ライフサイエンスコーパス: empathy

1 rietal junction would be required to disrupt empathy).

2 on average, lower on self-report measures of empathy.

3 in the evolution of social cognition such as empathy.

4 omical correlates of cognitive and affective empathy.

5 not regions involved in cognitive control or empathy.

6 enues for examining the neural substrates of empathy.

7 rning experiences are sufficient to increase empathy.

8 ve processes, such as perspective taking and empathy.

9 d positively with individual levels of trait empathy.

10 ough an implicit kinematic process linked to empathy.

11 a consensus on the meaning and definition of empathy.

12 condition including gullibility and impaired empathy.

13 social learning, which is predicted by trait empathy.

14 re specific, brain targets for studying pain empathy.

15 o interpret other's behavior and potentially empathy.

16 to others' distress, and a lack of guilt or empathy.

17 ocessing others' rewards is related to trait empathy.

18 regions involved in cognitive and emotional empathy.

19 on expression of affect, understanding, and empathy.

20 fail to capture the most fundamental form of empathy.

21 nagement of patients with impaired emotional empathy.

22 I review how focal lesions affect emotional empathy.

23 l affect recognition, social perception, and empathy.

24 icated in social understanding and cognitive empathy.

25 gical explanations evoked significantly less empathy.

26 disorders, which could increase clinicians' empathy.

27 elf-reported measures of autistic traits and empathy.

28 compared with patients with intact affective empathy.

29 es, may help to clarify the origins of human empathy.

30 important to parenting are those involved in empathy.

31 sychiatric diagnoses, social engagement, and empathy.

32 elopmental psychology as well as research on empathy.

33 prosodic comprehension had spared affective empathy.

34 lly intact inpatients on a test of affective empathy.

35 s and may thereby promote both imitation and empathy.

36 to experience negative emotions), but not to empathy.

37 bates: There's no consensus on how to define empathy.

38 nurses' negative attitudes toward emotional empathy.

39 as contributors to the neural development of empathy.

40 e social welfare in populations incapable of empathy.

41 Network (DMN) and its role in self-perceived empathy.

42 dy movement could be a marker of kinesthetic empathy.

43 scan and completed a questionnaire of dyadic empathy.

44 at OT underlies the kinesthetic dimension of empathy.

45 red persons, likely as a result of religious empathy.

46 ing complex psychological phenomena, such as empathy.

47 l underpinnings of individual differences in empathy.

48 ptoms would affect mental health clinicians' empathy--a crucial component of the relationship between

49 mbiguity and heterogeneity of the concept of empathy across the nursing literature.

50 Empathy-affective resonance with others' sensory or emot

51 scattered studies of patients with impaired empathy after stroke and other focal injury, but these s

52 suggest that those who increased the most in empathy and altruistic behaviors, and who decreased the

53 Factor analyses showed that empathy and apathy are distinct constructs, but that aff

54 Here we administered self-report measures of empathy and apathy-motivation to a large sample of healt

55 led behavioural assessment, with measures of empathy and awareness, were included.

56 simulation and memory can play in fostering empathy and begin to offer insight into the underlying m

57 ggesting that microstructural features of an empathy and body-related network are crucial for underst

58 rpreter; 2) interpretation that communicates empathy and caring; 3) bidirectional communication of cu

59 reportedly produces distinctive feelings of empathy and closeness with others.

60 t equivalent neural functions are engaged by empathy and direct emotion experiences remains to be dem

61 behavioural task to measure state affective empathy and emotion recognition.

62 are distinct constructs, but that affective empathy and emotional motivation are underpinned by the

63 d to directly evaluate the neurocircuitry of empathy and explore the interplay between blunted empath

64 e of callous-unemotional traits (deficits in empathy and guilt).

65 ersonality disorder characterised by lack of empathy and guilt, shallow affect, manipulation of other

66 Integrating empathy and IER provides a synthetic and generative way

67 nd ToM are distinct components; however, ToM empathy and intention subcomponents might share some fun

68 ntity and self-direction) and interpersonal (empathy and intimacy) functioning.

69 ations for disorders associated with reduced empathy and motivation as well as the understanding of t

70 ive advances scientific conceptualization of empathy and offers suggestions for tailoring empathy to

71 ion of complex social behavior, particularly empathy and parenting.

72 or donations were reflected in participants' empathy and perspective taking responses in a separate f

73 Empathy and previous trauma exposure (personal and whils

74 of prosocial behaviors, but the link between empathy and prosocial behavior is still unclear.

75 Though psychologists have studied empathy and prosociality for decades, this question has

76 frequent disinhibition, impulsivity, loss of empathy and repetitive behaviours.

77 elationship to behavioural change, levels of empathy and self-awareness.

78 reported that their children expressed more empathy and sensitivity for justice in everyday life tha

79 f their household, and parent-reported child empathy and sensitivity to justice.

80 iminished in bvFTD that might be relevant to empathy and social behavior.

81 our behavioral study, may reflect suppressed empathy and social cognition and indicate evidence of a

82 rs, and children, and the children had lower empathy and social engagement levels.

83 For instance, research on empathy and the arts suggests that the psychological pro

84 Both empathy and the imitation of an emotionally communicativ

85 he groundwork for a more coherent concept of empathy and thereby for a more fruitful debate over the

86 te highly specific roles of AI for affective empathy and TPJ for cognitive perspective taking as prec

87 r reduce negative emotions, which can reduce empathy and willingness to help.

88 sonal (e.g. depression), interpersonal (e.g. empathy), and emotion regulation skills measures (e.g. e

89 r intentional goal-setting, self-reflection, empathy, and episodic learning and memory.

90 ociated with cognitive rather than affective empathy, and greater social adversity was associated wit

91 e and neural mechanisms underlying emotional empathy, and how they contribute to the management of pa

92 iations between depression, autistic traits, empathy, and likelihood of suicidal ideation and suicide

93 chrony, primary intersubjectivity, emotional empathy, and mirror neurons; and it is associated with o

94 eases affiliative behavior, including trust, empathy, and social reciprocity.

95 These results identify empathy, and social skills more generally, as previously

96 well as by motivating cooperation, charity, empathy, and spite.

97 order) groups: imitation, biological motion, empathy, and theory of mind.

98 anisms through which learning interacts with empathy, and thus provide a neurobiological account for

99 on to OT-pathway genes, including parenting, empathy, and using social relationships to manage stress

100 ssessed attitudes, intention, self-efficacy, empathy; and 4 assessed knowledge.

101 Contagious yawning, emotional contagion and empathy are characterized by the activation of similar n

102 sustaining maturation of the neural basis of empathy are unknown.

103 developed ways to cope with disgust and use empathy as a main strategy to overcome it.

104 g a theoretical framework that characterizes empathy as a suite of separable components, we examine e

105 ttribution bias, aggressive fantasizing) and empathy as potential mediators.

106 endent variables and error rate on emotional empathy as the dependent variable to test a predictive m

107 stone toward understanding the evolution of empathy, as this essential social skill may have emerged

108 ontext, share Power in the interaction, show Empathy, ask about Concerns or fears, and work to develo

109 , and psychological dispositions (egoism and empathy) associated with attraction to terrorism.

110 distinction between emotional and cognitive empathy-borrowed from theoretical psychology-has been a

111 cation predicted the error rate in emotional empathy, but only percentage damage to the uncinate fasc

112 re known to exhibit behaviours suggestive of empathy, but the development and maintenance of these tr

113 we believe this model adheres to the PAM of empathy by eliminating the influence of social interacti

114 there is a critical level of concern, i.e., empathy, by the sick individuals above which disease is

115 Thus, it is crucial to understand how empathy can be learned and how learning experiences shap

116 ly implicated in vicarious reinforcement and empathy, carried less information about strategic variab

117 es for altruistic decision-making (affective empathy, cognitive perspective taking, and domain-genera

118 ions for the emergence of inequity aversion, empathy, compassion, and egalitarian moral values via th

119 mplex affective processing task including an empathy component.

120 As a model of empathy deficits, we used the well-established suppressi

121 Surprisingly, children with higher empathy demonstrated lower calculation skills.

122 cumulating evidence indicates that emotional empathy depends on coordinated functions of orbitofronta

123 y deficits in empathy, we review research on empathy development in typically developing children and

124 Self-report showed decreased empathy during placebo analgesia, and this was mirrored

125 affected patients' perceptions of providers' empathy during the pain procedure and manifested as subt

126 a genome-wide association study of emotional empathy (EE) as measured by emotion recognition skills i

127 Neurohemodynamic response to empathy-eliciting dynamic scenarios revealed by function

128 ter understanding of the neural responses to empathy-eliciting stimuli in psychopathy is necessary to

129 ther such shared activations imply that pain empathy engages similar neural functions as first-hand p

130 Deficits in empathy enhance conflicts and human suffering.

131 behavior was heavily influenced by affective empathy exhibited higher predictive accuracies for gener

132 observations suggested that a primal form of empathy exists in rodents.

133 ation that individuals high in dispositional empathy experience these physiological changes more quic

134 , making a translationally relevant model of empathy extremely important.

135 The patients with ALS showed reduced empathy (Fantasy scale) and increased behavioural dysfun

136 al in turn predicts a subsequent increase of empathy for a different out-group member (generalization

137 Empathy for another's physical pain has been demonstrate

138 oparietal junction [TPJ]) encoded trial-wise empathy for beneficiaries, whereas the TPJ (but not AI)

139 This work demonstrates that empathy for others depends upon a distributed network of

140 Previous human imaging studies focusing on empathy for others' pain have consistently shown activat

141 Empathy for pain activates brain areas partially overlap

142 erior frontal gyrus, regions associated with empathy for pain in previous studies.

143 ial neuroscience has consistently shown that empathy for pain recruits brain areas that are also acti

144 Subjective and neural measures of pain and empathy for pain were collected using self-report and ev

145 Using fMRI, we found that the 'empathy for pain' network was involved in encoding harmf

146 iew that self-nociception is involved during empathy for pain, and demonstrate the possibility to use

147 ng placebo analgesia also reported decreased empathy for pain, and this was associated with reduced e

148 sociated with shared activations in pain and empathy for pain.

149 sulted in a corresponding "normalization" of empathy for pain.

150 r this results in a concomitant reduction of empathy for pain.

151 e of pain, to test whether this also reduces empathy for pain.

152 altruism, (2) reinforce distinctions between empathy for sensory states like pain and anticipatory af

153 ress might be responsible for the absence of empathy for the pain of strangers.

154 research areas to the "end in mind" through empathy for the real-life problems embodied in the perso

155 process, focusing especially on the role of empathy for the victim of a harmful act.

156 is unsatisfactory, with a perceived lack of empathy from professionals and a shortage of stimulating

157 ference to the implusivity and interpersonal empathy gaps in decision-making.

158 d emotional skills, including expressions of empathy, has received scant attention in other primates

159 Impairments in emotional empathy have been mostly studied in neurological disease

160 lthough the biological mechanisms underlying empathy have been studied extensively, scientifically va

161 The neural mechanisms underlying emotional empathy have been widely studied with functional imaging

162 echanisms underlying affective and cognitive empathy have garnered intense interest.

163 Although signs of empathy have now been well documented in non-human prima

164 able to test a predictive model of emotional empathy in 30 patients with acute ischemic right hemisph

165 Thus, the study of empathy in animals has started in earnest.

166 ching and boundary building; and the role of empathy in caring.

167 n for stimulating a feeling of closeness and empathy in its users.

168 structive debate over the role and import of empathy in nursing practice.

169 for a more fruitful debate over the role of empathy in nursing.

170 hermore, we assessed dispositional levels of empathy in observers to determine how empathy might be r

171 f basic human qualities such as kindness and empathy in staff and, at service level, the extent of lo

172 which may reflect poor affect reactivity and empathy in the presence of hyperactive executive control

173 Callous traits index lack of empathy in these children and confer risk for adult psyc

174 icates that hens show no basis for emotional empathy in this context.

175 expression of emotional contagion (a form of empathy) in strangers of both species.

176 A multifaceted construct, empathy includes a prosocial motivation or intention to

177 rs such as social network size, anxiety, and empathy independently contributed to loneliness, only ba

178 nges the reward value of social stimuli, and empathy influences the extent of this change.

179 ex picture where selected ToM subcomponents (empathy; intention) showed a relationship to specific EF

180 s lesion studies have provided evidence that empathy involves dissociable cognitive functions that re

181 Empathy is a core human social ability shaped by biologi

182 A marked lack of empathy is a hallmark characteristic of individuals with

183 We conclude that a capacity for empathy is a key component for sustaining cooperation in

184 Empathy is a key component of our ability to engage and

185 Emotional empathy is a multifaceted and multilayered phenomenon wh

186 Empathy is a topic of continuous debate in the nursing l

187 Empathy is an integral part of socioemotional well-being

188 Animal empathy is best regarded as a multilayered phenomenon, b

189 -groups and tested whether and how out-group empathy is boosted by a learning intervention.

190 nal systems can help to delineate how primal empathy is constituted in mammalian brains.

191 Empathy is fundamental to human relations, but its neura

192 Many argue that empathy is indispensable to effective nursing practice.

193 Empathy is more effective than risk-aversion because whe

194 genetic contribution to different aspects of empathy is now established, although the exact loci are

195 However, although empathy is often thought to be automatic, recent theorie

196 knowledge about the kinesthetic dimension of empathy is still lacking.

197 in humans [1] and mice [2]; in both species, empathy is stronger between familiars.

198 These findings suggest that empathy is, in part, based on shared representations for

199 Since the term "empathy" is used to refer to a range of perceptual, cogn

200 Finally, we show that empathy itself can evolve through social contagion.

201 mice to display emotional state-matching, an empathy-like behavior.

202 methodology sufficiently sensitive to detect empathy-like responses previously, observer hens showed

203 We show that empathy likely evolved in a scenario where kin- and othe

204 ge in support of the proposal that affective empathy--making inferences about how another person feel

205 n together, these findings suggest that pain empathy may be associated with neural responses and neur

206 rds are processed in the brain and vary with empathy may be key for understanding disorders of social

207 perimental studies on our closest relatives, empathy may be the main motivator of prosocial behavior.

208 art 4, we outline how their understanding of empathy may facilitate current debates about empathy's r

209 We argue that impairments in cognitive empathy may reduce the repeated game effect on trust aft

210 ease of the stressed cagemate, suggesting an empathy mechanism.

211 els of empathy in observers to determine how empathy might be related to the degree of stress contagi

212 etween the individual and art (e.g., through empathy) might be a useful avenue for further considerat

213 unctional MRI, we demonstrated that the core empathy network including the medial prefrontal cortex (

214 lus plays an important role in the emotional empathy network.

215 ed to alterations in the (social) reward and empathy networks.

216 zed by impairments in social functioning and empathy, occur more commonly in males than females.

217 inform recent studies of decreased societal empathy, offer mechanisms and solutions.

218 Empathy often involves coactivations in further networks

219 o people's more general propensity to engage empathy or perspective taking can inform training progra

220 t whether the reported behavior is driven by empathy or social reward.

221 d that extra information such as reputation, empathy, or spatial structure is needed for fairness to

222 n all elements of interaction with patients: empathy, organization, and verbal and nonverbal expressi

223 01), inertia (p<0.001), loss of sympathy and empathy (p=0.008), repetitive behaviours (p<0.001) and d

224 treatment expectation, reward processing and empathy, paired with increased activation in attention-r

225 terior insula, supporting the view that pain empathy partly relies on neural processes engaged by sel

226 nisms underlying altruistic decision-making (empathy, perspective taking, and attentional reorienting

227 Empathy plays an important role in human social interact

228 of three emotional motivators - feelings of empathy, positive affect, and relational closeness.

229 ation and the interaction between egoism and empathy predicted video recruitment appeal.

230 ablishes when, how much, and what aspects of empathy promote specific outcomes.

231 anticipation spontaneously and following an empathy prompt in anterior insula and anterior/middle ci

232 showed no difference from controls after the empathy prompt.

233 rceived emotional effects (eg, prosociality, empathy, psychotherapy), but surprisingly little researc

234 re empathic participants, as measured by the empathy quotient (EQ), were better facial imitators and,

235 systemizing were assessed using the Combined Empathy Quotient-Child (EQ-C) and Systemizing Quotient-C

236 Empathy refers to the ability to perceive and share anot

237 own whether real-world altruists' heightened empathy reflects true self-other mapping of multi-voxel

238 we used the well-established suppression of empathy-related brain responses for the suffering of out

239 known about the ontogeny and consistency of empathy-related capacities in other species.

240 The enhancement of empathy-related insula responses by the neural predictio

241 Empathy-related insular and cingulate activity may refle

242 e learned and how learning experiences shape empathy-related processes in the human brain.

243 interplay between various skills, including empathy-related responding.

244 This has been interpreted as evidence that empathy relies upon neural processes similar to those un

245 ustments in focus, and the future promise of empathy research if these trends continue and expand.

246 edict more (e.g., narcissism) or less (e.g., empathy) revenge, with the opposite pattern for forgiven

247 ecognizing emotional expressions, as well as empathy, risk taking, impulsivity, behavior change, and

248 empathy may facilitate current debates about empathy's role in nursing.

249 Component Analysis (ICA) showed that higher empathy scores were associated with an increased contrib

250 s stronger for individuals with higher trait empathy scores.

251 Together, the present results suggest that empathy seems to rely on neural processes that are (part

252 ions in this network should be evaluated for empathy, so that deficits can be addressed.

253 reportedly because it increases feelings of empathy, sociability, and interpersonal closeness.

254 l of imitation) and high-level (mentalizing, empathy) sociocognitive processes.

255 indicate potential novel biomarkers of trait empathy, suggesting that microstructural features of an

256 t well-being is socially attractive, whereas empathy supports close relationships.

257 sm (self-report measures of autistic traits, empathy, systemizing, and sensory sensitivity).

258 ructures predicts error rate in an emotional empathy task after acute right hemisphere ischemic strok

259 uncinate fasciculus lesions in the emotional empathy task.

260 We show that empathy tends to foster cooperation by reducing the rate

261 find that women expressed significantly more empathy than men in messages accompanying their donation

262 form better on tests of social cognition and empathy than men.

263 n MDMA (0.75 mg/kg) had greater proximity to empathy than placebo.

264 for an approach to a multicomponent view of empathy that accounts for the interrelations among compo

265 n and present some of the seminal studies of empathy that can be found in the work of phenomenologica

266 Empathy - the capacity to understand and resonate with t

267 Empathy, the ability to vicariously experience and under

268 Using empathy, the awareness and understanding of other people

269 Empathy, the capacity for shared emotional valence with

270 cally, in participants with higher scores in empathy, the PCC had a greater effect on bilateral IPL a

271 d frontotemporal dementia, disrupt emotional empathy-the ability to share in and make inferences abou

272 In this setting we study the role of empathy-the capacity to form moral evaluations from anot

273 Emotional empathy--the ability to recognize, share in, and make in

274 Empathy--the ability to share the feelings of others--is

275 Empathy--the capacity to understand and resonate with th

276 rall, given the link between consolation and empathy, these findings help elucidate the development o

277 When individuals experience empathy, they often seek to bolster others' well-being.

278 empathy and offers suggestions for tailoring empathy to help people realize their social, emotional,

279 omains, from perception to language and from empathy to problem solving, that were once considered ou

280 various aspects of social behaviors such as empathy, trust, in-group preference, and memory of socia

281 ted a genome-wide meta-analysis of cognitive empathy using the 'Reading the Mind in the Eyes' Test (E

282 an's photograph; however, this newly created empathy waned rather quickly.

283 Cognitive empathy was associated with higher levels of motivation

284 Acute impairment of affective empathy was associated with infarcts in the hypothesized

285 In contrast, affective empathy was associated with lower levels of behavioural

286 grity of the insular cortex, while affective empathy was predicted by a marker of iron content in sec

287 CU traits are partly defined by deficits in empathy, we review research on empathy development in ty

288 nce we identify the most fundamental form of empathy, we will be able to distinguish among the more d

289 All patients with impaired affective empathy were also impaired in comprehension of affective

290 ticular, individual differences in cognitive empathy were associated with markers of myeloarchitectur

291 characterized by fun, whereas people high in empathy were central to networks characterized by trust.

292 Patients with impaired affective empathy were older, but showed no difference in performa

293 hibition, apathy, compulsiveness and loss of empathy were the most common initial symptoms, whereas d

294 llous-unemotional traits, indexing a lack of empathy, were related to brain responses during aToM.

295 tal junction, would cause impaired affective empathy (whereas bilateral damage to temporoparietal jun

296 socially beneficial depend on high levels of empathy, whereas different norms maximize social welfare

297 lights how mechanisms such as expectancy and empathy, which are seen as inducing musical emotions, ar

298 ive (automatic) and cognitive (higher-order) empathy, which is predicted by mother-child synchrony ac

299 theoretical and empirical evidence regarding empathy, which raises questions about the ordering and m

300 1, we outline the history of the concept of empathy within nursing, explain why nurses are sometimes