戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 res that distinguish vocal sounds from other environmental sounds.
2 c sounds, above artificial control sounds or environmental sounds.
3 tive, and emotionally negative) and nonvocal environmental sounds.
4 communication and/or facilitate awareness of environmental sounds.
5 h-processing programs, and cats responded to environmental sounds.
6  can effortlessly categorize a wide range of environmental sounds.
7  of unfamiliar voices and the recognition of environmental sounds.
8 f deficits in processing for both speech and environmental sounds.
9 sformation when optimized for non-biological environmental sounds.
10 gain biologically important information from environmental sounds.
11 dentification of important communication and environmental sounds.
12 needs of communication and the perception of environmental sounds.
13  of spoken words to equivalent processing of environmental sounds, after controlling for low-level pe
14 hemisphere-damaged aphasic patients to match environmental sounds and linguistic phrases to correspon
15 g is essential for the perception of speech, environmental sounds and music, and may be deranged in t
16 it in the presence of normal appreciation of environmental sounds and speech.
17 onses evoked during the processing of words, environmental sounds, and non-meaningful sounds in seman
18 ce may be inefficient, because many frequent environmental sounds are behaviorally irrelevant.
19      Patient studies suggest that speech and environmental sounds are differentially processed by the
20 blished by 7 years of age, the processing of environmental sounds continues to improve throughout dev
21 ts (e.g., beaches, buildings, and books) and environmental sounds (e.g., doorbells, dripping, and dia
22 imental conditions were words, syllables and environmental sounds, each controlled by a noise baselin
23 d posterior superior temporal regions, while environmental sounds enhanced activation in a right post
24 (e.g. human voices and speech, animal cries, environmental sounds) evoke in the human brain.
25 tal changes in neural responses to words and environmental sounds from pre-adolescence (7-9 years) th
26 ded environmental sounds results in improved environmental sound identification, with benefits shown
27 nimodal task) or of an object-picture and an environmental sound (in the crossmodal task).
28 lopment, allowing listeners to make sense of environmental sounds including speech.
29 bat's auditory midbrain, we hypothesize that environmental sounds (including vocalizations produced b
30 ssors, the temporal information in speech or environmental sounds is delivered through modulated elec
31  Hyperacusis, a marked intolerance to normal environmental sound, is a common symptom in patients wit
32  of auditory brainstem neurons by changes in environmental sound levels, and the results may extend t
33         Different types of auditory stimuli (environmental sounds, meaningless speech sounds, and wor
34 ferent types of sound-broadly categorized as environmental sound, music, and speech-resulting in nine
35 anning the domains of color, visual texture, environmental sound, music, tactile quality, and odor, w
36 ifferences were driven by stimulus type: the Environmental Sound N400 effect decreased in latency fro
37 The mismatch word-N400 peaked later than the environmental sound-N400 and was only slightly more post
38 ), overall liking (P =.001), aversiveness of environmental sounds (P =.02), and distortion (P =.02).
39 unction were correlated with speech, but not environmental sound perception.
40 d cognitive abilities showed that speech and environmental sound performance were differentially corr
41  compared during the processing of words and environmental sounds presented in semantically matching
42 Perceptual training with spectrally degraded environmental sounds results in improved environmental s
43 d significant improvements in all speech and environmental sound scores between the initial pretest a
44                          Complex natural and environmental sounds, such as speech and music, convey i
45 our-channel vocoder, consisted of a 160-item environmental sound test, word and sentence tests, and a
46                                          For environmental sounds (the stimulus class that was traine
47  These findings indicate generalizability of environmental sound training and provide a basis for imp
48 raining and provide a basis for implementing environmental sound training programs for cochlear impla
49 pretests (1 week apart) prior to a week-long environmental sound training regimen, which was followed
50 cing night during NREM; on Disruptive night, environmental sounds were used throughout sleep to induc
51 riched biosolid amendments was long-term and environmental-sound, which could be potentially applied