戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ntact precautions, (2) CDI confirmation, (3) environmental cleaning, (4) infrastructure development,
2  or cohorting (70%), hand hygiene (50%), and environmental cleaning (40%); nearly all studies with th
3 opriate hand hygiene for everyone (7/8); (6) environmental cleaning (8/8); (7) medical equipment disi
4 tions, private room/cohorting, hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and antibiotic stewardship); adv
5 hrough a combination of barrier precautions, environmental cleaning, and antimicrobial stewardship.
6 medication handling, equipment reprocessing, environmental cleaning, and handling of blood glucose mo
7 l measures included isolation, hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and rapid diagnostic testing.
8 essage reminders, alcohol hand rub, enhanced environmental cleaning, and weekly bathing of babies >=1
9  adequate staffing levels; ensuring adequate environmental cleaning; and using "bundled" intervention
10 tudy evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the environmental cleaning bundle for reducing the incidence
11 ng in Hospitals (REACH) study implemented an environmental cleaning bundle targeting communication, s
12 ng in Hospitals (REACH) trial implemented an environmental cleaning bundle targeting communication, s
13 liance of the average health care worker and environmental cleaning compliance by no more than 2% eac
14  This commentary discusses the importance of environmental cleaning during the pandemic and the essen
15 s, chlorhexidine bathing, MDRO surveillance, environmental cleaning education and feedback, hand hygi
16 D), antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), environmental cleaning (ENV), decolonization methods (DC
17 nvironmental cleaning or control of standard environmental cleaning, followed by a 5-week washout per
18 n, isolation precautions and prevention, and environmental cleaning in the ICU.
19 with contact precautions and more aggressive environmental cleaning may decrease transmission.
20  to intervention of UV-C light plus standard environmental cleaning or control of standard environmen
21                            Pre-intervention, environmental cleaning practices remained unchanged.
22 ination after room disinfection could inform environmental cleaning recommendations.
23                     Although the presence of environmental cleaning services (41.3% reduction, P = .0
24 , and the pseudo-outbreak was resolved after environmental cleaning, use of high-efficiency particula
25 nd at post discharge in addition to standard environmental cleaning, UV-C disinfection did not reduce
26 ments in health care worker hand hygiene and environmental cleaning were associated with greater redu