戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  findings from ajmaline provocation (n=332), exercise ECG (n=304), and signal-averaged ECG (n=118) wh
2 men >/= 45 years of age, 45% had an abnormal exercise ECG, thallium scan, or both.
3       Across normal, equivocal, and abnormal exercise ECG groups, age- and examination year-adjusted
4 th diabetes mellitus, equivocal and abnormal exercise ECG responses were associated with higher risk
5          Siblings with a concordant abnormal exercise ECG and thallium scan had a relative risk of 14
6                            Although abnormal exercise ECGs and thallium scans were both predictive of
7 n 29% of men and 9% of women, while abnormal exercise ECGs occurred in 12% and 5% respectively.
8           Forty-three subjects with abnormal exercise ECGs also underwent exercise thallium scintigra
9 entions, although rates of angiography after exercise ECG ranged from 0.6% to 2.9%.
10    All subjects had an echocardiogram and an exercise ECG performed, followed by magnetic resonance s
11  patients were randomized on the basis of an exercise ECG without imaging.
12         Women were less likely to undergo an exercise ECG (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.95) an
13 increased the chi-square of the clinical and exercise ECG model from 29 to 44.8 (p = 0.0001).
14 rospectively compares the utility of MPI and exercise ECG (EECG) in these patients.
15           After adjustment for age, sex, and exercise ECG results, the relative risk of developing cl
16          We examined the association between exercise ECG responses and mortality in 2854 men with do
17  patterns of associations were noted between exercise ECG testing and both CVD and all-cause mortalit
18 ttle is known about the relationship between exercise ECG responses and CHD risk in men with diabetes
19 ptomatic myocardial ischemia as evidenced by exercise ECG alone or in combination with thallium scan.
20 ed by 2-dimensional strain echocardiography, exercise ECG, and coronary angiography.
21 emed minimal (for resting ECG) or small (for exercise ECG).
22 osis in asymptomatic individuals and include exercise ECG testing, electron beam computed tomography,
23 of CE was compared with subjects with normal exercise ECG (n=611).
24 e main outcome measures across categories of exercise ECG responses, with stratification by cardiores
25 maximum on serial ECGs (Ser QTc-max), and on exercise ECGs (Ex QTc-max) and by T-wave patterns.
26 dle branch block, or left-axis deviation) or exercise ECG (ST-segment depression with exercise, chron
27                  Abnormalities on resting or exercise ECG are associated with an increased risk for s
28 tudies evaluated abnormalities on resting or exercise ECG as predictors of cardiovascular events afte
29 efits and harms of screening with resting or exercise ECG for the prediction of CHD events in asympto
30 recommends against screening with resting or exercise ECG for the prediction of CHD events in asympto
31 ts (15 male, 61+/-4.3 years) with a positive exercise ECG and exertional angina completed the protoco
32 a Cox proportional hazards model, a positive exercise ECG by standard criteria was not predictive of
33 jects to asymptomatic subjects with positive exercise ECG alone to those with concordant positive ECG
34 raphic documentation of disease and positive exercise ECGs.
35 rsus standard functional testing strategies (exercise ECG, stress nuclear methods, or stress echocard
36                                          The exercise ECG was suggested as an Appropriate test for ca
37  with exercise increases the accuracy of the exercise ECG in the detection of CAD.
38 ctively; in contrast, the sensitivity of the exercise ECG was 37.5%.
39 otropic reserve in routine evaluation of the exercise ECG.
40 ssion to improve the predictive value of the exercise ECG.
41                Early evidence focused on the exercise ECG and the Duke treadmill score.
42  were analyzed in 64 women who had undergone exercise ECG and coronary angiography for clinical indic
43 vs. 30%; P < 0.001) was less frequent, while exercise ECG (43% vs. 22%; P < 0.001) and ICA (48% vs. 1
44 l models were exercise echocardiography with exercise ECG and exercise 201Tl SPECT with exercise ECG.
45 h exercise ECG and exercise 201Tl SPECT with exercise ECG.