ライフサイエンスコーパス: epidural analgesia

1 (1.34%) and 111 480 (28.7%) were exposed to epidural analgesia.

2 , and in women with a medical indication for epidural analgesia.

3 agents, early ambulation, and fixed regimen epidural analgesia.

4 eturn of bowel motility, and weaning regimen epidural analgesia.

5 in terms of the risks and benefits of labor epidural analgesia.

6 sources for studies related to postoperative epidural analgesia.

7 ntrol compared with active controls, such as epidural analgesia.

8 incidence of dystocia than continuous lumbar epidural analgesia.

9 pen hepatic resection is often achieved with epidural analgesia.

10 ral analgesia or a combination of spinal and epidural analgesia.

11 418 761 (64.4%) were exposed to intrapartum epidural analgesia.

12 rtum exposure to epidural or combined spinal-epidural analgesia.

13 ed among women with a medical indication for epidural analgesia (0.50, 0.34 to 0.72) compared with th

14 among the 276 774 deliveries not exposed to epidural analgesia (192 510 women) (absolute risk differ

15 dpoint, the risk of death was decreased with epidural analgesia (3.1% vs 4.9%; odds ratio, 0.60; 95%

16 RCT), epidural anesthesia (2 meta-analyses), epidural analgesia (6 RCTs, 1 meta-analysis), and laparo

17 53%) among the 111 480 deliveries exposed to epidural analgesia (94 157 women) vs a diagnosis of ASD

18 ospital labor, 177 603 (76%) were exposed to epidural analgesia and 439 (0.19%) had HIE.

19 stimate the hazard ratio (HR) of intrapartum epidural analgesia and ASD in offspring.

20 time were the increased postoperative use of epidural analgesia and bronchoscopy (for clearance of pu

21 The presence and timing of epidural analgesia and demographic, pregnancy, and labor

22 was used to evaluate the association between epidural analgesia and HIE, adjusting for maximal birthi

23 ct that occurs in laboring women who receive epidural analgesia and in patients who receive spinal mo

24 This study compares the effect of epidural analgesia and PCA on pain relief, pulmonary fun

25 dence on the association between intrapartum epidural analgesia and risk of autism spectrum disorder

26 there was no significant association between epidural analgesia and the risk of HIE either on crude (

27 effect in women with medical indications for epidural analgesia and with preterm births.

28 Labor epidural analgesia and/or oxytocin use during labor and

29 While epidural analgesia appears to be safe, it comes with hig

30 ck protocols have questioned the position of epidural analgesia as the optimal method of pain managem

31 Pain control is as effective as epidural analgesia, but could be favored based upon reco

32 maximal inspiratory force were improved with epidural analgesia by day 3.

33 multimodal approach and the use of thoracic epidural analgesia can contribute to facilitate the fast

34 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Maternal fever following epidural analgesia complicates up to one-third of nullip

35 Epidural analgesia did not affect the incidence of respi

36 ears to be an association between the use of epidural analgesia during labor and an increased risk of

37 Use of epidural analgesia during labor and delivery.

38 Although use of epidural analgesia during labor is safe, detailed inform

39 A recent cohort study found that epidural analgesia during labor was associated with an i

40 udy of Danish children, maternal exposure to epidural analgesia during labor was not significantly as

41 Administration of epidural analgesia during labor, as identified by proced

42 s); of these, 92 900 (19.4%) were exposed to epidural analgesia during labor.

43 The primary exposure was epidural analgesia during labor.

44 Epidural analgesia during labour was associated with a 3

45 Of the 567 216 women, 125 024 (22.0%) had epidural analgesia during labour.

46 Importance: Epidural analgesia (EA) is used as an adjunct procedure

47 ration, followed by aggressive postoperative epidural analgesia for all patients.

48 Expanding access to epidural analgesia for all women during labour, and part

49 c colorectal cases performed with or without epidural analgesia for cancer, diverticular disease, and

50 The incorporation of thoracic epidural analgesia, goal-directed fluid management thera

51 icantly more women receiving combined spinal-epidural analgesia had pruritus (P<0.001) and requested

52 Epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia improve the overall outcome and short

53 Nonrandomized studies suggest that thoracic epidural analgesia improves outcome.

54 ous wound infiltration is an alternative for epidural analgesia in abdominal surgery but studies have

55 with both exposure and nonexposure to labor epidural analgesia in different deliveries.

56 f 10 RCTs evaluating the effect of receiving epidural analgesia in labor on cesarean delivery, where

57 The use of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery ha

58 The perioperative use of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is

59 ced catheters in neonates, study the role of epidural analgesia in outcome improvement for neonates,

60 ts have been obtained regarding the value of epidural analgesia in preventing postoperative pulmonary

61 g (1.8%) of mothers who received intrapartum epidural analgesia (incidence rate, 18.8 [95% CI, 18.4-1

62 Epidural analgesia initiated early in labor (when the ce

63 Whether epidural analgesia is a better method than parenteral op

64 Recent studies report that epidural analgesia is associated with a lower catecholam

65 ral analgesia, the combination of spinal and epidural analgesia is not associated with an overall dec

66 ults of this cohort study suggest that labor epidural analgesia is not independently associated with

67 Although thoracic epidural analgesia is still considered a 'gold standard'

68 These results demonstrate that epidural analgesia is superior to PCA in providing analg

69 Epidural analgesia is used by approximately 70% of birth

70 Maternal labor epidural analgesia (LEA) and oxytocin use for labor and

71 Among non-operative vaginal deliveries, epidural analgesia, non-reassuring fetal heart rate, mec

72 ent-controlled analgesia group compared with epidural analgesia (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.10-3.53;

73 significantly reduced in patients receiving epidural analgesia on days 2 and 3.

74 preoperative malnutrition and postoperative epidural analgesia on outcomes has also been explored fu

75 nalgesia to receive either continuous lumbar epidural analgesia or a combination of spinal and epidur

76 ury were prospectively randomized to receive epidural analgesia or PCA during an 18-month period.

77 nger stay was associated with intraoperative epidural analgesia (OR = 1.07, P = 0.019).

78 xis (OR 1.62, P = 0.047), and application of epidural analgesia (OR, 1.81, P = 0.

79 longed opioid use, planned regional block or epidural analgesia, or limited English fluency were excl

80 f surgery and pain assessments, all forms of epidural analgesia provided significantly better postope

81 Overall, epidural analgesia provides better postoperative pain re

82 urgery under general anesthesia, concomitant epidural analgesia reduces postoperative mortality and i

83 Epidural analgesia, regardless of analgesic agent, locat

84 Thus, epidural analgesia should be the preferred method for th

85 Epidural analgesia significantly decreased the risk of a

86 ve postoperative pain management, preemptive epidural analgesia significantly decreases postoperative

87 Epidural analgesia significantly reduced pain with chest

88 The authors have previously shown that epidural analgesia significantly reduces the pain associ

89 Among the women who received combined spinal-epidural analgesia, some were discouraged from walking a

90 could be noninferior to multimodal thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in patients undergoing open liv

91 his randomized trial was to compare thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) to intravenous patient-controll

92 orms of regional analgesia (such as thoracic epidural analgesia [TEA], paravertebral block [PVB], and

93 As compared with continuous lumbar epidural analgesia, the combination of spinal and epidur

94 It remains controversial whether adding epidural analgesia to general anesthesia decreases posto

95 n in spontaneous labor at term who requested epidural analgesia to receive either continuous lumbar e

96 he majority of evidence favors an ability of epidural analgesia to reduce postoperative cardiovascula

97 ls were used to estimate the hazard ratio of epidural analgesia use and ASD.

98 In this population-based study, maternal epidural analgesia use during labor and delivery was ass

99 no statistically significant association of epidural analgesia use during labor and delivery with AS

100 rom studies investigating the association of epidural analgesia use during labor and delivery with ri

101 Similar results were found when epidural analgesia using levobupivacaine with clonidine

102 001 for all), with the exception of thoracic epidural analgesia vs opioids for rest pain after thorac

103 crude HR for ASD associated with intrapartum epidural analgesia was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.25-1.36), and the

104 On case-matched analysis, epidural analgesia was associated with a longer hospital

105 Epidural analgesia was associated with a reduced risk of

106 Epidural analgesia was associated with a reduced risk of

107 Epidural analgesia was associated with a reduction in SM

108 Epidural analgesia was associated with a reduction in sp

109 esults of this study showed that intrapartum epidural analgesia was associated with a small increase

110 On unadjusted analysis, epidural analgesia was associated with an increased risk

111 Following qualitative assessment, epidural analgesia was associated with faster return of

112 uding more than 230 000 parent-infant dyads, epidural analgesia was associated with increased maximal

113 Epidural analgesia was associated with significantly red

114 When analyzed by postoperative day, epidural analgesia was better than parenteral opioids on

115 A propensity score for receiving epidural analgesia was created including demographic var

116 The observed reduced risk of SMM with epidural analgesia was increasingly noticeable as gestat

117 Epidural analgesia was initiated in the intrathecal grou

118 However, epidural analgesia was not associated with increased odd

119 Epidural analgesia was observed to be superior to PCA fo

120 Epidural analgesia was used in 4102 cases (2.14%).

121 Epidural analgesia was used in 66% of controls and in no

122 of 125 trials (9044 patients, 4525 received epidural analgesia) were eligible.

123 To describe the recent advances in labor epidural analgesia, which may have an impact on maternal

124 e tested the hypothesis that combined spinal-epidural analgesia, which permits ambulation during labo

125 s and there is also consistent evidence that epidural analgesia with local anesthetics is associated

126 luded randomized controlled trials comparing epidural analgesia (with local anesthetics, lasting for

127 cause they allow the neonate to benefit from epidural analgesia without the concerns of spinal cord i