ライフサイエンスコーパス: event-related potential

1 potential), and (3) top-down attention (P3b event-related potential).

2 ance advantage was reflected in a smaller P3 event related potential.

3 teral delay activity (tCDA component) of the event-related potential.

4 broadband field potentials, and less so with event related potentials.

5 as well as mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a event-related potentials.

6 ration trials assessing brain activity using event-related potentials.

7 in full-term and preterm human infants using event-related potentials.

8 eplicated a prior neuroimaging version using event-related potentials.

9 d dishabituation, imitation-based tasks, and event-related potentials.

10 ory responses, with no evidence of cognitive event-related potentials.

11 sting semantic associations, as evidenced by event-related potentials [4-7].

12 l established candidate signature is the P3b event-related potential, a late slow wave that appears w

13 To assess the clinical relevance of event-related potentials, a correlation analysis between

14 In this review, we describe the evidence for event-related potential abnormalities in CHR-P and discu

15 visually presented backward-words, and that event-related potentials above the frontal lobe are affe

16 d behavior better than stimulus phase or the event-related potential after the gap.

17 istics parametrically modulated single-trial event-related potential amplitudes during an early, tran

18 These modulations are tracked using classic event-related potential analyses complemented by Lempel-

19 at ceiling (94.8% accuracy), and traditional event-related potential analyses revealed only modest mo

20 We conducted time-frequency and event-related potential analyses to examine the time cou

21 Channel-level event-related potential analysis demonstrated that it is

22 In contrast, event-related potential analysis revealed that the contr

23 imulate commonly measured signals, including event related potentials and brain rhythms.

24 iness perception by employing scalp recorded event related potentials and evaluating effects on compo

25 for identifying generators of scalp-recorded event related potentials and for examining the physiolog

26 ffective patients, n = 13 healthy controls), event-related potential and event-related time-frequency

27 Our work demonstrates that there exist event-related potential and oscillatory correlates of vi

28 hibitory currents, as well as alterations in event-related potentials and brain oscillatory activity.

29 llable and chirp identification tasks, while event-related potentials and functional magnetic resonan

30 local contextual processing using a combined event-related potentials and lesion approach.

31 gic interneurons led to deficits in auditory event-related potentials and seizure manifestation, wher

32 Event-related potentials and source analysis were used t

33 Here, we combined event-related potentials and structural MRI to reveal th

34 ratings, skin conductance responses and EEG event-related potentials) and tonic arousal [indexed by

35 nses, (2) bottom-up attention orienting (P3a event-related potential), and (3) top-down attention (P3

36 Event-related potentials are synchronized to the onset o

37 This behavioral dichotomy is explained by event-related potentials around the parietal regions: lo

38 We recorded event-related potentials as participants performed a pro

39 P20, N40, and P80 components of the auditory event-related potential, as well as baseline and auditor

40 Following the event-related potential assessment, Hurricane Sandy, the

41 g bias was reflected in an asymmetry of late event-related potentials associated with motion evaluati

42 ces is further supported by a negative-going event-related potential at approximately 400 ms (N400),

43 Here we used dynamic causal modeling of event-related potentials, combined with group source rec

44 Another emotion-relevant event-related potential component (the early posterior n

45 while the late positive potential (LPP), an event-related potential component that reflects sustaine

46 ontrast, the feedback-related negativity, an event-related potential component thought to reflect neu

47 logical marker of visual selection (the N2pc event-related potential component) evoked by an array of

48 to alpha activity, we also assessed the N2pc event-related potential component, a lateralized transie

49 as reflected in the disappearance of the Pd event-related potential component, a neural marker of di

50 manifested as neuronal attenuation on the N1 event-related potential component.

51 on the attentional-orienting-sensitive N2pc event-related potential component.

52 stems, with alcohol leading to reductions in event-related potential components linked with attention

53 a control group, the current study examined event-related potential components sensitive to motivati

54 Predecisional and postdecisional event-related potential components were similarly modula

55 Candidate measures include event-related potential components with established sens

56 Results of three event-related potential components, including the P2, th

57 data (reaction time and accuracy) and in two event-related potential components: N2 and SP (a slow po

58 Event-related potential correlates of explicit face reco

59 Overall EEG variation, spectral power and event-related potentials could not explain this relation

60 High-density 129-channel event-related potential data were recorded from 26 parti

61 explanation, especially in the light of ERP (event-related potentials) data showing large evoked resp

62 al-to-trial variability in reaction time and event-related potential deficits during attention tasks.

63 Event-related potentials demonstrated early sensitivity

64 Somatosensory attention-orienting event-related potentials differentiated patients who cou

65 asure suppression of the N1 component of the event-related potential during active generation and pas

66 We analyzed event-related potentials during encoding and showed that

67 We found lateralized event-related potentials during task training that indic

68 (n = 15) participants with their lateralized event-related potentials during the performance of a vis

69 Event-related potentials during the talk/listen task wer

70 contralateral-delay activity (CDA) of human event-related potentials during visual search tasks in w

71 Using high-density electroencephalogram/event-related potential (EEG/ERP) recordings and source-

72 e mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the event-related potential elicited automatically by audito

73 The reward positivity, an event-related potential elicited by feedback indicating

74 wo separate studies, the N1 component of the event-related potential elicited by speech sounds during

75 During study, event-related potentials elicited by voices subsequently

76 We measured event-related potentials elicited from unique hues and t

77 this article is to review major findings in event related potential (ERP) research in schizophrenia

78 We directly compared the Event Related Potential (ERP) time-course for numerosity

79 The investigators compared event-related potential (ERP) amplitudes and event-relat

80 In the present study, event-related potential (ERP) and behavioral measures we

81 The present event-related potential (ERP) and functional magnetic re

82 Responses were analyzed using both event-related potential (ERP) and neuro-oscillatory (evo

83 h negativity (MMN) component of the auditory event-related potential (ERP) and tested native and non-

84 An event-related potential (ERP) component reliably associa

85 The N400 is an event-related potential (ERP) component that is elicited

86 neurodevelopment of ISL, we investigated the event-related potential (ERP) correlates of learning in

87 Moreover, the event-related potential (ERP) data obtained from Experim

88 ry functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related potential (ERP) experiments using a novel

89 ons of the feedback-related negativity (FRN) event-related potential (ERP) have been suggested as a p

90 positive potential (LPP) is a commonly used event-related potential (ERP) in the study of emotion an

91 ormation in visuospatial working memory, the event-related potential (ERP) index of maintenance is fo

92 t in the perceptual task, a well-established event-related potential (ERP) index of memory retrieval

93 gativity (MMN) and visual P1 are established event-related potential (ERP) markers of impaired audito

94 which is the first negative component of the event-related potential (ERP) occurring at posterior ele

95 that the error-related negativity (ERN), an event-related potential (ERP) originating in the medial

96 ed by a sustained positive deflection in the event-related potential (ERP) over the occipital scalp c

97 We used a neural marker of attention, the Event-Related Potential (ERP) P300 effect, to show that

98 ts in these perceptual tasks, as assessed by event-related potential (ERP) recordings.

99 ion is associated with anhedonia and reduced event-related potential (ERP) responses to rewarding or

100 Thus far the vast majority of event-related potential (ERP) studies investigating the

101 Event-related potential (ERP) studies of recognition mem

102 ns of these findings appear to conflict with event-related potential (ERP) studies showing no evidenc

103 This stands in sharp contrast to event-related potential (ERP) studies, as ERPs have been

104 We describe an event-related potential (ERP) study (Experiment 1) and a

105 This Event-Related Potential (ERP) study investigated whether

106 between these possibilities, we conducted an event-related potential (ERP) study testing the hypothes

107 investigated this hypothesis in the present event-related potential (ERP) study.

108 eval as assessed by repetition priming in an event-related potential (ERP) study.

109 administration while subjects engaged in an event-related potential (ERP) task known to be a valid i

110 To achieve this, we extended the classic Event-Related Potential (ERP) techniques (such as peak-t

111 eeler task was used to determine when in the event-related potential (ERP) waveform indices of word a

112 (ERN) and positivity (Pe) are components of event-related potential (ERP) waveforms recorded from hu

113 he P100 visual evoked potential (VEP) and P3 event-related potential (ERP) were compared in terms of

114 Pop-out target detection generated a P300 event-related potential (ERP) with a peak amplitude over

115 transient, spatially selective signal in the event-related potential (ERP), which scaled with relativ

116 wn marker of early face processing, the N170 event-related potential (ERP).

117 sing reflected by distinct components of the event-related potential (ERP).

118 Traditional "time-domain" event-related potentials (ERP) have been used translatio

119 d rest on affective picture processing using event-related potentials (ERP) in healthy men.

120 Event-related potentials (ERP) provide an objective inde

121 Here we report a study that used event-related potentials (ERP) to examine the neural and

122 We used event-related potentials (ERP) to test the hypothesis th

123 This event-related potentials (ERP) waveform, known as contra

124 Sixty-four-channel event-related potentials (ERP) were acquired during a vi

125 To address this question we recorded event-related potentials (ERP) while subjects performed

126 In this study, we used event-related potentials (ERP) with a balloon analogue r

127 and deflections in the raw potential trace (event-related potential; ERP).

128 In the second experiment, we also measured Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and observed robust elec

129 digms, infrequent stimuli elicit larger P300 event related potentials (ERPs) than frequent ones.

130 Here we used event related potentials (ERPs), known for their excelle

131 Combining event-related potentials (ERPs) and a defensive context

132 up of patients using electroencephalographic event-related potentials (ERPs) and determined their lon

133 In experiments using event-related potentials (ERPs) and functional magnetic

134 Continuous EEG and time-locked event-related potentials (ERPs) and gaze fixation were r

135 Here we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) and magnetic fields (ERM

136 o pictures of objects rotated in depth using event-related potentials (ERPs) and masked repetition pr

137 The current study used event-related potentials (ERPs) and masked repetition pr

138 by combining the high temporal resolution of event-related potentials (ERPs) and the high spatial res

139 Distinctive features in sensory event-related potentials (ERPs) are endophenotypic bioma

140 Auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 event-related potentials (ERPs) are reduced in schizophr

141 Event-related potentials (ERPs) are widely used in both

142 Although event-related potentials (ERPs) are widely used to study

143 We measured event-related potentials (ERPs) as human participants co

144 temporal-cortical sources revealed enhanced event-related potentials (ERPs) as well as decreased alp

145 We used event-related potentials (ERPs) combined with behavioral

146 We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked in response to au

147 olating the multisensory components of AV-VA event-related potentials (ERPs) from the sum of their un

148 In this regard, event-related potentials (ERPs) have been identified as

149 neural correlates of action monitoring with event-related potentials (ERPs) have focused on the erro

150 e we characterized neuronal oscillations and event-related potentials (ERPs) in Cynomolgus macaques f

151 At 6-10 months, we recorded infants' event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to viewing f

152 In previous EEG research enhanced event-related potentials (ERPs) in the late-positive pot

153 address this knowledge gap, we measured EEG event-related potentials (ERPs) in two macaque monkeys u

154 ain-computer interface (BCI) based on visual event-related potentials (ERPs) is of limited applicatio

155 e pathogenesis of RTT and that assessment of event-related potentials (ERPs) may serve as a biomarker

156 Previous reports consistently showed that event-related potentials (ERPs) measured over early soma

157 ecision accuracy was not predicted by either event-related potentials (ERPs) or oscillatory power mea

158 Here, by analyzing event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded in humans durin

159 The event-related potentials (ERPs) results showed atypical

160 ysiological recordings reveal alterations in event-related potentials (ERPs) similar to those observe

161 We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to demonstrate that tact

162 We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the extent to

163 Here, we investigated these issues by using event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure the effects o

164 Transient event-related potentials (ERPs) to stimulus onset (visua

165 poral resolution and whole-brain coverage of event-related potentials (ERPs) to test the hypothesis t

166 is provided by spatial attention effects on event-related potentials (ERPs) under conditions of rapi

167 Event-related potentials (ERPs) were additionally measur

168 Event-related potentials (ERPs) were collected in a memo

169 Event-related potentials (ERPs) were employed to investi

170 In groups of 7-year-olds and 11-year-olds, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to briefly

171 In the current study, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while Cauc

172 Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while list

173 use treatment performed a Go/NoGo task while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded.

174 sual and auditory working memory tasks while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded.

175 Herein, event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate

176 or pain were collected using self-report and event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants under

177 Here, we recorded high-density scalp event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants were

178 Here we used event-related potentials (ERPs), a direct measure of bra

179 registered using the N400 component of human event-related potentials (ERPs), a highly sensitive inde

180 ere, we used a combination of psychophysics, event-related potentials (ERPs), and quantitative modeli

181 heric transfer time (IHTT) as measured using event-related potentials (ERPs), and related this to DWI

182 ention Network Test), electroencephalography/event-related potentials (ERPs), and standardized low-re

183 and lateralization of this activation using event-related potentials (ERPs), in particular, occipito

184 ample, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a event-related potentials (ERPs), neurophysiological indi

185 We find that feedback-evoked event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically those clas

186 In the analysis of stimulation-induced event-related potentials (ERPs), we focused on model-bas

187 Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we show that active exp

188 ing in infants with West syndrome (WS) using event-related potentials (ERPs).

189 phenotypes such as subcomponents of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs).

190 ence of the pictures: the P300 and slow wave event-related potentials (ERPs).

191 as a prominent marker of Stroop conflict in event-related potentials (ERPs).

192 ng a picture-word interference paradigm with event-related potentials (ERPs).

193 asked priming paradigm with the recording of event-related potentials (ERPs).

194 ehavioral language assessment and linguistic event-related potentials (ERPs).

195 n with sensory over-responsivity (SOR) using event-related potentials (ERPs).

196 al metaphorical sentences were examined with event-related potentials (ERPs).

197 ted during such cuing paradigms by recording event-related potentials (ERPs).

198 c brain responses in signers, as measured by event-related potentials (ERPs).

199 We show that a brain measure (event-related potentials, ERPs) of word processing in ch

200 lying MMN impairments in schizophrenia using event-related potential, event-related spectral decompos

201 h functional neuroimaging, also demonstrated event-related potential evidence of attentional orientin

202 The mismatch negativity (MMN) is an event related potential evoked by violations of regulari

203 Analysis of the event-related potentials evoked by the subsequent target

204 In the event-related potential experiment, subjects performed a

205 electrodes have demonstrated a face-specific event-related potential (face-N200) recorded from human

206 ask while recording response times (RTs) and event-related potentials, focusing on the attentional-or

207 density electroencephalogram, and sources of event-related potential generators identified at right a

208 Studies of event-related potentials have consistently shown that sc

209 Reduced amplitude of the P300 event-related potential in auditory oddball tasks may ch

210 similar to an "attentional habit." Recording event-related potentials in humans during a reinforcemen

211 Studies of event-related potentials in humans have established larg

212 e present study investigated this issue with event-related potentials in humans, focusing on the N2pc

213 time course of effort cost integration using event-related potentials in hungry human subjects while

214 and healthy control individuals by analyzing event-related potentials in the electroencephalogram dur

215 We review the literature on event-related potentials, including our own data set, to

216 ermine whether mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential index of auditory sensory discri

217 Furthermore, when we examine the N170, an event-related potential index of face processing, we fin

218 /beta oscillations and frontal and posterior event-related potentials indexed feature-general top-dow

219 g and (2) test hypotheses about how the P300 event-related potential is affected by walking physical

220 by the error-related negativity (ERN) in the event-related potential, is a reliable finding in obsess

221 macological features with the deviant-evoked event-related potential known as mismatch negativity (MM

222 n audition have capitalized on low-frequency event-related potentials (LF-ERPs), such as the mismatch

223 The mismatch negativity (MMN) is a brain event-related potential marker of change detection thoug

224 The selection negativity, an event-related potential measure of sensory amplification

225 ficance of the mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential measured in humans which indexes

226 d by self-report ratings, and behavioral and event-related potential measurements were used to quanti

227 th controls on all cognitive-performance and event-related potential measures (all p < .05).

228 Performance and event-related potential measures (inter alia Cue-P3 and

229 n recent years, electroencephalography-based event-related potential measures with established sensit

230 (sympathetic adrenal medullary system), EEG event-related potentials (nociceptive cortical activity)

231 ctioning may be investigated using olfactory event-related potentials (OERPs).

232 mpared on cognitive-performance measures and event-related potentials of conflict monitoring (N2) and

233 n voices correctly classified as "new." This event-related potential OLD/NEW effect was limited to th

234 nteracts with reporting by measuring the P3b event-related potential, one of the proposed canonical "

235 sm and conflict-related activity measured by event-related potentials originating in the anterior cin

236 Event-related potentials over lateral prefrontal cortex,

237 to which each feature contributes to visual event-related potentials over time.

238 The event-related potential P2 amplitude elicited by non-tar

239 Using a similar auditory event-related potential paradigm in both rats and humans

240 atch negativity (MMN) component of the human event-related potential provides a sensitive metric of d

241 of distractor expectancy were assessed using event-related potentials recorded during the cue-to-targ

242 ixed-sequence (to establish prediction): (i) event-related potential recordings while passively viewi

243 gativity and P300 components of the auditory event-related potential, reflecting two steps of auditor

244 medial-frontal cortex, we could enhance the event-related potential related to learning from mistake

245 he latter indexed by the mismatch negativity event-related potential) relies on probabilities of soun

246 Compared to event-related potential responses for neutral pictures,

247 We identified robust event-related potential responses indicating 1) face det

248 paired AER in schizophrenia using a combined event-related potential/resting-state fMRI approach.

249 sms underlying impaired AER using a combined event-related potential/resting-state functional connect

250 Overall, these event-related potential results provide the first neurop

251 Event-related potentials revealed a posterior P2 compone

252 The analyses of event-related potentials revealed an attenuated N1 for t

253 Event-related potentials revealed early differential pro

254 g and behavioral probes: psychophysiological event-related potentials, self-report, simulated cocaine

255 This research tested (i) whether event-related potentials, specifically the late positive

256 uch a differential response is manifested in event-related potential studies as the mismatch negativi

257 This has been observed in neuroimaging and event-related potential studies centered in particular o

258 been shown repeatedly with neuroimaging and event-related potential studies for the last several dec

259 This event-related potential study tested whether hyperarticu

260 In the present event-related potential study, we tested whether and how

261 Here, we report an event-related potentials study of the time course of one

262 ved in cognitive control and responsible for event-related potentials, such as the error-related nega

263 is a preattentive component of the auditory event-related potential that is elicited by a change in

264 Mismatch negativity (MMN) is an auditory event-related potential that reflects an attentional tri

265 N170 and N250 are two event-related potentials that have been studied in relat

266 ss sensory modalities (the fronto-central P3 event-related potential), the single-trial amplitudes of

267 havioral adaptation, partly because a robust event-related potential, the feedback-related negativity

268 In event-related potential/time-frequency analyses, patient

269 nt of the N170 (negative peak around 170 ms) event-related potential to faces emerged, but a face-sen

270 presentation and the contralateral P1 visual event-related potential to investigate how aversive olfa

271 xploited the temporal resolution afforded by event-related potentials to disentangle the impact of st

272 Next, we use event-related potentials to show that orientation deviat

273 surrogate model of impulsivity, we utilized event-related potentials to study the neural mechanisms

274 Group differences were also observed in the event-related potentials to targets in the alphanumeric

275 Here we exploited the sensitivity of event-related potentials to test the hypothesis that ele

276 We analysed auditory event-related potentials to tones and syllables from 16

277 ate stages of visual processing, we measured event-related potentials to various categories of visual

278 d at each electrode and time point of visual event-related potential (vERP) data from nine different

279 Combining visual event-related potential (VERP) indices (P1 and P250/s) w

280 bal form and motion with high-density visual event-related potentials (VERPs) in 4- to 5-month-old in

281 sure of suppression--the PD component of the event-related potential--was associated with variations

282 ts of contralateral delay activity (CDA), an event-related potential waveform that tracks the number

283 dolescence (15 y; n = 115), error monitoring event-related potentials were measured in a flanker task

284 erformed a masked Go/No-Go task during which event-related potentials were measured.

285 Intervention Event-related potentials were obtained from 24 patients

286 Intracranial somatosensory event-related potentials were recorded from temporal, pa

287 Participants' brain event-related potentials were recorded in response to id

288 In the current study, event-related potentials were recorded while participant

289 pictures of butterflies were presented while event-related potentials were recorded.

290 ilistic reinforcement task while 128-channel event-related potentials were recorded.

291 s and no-stress conditions while 128-channel event-related potentials were recorded.

292 ed at central and peripheral locations while event-related potentials were recorded.

293 The effects of training on event-related potentials were restricted to the distract

294 At entry to the study (mean age, 22 months), event-related potentials were used to measure neural pro

295 The feedback-related negativity of the event-related potential, which is commonly assumed to be

296 neuronal substrate of a known deviant-evoked event-related potential, which is of fundamental signifi

297 By measuring event-related potentials while human observers performed

298 Here, we used event-related potentials whilst dyslexic and control adu

299 In conclusion, event-related potential word repetition effects appear s

300 -associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, using an event-related potential word repetition paradigm with de