コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 r variables of interest in development (age, executive function).
2 )] and VaD (i.e., information processing and executive functioning).
3 ssion, correlated with impaired preoperative executive function.
4 ur previous work had shown its importance to executive function.
5 eater memory decline, but not with change in executive function.
6 about bilinguals is a reported advantage for executive function.
7 and social behaviors combined with superior executive function.
8 nitive flexibility, which are key aspects of executive function.
9 sses response inhibition, a key component of executive function.
10 in these patients correlated with improving executive function.
11 schizophrenia and 2) related to deficits in executive function.
12 ognitive impairment and a small worsening in executive function.
13 hism has been reported to be associated with executive function.
14 loss of which is central in apathy-as a core executive function.
15 function, verbal fluency, working memory and executive function.
16 : -0.064, -0.006)-was associated with higher executive function.
17 assessments of global cognition, memory, and executive function.
18 ing prominent deficits in working memory and executive function.
19 n a fronto-parietal brain network underlying executive function.
20 and a modified Stroop interference test for executive function.
21 ce-dependent rewiring of circuits underlying executive function.
22 nt, potentially allowing for improvements in executive function.
23 in higher-order cognitive processes such as executive function.
24 networks predicts individual differences in executive function.
25 rticipants on neuropsychological measures of executive function.
26 r regulation, sensorimotor coordination, and executive function.
27 rtially mediated age-related improvements in executive function.
28 ith altered brain activation during tasks of executive function.
29 for significant gender or sex differences in executive function.
30 h PD have cognitive impairment especially in executive functions.
31 selection provides for the emergence of some executive functions.
32 efrontal cortex (PFC), an area important for executive functions.
33 gnificant alterations in social behavior and executive functions.
34 e and of memory, but not processing speed or executive functions.
35 cation of children at high risk for impaired executive functions.
36 ic processing, phonological recognition, and executive functions.
37 challenge for the cognitive neuroscience of executive functions.
38 sensory information, reward, cognition, and executive functions.
39 , and strongly related to working memory and executive functions.
40 comorbidities, including deficits in higher executive functions.
41 severely impairs higher order cognitive and executive functions.
42 nsmission and plasticity as well as impaired executive functions.
43 related to emotional transitions but also to executive functioning.
44 the various roles of dopamine in prefrontal executive functioning.
45 effort, as well as by the person's skill at executive functioning.
46 ssess the specificity of any associations to executive functioning.
47 understand perception, attention, memory and executive functions?
48 memory (0.21 [95% CI 0.08-0.34], p = 0.001), executive function (0.21 [95% CI 0.06-0.35], p = 0.006),
49 tarted cART at an older age deviated more in executive functioning (-0.13 z score, 95% CI -0.24 to -0
51 nscious experience from related enabling and executive functions, (2) suggest how critically reconsid
52 cognitive training on six adaptive tests of executive function; (2) Cognitive and physical exercise
55 ganglia was inversely correlated with their executive function ability, suggesting that bilinguals c
56 lity, declarative memory, procedural memory, executive function, academic achievement, fine motor dex
62 l Making Test (TMT) is a widely used test of executive function and has been thought to be strongly a
63 -limbic circuits), cognitive deficits (e.g., executive function and memory impairments), affective in
66 ia leading to brain injury, further impaired executive function and mental health, which results in s
67 tical dopaminergic abnormalities in impaired executive function and relapse in cocaine dependence.
69 cleus and anterior putamen, overlapping with executive function and social/language regions of the st
70 across multiple cognitive domains, including executive function and speed of information processing.
71 rum disorder completed a battery of tests of executive function and underwent diffusion-weighted imag
72 with a dose-dependent increased risk of poor executive function and visual motor function, even if no
74 rrelated significantly with lower global and executive function and with progression of WMH burden (a
75 This study examined the relationship between executive functioning and adaptive behaviour in adolesce
76 regions, support age-related improvements in executive functioning and self-regulatory capacities in
79 communication of frontal regions engaged in executive functions and emotion regulation represent dep
80 erformance in the domains of working memory, executive functions and procedural learning in healthy y
81 ognitive performance in the cognitive domain executive functions and processing speed (p = 0.027).
84 itive impairment was shown in the domains of executive functions and speed/attention and to a minor d
85 was also associated with hippocampal volume, executive function, and age-at-onset only among males.
86 limited on how phthalates affect cognition, executive function, and behavioral function into adolesc
87 lly on tests of language, general cognition, executive function, and functional ability at baseline a
89 h measured total cognitive function, memory, executive function, and processing speed before and afte
90 ng function), cognitive performance (memory, executive function, and processing speed), emotional wel
91 d with worse verbal learning, verbal memory, executive function, and psychomotor speed (P < .05 for a
95 ts (Digit-Span, Spatial-Span), self-reported executive functioning, and functional magnetic resonance
97 brain regions are involved in attention and executive functioning, and that these non-language domai
98 viors, positive alcohol expectancies), worse executive functioning, and thinner cortices and less bra
100 at are independent of sensory processing and executive functions, and (4) show how animal studies can
101 ct of ALIC-NAcc-DBS on personality traits or executive functions, and no potential outcome predictors
103 cal defects in social interaction, cognitive/executive functions, and repetitive behaviors reflective
104 gnitive functions, we tested working memory, executive functions, and several sub-processes of proced
105 of memory, information processing speed, and executive function; and adjudicated incident dementia ca
106 test battery, we assessed processing speed, executive function, anxiety, depression and disease seve
109 nce that visuomotor behaviors, a hallmark of executive functions, are mediated by the interplay of mu
110 ly to all brain areas (for example, motor or executive function areas) the success of NSC-based model
111 Here, we tested the hypothesis that human executive functions arise from the dynamic interplay of
112 psychologists and neuroscientists still see executive functions as independent, domain-general, supe
113 and implicit learning, language skills, and executive functions as well as atypical patterns of cort
114 the flexible modulation of recent memories (executive functions) as well as for the stable organizat
115 ot associated with worse global cognition or executive function at 3 or 12 months in models incorpora
116 motional reactivity at 7, 15, and 24 months, executive function at 36, 48, and 60 months, and emotion
117 ce was attributable to less deterioration in executive function at 4 months (23.3% v 40.4%; P = .01)
118 l reactivity in toddlerhood, followed by low executive function at school entry and high emotional an
119 9 to -1.53]; p = 0.08) months and with worse executive functioning at 3 (-3.61 [-7.48 to 0.26]; p = 0
120 neurodevelopmental symptoms include impaired executive function, attention, and spatial learning and
121 measure cortical activation during tasks of executive function, attention, social cognition, and lan
122 cortical thickness in regions implicated in executive functioning, attention, and memory after accou
123 Food insecurity was associated with poorer executive function (b = -1.45, SE = 0.58, P <= 0.01) and
124 These receptors are important for prefrontal executive function because pharmacological and genetic m
125 % confidence interval (CI): -0.874, -0.246), executive function (beta = -0.624 SD units, 95% CI: -0.9
126 ssociated with slower cognitive decline (for executive function, betaperson-meanxtime-in-study = 0.00
127 the spatial working memory strategy index of executive function between the patients who received evo
128 erior temporal lobe and supramarginal gyrus; executive functions: bilateral frontoparietal regions; v
130 vidence suggesting impairments in aspects of executive functioning but not psychomotor vigilance.
131 possible to immediately change components of executive function by directly manipulating neural activ
133 s of cortical physiology and two measures of executive functioning: cognitive inhibition, assessed us
135 tive control, serving as a core construct of executive functions, contributes substantially to genera
136 centive salience, negative emotionality, and executive function, could be identified through factor a
138 individuals reporting higher chronic stress, executive functioning decreased after dynamic conditions
139 interval [CI] 1.5-10.50; P = .012), whereas executive functioning decreased significantly more (grou
140 drome is likely a surrogate marker for other executive function defects, we suggest that microglia-di
141 diet (HFD)-fed offspring have cognitive and executive function deficits as well as whole-genome DNA
143 site of cognitive tests including memory and executive function differed between biomarker groups.
144 telligence, anxiety/depressive symptoms, and executive function (differences of 0.6-0.7 SD; P=1.2x10(
145 (ERD/ERS) analysis, we investigated cortical executive functions during a Go/NoGo task in PD patients
146 on tests of dysexecutive behaviour (DB) and executive function (EF) in patients with behavioural var
153 g domain-specific composite scores including executive function, episodic memory, visual-spatial proc
154 itive domains: information processing speed, executive function, episodic memory, working memory, and
156 ing memory capacity, a critical component of executive function, expands developmentally from childho
158 s was associated with accelerated decline in executive function (for all relationships combined, beta
159 ol of thoughts and behaviours-the so-called 'executive functions' (for example, attention, inhibitory
160 tal cortical dopamine regulates a variety of executive functions governed by the frontal lobes via ac
161 ion of the default mode network (DMN) during executive functioning have been observed in healthy and
162 Innovative computer-training regimes for executive functions have made tremendous inroads, yet th
163 g Speed (HR = 0.58 [0.36-0.95], P = .03) and Executive Function (HR = 0.52 [0.28-0.97], P = .040).
164 amic anatomical connectivity and severity of executive function impairment was examined in patients.
168 t orexin transmission is closely involved in executive function in normal and pathological conditions
171 llocatequin-3-gallate (EGCG), which improves executive function in young adults with DS and Ts65Dn mi
175 s by which LDX acts to improve self-reported executive functioning in healthy menopausal women with m
180 e interplay of brain regions associated with executive functioning, incentive salience, and interocep
181 will address the topic of sex differences in executive function including a discussion of differences
182 ctual abilities, such as the broadly defined executive functions including working memory, the core p
183 schizophrenia and contributes to deficits in executive functions, including working memory, attention
184 n, language, learning, memory, visuospatial, executive function, information processing, psychomotor
187 th hypoxia-ischemia on brain development and executive functions is moderated by genotypes associated
188 eterioration in functions such as memory and executive function, is faced by most older adults and af
189 hed role played by COMT genetic variation in executive functions, its impact on remote memory formati
190 d to both the complexity of the construct of executive functions itself and/or the methodological dif
191 ed with impairments in verbal IQ, attention, executive function, language and visuospatial memory on
192 (episodic memory, attention/working memory, executive function, language/semantic memory, and global
193 sis (ALS) exhibit mild cognitive deficits in executive functions, language and fluency, without demen
194 on in brain regions specifically involved in executive functions, language functions and verbal fluen
195 ient (IQ), processing speed, working memory, executive functioning, learning ability, and visual-moto
196 had worse performance on several measures of executive functioning, MATRICS processing speed and MATR
197 pause-related deficits in working memory, an executive function mediated by the dorsolateral prefront
198 ience/habits, negative emotional states, and executive function, mediated by the basal ganglia, exten
199 eral cognitive performance, processing speed/executive function, memory) in later life (after age 55
200 ering domains of attention/processing speed, executive function, memory, language, and visuospatial f
201 es associated with motor function, language, executive function, memory, verbal learning, perceptual
202 d are associated with deficits in cognition, executive function, memory, vision, hearing, motor skill
204 nt, we assessed attention, processing speed, executive functions, memory, emotions, and behavior with
205 uild on associative learning, and argue that executive functions might be better understood as cultur
206 tive control is fundamental to healthy human executive functioning (Miller and Cohen, 2001) and defic
207 and leg lean mass (LM), muscle strength, and executive function (multiple primary outcomes), as well
209 We examined whether the cortico-cerebellar executive function network is altered in children with A
212 video games that do not specifically target executive function or adapt the level of difficulty thro
213 ally if there are additionally reductions in executive functions or specific inhibitory control.
214 s between cortical inhibition/excitation and executive functioning, or between any neurophysiological
216 at the claustrum may preferentially subserve executive functions orchestrated by the cingulate cortex
217 between dynamic network reconfiguration and executive functions over short timescales and provide a
220 n on information processing speed (p=0.002), executive function (p<0.0001), motor function (p<0.0001)
223 o) was previously shown to be a predictor of executive function performance in children aged 7-9 y.
226 ed with standard neuropsychological tests of executive functions, PIT 360 degrees , and measures of u
229 score from the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool Version (BRIEF-P) in the ch
230 the spatial working memory strategy index of executive function (primary end point) was -0.21+/-2.62
231 ve neuropsychological test battery assessing executive function, processing speed, attention/working
232 e functions, including general intelligence, executive function, processing speed, memory, perceptual
233 ce and worse verbal learning, verbal memory, executive function, psychomotor speed, and fine motor sk
235 Symbol Digit Modalities Test (R(2)=0.31) and executive function (R(2)=0.36) test scores, independent
237 and with better parent-reported measures of executive functioning (r values < -0.29, 95% CIs -0.47 t
238 ia was associated with increased risk of low executive function (RD, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.10 and R
239 ry (+ 9.5%), processing efficiency (+ 7.5%), executive function reaction time (- 4.8%) and fluid inte
240 nctional MRI, and functional connectivity of executive function-related Crus I/II in the cerebellum w
243 at 18 (P = 0.233) or 24 (P = 0.146) mo or in executive function score at 24 mo (P = 0.467).Prenatal L
244 E4 carriers, lower OEF correlated with lower executive function scores (b = 0.079 z score for each pe
246 the spatial working memory strategy index of executive function (scores range from 4 to 28, with lowe
247 decline accelerated slightly with age, with executive functioning showing the largest additional rat
248 essing and regulation, as well as memory and executive function, some of which show trends of associa
249 eased response times and negatively impacted executive functioning, spatial planning and mental rotat
250 ; accuracy: P = 0.98, Cohen's d = 0.07), and executive function (speed: P = 0.60, Cohen's d = 0.31; a
252 ested that those with SDB had slightly worse executive function (standard mean difference, -0.05; 95%
253 stimulation on a working memory (n-back) and executive function (Stroop) task in 28 individuals with
255 itive outcomes reported as the Attention and Executive Functions subscore of the Developmental Neurop
256 of cortico-striatal circuit hyperactivity on executive functions subserved by these circuits is uncle
258 inhibition, assessed using the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Color-Word Interference ["Stro
261 and memory, processing speed, language, and executive functioning test scores using linear mixed mod
262 ry endpoints included a composite score of 7 executive function tests, auditory verbal and visual des
265 ome (memory, language, processing speed, and executive functioning tests) and Mini-Mental State Exami
266 1A-G carriers) also had poorer self-reported executive functioning than SN, but both groups reported
267 g impact on serotonergic circuits underlying executive function that are unmasked by loss of estradio
268 he complex cognitive processes of memory and executive function that deteriorate in Alzheimer's disea
269 ver, learning was negatively correlated with executive functions that rely on the DLPFC in the contro
270 ngly recognized to play a role in regulating executive function, the dysfunction of which is a factor
271 ative impact of prefrontal KYNA elevation on executive function, the mechanism underlying such a disr
272 opsychological tests of the frontal lobe and executive functioning, the Trail Making Test, and the Ve
273 lateral frontoparietal network implicated in executive functions: the multiple demand (MD) network.
275 cognitive domains of memory, attention, and executive function to classify whether participants had
276 g speed, working memory, verbal fluency, and executive functioning) to assess ante mortem performance
277 Conner's Continuous Performance Test-II) and executive function (Trail Making Test Part B, Controlled
278 ion, including assessments of the domains of Executive Function (Trail Making Test, Stroop, Digit Spa
279 sual Retention Test; score range, 0 to -26), executive function (Trail-Making Test B minus A; range,
281 esource-saving tools for early evaluation of executive functions using an ecological approach are nee
283 003) in reduced-intensity HCT recipients for executive function, verbal fluency, and working memory.
284 P < .001) post-HCT scores than controls for executive function, verbal speed, processing speed, audi
287 the basis of relative performance in memory, executive functioning, visuospatial functioning, and lan
290 ention, working memory, verbal learning, and executive functioning), were generally small (30 [40%] o
291 activation profiles in regions critical for executive function, which mirrored differences in cognit
292 , language, visuospatial, memory and frontal executive functions while presence of CSS was associated
293 illustrated the complex relationship between executive function, white matter integrity, stroke chara
295 hibited relative deficits in psychomotor and executive function with fewer deficits in memory and lea
296 for the Assessment of Neurologic Status and executive function with the Trail Making Test Part B.
297 Assessment of Neuropsychological Status and executive function with the Trail Making Test, Part B.
299 across multiple cognitive domains, spanning executive functions, working memory, and planning and pr
300 g and back muscle strength (26% to 40%), and executive function (z-score SD: 0.33 to 0.39), nor the s