ライフサイエンスコーパス: elective

1 was categorised as vaginal or CS (emergency/elective).

2 9.9% were male, and 89.1% of operations were elective.

3 and whether the procedure is emergent versus elective.

4 , of which 727,755 (43%, range 38%-57%) were elective.

5 The elective 1-year mortality rate was 4.7%.

6 , instrumental delivery (1.14 (1.10, 1.18)), elective (1.62 (1.57, 1.68)) and emergency (1.32 (1.28,

7 1 males), 130235 (75.0%) were categorized as elective, 22592 (13.0%) as emergency, and 20816 (12.0%)

8 t 63 operations, of which 23 operations were elective, 24 were emergent, and 16 were emergently perfo

9 SaAAAs had smaller diameters than FuAAAs, in elective (53.0 mm vs 61 mm, P = 0.000) and acute (68 mm

10 the late follow-up and should be avoided in elective AAA cases.

11 Changes in elective AAA management reduced short-term mortality, bu

12 ecommendations about which approach to offer elective AAA patients should not be based on relative co

13 l 12.907 (82.7% male) patients who underwent elective AAA repair between 2001 and 2015 in Sweden.

14 All patients undergoing elective AAA repair between 2013 and 2016 registered in

15 e procedure of choice for patients requiring elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

16 All adult patients undergoing elective abdominal resection for rectal cancer over a 10

17 Consecutive older patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery with expected LOS longer than

18 given to anaemic patients before major open elective abdominal surgery would correct anaemia, reduce

19 ained from 17 overweight patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery.

20 ing postoperative infective complications in elective abdominal surgery.

21 iral load trajectory after 43 spontaneous or elective abortions remained at less than 400 copies per

22 7 (85%, 104 livebirths and 43 spontaneous or elective abortions) were eligible for post-pregnancy vir

23 l aspirate, and serum were obtained from 188 elective adeno-/tonsillectomy patients.

24 months following a subsequent (emergency or elective) admission.

25 otal of 325 consecutive donors who underwent elective, adult-to-adult right hepatectomy were initiall

26 significantly differ between shapes in both elective and acute patients.

27 ata is a robust method to measure frailty in elective and emergency patients.

28 of this study was to examine the outcomes of elective and emergent abdominal operations performed in

29 , and Mann-Whitney U tests for comparison of elective and emergent cases.

30 rs) admitted to participating centres having elective and non-elective caesarean delivery during the

31 We identified 415,704 elective, and 95,581 emergency patients.

32 lood mononuclear cells from SAH patients and elective aneurysm controls were analyzed by multiparamet

33 symptomatic AS patients who may benefit from elective aortic valve replacement.

34 led trials, 1 cohort) in patients undergoing elective, biopsy-proven, primary non-metastatic colorect

35 Out of 39,424 elective BS performed in 19 high-volume academic centers

36 study that enrolled 330 patients undergoing elective CABG.

37 articipating centres having elective and non-elective caesarean delivery during the 7-day study cohor

38 -4 h, -8 h and -12 h, respectively prior to elective caesarean section to 10 pregnant women with a b

39 y enrolling normal pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section.

40 AM from elective caesarean sections contains natural microbial c

41 his COVID pandemic, the decision to continue elective cancer surgeries, and their subsequent outcomes

42 ontributed to favorable outcomes after major elective cancer surgeries.

43 thways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future

44 ing of the COVID-19 pandemic, the conduct of elective cancer surgery has become an issue because of t

45 any; derivation cohort) and those undergoing elective cardiac surgery (selected on the basis of a Cle

46 study comprised consecutive patients who had elective cardiac surgery at the Saarland University Medi

47 tients (n = 401) consecutively scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were prospectively studied.

48 glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) after elective cardiac surgery with the implementation of card

49 al infection (n = 30) and controls (n = 58) (elective cardiac surgery without infection).

50 toperative delirium in patients admitted for elective cardiac surgery.

51 Consecutive patients with ICD undergoing elective cardioversion for atrial arrhythmias at 13 cent

52 ated COVID-19 cohort wards were established, elective care was postponed and Intensive Care Units wer

53 sants, smoking, active infection, ASA class, elective case, wound classification, and history of abdo

54 Standard practices allow for postponement of elective cases and deferral to nonsurgical modalities of

55 Adjusted mortality in elective cases did not vary across the days of the week.

56 se of infrainguinal bypass for nonsevere and elective cases, along with improved in-hospital mortalit

57 creased adherence to practices for deferring elective cases; tiering urgent operations; following Nat

58 edure (n = 37; 31.6%) in April 2020, whereas elective cataract surgery (n = 481; 47.3%) was the most

59 erformance, and neurologic examination, with elective cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling, brain diffu

60 tational age, EGA) compared to those who had elective Cesarean deliveries near term (35 to 36 weeks o

61 elivered vaginally (10.6%), 110 delivered by elective cesarean section (ELCS) (61.5%) and 50 delivere

62 vantages to the newborn infant compared with elective cesarean section, and is reported to provide ne

63 vaginal delivery compared with those born by elective cesarean section.

64 nfants born by either vaginal delivery or by elective cesarean section.

65 hours after birth compared to those born by elective cesarean section.

66 n samples from women who delivered following elective Cesarean-section at term (39 to 40 weeks of est

67 In patients undergoing elective, clean contaminated colorectal surgery, the use

68 Among 8139 elective colectomies at 113 hospitals, LOS increased wit

69 ur experience, 30% of patients scheduled for elective colectomy can be managed in an ambulatory setti

70 ontrols (SSIPK-) of 1760 patients undergoing elective colectomy from January 2013 to March 2017.

71 (eg, diabetes, heart failure) undergoing an elective colectomy in a multipayer national administrati

72 We selected all patients who underwent elective colectomy or urgent hip fracture repair in Fren

73 [surgery (inclusive of stoma related to the elective colectomy), 4.0%; medical therapy, 1.6%].

74 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent elective colectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, abd

75 ohydrate drink to all patients scheduled for elective colectomy, with the goal of improving patient c

76 ter urgent hip fracture repair and not after elective colectomy.

77 For patients undergoing elective colon or rectal resection we recommend bowel pr

78 Sixty (60) adults scheduled to undergo elective colon or rectal resection were identified by co

79 tal of 19,557 Medicare patients underwent an elective colon resection for diverticulitis at 2462 hosp

80 Forty-four patients undergoing elective colon resection for nonmetastasized cancer were

81 During elective colonoscopy performed at 4 Veterans Affairs Med

82 Laparoscopy is increasingly used for elective colorectal cancer surgery, but uptake has been

83 Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection in the 2012 to 2015 Americ

84 108 Lapco delegates performed 4586 elective colorectal resections pre-Lapco and 5115 post-L

85 e day 1 (POD 1) serum laboratory tests after elective colorectal surgery are clinically warranted and

86 Routine POD 1 lab tests after elective colorectal surgery are rarely abnormal, and the

87 Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery between January 1, 2015 and

88 ctive cohort study of patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery in 3 hospitals in Israel, Sw

89 study including 175,787 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery using the Premier database b

90 Included were adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with the American-Society-of

91 studies including adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, receiving OAB with or witho

92 antibiotics reduce the risk of deep SSIs in elective colorectal surgery.

93 prevention of postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery.

94 ts were screened for ESBL-PE carriage before elective colorectal surgery.

95 s or synbiotics in adult patients undergoing elective colorectal, upper gastrointestinal, transplant,

96 Elective conversion in MIDP for PDAC was associated with

97 Elective conversion was associated with comparable overa

98 ndications for conversion were classified as elective conversions (eg, vascular involvement) or emerg

99 ospectively enrolled 113 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting for cross-secti

100 cesarean section (CS) after labor (L-CS), or elective CS (E-CS).

101 iagnosis, untreated women had higher odds of elective CS compared to women on medication (1.30 (1.17,

102 nfirmed, they could inform efforts to reduce elective CS rates that are not clinically indicated.

103 f anxiety/depression for outcomes other than elective CS, p < 0.001.

104 The authors piloted an elective Data Science Pathway (DSP) for 4th-year residen

105 New Jersey (1997-2011) to document trends in elective deliveries (induced vaginal delivery, cesarean

106 We found that elective deliveries more than doubled during the observa

107 of modifiable risk factors, and avoidance of elective dentoalveolar surgery (ie, surgery that involve

108 igher expulsion (8% versus 1%, p = 0.02) and elective discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio: 8.75, 9

109 rovement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was queried for elective DPs from 2014 to 2017.

110 Elective endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneu

111 Patients who underwent elective esophagectomy, total/partial gastrectomy, major

112 A total of 107 patients underwent elective EVAR.

113 iative registry data for patients undergoing elective EVR or open AAA repair from 2004 to 2015.

114 We aimed to establish whether elective frozen single blastocyst transfer improved sing

115 providing early enteral nutrition following elective gastrointestinal surgery.

116 A total of 785 patients undergoing major elective gastrointestinal, vascular, or cardiothoracic s

117 costs and readmission rates across 4 common elective general surgery procedures.

118 ropriately selected patients across 4 common elective general surgery procedures.

119 easing numbers of individuals have undergone elective genome sequencing, a comprehensive study survey

120 ed 65 years or older initiating warfarin for elective hip or knee arthroplasty at 6 US medical center

121 diagnosis of dementia, admitted for primary elective hip or knee arthroplasty.

122 mortality, admission to intensive care, non-elective hospital readmission, major complications, and

123 included proportion of patients who had non-elective hospitalisation (respiratory and all-cause) and

124 Among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing an elective HP resection, more than 1 in 4 hospitals perfor

125 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent an elective HP surgery between 2013 and 2017 were identifie

126 The risk was higher following both elective (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.12-1.13, p < 0.001) and emer

127 le participants were all patients undergoing elective inpatient colorectal surgery by one of the colo

128 rt study of patients undergoing 1 of 6 major elective inpatient operation from 2002 to 2011 using the

129 red annually in the US following 4.2 million elective inpatient surgical discharges.

130 y Medicare beneficiaries undergoing any of 4 elective inpatient surgical procedures between 2012 and

131 Adults with RA who were having elective inpatient total knee or hip arthroplasty, eithe

132 d trial including 108 patients scheduled for elective intra-abdominal surgeries requiring a nasogastr

133 We identified 19,213 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy from 2012 to 2015

134 surgery compared to lean controls undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

135 d December, 2016, all patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy and meeting rigorous cri

136 ss-sectional study of 24 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic general surgery at a single center

137 study in 132 consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic general surgery at an academic hos

138 Through a detailed human factors analysis of elective laparoscopic general surgery cases, this study

139 14 and December 2016, patients who underwent elective laparoscopic LAR + TME in 6 Italian nonacademic

140 ence of genitourinary (GU) dysfunction after elective laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection and

141 During elective laparoscopic operations, frequent intraoperativ

142 to antiseptic 0.04% polyhexanide solution in elective laparotomies.

143 solution is effective in reducing SSI after elective laparotomies.

144 Elective ligation of patent AVF in adults with stable ki

145 Autologous ADASc were obtained by elective liposuction.

146 based on adult patients registered for first elective liver transplant between April 2013 and Decembe

147 spective cohort study of patients undergoing elective lobectomy for lung cancer.

148 In all, 295 patients underwent elective lung resection for pulmonary malignancy from 20

149 e currently no guidelines for the conduct of elective lung resection surgery in this context.

150 ded, multicenter RCT, patients scheduled for elective LVHR (hernia defects 3 to 10 cm on computed tom

151 Among patients undergoing elective LVHR, the fascial defect should be closed.

152 d to patients with anaemia 10-42 days before elective major abdominal surgery.

153 These results support the continuation of elective major cancer surgery in regions with Covid 19 t

154 Adult patients undergoing elective major hepatic resection (>=3 segments) at a qua

155 aemia at preoperative hospital visits before elective major open abdominal surgery at 46 UK tertiary

156 ctive cohort study of patients who underwent elective major vascular surgery - carotid endarterectomy

157 dmission, or death after hospitalization for elective major vascular surgery.

158 nt MIDP, with 68 (19.7%) conversions, mostly elective (n = 46, 67.6%).

159 head and neck cancer patients undergoing an elective neck dissection.

160 IP; 2010-2014; N = 480,731) including major, elective noncardiac surgery patients to create the revis

161 herlands, among adult patients scheduled for elective noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia and

162 ilty status in individuals >=65 years having elective noncardiac surgery using the mFI and CFS.

163 Among patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery, heart failure with or witho

164 ter preliminary study of patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery, the use of a machine learni

165 years old, from 2003 to 2014, having major, elective noncardiac surgery.

166 S) and other outcomes in older people having elective noncardiac surgery.

167 cohort study of all adult patients receiving elective, noncardiac surgery in the Veterans Affairs Sur

168 d, controlled trial, 300 patients undergoing elective open colorectal surgery were assigned to receiv

169 One hundred thirty-nine patients undergoing elective open vascular surgery with inguinal incisions r

170 t is often deferred if the perceived risk of elective operation is elevated secondary to comorbid con

171 356 patients who had undergone 1 of 7 common elective operations (arthroscopic meniscal repair [116 7

172 65 years) who underwent one of 163 high-risk elective operations (ie, inpatient mortality of >=1%) wi

173 ering undergoing 1 of 2 preference-sensitive elective operations: (1) hernia repair, or (2) cholecyst

174 e cohort study including patients undergoing elective or emergency major gastrointestinal surgery fro

175 e screening using chest CT and RT-PCR before elective or emergency surgery under general anesthesia.

176 d people >65 years (2002-2015) who had major elective or emergency surgery.

177 Surgery was elective or non-urgent for 362 (90%), and median length

178 MPION PHOENIX) trials of patients undergoing elective or nonelective PCI.

179 HAMPION PHOENIX trial of patients undergoing elective or nonelective percutaneous coronary interventi

180 In anticoagulated patients undergoing elective or semi-urgent device surgery, the patient spec

181 categorised according to whether they had an elective or urgent PCI.

182 id-naive patients, aged 19 to 69, undergoing elective outpatient minor hand surgeries were enrolled o

183 s with benign or malignant disease requiring elective pancreaticoduodenectomy.

184 ography scans were acquired before and after elective partial temporal lobe resection in 25 patients

185 There were 5945 elective patients (6.5% SaAAA) and 1714 acute (4.8% SaAA

186 osed inguinal vascular surgical incisions in elective patients reduces the incidence of SSI.

187 Elective patients were the derivation cohort, emergency

188 nts were aged 21-85 years and had had either elective PCI for stable angina or urgent PCI for unstabl

189 -blinded trial tested the hypothesis that in elective PCI prasugrel 60 mg (ILS) is superior to standa

190 able and unstable angina patients undergoing elective PCI, the trial did not find a conclusive differ

191 among biomarker-negative patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), perip

192 cular Intervention Society including all the elective percutaneous coronary intervention from 2007 to

193 em has transitioned to predominantly SDD for elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

194 oing cardiac catheterization, most cases are elective, performed by femoral access, with interruption

195 ients with oncological disease scheduled for elective port implantation were randomized to a primary

196 The 2016 ISTH guidance against elective pregnancy termination for fear of DOAC embryoto

197 ebirths, 74 (22%) miscarriages, and 74 (22%) elective pregnancy terminations.

198 iagnosis of dementia (>=65 years) undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty were postopera

199 apshot study included patients who underwent elective (primary or completion) TP in 43 centers in 16

200 ization (n=152) of the non-IRA lesions in an elective procedure before hospital discharge.

201 s for non-cardiac chest pain, sepsis, and an elective procedure.

202 Among nonacute cases, elective procedures increased in ME states [3.9% (0.1%-7

203 sized a detailed process most applicable for elective procedures scheduled well in advance.

204 nge, 6.2% to 16.9%]) and persisted when only elective procedures were assessed (n = 88 hospitals) (me

205 institutional preparedness for resumption of elective procedures, patient preparation and communicati

206 ic aneurysm (AAA) deaths by 3% and increased elective re-interventions by 44%.

207 duction in AAA deaths, but a 52% increase in elective re-interventions.

208 One patient died from complications of elective reconstructive surgery.

209 eatening AEs and significant loss of CDVA in elective refractive lens exchange surgery was low.

210 26 years from the national Pediatric Eczema Elective Registry (PEER) cohort.

211 Tuesday was the most common day for elective repair (22%), Friday for symptomatic repairs (2

212 Tailored decision making for elective repair and considering the aforementioned risk

213 of hernia recurrence, the optimal timing of elective repair is after the last pregnancy.

214 esarean section a choice between planning an elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) or attempting a

215 Elective resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis decr

216 The risk of ostomy is not lower after elective resection, and considering colostomies related

217 All elective resections for a T1-3N0-2M0 stage colorectal ca

218 scularization, thereby reducing the need for elective revascularization before hospital discharge.

219 Subgroup analysis of patients with elective, ruptured, and symptomatic aneurysm repair demo

220 Instead, a discussion of elective segmental resection should be personalized to c

221 An elective segmental resection should not be advised based

222 diagnostic indication when performed in the elective setting.

223 terize the extent of geographic variation in elective sigmoid resection for diverticulitis and to ide

224 Elective Sigmoid Resection within 6 weeks vs. Conservati

225 2014, 109 patients were randomized to either elective sigmoidectomy (N = 53) or conservative manageme

226 the short-term results of the DIRECT trial, elective sigmoidectomy resulted in a significantly incre

227 Surgeons should counsel these patients for elective sigmoidectomy weighing superior QoL, less pain,

228 e DIRECT trial, a randomized trial comparing elective sigmoidectomy with conservative management in p

229 emonstrated a significantly higher QoL after elective sigmoidectomy.

230 Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) has been increasi

231 national estimates of these infections after elective surgeries based on microbiology data are limite

232 going inpatient or hospital-based outpatient elective surgeries from 7/1/2010-6/30/2015 at hospitals

233 Cancellation of elective surgeries had an adverse emotional impact on no

234 fections after both inpatient and outpatient elective surgeries highlight the continued need for surv

235 Four hundred ninety-four elective surgeries were performed (377 untested and 117

236 For elective surgeries, 30-day mortality was highest after c

237 costs and bleeding risk, and which may delay elective surgeries.

238 r who underwent any of the following general elective surgeries: abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AA

239 st 6 times higher after emergent rather than elective surgery (17.2% vs. 2.1%, aOR 5.82, 95% CI 4.66-

240 ce interval 1.03-2.51; P = 0.038) and having elective surgery (hazard ratio 1.72; 95% confidence inte

241 ohort (n = 36) of the Successful Aging after Elective Surgery (SAGES) study was used for SOMAscan.

242 age 56 +/- 14 yr, 59% women), 19% underwent elective surgery and 81% were treated by medical therapy

243 high proportion of patients undergoing major elective surgery and is associated with poor outcomes.

244 nagement of these patients in the context of elective surgery and pregnancy.

245 mercially insured patients who had undergone elective surgery at in-network facilities with in-networ

246 to 64 with chronic opioid use who underwent elective surgery between January 2008 and March 2015.

247 Higher rates of elective surgery but no long-term differences in quality

248 umber of infections divided by the number of elective surgery discharges).

249 is enrolled adults aged >=60 y who underwent elective surgery due to severe knee osteoarthritis.

250 jects comprising of adolescents admitted for elective surgery for nonrespiratory-related conditions.

251 At 1 year, patients treated by elective surgery had lower rates of recurrence (6%) vers

252 manually reviewed to assess for relevance to elective surgery in the United States during the global

253 ers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed.

254 benzodiazepine and Z-drug use in advance of elective surgery may potentially increase the safety of

255 anticholinergic medications with outcomes in elective surgery patients is poorly described.

256 The Successful Aging after Elective Surgery study enrolled dementia-free adults >/=

257 eoperative opioid use in patients undergoing elective surgery to identify the relationship between pr

258 nding highlights the importance of access to elective surgery to patients' emotional well-being.

259 ance design, out-of-pocket cost sharing, and elective surgery utilization, particularly in bariatrics

260 Blood plasma from older adults undergoing elective surgery was analyzed for 1305 proteins using SO

261 Among older persons, nonfrailty and elective surgery were positively associated with functio

262 ted to Sinai Hospital of Baltimore for major elective surgery, then retrospectively reviewed patients

263 In elective surgery, this can occur if patients choose in-n

264 least 24 hours that was not due to trauma or elective surgery.

265 utilization among patients undergoing major elective surgery.

266 anage anemia sufficiently early before major elective surgery.

267 t factors influencing where patients undergo elective surgery.

268 be considered an appropriate indication for elective surgery.

269 SUMMARY OF IPLA reduces pain in adult elective surgery.

270 oid use is common among patients who undergo elective surgery.

271 multiplying incidence by national inpatient elective surgical discharge estimates using the entire P

272 Among 1,116,994 hospital-based outpatient elective surgical discharges, 180-day S. aureus incidenc

273 Following 884,803 inpatient elective surgical discharges, 180-day S. aureus infectio

274 ng of individuals at risk may translate into elective surgical interventions and lowered mortality.

275 there was no death, and 3 patients required elective surgical mitral valve replacement at 6- to 54-m

276 ntricular outflow tract obstruction required elective surgical mitral valve replacement.

277 een CSF Abeta42 and delirium incidence in an elective surgical population, suggesting that postoperat

278 termine the feasibility of "hot spotting" in elective surgical populations.

279 Elective surgical practices have been profoundly impacte

280 ents aged 65 to 99 years undergoing 6 common elective surgical procedures [abdominal aortic aneurysm

281 nfections and limited resources, the risk of elective surgical procedures for index patient and commu

282 fied patients aged 65 to 99 years undergoing elective surgical procedures.

283 Elective surgical resection is no longer recommended sol

284 ss chromosomes in fetal ovarian samples from elective terminations of pregnancy.

285 in prevention of deep vein thrombosis in the elective total knee replacement population than combinat

286 sion of prophylaxis to patients admitted for elective total knee replacement surgery has been propose

287 line recommendations for patients undergoing elective total knee replacement surgery.

288 and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with

289 The exact diameter threshold for elective treatment of SaAAAs is difficult to determine,

290 e prone to rupture, guidelines suggest early elective treatment.

291 surgery-related characteristics (emergent vs elective, type of surgery, intraoperative blood transfus

292 4 [95% CI, 0.56-0.74]; P<0.0001), and across elective, urgent, and emergent revascularizations.

293 her NPWT on sutured inguinal incisions after elective vascular surgery can decrease the incidence of

294 (at least 18 years of age) undergoing open, elective, ventral hernia repairs with mesh placed in the

295 ients were stratified by urgency of surgery; elective versus acute (symptomatic/ruptured).

296 Patients undergoing elective versus emergent procedures had similar comorbid

297 Elective VHR was performed once preoperative requirement

298 ot be warranted in obese patients undergoing elective VHR.

299 a center and allocated to a patient on their elective waiting list (WL) based on unit prioritization.

300 minent emergency or oncologically urgent, or elective-were matched against the phases of the pandemic