230 See also the
editorial by Weiss and Nezami in this issue.
231 See also the
editorial by White and Kazerooni in this issue.
232 See also the
editorial by White in this issue.
233 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by White in this issue.
234 See also the
editorial by Wielputz in this issue.
235 See also the
editorial by Wolf in this issue.
236 colorectal cancer.(C) RSNA, 2020See also the
editorial by Yee in this issue.
237 See also the
editorial by Yin in this issue.
238 l is available for this article.See also the
editorial by Zaharchuk in this issue.
239 See also the
editorial by Zaharchuk in this issue.
240 See also the
editorial by Zanetti in this issue.
241 (C) RSNA, 2019 See also the
editorial by Zimmerman in this issue.
242 See also the
editorial by Zivadinov and Bergsland in this issue.
243 ee also the article by Eijlers et al and the
editorial by Zivadinov and Dwyer in this issue.
244 See also the
editorial by Zoga in this issue.
245 See also the
editorial by Zukotynski and Rowe in this issue.
246 tions and Review Articles, and an occasional
Editorial Comment) from the distinct specialties each ye
247 (See the
Editorial Commentary by Jehan and Qazi on pages 190-1) I
248 (See the
Editorial Commentary by Martin on pages 368-9.)Using pop
249 ird way is to frontload selectivity-reaching
editorial decisions based on rigorous evaluation of the
250 This
Editorial describes new enhanced scope of The American J
251 This
Editorial describes the extension in scope of The Americ
252 This
editorial discusses fundamental differences among 3 mode
253 The
editorial discusses the importance of national vital sta
254 This
editorial discusses what levels of off-target effects ca
255 i as the next editor in chief, I pass on the
editorial duties for the JCI to him and his team at John
256 In an
Editorial,
Edward Maibach and colleagues discuss the imp
257 This
editorial explains the revisions and the underlying scie
258 This
Editorial first introduces the background of the vaccine
259 In an
Editorial,
Guest Editors Alexander Tsai, Margarita Alegr
260 In this month's
Editorial,
Guest Editors Carol Brayne and Bruce Miller d
261 In an
Editorial,
Guest Editors Paul Spiegel, Terry McGovern an
262 This Guest
Editorial highlights the importance of autopsies in biom
263 This
Editorial highlights the reviews in the Breast Cancer Th
264 This Guest
Editorial highlights the reviews in the Race in Cancer H
265 This
Editorial highlights the value of The American Journal o
266 lub (along with a statistician) published an
editorial in 2015 modernizing and quantifying the proper
267 ly, newer GLs only scored clearly better in "
Editorial independence" and "Global evaluation." In AIT-
268 Median quality scores for
editorial independence, rigor of development, and stakeh
269 This Guest
Editorial introduces the theme reviews focusing on the g
270 This
Editorial introduces this month's special Breast Ductal
271 This Guest
Editorial introduces this month's special Neural Regener
272 This Guest
Editorial introduces this month's special Pancreatic Can
273 This
editorial is a call to join forces and embrace progress
274 were excluded if they were review articles,
editorials,
letters, or case reports.
275 In an
Editorial,
Ligia Kiss and Cathy Zimmerman discuss the ne
276 nuscript (e.g., correspondence, corrections,
editorials,
linked articles) should go to Annals.org or
277 Editorial note: This article has been through an editori
278 nd 226 (13.2%) other articles such as notes,
editorials or letters.
279 In this month's
Editorial,
PLOS Medicine Academic Editor Zirui Song and
280 In this month's
editorial,
PLOS Medicine's Chief Editor Larry Peiperl di
281 This article has been through an
editorial process in which authors decide how to respond
282 orial note: This article has been through an
editorial process in which the authors decide how to res
283 This article has been through an
editorial process in which the authors decide how to res
284 y published as preprints, and will focus its
editorial process on producing public reviews to be post
285 rs of JCI and JCI Insight are revisiting our
editorial processes in light of the strain that the COVI
286 ublished in English and removing reviews and
editorials produced 153 relevant manuscripts.
287 e that we take issue with Prof Park's recent
editorial published in the Journal of Controlled Release
288 distribution of gender across authorship of
editorials published in 5 high-impact epidemiology journ
289 This is an
editorial report of the supplements to BMC Bioinformatic
290 We believe
editorial roles are markers of leadership in a field.
291 In January's Guest
Editorial,
Sarah Stock and Jenny Myers discuss approache
292 ishing system, such as an access paywall and
editorial selection before publication.
293 swer to backloaded selectivity is to curtail
editorial selectivity altogether, deciding publication o
294 The original and corrected figures, and the
Editorial Summary, are shown in the accompanying Publish
295 Investigation marks the transition to a new
editorial team from Johns Hopkins University.
296 Journal of Pathology and introduces its new
editorial team.
297 In this
editorial,
the American Society for Microbiology Clinica
298 In this issue's
Editorial,
the Guest Editors Claudia Denkinger, Richard
299 st read the manuscript that accompanies this
editorial,
upon its online publication on February 19(th
300 In September's
Editorial,
Vikram Patel and Pattie Gonsalves discuss sui