ライフサイエンスコーパス: examiner

1 and medical history were obtained by another examiner.

2 digitally and saved for analysis by a masked examiner.

3 at 3 and 6 months by a calibrated and masked examiner.

4 by the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner.

5 ewing distance over two sessions by the same examiner.

6 Tissue texture also was assessed by the examiner.

7 nd digital image software by a single masked examiner.

8 is "no-flicker zone" was interpolated by the examiner.

9 ants are influenced by the handedness of the examiner.

10 clinically and radiographically by a masked examiner.

11 participant data and a random effect for the examiner.

12 e and 1 year after treatment by a calibrated examiner.

13 Measurements were performed by a masked examiner.

14 ed from records of the Office of the Medical Examiner.

15 relation to method for MGJ determination and examiner.

16 in clinical settings involving more than one examiner.

17 sed measurements were performed by a blinded examiner.

18 ical variable based on the perception of the examiner.

19 disappearance test were assessed by a masked examiner.

20 nical protocols, with assessment by a single examiner.

21 c presence of calculus was determined by two examiners.

22 g bleb classification score by two different examiners.

23 ocket depth (PPD) was measured by calibrated examiners.

24 ence relies on the expertise of latent print examiners.

25 iper to the nearest 0.1 mm by two calibrated examiners.

26 ellent reliability and agreement between the examiners.

27 in diabetic subjects by independent, masked examiners.

28 diographic measures were taken by calibrated examiners.

29 dication was assessed by > or =3 independent examiners.

30 on arrows observed by at least three of five examiners.

31 row image seen by at least three of the five examiners.

32 rameter measurements were made by calibrated examiners.

33 atings provided, and the satisfaction of the examiners.

34 d open bone levels were taken by independent examiners.

35 nts were averaged over all sites, teeth, and examiners.

36 vitis (GI) were assessed on all teeth by two examiners.

37 al examinations were performed by calibrated examiners.

38 surements were repeated a week later by both examiners.

39 ecimens were performed by masked, calibrated examiners.

40 38 patients by two experienced periodontist examiners.

41 Calibrated periodontists served as dental examiners.

42 cuity (VA) was measured by masked, certified examiners.

43 measured with OCT and USP by three different examiners.

44 tatistic was used to compare ratings between examiners.

45 leeding (FMBS) as assessed by two calibrated examiners.

46 A) was determined by certified visual acuity examiners.

47 lity for mean total SWV (MTSWV) was good for examiner 1 (ICC = 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.

48 <0.90) consistency, except for M1-C Y (0.73; examiner 1 to 2) and M1-M X (0.69; examiners 1 to 3).

49 easurements showed 70% and 55% agreement for examiners 1 and 2, respectively.

50 surement deviations were within +/- 1 mm for examiners 1 and 2, respectively.

51 Y (0.73; examiner 1 to 2) and M1-M X (0.69; examiners 1 to 3).

52 CI]: 0.30, 0.87; P = .003) and excellent for examiner 2 (ICC = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.92; P < .001).

53 ach tooth, KTW was assessed by 2 independent examiners after MGJ identification by the visual (VM), f

54 igh-throughput imaging, and blinded parallel examiners allowed precise quantification of insulin(low)

55 ves from baseline, both assessed by a masked examiner and confirmed by a retest.

56 dictive value (NPV) were calculated for each examiner and enhancement.

57 subjective, dependent upon the skills of the examiner and invariably dictated by the patients' abilit

58 taken from a stent by a calibrated, blinded examiner and open measurements were repeated at the 9-mo

59 IOP was measured using Icare ONE by clinic examiner and parent/guardian, then using Goldmann applan

60 A visual analog scale (VAS) was used by the examiner and subject to assess the defect change from ba

61 The examiner and subject VASs were statistically significant

62 ulus, frequency of dental visits, and dental examiner and survey phase.

63 ted in the least dispersion to the simulated examiner and the simulated patient.

64 In this study, the authors linked medical examiner and vital statistics records on underlying caus

65 Medical examiner and/or vital statistics data have been used to

66 cm, were performed by 2 independent, masked examiners and by the automated system.

67 e cecal intubation times among inexperienced examiners and patient acceptance during unsedated or mil

68 diagnosed with plus disease by 11 different examiners and were included in the study.

69 en a feasible option for most county medical examiners' and coroners' offices.

70 f tool-specific gestures demonstrated by the examiner, and imitation of meaningless gestures.

71 hs certified by coroners compared to medical examiners, and the odds of underreporting did not vary b

72 tion during MR imaging, in which a physician examiner applied mechanical force to the humeral head, w

73 A single examiner applied the PSPRS at every visit for 162 patien

74 Other questions for the initial examiner are when to consult the surgeon and if analgesi

75 rologic soft signs, which were scored by the examiner as well as a blind rater observing videotapes.

76 f the aggregate experience revealed that the examiners as a group exceeded 90% accuracy at the outset

77 re 0.72, 0.91, and 0.95 respectively for the examiners as a whole.

78 ized tissue were assessed by the same masked examiners as after the 6-month RCT.

79 e samples flagged by sexual assault forensic examiners as most probative, to build a standard machine

80 A single examiner assessed all the children.

81 At 4.5 years of age a masked examiner assessed stereopsis on these patients using 3 d

82 A traveling examiner assessed visual acuity at age 4.5 years.

83 Two independent, calibrated examiners assessed brushing duration, evenness of distri

84 Six examiners assessed photographs from a subset of 100 cons

85 Two calibrated examiners assessed the presence/absence and increase/dec

86 Trained examiners assessed thrust presence by gait observation.

87 kedly stronger predictors than corresponding examiner assessments.

88 Examiners' assessments were compared with a reference.

89 g a single examination) assessed by a masked examiner at 8 weeks.

90 Visual acuity was assessed by a traveling examiner at age 4.5 years.

91 coverage (PRC) were recorded by a calibrated examiner at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperati

92 easurements were performed by one calibrated examiner at baseline, 6, and 12 months.

93 rement of PDs between right- and left-handed examiners at various locations in the mouth (P>0.17 in a

94 should include multiple examiners to reduce examiner bias and should alternate the probing method to

95 Follow-up measurements were recorded by examiners blind to the allocation.

96 A prospective single-center, examiner-blind study comparing the effects of a staggere

97 This was a randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, nine-period crossover study conducted in

98 The study was a two-treatment, examiner-blind, randomized parallel group, controlled st

99 ntry measurements were taken by a calibrated examiner blinded to the treatment.

100 Examiners blinded to waveform analysis assessed patients

101 Calibrated external examiners, blinded to the child's study group, assessed

102 and skin reaction in AD using a patient and examiner-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crosso

103 than the selective policy based on forensic examiners, but more than doubles the yield.

104 htly higher PD measurements than left-handed examiners, but this difference did not reach statistical

105 5.3; 11 women and 11 men) by two independent examiners by using shear-wave elastography.

106 We present an approach to examiner calibration study design where the number of ca

107 obtained in a pilot study to design a formal examiner calibration study, where sample sizes were adju

108 Study examiners classified incident painful TMD, yielding 233

109 quent in procedures performed by experienced examiners compared with those with comparatively less ex

110 Calibrated examiners conducted oral examination, self-reported slee

111 Trained examiners conducted standardized eye examinations, inclu

112 4.2 +/- 10.9 years) were referred by medical examiners/coroners to Mayo Clinic's Sudden Death Genomic

113 Measurements were made by 2 examiners, correlated with each other for inter-observer

114 Using medical examiner data, we found that significant underascertainm

115 the accuracy and reliability of latent print examiners' decisions, a challenging and complex problem

116 the accuracy and reliability of latent print examiners' decisions, in which 169 latent print examiner

117 The correlation between the examiners demonstrated excellent (>0.90) or good (0.75>

118 ERA cohort and case-control studies, TMD was examiner determined according to established research di

119 on criteria were as follows: (a) The medical examiner determined that the infant had sustained a head

120 An examiner determined visible plaque index (VPI), marginal

121 The handedness of the periodontal examiner does not appear to influence the recorded measu

122 miners' decisions, in which 169 latent print examiners each compared approximately 100 pairs of laten

123 raphs was dependent on the experience of the examiner (EE kappaw = 0.618; LE kappaw = 0.426).

124 Oral mucositis was measured by a trained examiner every 2 to 3 days using the Oral Mucositis Inde

125 k factors: needle gauge, puncture technique, examiner experience, coagulation status, puncture target

126 rve time, limit cost, and reduce patient and examiner fatigue while providing maximal clinical inform

127 rve time, limit cost, and reduce patient and examiner fatigue, while providing maximal clinical infor

128 ertion-related SUDY were referred by Medical Examiners for a cardiac channel molecular autopsy.

129 Animals were assessed by blinded examiners for motor disability and LID severity using st

130 dex (GI) were performed by calibrated masked examiners for up to 6 months following surgery.

131 242) between voxel sizes only for one of the examiners, for a measurement of height.

132 Examiners frequently differed on whether fingerprints we

133 retinal degeneration presenting to a single examiner from 2008 to 2013.

134 An examiner graded iris color, and ethnicity was reported b

135 One examiner graded the lens for presence of nuclear (NSC),

136 However, the potential influence of examiner handedness (right or left) on the measurement o

137 The examiner held both forearms near the wrists while asking

138 Professional and lay examiners improved their sensitivity on silicone breast

139 had the same measurements taken by the same examiner in 2 additional sessions on the same day (9 AM-

140 dequate for the caregiver in 17% and for the examiner in 55% of studies.

141 e examined in 33 patients by eight different examiners in five private dental offices.

142 urrently, assessment is performed by medical examiners in situ.

143 xaminations were performed by two calibrated examiners in six sites per tooth from all present teeth.

144 observed variability both between and within examiners in the diagnosis of plus disease using DL.

145 physical examination questionnaires to guide examiners, including 1 state without a formal screening

146 Three masked examiners independently evaluated the radiographic image

147 After surgery, each of the four remaining examiners independently reviewed the radiographs for fur

148 The Medical Examiner Information System was searched for all cases o

149 in young people, a new role for the medical examiner is emerging.

150 by an experienced (EE) and less experienced examiner (LE).

151 Eighty-five percent of examiners made at least one false negative error for an

152 Five examiners made false positive errors for an overall fals

153 An examiner masked to the previous diagnosis examined the r

154 alyzed using customized software by a single examiner masked to the subjects' clinical details.

155 Examiners masked to maternal-infant exposure status admi

156 vertical EDI OCT B-scans by two experienced examiners masked to patients clinical data: lamina cribr

157 ence of the angle, were analyzed by a single examiner, masked to the subject's clinical details.

158 , we conducted a two-year randomized, dental-examiner-masked clinical trial.

159 istics in the randomized, open-label, vision examiner-masked SHORE phase 4 study that compared monthl

160 randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, examiner-masked study was undertaken to evaluate the cli

161 This randomized, controlled, examiner-masked, five-period crossover study examined pl

162 This randomized, controlled, examiner-masked, four-period cross-over study examined p

163 The study was a two-treatment, examiner-masked, randomized, parallel-group, controlled

164 assessment with respect to gestational age, examiner masking and consideration of additional exposur

165 ze intrasession repeatability, 1 experienced examiner measured 30 healthy eyes 5 times successively.

166 A single examiner measured weights, heights, and skinfold thickne

167 At each visit, masked and certified examiners measured binocular distance visual acuity (DVA

168 Masked examiners measured IOP at every study visit.

169 Trained examiners measured probing depth, clinical attachment le

170 lity were found to be much higher than intra-examiner measurement for all four methods of assessment.

171 evaluated by two calibrated and independent examiners (MG and TP).

172 rystals facilitate disease diagnosis but the examiner must be aware that they are only present 54% of

173 Examiners must change their screening criteria to mainta

174 aboration with the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME), developed the first standardized in-tr

175 In the prospective study, all 12 examiners observed statistically significant differences

176 tal admissions, and reports from the medical examiner of fatal injuries.

177 aths referred to the Office of Chief Medical Examiner of New York City between 1993 and 1998.

178 t, with an intraclass correlation among four examiners of 0.94.

179 Imaging data were evaluated by certified examiners of the Vienna Reading Center using a standardi

180 This study evaluated examiners on key decision points in the fingerprint exam

181 (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0028) between the two examiners only when measuring the width in two posterior

182 unnatural deaths) are carried out by medical examiner or coroner systems.

183 to other drugs) require linkage with medical examiner or multiple-cause records, because this code id

184 ear or on a slit-lamp, a simulated slit-lamp examiner, or a simulated patient using a fluorescent sur

185 promoting recall of events suggested by the examiner, or generating confabulations.

186 dontitis patients were monitored by a single examiner over a 6-month period.

187 ents with less severe disease than the other examiners (P < 0.01).

188 Two independent examiners participated.

189 Another masked examiner performed an irrigation test 1 week later and i

190 sal CBCT images were generated, on which two examiners performed 648 linear measurements and evaluate

191 observational study using data from medical examiner, prescription drug monitoring program, and opia

192 Experienced breast examiners prospectively identified patients with breast

193 depression with self-reported function after examiner-rated function was added to the analysis as a c

194 sis and medical burden and self-reported and examiner-rated functional assessments.

195 Measures included examiner ratings of depression diagnosis and medical bur

196 ion of service to the ABO, all directors and examiners received ties for men and scarves for women be

197 Before administering anesthesia, the same examiner recorded a Hamp index value of each proximal fu

198 Examiners recorded decayed, missing, and filled teeth (D

199 ning death should include the use of medical examiner records and underlying- and multiple-cause vita

200 e birth and fetal death records, and medical examiner records in Maryland during 1993-1998.

201 Using vital statistics or medical examiner records, 94.7% of poisoning deaths were capture

202 and 47% (n = 116) through review of medical examiner records.

203 pendent upon host-related, probe-related, or examiner-related variables.

204 ntervals (CI) determined the degree of inter-examiner reliability between grading of these clinical v

205 Inter-examiner reliability for the four clinical outcomes rang

206 We evaluated inter-examiner reliability in grading of clinical variables as

207 The kappa value for inter-examiner reliability was 0.78 and 0.90 for the original

208 The results demonstrated high examiner reproducibility for linear and volumetric param

209 Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility has been shown to be substantia

210 of this study was to assess intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility in measuring KTW by using 3 dif

211 Examiner reproducibility was examined by repeat evaluati

212 Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility was high (intraclass correlatio

213 Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility was high, regardless of treatme

214 A total of 79 of 91 county medical examiners responded.

215 Adjusting studies for netting out examiner reversals reduced heterogeneity significantly.

216 res after adjusting outcomes that netted out examiner reversals.

217 diagnosed as plus disease was present, and 1 examiner routinely diagnosed plus disease in patients wi

218 An experienced standard examiner (S) trained three dental hygienists (A, B, and

219 d, 513 cm(2), was slightly curved toward the examiner's face and allowed only 2% overspray.

220 attle, WA, USA) and Snohomish County Medical Examiner's Office (Everett, WA, USA) in negative-pressur

221 ied with COVID-19 at the King County Medical Examiner's Office (Seattle, WA, USA) and Snohomish Count

222 ls) were obtained from the San Diego Medical Examiner's office between 1997 and 2005.

223 t fatalities referred from the state medical examiner's office for the evaluation of possible child a

224 uggest that cases whose source was a Medical Examiner's office represent high tissue quality.

225 We collaborated with a medical examiner's office to assist in finding a diagnosis for t

226 es conducted at the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

227 es conducted at the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

228 a 6-year period recorded at a state Medical Examiner's Office.

229 gation in the United States' largest medical examiner's office.

230 oddlers, and young children, and rely on the examiner's skill and experience.

231 ve states assessed by calibrated and blinded examiners; secondary outcome measures included decayed,

232 act agreement measurements (95% CI) for each examiner-standard pair, respectively, were as follows: A

233 Varying examiner styles impact the structure of resulting data.

234 utilized to minimize the impact of different examiner styles in clinical settings involving more than

235 analyses indicated the presence of distinct examiner styles which are based on the frequency that a

236 Graphical analyses were used to profile examiner styles with respect to using the GI index.

237 clerkship) in mean National Board of Medical Examiners subject examination scores (range, 0-100), pre

238 tten examinations (National Board of Medical Examiners subject tests and/or internally prepared exami

239 edical record review and autopsy via medical examiner surveillance.

240 In this century, medical examiner systems have gradually replaced coroner systems

241 nge has slowed in recent years, with medical examiner systems now serving about 48% of the national p

242 Overall, right-handed examiners tended to record slightly higher PD measuremen

243 Masked examiners tested VA.

244 For both examiners, the correlations for FP (AK = 0.77, KC = 0.46

245 med probative by the sexual assault forensic examiners, the proposed policy increases the CODIS yield

246 er live OSCE including more efficient use of examiners' time, increased fairness, and better monitori

247 The image reconstruction enables the examiner to evaluate a two-dimensional image using multi

248 eted suicides obtained from the Utah Medical Examiner to genealogical records and medical records dat

249 w technology has enhanced the ability of the examiner to identify normal and complex fetal heart anat

250 four-dimensional ultrasound allows the fetal examiner to more accurately accomplish this task.

251 ciated variants were reported to the medical examiner to notify surviving relatives and recommend cli

252 structures using this technology allows the examiner to view cardiac anatomy in a manner that was li

253 ture search was conducted by two independent examiners to identify relevant studies reporting differe

254 e comparison studies should include multiple examiners to reduce examiner bias and should alternate t

255 erent mean PD between right- and left-handed examiners (unadjusted P<0.05; differences at or near 0.5

256 Certified examiners unaware of exposure to antenatal corticosteroi

257 Two independent examiners used both methods, in random order, to assess

258 Blinded expert examiners used the validated Team Emergency Assessment M

259 sessed at 4(1/2) years of age by a traveling examiner using the Aphakia Treatment Study HOTV protocol

260 ed on the optic disc by the same experienced examiner using the Cirrus OCT instrument, the classic gl

261 ime points by trained and calibrated dentist examiners using a standardized, national diagnostic prot

262 were compared between right- and left-handed examiners using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a rand

263 rs of OBS (48 mos) were scored by calibrated examiners using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) and Ind

264 distances in the phantoms were made by three examiners using various transducers.

265 each implant was measured by four different examiners, using both EPT devices, and compared.

266 Within some examiners, variability in the level of vascular severity

267 ometric characteristics of the subjects, and examiner variation, revealed that hip and knee flexion r

268 fficient was calculated to account for inter-examiner variation.

269 ow-up of 0.25 to 5.2 y, 248 adults developed examiner-verified incident TMD.

270 g varied by death investigator type (medical examiner versus coroner) or race/ethnicity.

271 mechanisms, and deaths recorded by a medical examiner versus coroner.

272 m of death, death investigator type [medical examiner versus coroner], county median income, and coun

273 Before surgery, one of five calibrated examiners viewed periapical and bitewing radiographs of

274 ental assessments were conducted by a single examiner visiting 189 schools 2 y after intervention; 19

275 lue of mean IOP difference (ICare ONE clinic examiner vs Goldmann applanation) was 3.3 +/- 4.0 mm Hg

276 plication of force to the humeral head by an examiner was associated with as much as 6 mm of anterior

277 ere blinded to screening results, and the NP examiner was blinded to screening and HIV status.

278 The clinical examiner was calibrated and blinded to the surgical proc

279 Retesting by the same examiner was identical and occurred within the same sess

280 Icare ONE IOP by clinic examiner was within 3 mm Hg of Goldmann applanation in 6

281 erpretation of the HH SD-OCT scans by masked examiners was performed, and the sensitivity and specifi

282 The National Board of Medical Examiners was selected to work with ASCO.

283 ta provided by the National Board of Medical Examiners were available for 52,035 (77.4%) of these res

284 Examiners were blind to stress ratings and cortisol leve

285 Participants and examiners were blinded to whether stimulation was active

286 Examiners were masked to the treatment group assignment.

287 rcent believed that at least two independent examiners were needed to determine competence, and 44% f

288 ntal recordings between the first and second examiners were within +/-1 mm in 90% to 100% of examined

289 ascular severity scores overall and for each examiner when the diagnosis of plus disease was made.

290 An examiner who was blind to the quadrants that had been sc

291 neuropsychological status was assessed by an examiner who was unaware of protocol assignment.

292 underwent retinoscopy with cycloplegia by an examiner who was unaware of the results from the PR2000

293 pathologic conditions, impairments, and the examiners who conducted the assessments.

294 and anthropometric measurements were made by examiners who were unaware of the children's original tr

295 This effect is mitigated to a degree by the examiners, who slightly overcompensate for patient diffi

296 Acuity was then assessed by an examiner with a standard chart-based near ETDRS acuity t

297 ropsychological instrument that provides the examiner with information on a wide range of cognitive s

298 chnologies have been combined to provide the examiner with the ability to make accurate and comprehen

299 s guidelines for the process) and the use of examiners with little cardiovascular training.

300 The patient was sitting in front of the examiner, with the hand lying palm up on the examination