ライフサイエンスコーパス: endoscopist

1 important maneuvers available to the biliary endoscopist.

2 antation, provide challenges for the biliary endoscopist.

3 ologist blinded to the identity of the first endoscopist.

4 dem colonoscopies were performed by the same endoscopist.

5 dures) was calculated for each site and each endoscopist.

6 oscopist and randomly evaluated 7 videos per endoscopist.

7 a set to categorize the annual ADRs for each endoscopist.

8 denoma identification, as recommended by the endoscopist.

9 tely 30 patients by the center or individual endoscopist.

10 ERCPs are performed online by the surgeon or endoscopist.

11 of incomplete resection varies broadly among endoscopists.

12 oceles because they are managed primarily by endoscopists.

13 scopy, have become standard of care for many endoscopists.

14 y increase the use of the recommendations by endoscopists.

15 eria by a separate international panel of 29 endoscopists.

16 ageal interventions performed by therapeutic endoscopists.

17 en with abdominal injury by radiologists and endoscopists.

18 py if performed by experienced and dedicated endoscopists.

19 were due to variation in performance of the endoscopists.

20 can be performed very safely by experienced endoscopists.

21 ll adenomas were found among essentially all endoscopists.

22 tem provided performance data for individual endoscopists.

23 85-0.98), but similar for high-ADR/low-SSLDR endoscopists.

24 dditional analyses excluding high-performing endoscopists.

25 ists and 85 (60.7%) were removed by advanced endoscopists.

26 ire randomly reordered, was sent to the same endoscopists.

27 management of Barrett's esophagus by general endoscopists.

28 s assessed 119 colonoscopies performed by 17 endoscopists.

29 g success by colon segment as rated by local endoscopists.

30 % of average-risk patients by high-detecting endoscopists.

31 who perform high volume of EMR and advanced endoscopists.

32 lassification system was developed by expert endoscopists.

33 31 patients with C&M values scored by expert endoscopists.

34 g institution but may benefit low-performing endoscopists.

35 al ADR and to provide real-time feedback for endoscopists.

36 r-observer agreement in classification among endoscopists.

37 CAD, the novice endoscopists, and the expert endoscopists.

38 d a NPV of 91.5%, and in a shorter time than endoscopists.

39 ocedures were performed by three experienced endoscopists.

40 erformed under optimal conditions, by expert endoscopists.

41 duct injuries can be managed successfully by endoscopists.

42 as safety and quality were determined by the endoscopists.

43 ations within 60 days by a different blinded endoscopist (1161 colon segments total) at the West Have

44 est the diagnostic ability of the DNN-CAD vs endoscopists (2 expert and 4 novice), who were asked to

45 nserted the sigmoidoscope further than nurse endoscopists (61 vs. 55 cm, respectively; P < 0.00001).

46 Throughout the enrollment period, 219 endoscopists (74.5%) increased their annual ADR category

47 There was also considerable variation among endoscopists; 75% of providers had no colonoscopies with

48 ile leaks were managed almost exclusively by endoscopists (96%) with a 96% success rate.

49 uorescence endoscopy platform, providing the endoscopist a wide-field red-flag technique for adenoma

50 This case seeks to highlight to endoscopists a rare benign disorder that may be encounte

51 Targeting endoscopist about non-adherence to colonoscopy guideline

52 denoma detection may have lasting effects on endoscopists' adenoma detection rates.

53 Endoscopist ADR and sessile serrated lesion detection ra

54 From lowest to highest endoscopist ADR quintile, CRC detection increased from 2

55 confidence intervals (CIs) were adjusted by endoscopist, age, sex, and indication for colonoscopy.

56 S each(total 52,760 CRPS), that pathologist, endoscopist, anatomical location and year were all stron

57 al hand pressure was more effective when the endoscopist and endoscopy assistant could see the imager

58 to be done by two trainees, either with the endoscopist and endoscopy assistants viewing the imager

59 econd colonoscopy by the same or a different endoscopist and in the same or different position.

60 Both the endoscopist and pathologist were blinded to the patient'

61 28 screening/surveillance colonoscopies per endoscopist and randomly evaluated 7 videos per endoscop

62 Collected data were coded by two experienced endoscopists and analysed.

63 ered, computerised, coded by two experienced endoscopists and analysed.

64 owel preparations at the level of individual endoscopists and at the level of the endoscopy unit is a

65 ng flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by nurse endoscopists and by gastroenterologists.

66 founders, we found that as the experience of endoscopists and centers increased with cases, the numbe

67 included characteristics of participants and endoscopists and findings from index and follow-up colon

68 the number of patients treated by individual endoscopists and individual centers on safety and effica

69 Patients and outcome assessors, but not endoscopists and investigators, were masked to treatment

70 demonstrated considerable variability across endoscopists and over time.

71 vide an overview of the evidence and support endoscopists and patients on the use of computer-aided d

72 A cross-sectional study was conducted of endoscopists and their patients from 7 Montreal and 2 Ca

73 ized curriculum for advanced biliopancreatic endoscopists and to implement universally validated skil

74 nistered propofol sedation supervised by the endoscopist, and patient controlled sedation.

75 these algorithms, its interaction with human endoscopists, and clinical implications of false-positiv

76 These results are important to patients, endoscopists, and policy makers to inform consent and to

77 time were compared among DNN-CAD, the novice endoscopists, and the expert endoscopists.

78 pling error caused by insufficient biopsy by endoscopists; and incomplete patient follow-up.

79 A collaborative effort involving Endoscopists, Anesthesiologist and Institutions is neede

80 gical practices in modern medicine.Pediatric endoscopists are alerted to prolapse gastropathy, a more

81 urveys have shown that a large proportion of endoscopists are conducting surveillance examinations at

82 er, these findings often go undiagnosed when endoscopists are unfamiliar with the characteristic visu

83 ssion, with age, sex of patient, decade, and endoscopist as independent variables to adjust for inter

84 eat endoscopy and biopsies by an experienced endoscopist, as visual and histologic discernment may im

85 was high with FPSS based on unblinded local endoscopist assessment (93%) and blinded central reading

86 ticipants receiving FS screening by the main endoscopist at one of 13 centres in the UK FS Screening

87 ocation of diverticula was obtained from the endoscopist at the end of each procedure.

88 All 42 endoscopists at our institute were asked to attain a col

89 l diagnosis exhibits noninferior accuracy to endoscopist-based diagnosis.

90 mated on the basis of accuracy values of the endoscopist before and after CADx assistance.

91 Endoscopists' behaviors, independent of patient factors,

92 GD) (Olympus GIF-100 or GIF-Q140) by a staff endoscopist blinded to the findings of the sc-EGD.

93 Sigmoidoscopy by an endoscopist blinded to treatment assignment was performe

94 Endoscopists blinded to patients fasting status carried

95 Part 2 was endoscopist-blinded: patients undergoing screening colon

96 evidence of variation in sensitivity between endoscopists, but significant miss rates for small adeno

97 s use artificial intelligence (AI) to assist endoscopists by analysing real-time colonoscopy images t

98 Trained nurses and endoscopists can administer propofol safely for endoscop

99 screening program that uses highly qualified endoscopists can detect a significant number of adenomas

100 Fewer than half of the novice endoscopists classified polyps with a NPV of 90% (their

101 BACKGROUND & AIMS: The quality of endoscopists' colonoscopy performance is measured by ade

102 size, morphology, patient comorbidities, and endoscopist comfort level with specific techniques.

103 Some endoscopists consider duodenal biopsy mandatory in anaem

104 As endoscopists continue their commitment to the promise of

105 tions, the demand for expert biliopancreatic endoscopists continues to increase.

106 dentify an attainable, standard ADR to which endoscopists could aspire.

107 ortality rate than that in published data on endoscopist-delivered benzodiazepines and opioids and a

108 lonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening is endoscopist dependent, and colonoscopy quality improveme

109 though barium enema was performed first, the endoscopist did not know the results.

110 s within domains (periprocedural parameters, endoscopist-directed interventions, intraprocedural tech

111 Endoscopist-directed propofol sedation (EDP) remains con

112 orldwide study of 646 080 patients receiving endoscopist-directed propofol sedation found a mortality

113 Endoscopist-directed propofol sedation is well tolerated

114 BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopists do not routinely follow guidelines to surve

115 The use of sedation or endoscopist experience did not differ between the endosc

116 ms, endoscopic findings, use of sedation and endoscopists experience at the endoscopy prior to esopha

117 settings can therefore be selected based on endoscopist expertise and preference.

118 Currently some endoscopists extend the indication for endoscopic mucosa

119 d describe some of the unique challenges the endoscopist faces when evaluating these complex patients

120 Individual endoscopist factors have greater impact on SSL detection

121 1.73 million colonoscopies performed by 3567 endoscopists for screening or abnormal fecal test follow

122 el preparation, or number or size of polyps, endoscopists frequently recommend 3-year surveillance in

123 0% for both male and female patients for the endoscopist from both colonoscopic exams, as well as sec

124 Twenty-six endoscopists from 2 tertiary care centers underwent stan

125 In phase one, 68 general endoscopists from 4 countries assessed 4 batches of 20 v

126 Total of 120 endoscopists from 83 institutes were enrolled of which 3

127 ment, an online questionnaire was sent to 20 endoscopists from several countries (10 experts and 10 n

128 r, prospective study of data collected by 58 endoscopists, from 1634 consecutive patients (examining

129 inary evaluation (made by a surgeon, biliary endoscopist, gastroenterologist, and radiologist) of jau

130 (GCS) score, sedation, bowel preparation and endoscopist grade were documented.

131 assisted) was more likely with higher volume endoscopists (> 239/year: OR 2.79), more efficient fluor

132 cations in which ERCPs were performed by the endoscopist had a longer average FT than those with tech

133 Gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists had equivalent miss rates for adenomatous p

134 colonoscope is sometimes difficult since the endoscopist has to guess where the tip is.

135 Feedback to endoscopists has been shown to improve ADRs; however, ma

136 However, it remains essential that the endoscopist have both a thorough knowledge of these vari

137 Endoscopists have long awaited advances in the equipment

138 Since the turn of the millennium, endoscopists have witnessed an explosion in the developm

139 ies performed by 294 endoscopists, with each endoscopist having participated at least twice in annual

140 rmance was stable, though one low-performing endoscopist improved ADR by 20.0%.

141 time taken to withdraw the colonoscope among endoscopists in a large community-based practice.

142 benefit of NBI in reducing variation between endoscopists in detection of adenomas.

143 more than 2100 practices by highly qualified endoscopists in Germany from January 2003 to December 20

144 Further education is required to educate endoscopists in optimal technique to improve overall col

145 o train registered nurses supervised only by endoscopists in the administration of propofol for endos

146 Although many practicing endoscopists initially resisted its adoption, the fibers

147 Patient, endoscopist, institution, and procedure factors were der

148 individual safety records of all nurses and endoscopists involved in propofol delivery at the 3 cent

149 ORs of CRC detection were lower for low-ADR endoscopists irrespective of SSLDR (high-SSLDR, 0.87; 95

150 ated whether increasing ADRs from individual endoscopists is associated with reduced risks of interva

151 appa = 0.56), and exceeded agreement between endoscopists (Kappa = 0.36).

152 re, we explored possible procedure-level and endoscopist-level characteristics that may be associated

153 During real-time colonoscopy, endoscopists made diagnoses with high confidence for 75%

154 Endoscopists made real-time predictions of diminutive co

155 13018 ERCPs were performed by 85 endoscopists (March 2007 - May 2011).

156 Endoscopists may consider resecting gastric carcinoids <

157 er screening, diagnosis and surveillance but endoscopists may fail to detect adenomas.

158 These data suggest that experienced nurse endoscopists may perform screening flexible sigmoidoscop

159 ectal cancer in the local population, or the endoscopists' medical specialty or previous experience.

160 In addition, the endoscopist must have the capability to manage procedura

161 ile duct injuries were managed most often by endoscopists (N = 115, 40%) followed by surgeons (N = 10

162 Thirteen medical endoscopists, one per trial center, each performed about

163 flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by a nurse endoscopist or by a gastroenterologist.

164 s with visible or nonvisible dysplasia to an endoscopist or center with expertise in the diagnosis an

165 experiences of the authors, who are advanced endoscopists or hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons with ext

166 atabase of over 10,000 procedures by over 80 endoscopists over several countries.

167 To investigate how endoscopist performance at flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) a

168 Our results suggest that endoscopist performance may be an important contributor

169 ify whether specialty training or individual endoscopist performance primarily drives detection varia

170 Adenoma detection rates (ADRs) measure endoscopist performance.

171 CRCNet exceeds average endoscopists performance on recall rate across two test

172 Over the pilot period the endoscopist performed 145 colonoscopies, of which 78 had

173 The endoscopists performed 1451 colonoscopies and made 3012

174 Five experienced endoscopists performed same-day tandem colonoscopies, wi

175 BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Endoscopists performing duodenal polyp resection should

176 We contacted all endoscopists performing EDP for endoscopy that we were a

177 Practice Advice 16: Endoscopists performing endoscopic eradication therapy s

178 For experienced endoscopists performing screening and surveillance colon

179 ination; and (iii) the reproducibility among endoscopists performing this procedure.

180 One endoscopist piloted the tool, and results of the tool we

181 Endoscopists play a key role in the placement of enteral

182 tic endoscope technology, training of airway endoscopists, preoperative and sedative medications, pat

183 Experienced therapeutic endoscopists prospectively graded gastroenterology fello

184 that underwent subsequent nonblinded OC (ie, endoscopists provided advanced knowledge of specific pol

185 Endoscopists provided demographic and clinical informati

186 This prospective, single blinded (endoscopist), randomized controlled trial was conducted

187 Kappa values for agreement between endoscopists ranged from 0.60 to 0.85.

188 naged care setting with salaried physicians, endoscopists recommend repeat colonoscopy sooner than gu

189 We aimed to identify the reasons that endoscopists recommend shorter surveillance intervals fo

190 We compared EMR-documented, endoscopist-recommended intervals for colonoscopies with

191 onses and all colonoscopies performed by the endoscopist recorded in the EHR, ADR was calculated in a

192 Agreement between radiologists, and between endoscopists regarding size of varices was determined us

193 95.83% of endoscopists regularly used risk stratification of patie

194 were read centrally by 3 radiologists and 2 endoscopists, respectively, who were all independent and

195 applied carefully and in accordance with the endoscopist's experience, could all be successful in pat

196 %; P=0.006), atrophic gastritis according to endoscopist's judgment (12.9% vs. 3.5%; P<0.01) and corp

197 Endoscopist's preferences and patient's surgical history

198 the baseline examinations, according to the endoscopist's recommendation.

199 ic closure techniques helps in expanding the endoscopist's role in the management of gastrointestinal

200 d during resection, and skills of performing endoscopist's were extracted.

201 confirmed, for the subset where pathologists/endoscopists saw > 600 CRPS each(total 52,760 CRPS), tha

202 etecting centers should be achievable by all endoscopists screening unscreened populations aged older

203 Endoscopists should aim to stay above the lower 95% conf

204 BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Endoscopists should be familiar with the indications, ef

205 BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Endoscopists should ensure that all individuals with con

206 ficant and only well-trained and experienced endoscopists should perform ampullectomy.

207 BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Endoscopists should understand the risk of bleeding from

208 Endoscopists should warn patients, especially those with

209 BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Endoscopists should work with their local pathologists t

210 an academic teaching hospital referred to an endoscopist specializing in difficult colonoscopy.

211 e sought to examine the relationship between endoscopist specialty and polypectomy rate, a colonoscop

212 An association between endoscopist specialty and polypectomy was observed in bo

213 We determined endoscopist specialty by linkage to the American Medical

214 Some studies have shown that endoscopist specialty is associated with colorectal canc

215 The strength of the association varied with endoscopist specialty.

216 etween colonoscopy and CRC death varied with endoscopist specialty.

217 eath in the United States by site of CRC and endoscopist specialty.

218 Practice guidelines recommend that endoscopists spend at least 7 minutes examining the colo

219 ually by an interdisciplinary team involving endoscopists, surgeons and radiologists.

220 be safer and more effective for patients and endoscopists than propofol during endoscopic oesophageal

221 microscopy may have an advantage of offering endoscopists the ability to make an 'optical diagnosis'

222 Compared with high-ADR/high-SSLDR endoscopists, the ORs of CRC detection were lower for lo

223 se high-magnification images might allow the endoscopist to make a tissue diagnosis during endoscopy

224 Patients were randomized by endoscopist to the standard or CADe colonoscopy arm usin

225 Endoscopic closure techniques help the endoscopist to walk on thin ice and save himself and the

226 tes and disease-free survival so as to allow endoscopists to determine which treatment options are be

227 a multiplexed detection approach could allow endoscopists to distinguish between normal and precancer

228 Quality measures should be used by endoscopists to document and compare their performance w

229 aging could be used by appropriately trained endoscopists to make a reliable optical diagnosis for co

230 The use of nurse endoscopists to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy is expand

231 paroscopic-assisted procedures, have enabled endoscopists to successfully place enteral feeding tubes

232 rology is often unavailable, thus committing endoscopists to take routine duodenal biopsies.

233 forward camera of the colonoscope, allowing endoscopists to view behind folds and in blind spots, wh

234 ould be attributed to varying performance by endoscopists, to examine the effect of experience on per

235 These results can inform endoscopists, unit managers, and endoscopy societies on

236 ures along with other advances that give the endoscopist unprecedented options in the treatment of es

237 Some endoscopists use a type of blended current (yellow), whe

238 sing efficacy was evaluated by the attending endoscopist using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, th

239 d by Hines VA and organized and managed by 2 endoscopists using preestablished endoscopic criteria.

240 ; 7 [0-55] vs 10 [0-80] [group 2]), when the endoscopist was able to see the imager view.

241 The endoscopist was masked to group allocation until immedia

242 The question on technical skill of endoscopist was replaced with a question on patient comf

243 R and polyp size, morphology, histology, and endoscopist were assessed by regression analysis.

244 s for the CAD system vs those of the general endoscopists were 88% vs 73% accuracy, 93% vs 72% sensit

245 total of 4,306 colonoscopies performed by 10 endoscopists were analyzed.

246 Volunteers and endoscopists were blind to whether they were receiving r

247 Endoscopists were classified as higher, intermediate, or

248 In group 2, two skilled endoscopists were randomised (as with group 1) to undert

249 acteristics of the patients, procedures, and endoscopists were similar except that dilation patients

250 benign disease, 1 for unavailability of the endoscopist while 8 withdrew from the trial.

251 respectively vs. 3.99 years for the advanced endoscopist who did not complete EMR hands-on workshop,

252 was done independently by a radiologist and endoscopist who were blinded to each other's findings.

253 Procedures performed by endoscopists who did not supervise trainees were exclude

254 greater rates of detection of adenomas among endoscopists who had longer mean times for withdrawal of

255 assessed colonoscopy inspection technique of endoscopists who had performed 100 annual screening colo

256 d with those who performed fewer procedures, endoscopists who performed more than one sphincterotomy

257 lyps without human input or (2) diagnosis by endoscopists who performed optical diagnosis of diminuti

258 0 mg twice a day was confirmed by a panel of endoscopists who reviewed the videotapes.

259 Procedures were reviewed by local endoscopists, who had undergone similar formal SB-VCE re

260 irritable bowel syndrome patients, and most endoscopists will have observed such biofilms during col

261 Performance improves with time, but most endoscopists will require ongoing auditing of performanc

262 tions were performed by a single experienced endoscopist with a known high detection rate of adenomas

263 result in better detection of adenomas by an endoscopist with a known high detection rate using white

264 dures has traditionally been provided by the endoscopist with benzodiazepine and/or a narcotic.

265 then underwent colonoscopy by an experienced endoscopist with centralized double-reading.

266 ic diagnosis of LGD should be referred to an endoscopist with expertise in managing Barrett's esophag

267 CR frequency varied between endoscopists with 9 never performing CR and 2 performing

268 m, which performed significantly better than endoscopists with a lower or medium experience level.

269 Data set 5 was also scored by 53 general endoscopists with a wide range of experience from 4 coun

270 iffer between ileal and cecal intubation for endoscopists with ADR >=25 and < 25%, respectively.

271 ith adequate bowel preparation, performed by endoscopists with an adenoma detection rate of 20% or gr

272 The IRR for endoscopists with at least 20 polypectomies ranged from

273 experiences of the authors, who are advanced endoscopists with high-level expertise in performing end

274 commonly due to missed CRC, especially among endoscopists with low ADR.

275 Being screened by endoscopists with low or intermediate ADRs, compared to

276 We assessed trainees and endoscopists with much experience of routine outpatient

277 , and compared with the performance of human endoscopists with varying levels of experience.

278 racy than any of the individual 53 nonexpert endoscopists, with comparable delineation performance.

279 from 146,860 colonoscopies performed by 294 endoscopists, with each endoscopist having participated

280 colonoscopies performed by the participating endoscopists within 12 months prior to onset of the stud

281 was calculated in a report and displayed to endoscopists within the EHR.

282 We investigated whether endoscopists without prior training in NBI can achieve t