ライフサイエンスコーパス: emmetropia

1 nts by ray tracing, aiming for postoperative emmetropia.

2 error was defined as refractive error minus emmetropia.

3 at 10 years postoperatively in eyes aimed at emmetropia.

4 pia and 34 (65.3%) had SE within +/-1.0 D of emmetropia.

5 continues to occur in an attempt to maintain emmetropia.

6 e can maintain coordinated growth to achieve emmetropia.

7 ed us closer to the ultimate surgical result-emmetropia.

8 spherical power of the IOL needed to achieve emmetropia.

9 to 40 years, diagnosed with either myopia or emmetropia.

10 0.25 D, astigmatism, cylinder < -0.25 D, and emmetropia (-0.25 <= SE(D) <= + 0.25, cylinder >= -0.25)

11 ategorized as myopia (</=-0.50 diopter [D]), emmetropia (-0.50 to +0.50 D), and hyperopia (>/=+0.50 D

12 ssified into 4 groups: hyperopia (>/=1.0 D), emmetropia (-0.99 D to 0.99 D), mild myopia (-1.0 D to -

13 The predictor was refractive status; emmetropia (-0.99 to +0.99 diopters [D]), mild myopia (-

14 odds of prevalent AMD (pooled OR myopia vs. emmetropia: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92).

15 for optical biometry and SRK/T formula, the emmetropia (+/-1.00 D) of SE, was able to get near 100%

16 ds of prevalent AMD (pooled OR hyperopia vs. emmetropia: 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.2

17 ll known and can negatively affect achieving emmetropia after concomitant cataract surgery.

18 Ten subjects with emmetropia and 10 with myopia were tested.

19 rs of age to 9.5% (standard error, 0.01) for emmetropia and 15.3% (standard error, 0.06) for high hyp

20 e can maintain coordinated growth to achieve emmetropia and 2) disruptions of emmetropization resulti

21 lex group were within +/-1.00 diopter (D) of emmetropia and 33 eyes (80%) and 34 eyes (83%) were with

22 spherical equivalent (SE) within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia and 34 (65.3%) had SE within +/-1.0 D of emme

23 s requesting a surgical procedure to achieve emmetropia and also address presbyopia.

24 function are not significantly different in emmetropia and LOM, the ETs are significantly different.

25 igate retinotopic accommodation responses in emmetropia and myopia under dynamic conditions.

26 Five subjects with emmetropia and six subjects with myopia were tested (+0.

27 Myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia were defined as a spherical eq

28 Myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia were defined as a spherical eq

29 7.1%, 7.7%, and 11.7%, in eyes with myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia, respectively.

30 es of refractive development had been toward emmetropia, and the control subjects with myopia were no

31 One eye was set for emmetropia, and the fellow eye received an additional as

32 of teenagers in comparison to teenagers with emmetropia, and to confirm whether the level of trait an

33 s a spherical equivalent of -1.00 D or less, emmetropia as -0.75 to +0.75 D and hyperopia as +1.00 D

34 Of all eyes, 95.3% were within 0.50 D of emmetropia at 12 months.

35 If the goal is emmetropia at age 5 years, then the immediate postoperat

36 0.377, both P < .001) than control eyes with emmetropia at the macular region.

37 n subjects with myopia than in subjects with emmetropia before and after timolol instillation.

38 in C57/BL6J mice during the establishment of emmetropia between postnatal weeks 4-6.

39 Compared to control eyes with emmetropia, choroidal vascularity was greater in eyes wi

40 r hyperopic subjects was consistently nearer emmetropia compared to their horizontal meridian.

41 Patients with myopia and emmetropia constituted the study and control groups, res

42 However, the emmetropia decreased to 80% when the enclavation is retr

43 The WFG group was significantly closer to emmetropia for both sphere and spherical equivalents at

44 byopia-correcting intraocular lenses require emmetropia for the best visual outcome, as small amounts

45 1.61 mm compared to 22.21 +/- 0.84 mm in the emmetropia group (P < 0.0001).

46 hed subjects with emmetropia or mild myopia (emmetropia group) and 34 subjects with moderate to sever

47 ilure compared to the combined hyperopia and emmetropia groups, not statistically significant (OR: 0.

48 gmatism </=1.5 D, anisometropia </=1.0 D) or emmetropia (hyperopia </=1.0 D; astigmatism, anisometrop

49 -astigmatism with refractive status (myopia, emmetropia, hyperopia).

50 alent -8.66 +/- 2.00 D) and 88 controls with emmetropia in both eyes underwent choroidal imaging usin

51 n of patients achieved a SER of <= 0.5D from emmetropia in the TAP group (78% vs. 58%, p < 0.001).

52 ral high myopia in their right eyes and near emmetropia in their left eyes from infancy.

53 (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02-1.92) compared with emmetropia in unadjusted models.

54 Maintaining emmetropia is an active process.

55 This negative shift toward emmetropia is associated with ocular alignment, which su

56 y has become a refractive procedure in which emmetropia is the goal, with the implantation of extende

57 wth and functional integration into the eye (emmetropia) is a robust example.

58 ents with low myopia (<-1D and >-6D) (0.7%), emmetropia (<1.0D and >-1.0D) (0.4%), and hyperopia (>1.

59 n age 3.2 +/- 1.5 years), the prevalences of emmetropia, myopia, and hyperopia were 26.7% (n = 8944),

60 A total of 54.5% of eyes were within 1 D of emmetropia (n = 12) and 77.3% were within 2 D of emmetro

61 tropia (n = 12) and 77.3% were within 2 D of emmetropia (n = 17) 6 months (n = 22) after surgery.

62 compared with DSBCS patients (compared with emmetropia: odds ratio for ametropia was 1.02, confidenc

63 After eyes have achieved emmetropia or have compensated for a minus lens, continu

64 CI, -1.48 to 0.10 D; n = 27) than eyes with emmetropia or hyperopia immediately after surgery (-1.70

65 ia group) and 17 age-matched volunteers with emmetropia or mild myopia (control group) were housed fo

66 conditions from 32 age-matched subjects with emmetropia or mild myopia (emmetropia group) and 34 subj

67 tial postoperative refractive error was near emmetropia or undercorrected by 2 diopters or more.

68 summation with the fellow eye, adjusted for emmetropia, produces an excellent binocular distance VA

69 4 (38.0%) and 23 (5.8%) eyes with myopia and emmetropia, respectively (P = 0.0001).

70 %) and 34 eyes (83%) were within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia, respectively.

71 ranges of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 D of target and emmetropia, respectively.

72 In targeting emmetropia, selecting the first plus IOL power is advisa

73 We obtained near-to-emmetropia SEQ postoperatively (mean - 0.03 +/- 0.43D),

74 Emmetropia (spherical equivalent -0.5 to 0 diopter) was

75 cts with myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and emmetropia, the latter being the control group.

76 Compared with those with emmetropia, those with high myopia had a significantly i

77 ith its optical power to achieve approximate emmetropia, through appropriate adjustment to eye growth

78 +/-0.25 and +/-0.50 D, the Olsen, Kane, and Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) all had insignificant

79 niere, Gatinel, and Saad (IOLup1D) (0.66 D), Emmetropia Verifying Optical (IOLup1D) (0.67 D), Hollada

80 d refraction of +/-0.50 D were seen with the Emmetropia Verifying Optical (IOLup1D), Kane (IOLup1D),

81 Acceptable emmetropia was considered if the resulting spherical equ

82 refractive error within +/- 0.25 diopters of emmetropia was higher than in the WF-optimized group (67

83 ropia was present in 222 subjects (52%), and emmetropia was present in 111 subjects (26%).

84 Seven of 84 (8.3%) children achieved emmetropia while an equal proportion were myopic (45%) o

85 thin +/- 0.5 D and 97.1% within +/- 1.0 D of emmetropia with a mean accuracy of -0.10 +/- 0.41 D.