ライフサイエンスコーパス: exemption

1 udents at each school who received a medical exemption).

2 l care (e.g., ambulance network and user-fee exemptions).

3 The study received internal review board exemption.

4 eral legislation under an explicit antitrust exemption.

5 d Drug Administration investigational device exemption.

6 d clinical trial with investigational device exemption.

7 have undermined the purpose of the medicine exemption.

8 price negotiation because of the sole orphan exemption.

9 study or on the basis of a compassionate use exemption.

10 requirements for obtaining a personal belief exemption.

11 ease risk in the context of vaccine delay or exemption.

12 Here we identify an exemption.

13 4, among states that offered personal belief exemptions.

14 should know the regulatory criteria for the exemptions.

15 offset by the larger reduction in nonmedical exemptions.

16 determine the reasons why individuals claim exemptions.

17 ublic health on overall vaccine coverage and exemptions.

18 ket notification, and investigational device exemptions.

19 replaced by increases in medical vaccination exemptions.

20 minating school-entry nonmedical vaccination exemptions.

21 , Senate bill 277 eliminated personal belief exemptions.

22 e study had high rates of nonmedical vaccine exemptions.

23 proportions with medical or personal-belief exemptions.

24 MR vaccine, with 2.5% having personal-belief exemptions.

25 -0.41% of enrolled children received medical exemptions.

26 main unvaccinated because of personal belief exemptions.

27 mean annual decreases in medical vaccination exemptions (0.02%; 95% CI, 0.01%-0.03%) through the end

28 D + ALND cases (64.6%), 20 cases (22.2%), or exemption (13.1%).

29 ibrillator IDE study (Investigational Device Exemption), a successful conversion test required 2 cons

30 An institutional review board exemption and a waiver for informed consent were granted

31 1, 2008, as cutoff points, when delivery-fee exemption and free health insurance were introduced in G

32 Institutional review board exemption and informed consent waiver was granted at eac

33 With exemption and waiver of consent granted from the Institu

34 Permitting personal belief exemptions and easily granting exemptions are associated

35 y reports, hospital discharges and copayment exemptions and matched with up to five references by sex

36 al-use concept may inform decision-making on exemptions and provide insights on its implementation.

37 State policies granting personal belief exemptions and states that easily grant exemptions are a

38 S and product data, inappropriately designed exemptions and thresholds, and limited agency resources

39 at geographic clusters of nonmedical vaccine exemptions and waning immunity may have been factors con

40 to understand the role of nonmedical vaccine exemptions and waning immunity may have had on the resur

41 ne, 1 (2%) was unvaccinated due to religious exemption, and 1 (2%) had unknown vaccination status.

42 s, and rubella (MMR) vaccination, nonmedical exemption, and medical exemption in children entering ki

43 ates than states that offered only religious exemptions, and states that easily granted exemptions ha

44 law, ie, a mandatory vaccination law without exemptions, applies equally to everyone, but its effects

45 rsonal belief exemptions and easily granting exemptions are associated with higher and increasing non

46 lief exemptions and states that easily grant exemptions are associated with increased pertussis incid

47 Children with exemptions are at increased risk of contracting and tran

48 Exemptions are generally offered for medical, religious,

49 The extent to which medical exemptions are granted and the relationship with ease of

50 tion before policies to eliminate nonmedical exemptions are implemented widely and outline a process

51 but the health consequences of claiming such exemptions are poorly documented.

52 Without close-in-age exemptions, arguments to align the legal age of sexual c

53 health care use of adults applying for such exemptions at a Yale New Haven Hospital care practice be

54 through 2004 state-level rates of nonmedical exemptions at school entry and 1986 through 2004 pertuss

55 ation coverage and a reduction in nonmedical exemptions at state and county levels.

56 zed Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) exemption because of inadequate evidence suggesting mort

57 ss and delays in processing Applications for Exemption between September 1999 and March 2003.

58 The clustering of nonmedical exemptions can affect community risk of vaccine-preventa

59 that government policies removing nonmedical exemptions can be effective at increasing vaccination co

60 inistration-regulated investigational device exemption clinical study.

61 We included 515 IDE (Investigational Device Exemption) clinical trial patients and 500 Continued Acc

62 tions was 2.8 times larger in the identified exemption clusters.

63 s in Michigan and geographic overlap between exemptions clusters and clusters of reported pertussis c

64 The overlap of exemptions clusters and pertussis clusters remained sign

65 Census tracts in exemptions clusters were more likely to be in pertussis

66 iagnostic, surgical procedure and co-payment exemption codes, pharmacy claims and specialist's visits

67 Therapeutic Use Exemptions containing objective evidence of athlete asth

68 In states with easier medical exemption criteria, medical exemption rates were signifi

69 As conscientious vaccination exemption (CVE) percentages rise across the United State

70 Approvals, De Novo, and Humanitarian Device Exemption databases from January 2019 to December 2021 f

71 ed in the placebo tests, top 5%), nonmedical exemptions decreased by 2.4% (top 2 of 43 states evaluat

72 erval [CI] 2.9%-5.8%, p < 0.001), nonmedical exemptions decreased by 3.9% (95% CI 2.4%-5.4%, p < 0.00

73 ible and 405 (70.6%) of these had nonmedical exemptions (eg, exemptions for religious or philosophica

74 kinson disease and has a humanitarian device exemption for dystonia and obsessive-compulsive disorder

75 The current exemption for regulatory testing for occupant protection

76 The institutional review board granted an exemption for this HIPAA-compliant study; patient inform

77 The institutional review board granted exemption for this retrospective study, the need for inf

78 islation around nonmedical (personal-belief) exemptions for childhood vaccination and possibly a spec

79 that legislative action to limit nonmedical exemptions for compulsory vaccination for school entry i

80 sed on Canadians who were granted Section 56 exemptions for legal psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy.

81 uce contamination by wildlife and regulatory exemptions for locally grown produce.

82 e-eligible US-resident case-patients claimed exemptions for personal beliefs.

83 Specifically, the SECURE rule 1) establishes exemptions for plants modified by genetic engineering wh

84 .6%) of these had nonmedical exemptions (eg, exemptions for religious or philosophical reasons, as op

85 Eight participants with Section 56 exemptions (four females, M(age) = 52.3 years), all with

86 tential welfare threat associated with their exemption from approval.

87 Materials and Methods An institutional exemption from full ethical review was granted for the s

88 This investigation met the criteria for an exemption from institutional review board approval.

89 therefore be considered negligible, but the exemption from labelling should be allowed only when the

90 th study period, each study site was granted exemption from prior authorization requirements by radio

91 wship or residency training in SLND provided exemption from skill requirements.

92 in nursing homes and individuals who had an exemption from the Danish mandatory governmental electro

93 in nursing homes and 211 632 (17.2%) with an exemption from the electronic letter system.

94 hildren who have philosophical and religious exemptions from immunization has been understudied.

95 ogy reports, hospital discharge records, and exemptions from prescription charges for clinical tests.

96 All 50 US states allow medical exemptions from school entry immunization requirements.

97 licy (Senate Bill 277) eliminated nonmedical exemptions from school entry requirements.

98 Children with exemptions from school immunization requirements (a meas

99 dren may delay routine immunizations or seek exemptions from state vaccine mandates.

100 Exemptions from such exceedences can be sought for episo

101 tory Authority to describe trends in medical exemptions from utility disconnection and characteristic

102 s exemptions, and states that easily granted exemptions had higher nonmedical exemption rates in 2002

103 2004, states that permitted personal belief exemptions had higher nonmedical exemption rates than st

104 he relationship with ease of obtaining these exemptions has not previously been examined in detail.

105 Worth, and Houston-are potential vaccination exemption "hotspots," with over 13% of local school syst

106 Humanitarian Use Device/Humanitarian Device Exemption (HUD/HDE) pathway in the development of new ca

107 ndage Occluder [LAAO] Investigational Device Exemption [IDE] Trial [Amulet IDE trial]; NCT02879448).

108 ndage Occluder [LAAO] Investigational Device Exemption [IDE] Trial) evaluated the safety and effectiv

109 ccination, nonmedical exemption, and medical exemption in children entering kindergarten.

110 oards and FDA with an investigational device exemption in U.S. cases.

111 y significant clusters of nonmedical vaccine exemptions in kindergarteners and 11 statistically signi

112 s evaluated spatial clustering of nonmedical exemptions in Michigan and geographic overlap between ex

113 rize the spatiotemporal landscape of vaccine exemptions in Michigan for the period 2008-2018 using Mo

114 10-2.14) and availability of personal belief exemptions (incidence rate ratio = 1.48; 95% confidence

115 justing for demographics, easier granting of exemptions (incidence rate ratio = 1.53; 95% confidence

116 d in the placebo tests, top 5%), and medical exemptions increased by 0.4% (top 1 of 44 states evaluat

117 % (95% CI 2.4%-5.4%, p < 0.001), and medical exemptions increased by 2.4% (95% CI 2.0%-2.9%, p < 0.00

118 accinating all children with personal-belief exemptions, increasing uptake by 10% to 50% in all low-i

119 iant and received institutional review board exemption; informed consent was not required.

120 these drugs, however, suggests that special exemption is unnecessary for them to achieve financial s

121 the policy decision to eliminate nonmedical exemptions is clearly articulated.

122 e LEADLESS II phase 1 investigational device exemption, LEADLESS Observational, or LEADLESS Japan tri

123 the first state to pass physician antitrust exemption legislation allowing physicians, under certain

124 specimen radionuclide content was below the exemption level for (68)Ga.

125 eligious or personal beliefs (ie, nonmedical exemptions) may be a useful strategy to increase immuniz

126 19 amidst rising rates of nonmedical vaccine exemptions (NMEs) and low vaccination coverage compared

127 However, exemption of children from clinical trials has created u

128 ystem should be rationalized not in terms of exemption of disease but in terms of change of reactivit

129 With the exemption of GHRP-2, the entity of these peptides repres

130 onal review board approval was received with exemption of informed consent for this retrospective HIP

131 These data support the need for an exemption of section 503B of the DQSA and continued use

132 ids were in general well tolerated, with the exemption of the P6 position.

133 th consideration of removing personal belief exemptions of childhood vaccination.

134 , version 9.4, to analyze nonmedical vaccine exemptions of children entering kindergarten in 2011 and

135 contributions from donors, savings from tax exemptions on issued bonds, and federal unemployment tax

136 gislation eliminating nonmedical vaccination exemption options from school-entry requirements, the im

137 s seen in states that offered only religious exemptions or that had medium and difficult exemption pr

138 pes of help and by exercising commiseration, exemption, or discretion.

139 1020 patients in the investigational device exemption per-protocol population, 536 were still receiv

140 ibiting predictable increases in vaccination exemption percentages.

141 The role of exemption policies may be especially important for pertu

142 States should examine their exemption policies to ensure control of pertussis and ot

143 mpared with states with medium and difficult exemption processes.

144 exemptions or that had medium and difficult exemption processes.

145 under its Section 18 Public Health Emergency Exemption program for use in seven states.

146 to-Edge Repair Study) Investigational Device Exemption program, which is comprised of the randomized

147 The mean exemption rate increased an average of 6% per year, from

148 ically significant census tract clusters for exemption rates and 6 significant census tract clusters

149 ily granted exemptions had higher nonmedical exemption rates in 2002 through 2003 compared with state

150 Routine evaluation of medical exemption rates is needed to ensure their appropriate us

151 onal belief exemptions had higher nonmedical exemption rates than states that offered only religious

152 h easier medical exemption criteria, medical exemption rates were significantly higher (adjusted inci

153 In addition to monitoring state-level exemption rates, health authorities should be mindful of

154 ted with higher and increasing nonmedical US exemption rates.

155 (i.e., hospital discharge records, copayment exemptions registry, pharmacy claims and specialist visi

156 ese studies under the Investigational Device Exemption regulations.

157 mplementation, in addition to a reduction in exemption requests and healthcare-associated influenza.

158 ry care children's hospital, reducing annual exemption requests with a small number of terminations s

159 tment of patients with BCP-ALL in a hospital-exemption setting.

160 pective, multicenter, investigational device exemption, single-arm trial enrolled 264 patients with s

161 med consent, and an Investigational New Drug Exemption, six healthy volunteers and 10 patients with s

162 The study received internal review board exemption status, without the need for informed patient

163 , physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies between 2005 and 2020 who underwent el

164 vices implanted under Investigational Device Exemption studies.

165 , multicenter pivotal investigational device exemption study of PerAF patients undergoing PVI+PWA wit

166 Enrollment for the US Investigational Device Exemption study of the Melody valve began in 2007.

167 ministration-approved investigational device exemption study to evaluate feasibility and safety of TA

168 The SUPERB Trial, an investigational device exemption study using an interwoven nitinol wire stent i

169 d Drug Administration investigational device exemption study, evaluated the long-term safety and effe

170 d Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption study, we used a novel system for real-time, h

171 e physician-initiated investigational device exemption study.

172 d tissue regulations, including the hospital exemption system in the European Advanced Therapy Medici

173 In states that easily granted exemptions, the rate increased 5% per year, from 1.26% i

174 We use this exemption to legally digitize a collection of 2,307 film

175 ress could consider removing the sole orphan exemption to obtain additional savings for patients and

176 se initiatives include a process for federal exemptions to allow for pharmacologic treatment in offic

177 ssage of SB 277, which eliminated nonmedical exemptions to childhood immunizations for school entry.

178 hat eliminate nonmedical ("personal belief") exemptions to childhood vaccination requirements are con

179 Third, allowance of exemptions to compulsory vaccination may limit public ba

180 ated counts and rates of state-level medical exemptions to kindergarten entry requirements over 7 sch

181 n more than 30 years to eliminate nonmedical exemptions to mandatory childhood immunizations for scho

182 Forty-eight states offer nonmedical exemptions to school immunization requirements.

183 Most states offer nonmedical exemptions to school requirements (religious or personal

184 cy on vaccination coverage and prevalence of exemptions to vaccine requirements (nonmedical and medic

185 hnique in the LAMPOON investigational device exemption trial (39+/-09 versus 65+/-35 minutes).

186 ortic Valve System US Investigational Device Exemption trial [PORTICO IDE]), high and extreme risk pa

187 comes from the Melody Investigational Device Exemption trial affirm the benefits of Melody TPV replac

188 domized, multicenter, investigational device exemption trial compared CB with HPB.

189 The US Investigational Device Exemption trial prospectively enrolled 171 pediatric and

190 med as part of an FDA investigational device exemption trial protocol, and a national noncoverage dec

191 ticenter, single-arm, investigational device exemption trial to establish the safety and effectivenes

192 center randomized MPP investigational device exemption trial.

193 bjects in the LAMPOON investigational device exemption trial.

194 uction in the LAMPOON investigational device exemption trial.

195 d Drug Administration investigational Device Exemption trials.

196 ments for all required vaccines) and medical exemption uptake (defined as the percentage of students

197 ean absolute decrease in medical vaccination exemption uptake at both public and nonpublic schools, a

198 school vaccine coverage and medical vaccine exemption uptake have not been examined.

199 Institutional review board exemption was granted by the local research ethics commi

200 Institutional review board exemption was granted for this electronic survey, which

201 Institutional review board exemption was granted for this study, which included con

202 Institutional review board exemption was granted from Boston Children's Hospital an

203 Institutional review board exemption was obtained, and informed consent was not req

204 An Institutional Review Board exemption was obtained, and patient consent was waived i

205 Institutional review board exemption was received for this HIPAA-compliant retrospe

206 n of kindergarteners with nonmedical vaccine exemptions was 2.8 times larger in the identified exempt

207 that eliminated nonmedical childhood vaccine exemptions was associated with an estimated increase in

208 epeal of school-entry nonmedical vaccination exemptions was associated with increased vaccine coverag

209 The observed increase in medical exemptions was offset by the larger reduction in nonmedi

210 Vaccinating children with personal-belief exemptions was one of the most effective interventions t

211 nating the 972 children with personal-belief exemptions was similar to that of targeting all low-immu

212 Cross-Seal IDE trial (Investigational Device Exemption) was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter st

213 Institutional review board evaluation and exemption were granted for the study, as primary data we

214 Although no religious exemptions were cited, only 2 case patients had document

215 sitancy as well as the removal of nonmedical exemptions were estimated.

216 Institutional review board exemptions were granted prior to the collection of data

217 The sole orphan exemption will exclude billions of dollars of Medicare d

218 ne hesitancy (nonmedical and personal belief exemptions), will have substantial public health and eco

219 eive the vaccine without documentation of an exemption, with 9 (0.06%) subsequently being terminated.