ライフサイエンスコーパス: endoscopy

1 %) received endoscopy within 24 h (early UGI endoscopy).

2 e classification of data obtained during HSI endoscopy.

3 No gross lesions were identified by endoscopy.

4 hite-light endoscopy to 81% for fluorescence endoscopy.

5 e with GI symptoms should be evaluated by GI endoscopy.

6 ointestinal bleeding during wireless capsule endoscopy.

7 ociety for Airway Management, and Karl Storz Endoscopy.

8 sfully managed either conservatively or with endoscopy.

9 examination, magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopy.

10 None had abnormal findings visible during endoscopy.

11 evices, quantum state control processing and endoscopy.

12 r age, male sex, and obesity, should undergo endoscopy.

13 be encountered incidentally during lower GI endoscopy.

14 shows potential for enabling HSI in clinical endoscopy.

15 All patients underwent endoscopy.

16 lecular level during clinical nasopharyngeal endoscopy.

17 atient with scores of > 4 received early UGI endoscopy.

18 ident variceal bleeding confirmed with upper endoscopy.

19 perplastic diminutive (1-5 mm) polyps during endoscopy.

20 nign disorder that may be encountered during endoscopy.

21 esophageal cancer within 5 years after index endoscopy.

22 leading to gastric eosinophilia assessed by endoscopy.

23 d high Rutgeerts score (>2) in postoperative endoscopy.

24 illation underwent postprocedural esophageal endoscopy.

25 roid resistance was evaluated by using nasal endoscopy.

26 nd The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

27 and histologic findings at the time of index endoscopy.

28 ulcer that had healed by the time of 3-month endoscopy.

29 he Cytosponge test before their surveillance endoscopy.

30 women with endoscopy occurred <2 weeks after endoscopy.

31 ugh, abdominal computed tomography (CT), and endoscopy.

32 es, interventional radiology procedures, and endoscopy.

33 ould be excluded with both imaging and lower endoscopy.

34 scitation, triage, and preparation for upper endoscopy.

35 oscopy in comparison to standard white-light endoscopy.

36 osponge-TFF3 result and were referred for an endoscopy.

37 based classification during real-time HSI in endoscopy.

38 s superiority to high-definition white-light endoscopy.

39 pain score after pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopies.

40 pregnancies exposed to endoscopy (2025 upper endoscopies, 1109 lower endoscopies, and 58 endoscopic r

41 inal ultrasonography, 27% CT scan, 21% upper endoscopy, 13% colonoscopy and 83% a gastroenterologist

42 We identified 3052 pregnancies exposed to endoscopy (2025 upper endoscopies, 1109 lower endoscopie

43 e significantly longer than with white-light endoscopy (22.4 +/- 8.7 minutes and 13.5 +/- 5.6 minutes

44 s (37.5%; 95% CI 29.5-46.1) than white-light endoscopy (23.4%; 95% CI 16.9-31.4; P = .01).

45 y (34.4%; 95% CI 26.4%-43.3%) vs white-light endoscopy (28.1%; 95% CI 21.1%-36.4%; P = .28).

46 1.0 million colonoscopies, 6.1 million upper endoscopies, 313,000 flexible sigmoidoscopies, 178,400 u

47 FMT-assigned patients underwent repeat endoscopies 4 weeks postenrollment.

48 frequency of angiodysplasia confirmed during endoscopy (58% versus 23%; P=0.03).

49 kins Hospital who underwent at least 2 upper endoscopies 6 months apart showing biopsy-documented BE

50 During endoscopy, 6 allergens were injected in the esophagus of

51 was no significant difference in mortality (endoscopy 8.8% vs surgery 6.3%; P = .999), none of the p

52 (83.3% vs 0%, P = 0.0041) and intraoperative endoscopy (83.3% vs 0%, P = 0.0041).

53 iated with a reduction in the utilization of endoscopy, abdominal radiology, and antibiotic prescribi

54 nge device successfully, 221 (13%) underwent endoscopy after testing positive for TFF3 and 131 (8%, c

55 0.047) and did just as well as a combined CT-endoscopy algorithm (AUC: 85.8 [95% CI, 76.5-95.0] vs 85

56 During the initial endoscopy an extensive polyposis of the stomach and jeju

57 achieve remission using the least number of endoscopies and with increased acceptability to the pati

58 During their hospitalization, 33% had upper endoscopy and 64% colonoscopy.

59 found to have non-dysplastic BE at the index endoscopy and after 1 year or more of follow-up.

60 ncluded pre-existing lung diseases, lower GI endoscopy and antibiotics.

61 rkers to identify the presence of rejection, endoscopy and biopsy remain the gold standard for its di

62 Recent data suggest that frequent endoscopy and biopsy without evidence of graft dysfuncti

63 Upper GIS endoscopy and colonoscopy are the recommended screening

64 Mice were analyzed by endoscopy and for intestinal epithelial barrier permeabi

65 anges in esophageal mucosal integrity during endoscopy and found it to be safe and able to identify p

66 Animals were then examined by endoscopy and gastrointestinal tissues collected for his

67 o endoscopy, we found no association between endoscopy and gestational age or birth weight.

68 re in development, diagnosis still relies on endoscopy and histological assessment of biopsy specimen

69 pproach, based on symptoms and findings from endoscopy and histology.

70 ations and diagnostic tools (including nasal endoscopy and imaging) have undergone major changes over

71 Clinical Stryker imaging instruments for endoscopy and open surgery were used in the study.

72 t study using routine lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and pathology data from patients who, after ba

73 Diagnostic performance of endoscopy and positive predictive value (PPV) of endosco

74 lar esophagus on high-definition white-light endoscopy and preferably optical chromoendoscopy.

75 f-the-art computer vision methods applied to endoscopy and promoting the development of new approache

76 ith continued symptoms can be evaluated with endoscopy and tests of esophageal physiology, to better

77 e study is to assess the diagnostic value of endoscopy and the predictive value of endoscopic feature

78 isease requires invasive procedures, such as endoscopy and tissue biopsy.

79 EPOS; clinically based CRS also encompasses endoscopy and/or CT scanning.

80 PLP had histopathologic evidence for DGC on endoscopy and/or gastrectomy.

81 ndoscopy (2025 upper endoscopies, 1109 lower endoscopies, and 58 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancr

82 f performance when used as a replacement for endoscopy, and assessment of responsiveness to changes i

83 Methods such as diffraction, endoscopy, and optical coherence tomography have been ap

84 sy cohorts, the screening period included an endoscopy, and participants with duodenal histology who

85 ices that are placed or removed via flexible endoscopy, and procedures that utilize instruments that

86 1 or more mucosal ulcerations [identified by endoscopy], and failure of conventional therapy) from Ma

87 astomotic leakage are present, a CT-scan and endoscopy are currently the methods of choice.

88 the submissions to the first edition of the Endoscopy Artefact Detection challenge (EAD).

89 rspectral imaging (HSI) is being explored in endoscopy as a tool to extract biochemical information t

90 rom patients without BE, using findings from endoscopy as the reference standard.

91 ) and high-wavenumber (HW) fiber-optic Raman endoscopy associated with genetic algorithms-partial lea

92 tment for rectal cancer can be identified by endoscopy at +/-9 weeks.

93 recurrence assessed by barium meal X-ray and endoscopy at 3-4 years.

94 ubjects who completed upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at the Health Examination Center of Changhua C

95 group had reflux esophagitis, as assessed by endoscopy; at 24 months, the corresponding percentages w

96 who underwent magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy before and after a therapeutic intervention.

97 ch included a bidirectional gastrointestinal endoscopy, between July 2006 and June 2015.

98 antitative, deep learning-assisted laryngeal endoscopy, by fully automating segmentation and midline

99 visualization of AV using this cap-assisted endoscopy (CAE) approach to standard forward-viewing end

100 Capsule endoscopy (CE) is the preferred diagnostic test of choic

101 cific small bowel enteritis (NSE) on capsule endoscopy (CE) poses a clinical challenge.

102 BACKGROUND & AIMS: Video capsule endoscopy (CE) provides a noninvasive option to assess t

103 A new capsule endoscopy (CE) system featuring two advanced optics for

104 per and/or lower GI tract in 6 patients in 2 endoscopy centers.

105 ients attending the outpatient clinic, nasal endoscopy changed classification in only four patients (

106 strategies such as laparotomy, laparoscopy, endoscopy, computed tomographic angiography, angiographi

107 atients at low risk of progression, for whom endoscopy could be avoided.

108 P-C) or Child-Pugh B plus active bleeding at endoscopy (CP-B+AB) are at high risk for treatment failu

109 erapeutic response are currently assessed by endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging, and biomarkers.

110 ain advantages over other techniques such as endoscopy, CT enterography, and MR enterography.

111 et-UNet model CAD system using 5 independent endoscopy data sets.

112 , through December 31, 2017 using coding and endoscopy data.

113 ld significantly reduce cost and pressure on endoscopy departments, in addition to the pain and disco

114 patients with OSA through drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).

115 s and superimpose them, in real time, on the endoscopy display a green box over suspected lesions.

116 to precede AEF development, and postablation endoscopy documenting esophageal ulcer may identify pati

117 nty-five OSA patients underwent upper airway endoscopy during natural sleep to assess tongue position

118 ting the study population to women having an endoscopy during pregnancy or before/after, and only ana

119 Exposure to any endoscopy during pregnancy was associated with an increa

120 endoscopy <1 year before or after pregnancy, endoscopy during pregnancy was associated with preterm b

121 l disease, celiac disease, or liver disease, endoscopy during pregnancy was not linked to preterm bir

122 comes of pregnancies for women who underwent endoscopy during their pregnancy.

123 Villous height to crypt depth, video capsule endoscopy enteropathy score, enzyme-linked immune absorb

124 then tested on a set of images simulating an endoscopy environment, consisting of color charts warped

125 fied (via Computed Tomography, Ultrasound or Endoscopy) episode of diverticulitis were included in th

126 On endoscopy esophageal injuries were classified as grade 1

127 nd those with persistent heartburn underwent endoscopy, esophageal biopsy, esophageal manometry, and

128 ch treatment or if the diagnosis is unclear, endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and esophageal pH monit

129 Emergency endoscopy evaluation after caustic ingestion is not indi

130 Upper endoscopy examination was performed in 127 (46.4%) patie

131 SSM measured to save up to half of the upper endoscopy examinations.

132 a posteriorly-located tongue (natural sleep endoscopy) exhibit a preferential improvement in collaps

133 MCSs) (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy findings) of 4-9, endoscopic subscores of 2 or

134 s indicate more severe CD activity, based on endoscopy findings.

135 reviewed clinical, pathology, radiology, and endoscopy findings.

136 ients in the group randomized to receive the endoscopy-first approach group (37 vs 49; between-group

137 in the early surgery vs 16 of 41 (39%)in the endoscopy-first approach group (P = .10).

138 domization and 44 patients randomized to the endoscopy-first approach group who underwent medical tre

139 pancreatitis, early surgery compared with an endoscopy-first approach resulted in lower pain scores w

140 ntly different between early surgery and the endoscopy-first approach.

141 Fluorescence molecular endoscopy (FME) is an emerging technique that has the po

142 the Baveno VI guidelines recommend avoiding endoscopies for patients with liver stiffness measuremen

143 static treatment was administered at initial endoscopy for 155 patients (60.1%) in the urgent-endosco

144 Timing of endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

145 tially provide a less invasive approach than endoscopy for diagnosing and monitoring IBD.

146 Gold-standard test for comparison was endoscopy for luminal inspection and computed tomography

147 ast 1 symptom could avoid risks and costs of endoscopy for more than half the children with celiac di

148 n response to therapy and was as reliable as endoscopy for the assessment of mucosal healing.

149 at utilize instruments that require flexible endoscopy for the indications of weight loss or treatmen

150 racentesis, thoracentesis, and routine upper endoscopy for variceal ligation in patients with hepatic

151 classify, localize and segment artefacts in endoscopy frames as critical prerequisite tasks.

152 Full-spectrum endoscopy (FUSE) incorporates 2 additional lateral camer

153 y (CAE) approach to standard forward-viewing endoscopy (FVE).

154 gery group (0.69 +/- 1.03) compared with the endoscopy group (0.15 +/- 0.44) (P = .007).

155 copy group and 6.6% (17 of 258) in the early-endoscopy group (difference, 2.3 percentage points; 95%

156 ndoscopy group and in 20 (7.8%) in the early-endoscopy group (difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95%

157 was 8.9% (23 of 258 patients) in the urgent-endoscopy group and 6.6% (17 of 258) in the early-endosc

158 scopy for 155 patients (60.1%) in the urgent-endoscopy group and for 125 (48.4%) in the early-endosco

159 ccurred in 28 patients (10.9%) in the urgent-endoscopy group and in 20 (7.8%) in the early-endoscopy

160 nts (66.4%) with peptic ulcers in the urgent-endoscopy group and in 76 of 159 (47.8%) in the early-en

161 copy group) or between 6 and 24 hours (early-endoscopy group) after gastroenterologic consultation.

162 to undergo endoscopy within 6 hours (urgent-endoscopy group) or between 6 and 24 hours (early-endosc

163 scopy group and for 125 (48.4%) in the early-endoscopy group.

164 group and in 76 of 159 (47.8%) in the early-endoscopy group.

165 urgical treatments, percutaneous and hybrid (endoscopy-guided angiography) sclerotherapy and procedur

166 Percutaneous or endoscopy-guided hybrid sclerotherapy appeared to be a s

167 Six patients underwent endoscopy-guided hybrid sclerotherapy, one patient under

168 All patients who received early UGI endoscopy had a low or moderate clinical Rockall score i

169 Ce6-PVP-based fluorescence endoscopy had an improved detection rate of 100% (8/8) i

170 Endoscopy has been less well studied, and the objective

171 d anesthesia care (MAC) for gastrointestinal endoscopy has increased in the Veterans Health Administr

172 The European Society for Endoscopy has recommended that a comparison between ESD

173 Motion artefacts during medical endoscopy have traditionally limited HSI application, ho

174 e effective than high-definition white-light endoscopy (HD-WLE) in detecting serrated lesions in pati

175 Endoscopy helped in identifying poor prognosis in 30 of

176 lines for diagnostic evaluation recommending endoscopy (high risk), MR cholangiopancreatography (inte

177 icipants in the usual care group only had an endoscopy if deemed necessary by their general practitio

178 oup), in which participants only received an endoscopy if required by their general practitioner, or

179 Cytosponge-TFF3 procedure, with a subsequent endoscopy if the procedure identified TFF3-positive cell

180 fine-tuned on a dataset of 300 hyperspectral endoscopy images acquired from a planar Macbeth ColorChe

181 To evaluate whether urgent endoscopy improves outcomes in patients predicted to be

182 Predictors for high pain scores after endoscopies in children are not known.

183 roesophageal varices could spare unnecessary endoscopies in patients with low probability of finding

184 ing or visible vessels were found on initial endoscopy in 105 of the 158 patients (66.4%) with peptic

185 rom a nutritional intervention, we performed endoscopy in 80 children who had biopsy-confirmed EED an

186 iagnose functional dyspepsia, the utility of endoscopy in all patients with typical symptoms is minim

187 nd higher pain scores after gastrointestinal endoscopy in children.

188 inylpyrrolidone (Ce6-PVP)-based fluorescence endoscopy in comparison to standard white-light endoscop

189 incidence of DGC and limited sensitivity of endoscopy in detection have prompted recommendation for

190 ears) who underwent upper and lower GI tract endoscopy in Germany from December 2015 through Septembe

191 Emergency CT outperforms endoscopy in predicting esophageal stricture formation a

192 cy of emergency computed tomography (CT) and endoscopy in predicting risks of esophageal stricture.

193 after ingestion showed that CT outperformed endoscopy in predicting stricture formation (AUC: 85.1 [

194 image distortions that arise during flexible endoscopy in the clinic have made integration of HSI cha

195 feasible, whereas performance of esophageal endoscopy in the presence of AEF may result in significa

196 The findings that were noted during endoscopy included the optic disc characteristics, anato

197 roach group who underwent medical treatment, endoscopy including lithotripsy if needed, and surgery i

198 e performed with high-definition white-light endoscopy, including careful inspection of the neosquamo

199 nd panoramic views obtained by full-spectrum endoscopy increased the number of dysplastic lesions det

200 ells, interleukin-2, symptoms, video capsule endoscopy, intraepithelial leukocytes, and tissue multip

201 oncept study that Ce6-PVP-based fluorescence endoscopy is a highly sensitive red flag technology to i

202 Third-space endoscopy is a novel, safe, and effective method for tre

203 Endoscopy is a routine imaging technique for the detecti

204 However, upper airway endoscopy is considered an aerosol-generating procedure

205 colonoscopists, high-definition, white-light endoscopy is noninferior to pancolonic chromoendoscopy f

206 me surveillance, high-definition white-light endoscopy is not inferior to pancolonic chromoendoscopy

207 this has not been assessed in Tanzania since endoscopy is not readily available for routine use in ou

208 Although technically a normal endoscopy is required to diagnose functional dyspepsia,

209 Endoscopy is the best predictor of stricture formation a

210 enital malformations) in women who underwent endoscopy just before or after pregnancy.

211 and co-culture studies, high-resolution mini-endoscopy, light-sheet fluorescence microscopy and micro

212 Numerous dietary restrictions and endoscopies limit the implementation of empiric eliminat

213 Compared to women with endoscopy <1 year before or after pregnancy, endoscopy d

214 Gastrointestinal endoscopy may be associated with pain and anxiety.

215 s that underwent high-definition white-light endoscopy (n = 128) or pancolonic chromoendoscopy (n = 1

216 None of the 15 stillbirths to women with endoscopy occurred <2 weeks after endoscopy.

217 e made high-definition digital videos during endoscopies of patients with BORN and non-dysplastic Bar

218 n pump inhibitor therapy and/or surveillance endoscopy) of this before undergoing the procedure.

219 Lesions were scored by endoscopy on the last day of PPE exposure.

220 verted to standard total extraperitoneal gas endoscopy once an extraperitoneal space of at least 8 cm

221 sal allergen challenge and monitored by mini endoscopy or airway hyperreactivity, respectively.

222 diagnosis by CT and confirmation by surgery, endoscopy or radiological control.

223 rticipants who did not have a previous lower endoscopy (OR 0.73 (0.64, 0.83)).

224 A consensus article from the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) proposed an approach for in

225 d 2 or more years of follow-up and 3 or more endoscopies over an average follow-up period of 5.13 yea

226 anges in esophageal mucosal integrity during endoscopy over a long segment of the esophagus.

227 Endoscopy patients underwent venipuncture and erythrocyt

228 associated with lower 30-day mortality than endoscopy performed between 6 and 24 hours after consult

229 lesion on the stomach cardia, with upper GIS endoscopy performed due to deep anemia, who underwent si

230 at high risk for further bleeding or death, endoscopy performed within 6 hours after gastroenterolog

231 The role of endoscopy performed within time frames shorter than 24 h

232 Endoscopy plays a critical role in the posttransplant ma

233 hospital admissions, surgical interventions, endoscopies, PN, and immunosuppressive medication.

234 cation who underwent a diagnostic ophthalmic endoscopy procedure from March 2014 to May 2016.

235 more than 6 months, and had not undergone an endoscopy procedure within the past 5 years.

236 Diagnostic endoscopy provided invaluable supplemental information a

237 However, clinical visual endoscopy provides no quantitative subsurface cancer inf

238 icipants in the Gastrointestinal Disease and Endoscopy Registry (GIDER), a colonoscopy-based longitud

239 The endoscopy reporting system provided performance data for

240 In the group of animals fed HEWP, endoscopy revealed clinical signs of esophagitis includi

241 ients reported mild nausea and vomiting, and endoscopy revealed only minor self-limiting ulcers in 5

242 iagnostic yield of small-bowel video capsule endoscopy (SB-VCE) are communicated in recent clinical a

243 Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) was introduced into clinical practice a

244 comparing the agreement of the machine-read endoscopy score with the human central reader score.

245 Postablation endoscopy seems to identify patients at high risk of eso

246 By endoscopy, seven patients (36.8%) showed discreet change

247 subsquamous intestinal metaplasia, a repeat endoscopy should be performed and visible islands or ton

248 examination with high-definition white-light endoscopy should be performed within 3-6 months to rule

249 s on evaluating how to improve access to UGI endoscopy so as to improve outcomes.

250 h risk of delayed bleeding (based on Spanish Endoscopy Society Endoscopic Resection Group score).

251 nt anatomy may be slightly different, making endoscopy sometimes technically challenging and necessit

252 r adverse outcomes of pregnancy according to endoscopy status using 1,589,173 unexposed pregnancies a

253 f a combined histologic and endoscopic (Mayo endoscopy subscore, 0 or 1) improvement endpoint, which

254 using DESI-MSI in the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy suite, as well as functional studies to determ

255 erology clinic, hospital emergency room, and endoscopy suite.

256 e new Expanded-Baveno VI criteria spare more endoscopies than the original criteria with a minimal ri

257 ), however when stratified by previous lower endoscopy, the association was only observed in the part

258 ed at baseline and confirmed by a subsequent endoscopy, the odds for progression to neoplasia also in

259 Based on CT-scans and upper endoscopy, the true number of anastomotic leakage was 15

260 alse discovery rate from 45% for white-light endoscopy to 81% for fluorescence endoscopy.

261 In cirrhosis upper-gastrointestinal-endoscopy (UGIE) identifies oesophageal varices (OV).

262 Patients admitted to the Endoscopy Unit were recruited and clinically examined fo

263 However, the total number of avoided endoscopies using this rule is relatively low.

264 assessment every 3 months, and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) at baseline and every 6 months for 2 yea

265 We used serial video capsule endoscopy (VCE) to assess the efficacy of a specific Bif

266 Transoral endoscopy, videofluoroscopy, ultrasonic vocalizations, a

267 rt central readers assigned each full-length endoscopy videos 1 endoscopic Mayo score (eMS) and 1 Ulc

268 ment of abnormal mucosal surface observed in endoscopy videos is presently not realized accurately.

269 Seven hundred and ninety-five full-length endoscopy videos were prospectively collected from a pha

270 ct eMS and UCEIS from individual full-length endoscopy videos.

271 edict levels of UC severity from full-length endoscopy videos.

272 Median time to endoscopy was 9 (interquartile range 8-12) weeks.

273 judication panel that reviewed radiology and endoscopy was masked to allocation and visits.

274 of UGIB among the 86 patients who underwent endoscopy was oesophageal varices (57%), followed by pep

275 A second endoscopy was performed after 24 hours to evaluate delay

276 Endoscopy was performed at baseline and 1-week post-proc

277 ork-out with a barium swallow, manometry and endoscopy was suggestive for primary achalasia.

278 Upper GI endoscopy, was performed on 46 (37.4%) patients, of whom

279 , for which only 1 birth had been exposed to endoscopy, we found no association between endoscopy and

280 ere electively admitted for gastrointestinal endoscopies were included.

281 Patients with EAC or HGD at the initial endoscopy were excluded.

282 Patients with cirrhosis undergoing an endoscopy were identified by International Classificatio

283 253 798 patients who underwent colonic endoscopy were identified, of whom 11 944 with intermedi

284 n ablation and postinterventional esophageal endoscopy were included in the study.

285 t, a computed tomography (CT) scan and upper endoscopy were performed.

286 (8%, corresponding to 59% of those having an endoscopy) were diagnosed with Barrett's oesophagus or c

287 agnosis and monitoring of IBD are reliant on endoscopy, which is invasive and does not provide inform

288 diagnosed after doing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, which showed ongoing bleed from a nonvariceal

289 d samples were obtained from patients having endoscopy who had received infliximab therapy for inflam

290 Endoscopies with duodenal and sigmoid biopsies, stool an

291 This strategy will lead to additional endoscopies with some false positive results.

292 r disease (cACLD) can safely avoid screening endoscopy with a platelet count >150 x 10(9) cells/L and

293 sia has been achieved with BET, surveillance endoscopy with biopsies should be performed at the follo

294 days and underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with duodenal biopsy of the distal duodenum at

295 ization, patients with NVUGIB should undergo endoscopy with endoscopic treatment of sites with active

296 nosis of functional heartburn requires upper endoscopy with esophageal biopsies to rule out anatomic

297 %) patients, of whom only 8 (17.4%) received endoscopy within 24 h (early UGI endoscopy).

298 cute upper gastrointestinal bleeding undergo endoscopy within 24 hours after gastroenterologic consul

299 ggests that patients with acute UGIB undergo endoscopy within 24 hours of presentation.

300 isk of further bleeding or death) to undergo endoscopy within 6 hours (urgent-endoscopy group) or bet