コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 es and improve awareness and follow-up after emergency care.
2 lth equity into efforts to improve pediatric emergency care.
3 POT), a critical measure of timely access to emergency care.
4 ciated with differential delays in access to emergency care.
5 ed by differences in factors associated with emergency care.
6 ng from 5% to 15% within 1 year of receiving emergency care.
7 rt technology beyond the hospital setting to emergency care.
8 d to address these inequities in prehospital emergency care.
9 diac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay may expedite emergency care.
10 o the facility where they initially received emergency care.
11 se complexity at the time of presentation to emergency care.
12 important component of health disparities in emergency care.
13 rating diagnostic and treatment workflows in emergency care.
14 cations for children and adolescents needing emergency care.
15 he US with limited availability of pediatric emergency care.
16 aining program for PCPs to become experts in emergency care.
17 been proposed as a measure of the quality of emergency care.
18 as quick diagnostics of possible overdose in emergency care.
19 isits involving preventive, restorative, and emergency care.
20 much attention is the delivery of pediatric emergency care.
21 affecting the delivery of quality pediatric emergency care.
22 by timely delivery of effective prehospital emergency care.
23 ing numbers of spaces dedicated to pediatric emergency care.
24 ations, diagnoses, and Medicaid spending for emergency care.
25 bing approaches to the delivery of pediatric emergency care.
26 area mimicking an abscess, and reported for emergency care.
27 in a number of different sectors, including emergency care.
28 minutes from the facility where they sought emergency care.
29 that may be associated with timely access to emergency care.
30 ntified at ED triage as needing immediate or emergency care; 12.5% (95% CI, 11.8%-14.3%) required hos
32 fs that symptoms were not serious enough for emergency care (31%) and that symptoms would resolve spo
33 t during Initial Assessment and Treatment in Emergency Care), a randomized controlled trial of emerge
34 grow in the face of an escalating crisis in emergency care access and the decreasing availability of
35 ent of self-referrals by PCP cooperatives in emergency care access points is safe and cost-effective.
36 ith hospital emergency departments, forming "emergency care access points." This collaboration has de
43 ever, the association between travel time to emergency care and risk for complex presentation is poor
44 of care (POC) is an unmet diagnostic need in emergency care and time-sensitive outpatient care settin
45 sment of routine provision of care (not just emergency care), and contextualise this importance withi
46 igh rates of asthma-related hospitalization, emergency care, and mortality among urban African Americ
47 e may trigger asthma exacerbations requiring emergency care, and reducing exposures among asthmatic p
50 ective analysis of the prospective Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) head in
51 ergency Research Canada (PERC) and Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) probiot
52 ildren's hospitals included in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Registr
53 en with low-risk TBI, but only the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rules h
55 ded 14 pediatric ED members of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network and 1 Indian Hea
56 e cohort study was conducted at 15 Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network clinical sites o
57 were collected from patients at 14 Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network EDs and 1 Indian
58 ng 26 emergency departments in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network from 2008 to 201
60 health systems contributing to the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network were included.
66 ospective cohort study of children receiving emergency care at 983 EDs in 11 states from January 1, 2
67 ity of clinical services, such as skilled or emergency care at birth and care of ill newborn babies a
68 te that within a month of being treated with emergency care at Veterans Affairs hospitals, dually eli
69 terval [CI], .77-.94), hospital admission or emergency care attendance (aHR = 0.87; 95% CI, .81-.94),
71 h improved survival among children receiving emergency care, but state and national costs to reach hi
72 ntegrated impedance cardiogram could improve emergency care by lay persons, enabling rapid and approp
73 nce cardiogram) has the potential to improve emergency care by laypersons using automated defibrillat
74 There was a modest decrease in ambulatory emergency care center visits in 2020, and lower increase
75 tic purchasing, physician visits, ambulatory emergency care center visits, emergency department visit
76 approximately 6,000 for asthma) to the major emergency care centers in Atlanta, Georgia, during the s
77 points received for presence of a pediatric emergency care coordinator (PECC) and quality improvemen
80 tion of catchments is important for planning emergency care delivery and in the use of hospital data
81 an be valuable for monitoring vital signs in emergency care, detecting the early onset of cardiovascu
82 al records of patients presented to hospital emergency care due to SC use between January 2014 and Fe
85 ember multidisciplinary panel of allergy and emergency care experts; 9 members formed a writing group
88 adult Medicaid beneficiaries who present for emergency care for deliberate self-harm are discharged t
90 ture disruptions, which may create delays in emergency care for nonparticipants with acute medical co
91 upport a more intensive regional approach to emergency care for patients with ST-segment-elevation my
93 However, all of these may be limited during emergency care for trauma and cardiac arrest outside the
96 s clinical settings, including primary care, emergency care, hospitalized and nursing home patients.
97 NTS: This cohort study of children requiring emergency care in 586 EDs across 11 states was conducted
98 bly expanded options for veterans to receive emergency care in community, or non-Veterans Affairs (VA
99 ypassing rural emergency departments to seek emergency care in larger hospitals, and to measure the a
104 Prostitution was associated with use of emergency care in women and use of inpatient mental heal
105 uss the need for a holistic understanding of emergency care interactions linked to alcohol, drugs, an
109 Access to skilled obstetric delivery and emergency care is deemed crucial for reducing maternal m
113 tes has been celebrated as a model system of emergency care, it is not clear that pediatric trauma ca
114 d with more hospitalizations; greater use of emergency care; lower receipt of mammography screening a
115 explore the mechanisms by which transport to emergency care may influence disparate restrictive inter
116 ble to admission, readmission, ambulatory or emergency care; monthly spending 6 months before and fol
117 9 and highlighted the populations who access emergency care most frequently and who more likely need
118 dies), including patients from self-referral emergency care (n = 12,612), primary healthcare clinics
119 babilities, respectively, as injury related, emergency care needed, emergent but primary care treatab
125 n among nonechocardiographers (intensivists, emergency care physicians, internists, and medical stude
126 tance use problems, resulting in high use of emergency care, poor outcomes, and extreme social inequi
127 community paramedicine, novel roles such as emergency care practitioners, and physician delivered pr
128 rch, including psychosocial factors, and the emergency care preferences of patients and caregivers.
131 n the salmeterol group were not elevated for emergency care (rate ratio estimate [RR] = 0.69, 95% con
132 nce suggests that the use of therapy dogs in emergency care reduces anxiety in adults, but no trial h
134 A literature search of PubMed, Medscape, Emergency Care Research Institute Guidelines Trust, and
136 ients seen with suspected anaphylaxis at the emergency care setting (ECS), after subsequent diagnosti
139 ow the pandemic affected adolescents' use of emergency care, specifically for mental health (MH).
140 amily income has been associated with higher emergency care spending and insecure access to allergen-
144 ities had higher expected rates of community emergency care than lower volume and high-complexity fac
145 ents about uninsured patients presenting for emergency care that appeared without citation or that we
148 ts with acute heart failure who were seeking emergency care, the use of a hospital-based strategy to
152 ong 18-64-year-olds using cases admitted via emergency care, VE after a 3rd dose peaked at 82.4% and
153 its: OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.69-4.12), urgent or emergency care visits (1-3 visits: OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.2
154 -0.35; 95% CI, -0.61 to -0.09) and number of emergency care visits (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.96) f
155 %) were hospitalized, died, or had urgent or emergency care visits compared with 36 (6.0%) receiving
156 spanic Black, 63.1% non-Hispanic White) with emergency care visits during the pregnancy were included
157 mergency surgical conditions, travel time to emergency care was associated with markers of delayed pr
158 ) aims to ensure all veterans have access to emergency care, whether at VA or community facilities.
160 llary study enrolled children presenting for emergency care who received a 5-d probiotic or placebo c
161 ve financing schemes, balance of primary and emergency care with expensive referral care, development