戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 rial and the Careful Urinary Tract Infection Evaluation Study).
2 a Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation study.
3 a Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study.
4 ich was found to be 99.9% from a multicenter evaluation study.
5 a Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study.
6 a Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study.
7 ed as per the population-based Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study.
8 872 participants in the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study.
9 rs from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study.
10 nors in the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation study.
11 trial or the Careful Urinary Tract Infection Evaluation study.
12 rs from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study.
13                             Cross-discipline evaluation study.
14 a Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study.
15 a Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study.
16 a Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study.
17 e derived from the 2016 Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study.
18 cipating in the Pravastatin Inflammation/CRP Evaluation Study.
19  system, MedLEE, and performed a preliminary evaluation study.
20 join The SARS-CoV-2 Immunity and Reinfection Evaluation study.
21                       Comparative diagnostic evaluation study.
22 te-sponsored WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study.
23  from the DARE (Drug-Induced Arrhythmia Risk Evaluation) study.
24 w Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
25 Sonographic Coronary Obstruction Prospective Evaluation) study.
26 ors in Non-Ischemic cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation) study.
27 o reference data uncertainty in future model evaluation studies.
28 towards, and using the results from economic evaluation studies.
29 Rs and the radioligand was suitable for drug evaluation studies.
30 eed to be better documented through rigorous evaluation studies.
31 t is, aetiological, longitudinal and service evaluation studies.
32 date reference tests for the conduct of test evaluation studies.
33 ost-exposure vaccination strategies and drug evaluation studies.
34 ls have the potential to enhance preclinical evaluation studies.
35  conducting and interpreting high-quality AI evaluation studies.
36 le of 107 lens images from the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study, a digital cortical cataract grading al
37 ong participants in the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a population-based cohort study of com
38                  Data from the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study, a population-based sample of 2,520 adu
39  (DIGS) and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES) were classified with optic dis
40 ma Study (DIGS)/African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES) with >=2 years/4 visits of opt
41 tudy (DIGS)/the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES) with >=2-years and 4-visit fol
42 90 eyes) enrolled in the African Descent and Evaluation Study (ADAGES) with a diagnosis of glaucomato
43 tudy (DIGS) and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES) with at least 2 years of follo
44 = 151), and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES; validation cohort, n = 52) wer
45  Glaucoma Study-DIGS and African Descent and Evaluation Study-ADAGES) were observed with standard ach
46 e, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation study, adults with supratentorial ischaemic s
47  to participants in the Aichi Gerontological Evaluation Study (AGES) Project in 2003.
48                             In this economic evaluation study, an all-virtual, at-home acute care pro
49  SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this economic evaluation study, an analytical model of drug developmen
50 GN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic evaluation study analyzed electronic health records link
51 the multicenter African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study and Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma
52 g data from the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study and the Diagnostic Innovations in Glauc
53 sed the control groups of the Asthma Control Evaluation study and the Inner City Anti-IgE Therapy for
54 nt data from the RALES (Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study) and EMPHASIS-HF (Eplerenone in Mild Pa
55 geous Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation Study [APACE]; NCT00470587).
56                                              Evaluation studies are needed.
57  Renasight Clinical Application, Review, and Evaluation study assessed the utility of genetic testing
58                                This economic evaluation study assesses the clinical benefit of novel
59                               (BAsel Syncope EvaLuation Study [BASEL IX]; NCT01548352).
60                               We did a field evaluation study between Oct 1, 2014, and April 30, 2016
61                                This economic evaluation study compares the costs of intravitreal inje
62                                    Last, GFR evaluation studies conducted in approved donors and not
63 onal Study was a prospective diagnostic test evaluation study conducted in 7 centers.
64 GN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic evaluation study, conducted from September 1, 2022, to M
65 main subtomogram classification in extensive evaluation studies demonstrated herein using both simula
66 ons for a standardized approach for economic evaluation study designs (e.g., common asthma outcomes,
67 y of ML workflows, one usually finds diverse evaluation study designs.
68 ma Study or the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (DIGS/ADAGES).
69 describe the completed qualitative summative evaluation study, embedded within PALliative Care for en
70  implemented to reduce As exposure, although evaluation studies for these efforts are rare in the lit
71 016, used data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study for participants aged 65 years or older
72 For prostate cancer screening, this economic evaluation study found that PSA testing followed by MRI
73  2010, the HIVE (Household Influenza Vaccine Evaluation) study has followed a cohort of households in
74 benzodiazepines as second line, but very few evaluation studies have been reported.
75  [KPNC] and Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III [REDS-III] databases of data from J
76                             In this economic evaluation study, implementation of an intensive smoking
77 for the 1945-1965 birth cohort, research and evaluation studies in settings where persons who inject
78                             Further efficacy evaluation studies in the P. knowlesi-rhesus monkey spor
79 GN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic evaluation study in Massachusetts used a cohort state-tr
80 ed data from the RALES (Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study) in 1,658 patients with New York Heart
81 ATERIAL/METHODS: This observational clinical evaluation study included 224 patients who were referred
82                     In this multi-laboratory evaluation study including 11 sites worldwide, we demons
83                     The Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study is a nationwide cohort study of individ
84         The Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-IV-Pediatric (REDS-IV-P) Epidemiology,
85  study was based on the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) Cohort Study data.
86  to participants in the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study living in Mifune, a town in Kumamoto Pr
87                             In this economic evaluation study, many patients treated for HNCs receive
88                              In our clinical evaluation study, MCM2-positive cells were retrieved fro
89                      Data from major program evaluation studies of existing substance abuse treatment
90                                  Performance evaluation studies of low-cost sensors (LCS) measuring a
91 ons are intended for tuberculosis diagnostic evaluation studies of symptomatic children with clinical
92                                          The evaluation studies of the proposed model revealed that i
93 models (Seattle Heart Failure Score, ESCAPE [Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
94 ndomized or registry portions of the ESCAPE (Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
95 eart failure (n=657) and (2) patients in the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
96                              We analyzed the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
97                              Subjects in the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
98                                             (Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
99 ion were created using data from the ESCAPE (Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
100 were measured in 287 patients in the ESCAPE (Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
101                      We examined the ESCAPE (Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
102                  Based on the results of the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
103                                       In the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
104  heart failure (HF) patients enrolled in the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmona
105                             In this economic evaluation study of enhanced cleaning and disinfection o
106 pective Canadian Respiratory Syncytial Virus Evaluation Study of Palivizumab (CARESS) registry was se
107 , registry-based, single-arm, observational, evaluation study of patients with solid cancer and extra
108 SIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An economic evaluation study of solar-powered O2 was conducted from
109                             In this economic evaluation study of TMT and RC for treatment of MIBC, TM
110  October 2012 were enrolled in a prospective evaluation study of visual inspection using acetic acid
111                                     Rigorous evaluation studies on the effect of vision assistance ap
112 CORE (Heart Strategies Concentrating on Risk Evaluation) study participants.
113 eral design and interpretation of diagnostic evaluation studies, particularly in the field of respira
114 Events in Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation Study) patients, 735 had available images and
115                         During this economic evaluation study period, launch prices of cancer drugs w
116 ospectively collected, retrospective blinded evaluation study, probability of cancer was calculated f
117  SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this economic evaluation study, procedure- and diagnosis-specific code
118 D PARTICIPANTS: In this multicenter economic evaluation study, publicly available price transparency
119               After the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) demonstrated a 30% mortality be
120 fter publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) in national cohorts of older pa
121 25 mg or placebo in the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) trial.
122 aily or placebo, in the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES).
123  With this report (Randomized Spironolactone Evaluation Study [RALES] trial), we noted a marked incre
124 a With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation) study randomized trial and registry of high-
125 HLBI-funded Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study (REDS-III), aims to understand the gene
126 lled in the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study, REDS RBC Omics.
127  be completed in 2-4 h; and in vitro/in vivo evaluation studies require 1-14 d, depending on the desi
128 is single-institution retrospective economic evaluation study screened 435 patients to identify patie
129  part of the nationwide Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study seven months before the disaster.
130     Case studies are presented for 3 vaccine evaluation studies, showcasing some of these challenges
131                                   Biological evaluation studies showed that several analogues can imp
132            The CAFE (Conduit Artery Function Evaluation) study showed less effective central aortic p
133                                  An unbiased evaluation study shows that for nsSNPs with sufficient e
134                                This economic evaluation study suggests that there is a high economic
135 nt is relevant for animal models and vaccine evaluation studies that use nonhuman complement.
136                   We performed a preliminary evaluation study that shows encouraging results of our s
137                             In this economic evaluation study, the cost of PPM implantation in pediat
138                             In this economic evaluation study, the cost of therapeutic complex medica
139 n the PREPARE (Primary Prevention Parameters Evaluation) study, these prior strategies were combined
140  SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this economic evaluation study, time-driven activity-based costing was
141  is typically followed by multisite clinical evaluation studies to confirm diagnostic performance in
142 ue is uniformly accepted and used in vaccine evaluation studies to determine the acceptable level of
143  of commonly used PROMs through psychometric evaluation studies to increase researchers' and clinicia
144 globally commercialized supports use of meta-evaluation studies to test discrimination power among mo
145                             This was a pilot evaluation study to identify factors that facilitated/hi
146 l studies in HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) study-type patients, the aims of this study
147 GN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic evaluation study used a 3-state partitioned survival mod
148 GN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic evaluation study used a microsimulation cohort of patien
149 The diagnostic was assessed in 2 performance evaluation studies using 199 serum samples from individu
150                         Through an extensive evaluation study using a diverse array of experimental d
151                             In this economic evaluation study using a simulated patient cohort, the O
152                                This economic evaluation study using microsimulation modeling found th
153 GN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic evaluation study was a within-trial cost-effectiveness a
154 GN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic evaluation study was conducted from a lifetime health ca
155        The HIVE (Household Influenza Vaccine Evaluation) study was established in 2010 to follow a co
156                             In this economic evaluation study, we built decision models to project th
157                            In a mixed-design evaluation study, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of
158               In a single-centre, laboratory evaluation study, we did a head-to-head comparison of si
159                 In this prospective economic evaluation study, we found that costs were similar for i
160 A-TT first-introducer countries, and several evaluation studies were conducted to estimate the vaccin
161                                Subsequently, evaluation studies were performed on isolated perfused r
162         Moreover, two subjective radiologist evaluation studies were performed to verify the clinical
163 ucoma Study and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study were included, based on the appearance
164 a Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study were included.
165 ne thousand participants enrolled in a field evaluation study, were linked to population-level health
166 a Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study with >=2 years/5 visits of optic nerve
167 n the multisite African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study with primary open-angle glaucoma and wh

 
Page Top